[]
The origin of the solar system. Reasons tilt axes of rotation of the planets and sun to the plane of the ecliptic and mismatch rotation axes with magnetic axes
Yüklə 6,37 Mb.
|
4.2 The origin of the solar system. Reasons tilt axes of rotation of the planets and sun to the plane of the ecliptic and mismatch rotation axes with magnetic axes.Current hypotheses about the origin of the solar system presents excerpts from the article "The Origin of the Solar System» http://mirznanii.com/info/a183_proiskhozhdenie-solnechnoy-sistemy "One of the important issues related to the study of our planetary system - the problem of its origin. The solution to this problem is natural - scientific, ideological and philosophical significance. Over the centuries and even thousands of years, scientists have tried to figure out the past, present and future of the universe, including the solar system. However, the possibility of a planetary cosmology and to this day remains very limited - for an experiment in the laboratory are available so far only meteorites and lunar rock samples. Limited opportunities and comparative method of research: the structure and patterns of other planetary systems are not yet sufficiently understood. There are currently known to many hypotheses about the origin of the solar system, including proposed independently by the German philosopher Kant (1724-1804) and the French mathematician and physicist Pierre Simon de Laplace (1749-1827). View Kant was in the evolution of cold dust cloud in which first arose central massive body - the Sun, and then born, and the planet. Laplace considered the original nebula of gas and very hot in a state of rapid rotation. Contracting under the force of gravity, the nebula due to the law of conservation of angular momentum spun faster and faster. Under the influence of high centrifugal forces occurring during rapid rotation of the equatorial belt, from it sequentially separated rings, turning as a result of cooling and condensation in the world. Thus, according to the theory of Laplace, the planets were formed before the sun. Despite this difference between the two hypotheses under consideration, they both come from the same ideas - the Solar System is the result of natural development of the nebula. And so this idea is sometimes called Kant-Laplace hypothesis. However, this idea had to be abandoned because of the many mathematical contradictions, and in its place came a few "tidal theory." The most famous theory was advanced by Sir James Jeans, a famous popularizer of astronomy in the years between the First and Second World Wars. (He was also a leading astrophysicist, and only at the end of his career turned to the creation of books for beginners.) According to Jeans, planetary substance was "taken out" from under the influence of the Sun took place near the star, and then broke up into separate parts to form a planet. The most large planets (Saturn and Jupiter) are at the center of the planetary system, where once was a cigar-shaped thickened part of the nebula. If things really stood in such a way that planetary systems would be extremely rare, since the stars are separated by huge distances, and it is possible that our planetary system could claim to be the only one in the galaxy. But mathematics again rushed to the attack, and, in the end tidal theory joined the gaseous rings of Laplace in the trash science. According to modern concepts, the planets of the solar system formed from a cold cloud of gas and dust that surrounded the sun billions of years ago. This point of view the most consistently reflected in the hypothesis of Russian scientist, Academician O. Schmidt (1891-1956), which showed that the cosmology of the problem can be solved by the concerted efforts of astronomy and earth sciences, especially geography, geology and geochemistry. The basis of the hypothesis O. Schmidt lies the idea of the formation of planets by combining solids and dust particles. The emerging gas-dust cloud around the sun first consisted of 98% hydrogen and helium. The remaining elements were condensed into dust particles. Random motion of the gas in the cloud quickly stopped: it was replaced by a quiet movement of the clouds around the sun. Dust particles are concentrated in the central plane, forming a layer of increased density. When the density of the layer has reached a critical value, its own gravity was "compete" with the Sun gravitation. A layer of dust proved unstable and broken up into separate dust clumps. Facing each other, they form a plurality of continuous dense bodies. The largest of them have gained nearly circular orbits and in its growth began to overtake other body, becoming the embryo of the future potential of the planets. As the more massive body, tumors took over the remaining material gas and dust clouds. In the end, it formed nine major planets in orbits whose motion remains stable for billions of years. When the density of the layer has reached a critical value, its own gravity was "compete" with the Sun gravitation. A layer of dust proved unstable and broken up into separate dust clumps. Facing each other, they form a plurality of continuous dense bodies. The largest of them have gained nearly circular orbits and in its growth began to overtake other body, becoming the embryo of the future potential of the planets. As the more massive body, tumors took over the remaining material