Aa history Lovers 2009 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 11,49 Mb.
səhifə63/74
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü11,49 Mb.
#49237
1   ...   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   ...   74
part of November 1938.
About this time we almost had a disaster in our still wobbly group but it

later


turned out to be a Godsend. Bill and Hank had distributed quite a few copies

of

the original manuscript to doctors, psychiatrists and ministers to get a



last

minute reaction. One of these went to Dr. Howard, Chief psychiatrist for the

State of New Jersey. He became greatly interested and enthusiastic, but was

highly critical of several things in the book, for after reading it he told

us

there was entirely too much "Oxfordism" and that it was too demanding. This



is

where the disaster nearly overtook us, for it nearly threw Bill into a

terrific

mental uproar to have his "baby" pulled apart by an outside "screwball"

psychiatrist, who in our opinion knew nothing about alcoholism. After days

of

wrangling between Bill, Hank, Fitz and myself, Bill was finally convinced



that

all positive and "must" statements should be eliminated and in their place

to

use the word "suggest" and the expression "we found we had to."


Another thing changed in this last rewriting was qualifying the word "God"

with


the phrase "as we understand Him." (This was one of my few contributions to

the


book.) In the final finishing the fellowship angle was enlarged and

emphasized.

After many arguments and uproars, the manuscript was finally finished,

complete,

in December 1938. We now had one real problem - no money.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 2009 from "Arthur"

posted on Sep 3, 2004


1939:
Feb/Mar (?), The distributed multilith copies were returned, but reader's

comments produced few alterations in the final text. A major change did

occur at

the suggestion of a Montclair, NJ psychiatrist, Dr Howard, who recommended

toning down the use of "musts" and changing them to "we ought" or "we

should."


Dr Silkworth and Dr Tiebout offered similar advice. (AACOA 167-168 NG 67-77)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 2396 from "Art Sheehan"

posted on May 10, 2005


During Feb/Mar 1939, multilith copies of the Big Book manuscript,

distributed

for review, were returned. Reader's comments produced few alterations in the

final text. A major change did occur at the suggestion of a "Dr Howard, a

well-known psychiatrist of Montclair, NJ" who recommended toning down the

use of


"musts" and changing them to "we ought" or "we should." Dr Silkworth (a

neurologist) and Dr Tiebout (a psychiatrist) offered similar advice. (re AA

Comes of Age [AACOA] pgs 167-168).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 2628 from

Sep 3, 2005


[Hi Old Bob, Here's another piece of information that would probably

be of interest regarding the multilith. Again the source is Black

Sheep and its source was an exact transcription from GSO Archives mf

of original I made in the early 90's.


On February 21, 1939 Rockerfeller Foundation exec Frank Amos wrote to

co-exec Mr. Richardson,]


[additions, corrections or deletions always in brackets]
[...]
"The photo-litho copies of the book has been carefully edited, but the

individual stories, occupying the last half of the book, still must

undergo considerable editing. Also there are a number of stories to be

added, most of them, I believe, from Akron. If you will let me or Bill

know how many of those photo-litho copies you would like to have, he

will see to it that you get them at once. They are quite legible, but

of course are put up in cheap form and cannot be compared in

attractiveness and readibility to the final printed volume."


[ . . .]
STOP
[I have no notation of the original reported letter from Dr. Howard, a

psychiatrist from Montclair N.J. where Hank (and around that time Bill

as well having to vacate Brooklyn Heights, and probably also Jim as

per his story) lived at this time. This is generally refered to as the

primary source of objection to the "directions" and "you musts" that

are prevelent throughout the "multi-liths". The date of this

correspondence would be helpful to track down and it may be in Ernie

Kurtz's, Not God, footnotes.]


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Merton M. believed that "Dr. Howard" was a pseudonym]
Message 3082 from

Jan 22, 2006


bout a month ago Chuck P. (no known relationship to Hank P. at this

time) made available to me the 4 pages from the Sotheby's catalog

where the heavily annotated manuscript that was sold for well over

$1Million appeared. Having personally owned numerous handwritten

documents that were given to me by Hank's living relatives and viewed

numerous other of Hank's original documents at GSO, Stepping Stones

and Clarence's letters from Hank now housed at Brown University, I've

concluded (to my own satisfaction anyway) that except for the much

later dated page signed by Bill the vast majority of the commentary

was pened by Hank P.


Hank had 3 different styles of handwriting, one being block letters

(which I call H1) the second being a very neatly written style (which

I call H2 and somewhat rare) and third a rapid scribble (which I call

H3 and the most typical. On the bottom of several of the pages the

initials HGP appears (Hank's initials the G. standing for Giffen).

