[]

2. THE ROAD OF SORROWS

The first positive results of the Faraday-Maxwellian mechanical models of physical interactions were obtained by the author back in 1974. On the advice of the head of the Department of Philosophy of the Kharkov State University Y.F. Bukhalov was prepared and sent an article in the editorial offices of profile magazines with a request for publication for scientific discussion. However, Yury Fedorovich expressed doubt that the article will be published, as on the concepts of the powers that be "communists," study based on mechanical views, in their view, it is harmful bourgeois trend, but Einstein's relativity theory - certainly materialistic. To my objections that everything is really the opposite, on the contrary - turned upside down, Yuri Fedorovich invited the author to get acquainted with the article of the Hungarian academician Ludwig Janosi, published in the journal Questions of Philosophy. The article expressed the conviction that the theory of relativity and quantum theories are an antiscientific idealistic direction that led to a collapse in theoretical thinking. Therefore, he "rejects today's dogmas" and insists that in the resolution of problems of physical interactions there must be a material medium - an intermediary (ether). "As you see, you are not the last of the Mohicans. Turn to Janosha and let luck accompany you "- Yuri Fedorovich instructed.

Indeed, all the editors without exception sent a refusal to publish the research materials "as not being at the present level and not representing scientific interest." The materials sent to academician Janosi were returned with the explanation of the KGB: "for the transfer of scientific materials abroad it is necessary to have permission from the profile institution of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, and to send permission to the capitalist countries to the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences."

In connection with the gross violation of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the author sent research materials to the President of the USSR Academy of Sciences Anatoly Petrovich Aleksandrov for taking appropriate measures.

The measures were taken immediately. The author was invited to a meeting in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Uzbek SSR.

Question: - Do you think that Einstein is a fool?

Answer: - No. I do not think so. But the theory of relativity is an idealistic ideological diversion in Marxist philosophy. You Communists. Your "unconditional duty", bequeathed by VI. Lenin, to defend the achievements of dialectical materialism from pseudoscientific scammers.

Question: - So you think that all scientists are fools?

Answer: - No. I do not think so. But in the materials of the study there is evidence of a crisis in which quantum-relativistic subconsciousness led the science and proposes a scientifically grounded way out of the impasse, consistent with the views of outstanding scientists, for scientific discussion.

Resume representative of the Central Committee: - Our scientists created nuclear power plants and icebreakers, launched satellites and man into space, selflessly work to build a communist future, and such as you distract them from the great achievements. So let's agree. If you do not stop your writing, then we will identify you where the Einsteins, Newtons are, and you will take a worthy place among them.

Despite the threats, the author turned to the academician-secretary of the Department of Physical and Mathematical Sciences of the Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, V.P. Shcheglov. Having read the article, Vladimir Petrovich suggested: "Indeed, the study has a rational grain. But nobody deals with these problems in the Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR. Therefore, it is worthwhile to address this issue to my pupil Professor Nikolai Vsevolodovich Mickiewicz of the University of Friendship of Peoples. " And Vladimir Petrovich wrote and presented the author with a letter of recommendation. The meeting was held. After a lengthy discussion, Nikolai Vsevolodovich stated: "Let's say that you are right. Although, of course, you're wrong. I'm conducting a seminar on relativistic gravity. My postgraduate students are relativists. I have candidates for membership in the Academy of Sciences, real academics and even the president of the USSR Academy of Sciences - they are all relativists. So what do you want? So that we say that for seventy years we fool all heads, but here came some Cherepennikov and convicted us of pseudo-scientific fraud? So, no one, never will publish your studies and will not discuss. Go your way, and do not open your mouth to our mouth. "

But here comes to power M.S. Gorbachev, who declares that a return to Leninist principles is inevitable. The author has sent research materials that inevitably lead to a return to Leninist principles, to Gorbachev. From the presidential administration, the materials are sent to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR !?All subsequent appeals-protests are also redirected in the same direction. Well, and there - silence. With great difficulty, I got to see the Deputy Head of the Department of Science and Educational Institutions of the Central Committee of the CPSU, on the instructions of which the materials were sent to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. The author handed him a pamphlet of his comrade in the course of torturing Sekerin V.I. "The theory of relativity mystification of the XX century." In response, I heard that, in principle, he shares the views of the author and Sekerin, that he tried to draw attention to research materials of leaders of the highest rank. But he was warned that if he insisted on his own, then there would be nothing to do for him in the Central Committee. Therefore, all he can advise is to publish research materials at his own expense.

For a long time publishing houses refused to publish the research materials. Finally, the Chairman of the Commission on Ethics in the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, Anatoly Alekseyevich Denisov agreed with the private cooperative "Tovarishch" in Saratov, who agreed to publish the pamphlet of the author "Science needs protection" in ten thousand copies. Anatoly Alekseevich had to publish his pamphlet The Myths of the Theory of Relativity in Vilnius. After its publication in fifty thousand copies, the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences attacked the author and the cooperative, which realized "Myths ..." with the threat of their destruction. In this regard, the trading network flatly refused to distribute the brochure "Science needs protection". Nevertheless, the brochure dispersed at conferences, friends and acquaintances.

And to this day, walking on agony continues for all who do not accept lies and strive for the knowledge of the truth.

But, as F. Engels wrote further: "For some time now philosophical, especially natural philosophical systems grow like mushrooms after rain, not to mention countless new systems of politics, political economy, etc. Just as in the modern state it is assumed that every citizen is capable of judging all those issues on which he has to voice his voice; Just as political economy is based on the assumption that every buyer is also an expert on all those goods that he has to buy for his life, like now it is considered that in science one should also adhere to the same assumption. Everyone can write about everything, and the "freedom of science" is understood precisely as a person's right to write especially about what he did not study, and to give it out as the only strictly scientific method ... - a cheeky pseudo science that nowadays comes to the forefront And everything is drowned out by the roar of his lofty gossip. Venerable idle talk in poetry, in philosophy, in political economy, in history, lofty gossip from the pulpit and rostrum, lofty gossip everywhere, lofty gossip with a claim to superiority and profundity ...

One can not now take in the hands of almost any theoretical book on natural science without having received such an impression from reading it that the naturalists themselves feel how strongly this disorder and confusion reign over them, and that philosophy, which currently has circulation, does not give absolute No way out. And here there really is no other way out, no other possibility, except a return in one form or another from metaphysical thinking to dialectical thinking".

The testimony of F. Engels is still relevant today: "high-flown idle talk everywhere, lofty gossip with a claim to superiority and profundity" at the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Russian Federation, the State Duma, and all mass disinformation.