gas and dust clouds. In the end, it formed nine major planets in orbits whose motion remains stable for billions of years. When the density of the layer has reached a critical value, its own gravity was "compete" with the Sun gravitation. A layer of dust proved unstable and broken up into separate dust clumps. Facing each other, they form a plurality of continuous dense bodies. The largest of them have gained nearly circular orbits and in its growth began to overtake other body, becoming the embryo of the future potential of the planets. As the more massive body, tumors took over the remaining material gas and dust clouds. In the end, it formed nine major planets in orbits whose motion remains stable for billions of years. Facing each other, they form a plurality of continuous dense bodies. The largest of them have gained nearly circular orbits and in its growth began to overtake other body, becoming the embryo of the future potential of the planets. As the more massive body, tumors took over the remaining material gas and dust clouds. In the end, it formed nine major planets in orbits whose motion remains stable for billions of years. Facing each other, they form a plurality of continuous dense bodies. The largest of them have gained nearly circular orbits and in its growth began to overtake other body, becoming the embryo of the future potential of the planets. As the more massive body, tumors took over the remaining material gas and dust clouds. In the end, it formed nine major planets in orbits whose motion remains stable for billions of years. Thus, the current theory is much more plausible, which, oddly enough, is closer to the ideas of Laplace, than the Jeans theory. It is believed that the planets condensed from cosmic clouds of material associated with the young sun, so they are all close in age. This explains why the solar system is clearly divided into two parts. Closer to the Sun temperature was very high, so the light gases such as hydrogen and helium, were replaced on the periphery and on the inner planets there was an accumulation of the heavier elements. Subsequently, the temperature dropped and the opportunity to hold the light elements: why planet - giants, in contrast to the internal members of the system are not dense and rocky. Indeed, the planet - giant may be a solid core, but for the most part they consist of liquid with very powerful atmosphere rich in hydrogen and helium. The process of formation of the solar system can not be considered thoroughly studied and proposed a hypothesis - perfect. For example, in today's hypothesis does not take into account the effect of the electromagnetic interaction in the formation of planets. Figuring out this and other issues - in the future. " No less mysterious by far is the question of the causes of the inclination of the axes of rotation of the Sun and planets to the ecliptic plane and the axes of rotation mismatch with the magnetic axes. Consider the current hypotheses that try to solve the problems presented in the following articles.
Unusual axial tilt of Uranus - one of the most impressive of its characteristics, but astronomers still do not know exactly why the object was in that position. At the time of the birth of our solar system from the rotating disk of gas and dust 4.6 billion years ago all the major planets are located in orbits close to its flattened plane - the ecliptic. It was the inevitable result of the laws of large numbers and the conservation of momentum. As the planets were formed by the collision of countless particles, any accidental movement had to equilibrate to the planet continues to rotate in the upright position on their orbits. However, it is obvious that this is not the case if Mercury and Jupiter, in fact, more or less vertically, Earth, Mars, Saturn and Neptune is inclined at an angle of about 25 °, and Uranus - 98 °. Depending on the viewpoint Venus can also seem inclined at an angle of 177 °. Turns, the planet upside down or close to the strictly vertical position, rotated only in the opposite direction. But what brought down many of the major planets in the solar system with their axes? Regarding the rocky planets such as Venus, the answer will probably interplanetary collision. Collision with the larger planet could easily knock them into the inclined path or change the time of rotation of the planet. However, the Giants are large in size, so to knock down their axes, a large force is required. So, for a clash that could bring down the axis of Uranus is 98 °, and Saturn - 26 °, would require a restive planet the size of Earth, but the mathematical models do not indicate the possible existence of a facility of this size in the outer solar system. Another problem is that all the giants are surrounded by large families of rings and moons. Catastrophic collision of some object to the parent planet would have to throw all of these small bodies in space. The fact that they hold the equatorial plane, which suggests that they are either formed in that position, or the change of each planet's axial tilt is so slow that the tidal forces managed to keep a lid on satellites. If we talk about satellites problem, then it is possible that he could hit from the outside to cause the eruption of material from the interior of the planet, from which the moons formed. However, the differences in the chemical composition of the satellites and their parent