Also note that the well known Dr. Howard (See PIO) appears several

times and it seems very likely that this is the manuscript lent to Dr.

Howard for review. Dr. Howard was the individual who told them that

the book was all wrong and they must remove the "You musts" from the

book and replace it with more suggestive language. Note that my review

of the Montclair City Directory from 1937-1940 revealed no Dr. Howard

and its quite likely that this was a pseudonym. (also his first name

is unknown and he seems to have vanished from all historical accounts

of the era after the review). Jim Burwell says in his history

something to the effect that he was the head psychiatrist of New

Jersey, though I could not find such a position to have existed then.

Any doctor at the time of the writing of the book (other than Dr.

Silkworth) would be reluctant to attaching his name to this idea or book.


There are references to some of the material being "too groupy" and to

the Oxford Group explicitly demonstrating that there was a perception

that the book should avoid such appearence.(at least by Hank).
I'm not a handwriting expert but absent a great forgery I'm quite sure

of my analysis of the majority of the handwriting being that of Hank.

I've also only seen evidence regarding these 4 pages so it goes

without saying that I have no knowlege of what appears on any of the

other pages.
As always anyone should feel free to challenge any of this (preferably

having viewed the document or fascimiles in the above-referenced

auction catelog).
That such an extraorinary document should surface at this late date

demonstrates that their is still original material out there that

hasn't been noted by anyone.
All the Best,
-merton
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Jared L. suggested that "Dr. Howard" was really Marcus A. Curry]
Message 3100 from

Jan 26, 2006


On the name of the "Chief Psychiatrist of NJ"

I suggest Marcus A. Curry, Chief at the NJ State Asylum for the Insane

at Greystone Park during the years 1936-40 (from the Greystone Park

Annual Reports 1936-40 in the NJ State Archives). -- Jared Lobdell


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 3111 from "ArtSheehan"

Jan 27, 2006


Oh how I would love to find out, for certain, who "Dr Howard" was.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6029. . . . . . . . . . . . Background: Dr. Howard question

(Part 2 of 3)

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/20/2009 2:23:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Message 3117 from

Jan 29, 2006


Re: The Dr. Howard/Hank P. manuscript
Hi Rick,
As Stated in my original post this appears to be the draft edited by

Hank P. and Dr. Howard. It does not appear to be anything like a draft

that a publisher could work from and if you look closely at the 4

pages from the Sotheby's Catelog I think you will agree. Its quite

obviously an intermediate sort of draft as it doesn't remotely agree

with the finished product. Also as stated previously there are two

handwritten references to Dr. Howard and most of the handwriting is

Hank P.'s in my opinion. I disagee with the Sotheby assertion that

this is the final copy that went to Cornwall Press. This document is

far more significant historically. I am quite cautious with such an

assertion as their experts are quite meticulous.
Please look to what's available facimilewise rather than what

secondhand reporters tell us.


All the best!!
-merton
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 3119 from

Jan 29, 2006


Re: Printer's Copy and Dr. Howard
The name Curry is extremely interesting as it was one of names

mentioned by Bill and Hank during their 2 week stock redemption

debate, as a creditor of Henry G. Parkhurst, Inc. (unincorporated in

reality)(the name Honor Dealers was not used in this discussion, Hank'

contention was that he was principally liable as the company bore his

namesake so he owned the furniture. Bill pointed out that as treasurer, an

officer, he was equally liable). One of the other creditors was Sinclair

Oil.
As I stated originally after reviewing the 4 pages from the Sotheby's

catelog its my very stong opinion that this wasn't a "publisher's

draft" but rather an intermittent draft and is mostly in Hank P's and

very likely the mysterious Dr. Howard's hand. The one page in Bill's

hand was written many years after publication. Hopefully more people

can view the photo fascimiles from the catelog to understand my point.

If there's anyone living in the Essex or Morris County area's please

check the various city directories for Dr. Marcus A. Curry.
Thank you jlobdell for this possible lead into identifying the elusive

Dr. Howard. Greystone Park yielded several very early members

including Morgan R., from Glen Ridge, who spoke on the radio about AA.