planets say that they are likely to appear in the light of the external parts of the " nebulosity " which formed each of these planets. Another hypothesis is that something (perhaps the gravity of the passing star) caused a "protrusion" outer Solar System. But even if such a hypothetical "bulging" did take place in computer simulation models under these conditions is not possible to recreate the solar system such as we know it today. In 2006, an Argentine astronomer Adrian Brunini suggested that the outer planets tilt axis are the result of the chaotic years that arose shortly after the formation of these planets, when their orbits for a brief period close.in computer simulation models under these conditions it is not possible to recreate the solar system such as we know it today. In 2006, an Argentine astronomer Adrian Brunini suggested that the outer planets tilt axis are the result of the chaotic years that arose shortly after the formation of these planets, when their orbits for a brief period close.in computer simulation models under these conditions it is not possible to recreate the solar system such as we know it today. In 2006, an Argentine astronomer Adrian Brunini suggested that the outer planets tilt axis are the result of the chaotic years that arose shortly after the formation of these planets, when their orbits for a brief period close. Shock theory tilt axis Uranus contradicts the fact that, for example, orbit moons and Uranus are inclined to the ring plane of the solar system in a similar manner (when a collision must only affect itself was planet). In 2009, a new theory in the new work, researchers conducted a computer simulation of the rotation axis of Uranus changes under the influence of gravity of another celestial body has been proposed. To do this, scientists have suggested that the giant was the moon, which later was thrown out beyond the orbit of the planet. Expelling the simulation of planetary evolution about 10,000 times, the researchers obtained results are in good agreement with the actual data. Each of these theories has its strengths and weaknesses, but we will probably never know what kind of "injury" Uranus resulted in a heeled position. " "One of the most common hypothesis - the theory of the dynamo effect - suggests that convective and / or / turbulent conducting fluid in the nucleus and promote the self-excitation of keeping the field in a steady state. But it is hard to imagine that the core emerge over time the temperature in the same direction - if this convective motion or arising from the rotation of the turbulence was so constant, in order to maintain the effect of self-excitation, and even in the same direction. Although generally incomprehensible nature of turbulences - in due course, in the absence of external forces, the Earth's inner substance due to viscosity is also uniformly rotate with the shell. It remains unclear as this, where there are potentials on this core. Even the authors of this hypothesis, it is not considered proven. Although hydrodynamic dynamo hypothesis explains well the many well-known facts, but of power, causing the work "dynamo" is clearly defined incorrectly. There is a hypothesis about the appearance of the field in the ionosphere due to the solar wind. There is due to the stream of salt water in the oceans. None of these hypotheses can not be applied to all the planets of the solar system without encountering contradictions. For example, Jupiter, rotating around its axis in the same direction as the Earth has a magnetic field direction is opposite Earth, Venus and Mars do not have strong fields. To consider the Earth the owner of some unique properties that are unique to it as something not serious, it's not the one it has a magnetic field, and to come up with for each planet its own mechanism, creating a field, too, somehow not "that" as what's could be wrong? "/ From the article V.I. Daniel, "Nature of the magnetic field of the Earth and Planetary" /. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that there is still no satisfactory theory which could explain the origin and evolution of the solar system, as well as to determine the physical cause of the tilt axes of rotation of the planets and the Sun itself. Evolutionary cyclic sequence of the origin and development of stars and planetary systems adequately set out in the study 3.1. Therefore further discuss the causes of inclination of the axes of rotation of the planets and sun to the plane of the ecliptic, and the rotational axes of discrepancy with the magnetic axes of planets. Note that, often, the information and illustrations in scientific articles contradict each other. For example, in Fig. 4.2.1 and fig. 4.2.2 trajectory of motion of the planets around the sun is fused in opposite directions; Fig. 4.2.2 and fig. 4.2.3 inclinations of the axes of rotation of planets, mostly also directed in opposite directions. The same, if not more, confusion occurs when determining the directions of the magnetic fields of the planets. We would still accept the best of conflicting data, the basis of information on the slopes of the planets shown in Fig. 4.2.3 as the most reliable. Based on the dialectical march Engels to the question of the cyclical evolutionary development of material systems of objects, representations of M. Faraday and Maxwell K. about the mechanical nature of the interactions of material objects through the air, as well as of the results of this study - to build a mechanical model of the solar system, which allows consistent justify physical cause tilting axes of rotation of the planets and sun. In Fig. 4.2.4 is a schematic arrangement of the solar system planets relative to the plane of the Galaxy. Shown axes tilt angles of rotation of the solar system planets relatively perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic, and the direction of stream ester, according to the studies 3.6, 3.7. Where: In Figures 4.2.5 - 4.2.29 are presented Graphic analytical construct - solving problems justifying mechanical nature tilts the axes of rotation of the planets of the solar system and the sun. Where: From astronomical observations it is known that all the solar system planets and the Sun itself rotates around its own axis and have magnetic poles which, as a rule, do not coincide with the geographic poles of the planet. The axis of rotation of the planets and the Sun have different angles of inclination of the axes of rotation, but always in the same plane. So, in the figures: 4.2.6, 4.2.9, 4.2.12, 4.2.15, 4.2.18, 4.2.21, 4.2.24, 4.2.27 - presented location vectors Drawings: 4.2.7, 4.2.10, 4.2.13, 4.2.16, 4.2.19, 4.2.22, 4.2.25, 4.2.28 - augmented vector To determine the vector Based on available data that the "Magnetic poles Sun approximately coincide with the light axis of rotation» /Ukhtoma.ru magnetic field and magnetic storms on the sun / meaning The sun is a powerful source and has a greater angular velocity One revolution around the axis takes only 25.38 Earth days. It should be noted that the closer a star is to center of the galaxy, the greater the value of All the planets of the solar system formed by the eruption of prominences the powerful gas, substance and ether, escaping from the surface of the sun at the transition stage from the extinct sun-drains to sources-supernovae stars, galactic similarly transitions from EO to SBa. "Radiated into space the heat should be transformed into another form of motion, in which it can re-focus and begin to function actively. Thus, there is no major difficulty standing in the way of the recognition of reconverting obsolete suns in the fiery nebula ... rotating incandescent gaseous nebulae ... develops the solar system. " - says Engels. " Indeed, "from the rotating swirls, hot gases spewed out by the Sun nebulae are formed at the initial stage of planetesimals hot - springs, which rotate in the opposite side of the sun's rotation. Due to this rotation of planetesimals retained the sun. The physical nature of attraction is the same as that of a current-carrying conductor discussed in the study 4.8. Cooling down, the planetesimals - the sources, under the influence of reaction forces lose their speed to a complete stop, and then, as was shown in the study, 3.6, becoming the world - drains begin to spin in the opposite direction. In this regard, the prevailing idea that the sun and planets, supposedly, periodically changing their magnetic poles are not true. Mercury, one might say, is the youngest planet - Drain having a negligible speed of rotation around an axis - only 58 Earth days. Most recently, on a cosmic scale, it was hot protoplanet - source and rotated in the opposite direction of rotation of the Sun as Venus. Now, turning to the planet - a drain, he just taking off. Zero Mercury tilt rotation axis is caused as the nearest to the sun planet large value Venus - the last of the Mohicans - still hot protoplanet - source, rotating in the opposite direction to all the other planets of the solar system. The speed of its rotation around its own axis of 243 Earth days. Venus minimum inclination to the perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic - about As well as Mercury, due to its proximity to the Sun, i.e. a large value Earth - the planet madmen destroying their own kind, to the final stage of early "cut off from the world its highest color - thinking spirit." Earth - the planet - runoff. The speed of its rotation around its axis 24 hours. The earth's axis is tilted to the perpendicular to the ecliptic plane at an angle Mars - the closest neighbor of ours - the planet - runoff. Its rotational speed differs little from the Earth's rotation rate - 24 hours and 37 minutes. Therefore, the inclination of the axis of rotation of Mars to the perpendicular to the ecliptic plane is close to the earth - Jupiter - the planet - giant. It is a powerful drain. Jupiter rotational speed about its axis 9 hours 55 minutes. Therefore their Saturn - Planet - drain less massive than Jupiter and removed of the Sun is almost twice more than Jupiter. The angular speed of rotation of Saturn 10 hours and 40 minutes. Therefore, the value of Uranus - the planet well-known fact that rotates on its axis, lying on its side. Uranium is also a drain. Uranium, unlike gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, a giant ice. Most Uranus (80%) consists of hot and dense fluid "icy" materials - water (H2O), methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3), located on top of the stone kernel. He was removed from the Sun twice farther than Saturn. The rotation speed around its axis is 17 hours 14 minutes. As a result, it has the small amount Neptune in composition similar to Uranus and both planets are different in composition from the larger giant planets - Jupiter and Saturn.
So, to sum up the results. Engels' theory of evolution cyclic interconversion of material objects presented in this study, "modern academic level" rejects. "Always repeated succession of worlds in infinite time is only a logical addition to the simultaneous co-existence of innumerable worlds in infinite space: the position, forced the need for which was forced to admit even anti theoretical Yankee brain of Draper" - exposes Engels anti theoretical thinking Yankees Draper. But do not want to recognize antitheoretical brains pseudoscientific scams RAS defending "stupid and ridiculous" cosmological hoax "Big Bang", which is "the height of absurdity and an affront to common sense." The present study provides consistently substantiate the validity of Engels the dialectical approach to the resolution of problems of education of the Sun and the planets of the solar system. In addition, research on a mechanical basis allows to solve the problems, not previously having explanation mismatch axes of rotation of the planets with magnetic axes and set the mechanical cause inclination angles planetary axes of rotation to the ecliptic.
Fig. 4.2.1 
Fig. 4.2.2 
Fig. 4.2.3 Plane of ecliptic  
Neptune  
Uranus
Saturn 
Jupiter  Mars 
 
 Earth 
Venus
 
 
 Mercury
  
 Galactic plane
Sun 
Fig. 4.2.4 Sun
Plane of ecliptic  
Fig. 4.2.5 Mercury Plane of ecliptic Fig. 4.2.6
 
Fig. 4.2.7
Fig. 4.2.8
Galactic plane
Fig. 4.2.9
Fig. 4.2.10
Fig. 4.2.11
Plane of ecliptic 
Galactic plane
Fig. 4.2.12
Fig. 4.2.13
Fig. 4.2.14 MARS Plane of ecliptic 
 Galactic plane
Fig. 4.2.15 
Fig. 4.2.16
Fig. 4.2.17 JUPITER Plane of ecliptic Fig. 4.2.18 
 Fig. 4.2.19
Fig. 4.2.2 SATURN Plane of ecliptic Fig. 4.2.21 
Fig. 4.2.22
Fig. 4.2.23
Plane of ecliptic Fig. 4.2.24 
 
Fig. 4.2.25 
Fig. 4.2.26 NEPTUNE Plane of ecliptic  
Galactic plane
 
Fig. 4.2.27
Fig. 4.2.28
Fig. 4.2.29 Yüklə 6,37 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|
- total velocity vector galactic ether stream;
- planet is moving with velocity 
/ Mercury /, 
/ Venus /, 
/ Earth /, 
/ Mars /, 
/ Jupiter /, 
/ Saturn /, 
/ Uranus /, 
/ Neptune /). 
- total external angular velocity of vortex stream tubes ether ith planet
- angular velocity vector 
- longitudinal velocity vector elliptic stream ether 
- total velocity vector elliptic longitudinal ether Galaxy streams and Sun 
- the total angular velocity vortex tubes longitudinal elliptic stream ether ith planet is moving with velocity 
. In this case, as was found in the study 3.7 planet must will rotate to match
.
. Similarly, 
is many times larger than the Earth and Mars. Thus Jupiter significantly increases the total amount of 
. As a result, the slope Jupiter rotation axis perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic is only 
. See Figures 4.2.18, 4.2.19, 4.2.20.
, respectively lower than that of Jupiter. Hence, the slope of Saturn rotation axis with respect to the perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic 
. All this gives him the greatest inclination of its axis of all the planets of the solar system to the perpendicular to the ecliptic plane 