Source - documents in GSO Archives 1939-40 for unpublished yet Black

Sheep manuscript)
All the Best!!!
-merton
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[General background on the writing of the Big Book]
Message 3284 from

Mar 22, 2006


"Pass It On" (page 200) ... states "Bill wrote at

least ten of the opening chapters of the book; there is some reason to

believe that "To Employers" may have been written by Hank."
... Mitchell K ... relayed information he received through testimonial from

Ruth


Hock (a first person observer).
Merton M, a member of this forum, is researching a comprehensive

history of AA in New Jersey (which was started by Hank P). Merton also

attributes authorship of "To Employers" to Hank P based on his

research (and he is a bit of a stickler for accurate details) ....

The idea that Bill only wrote the first paragraph of "To Employers" in

no way detracts from or diminishes his role in the overall production

of the Big Book. Bill's methodology for writing the Big Book chapters

was for him to develop an outline of the chapters on a yellow legal

pad and then later dictate narrative details to Ruth Hock to type up

drafts.
The drafts were then presented to NY, Akron and Cleveland members for

editing and changes ....
The Big Book is unique in that it is the only literary work in AA

where everyone who was a member at the time (1938-1939) had an

opportunity to directly contribute to shaping both the wording and

style of the book. This also included non-alcoholic friends of AA:


1. Dr Silkworth wrote a letter of support for AA for use in

fundraising for the book. The letter, and additional narrative from Dr

Silkworth, were incorporated into the chapter "The Doctor's Opinion."
2. 28 members submitted their stories for the book. These stories,

then and today, make up a substantial and very important portion of

the Big Book (notwithstanding the tiresome "first 164 pages" mantra

that circulates within AA).


3. Jim B (whose story is "Vicious Cycle") suggested the phrases "God

as we understand Him" and "Power greater than ourselves" be added to

the Steps and basic text.
4. A psychiatrist "Dr Howard" (an alias) caused the whole tone of the

book to be changed from "must" to "should" or "ought."


5. Tom Uzzell, a friend of Hank P, an editor at Collier's and a member

of the NYU faculty, edited the manuscript which was variously

estimated as 600-800 pages (including personal stories). Uzzell

reduced it to approximately 400 pages. Most cuts came from the

personal stories, which had also been edited by Jim S of Akron and

Bill W and Hank P in NY.


The Big Book is a product of informed group conscience and, as a

consequence, it turned out to be a very remarkable product. By his own

admission, Bill wrote that his role eventually changed from one of

primary author to umpire.


Cheers
Arthur
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 4377 from "schaberg43"

Jun 12, 2007


I went down to Sotheby's today to take a long look at the Original

Manuscript copy that they will be auctioning off on Thursday, June

21st. This is the OM copy where Hank, Ruth, Bill, and others

recorded ALL of the suggestions that they received for edits before

actually printing the first edition of the Big Book. It is an

important historical document on many levels, but most importantly,

I think, because it shows who made some of the suggestions and also

allows you to see the suggestions that our founders did NOT take

when editing the Big Book.
NOTE: I was privileged with a private viewing of this copy of the

Original Manuscript because I had assisted the cataloger in his

write up of the history of the Original Manuscript printings --

which, with the 13 photos, takes up 11-1/2 pages of the catalog. While

I had only 20 minutes to look at this piece when it was first

auctioned off in June of 2004, this time Sotheby's allowed me over

two hours to examine this important copy and it was a truly amazing

two hours! What a piece of AA history!


Just a couple of highlights.
The original front cover of this copy is stamped in black

ink: "LOANED COPY" -- something I have heard about but never seen

before. {Note: this copy is missing the original back cover along

with the two pages of "Index" usually found in these copies.)


The reverse side (verso) of the title page has a long handwritten

note on it (see photo in lower left on page 224 of the Sotheby's

catalog). This note continues onto the verso of another loose piece

of paper that is also included here (but not pictured in the

catalog).
This is the manuscript copy of four paragraphs that were inserted

into "Bill's Story." The paragraphs in question are the first four

complete paragraphs found on page 12 of our basic text -- starting

with "Despite ..." and ending with "... would!" These additions --

certainly the largest edit to the Big Book immediately before it was

published -- include some extremely important AA precepts, not least

of which is the italicized quote: "Why don't you choose your own

conception of God?"


This manuscript section is not in Bill's hand. I suspect (especially

given the free use of abbreviations) that it was written there by

Ruth Hock -- either transcribed from Bill's notes or taken down from

dictation.


Once again, I noticed that the name of Doctor Howard was just about

everywhere in the manuscript. He sure had a LOT to say about edits

to our book. In addition, two other doctors I have never before

heard referenced as contributors of Big Book suggestions list (Dr.

Witherspoon & Dr. Bevoise [sp?]) are also found here.
The Manuscript is littered with several comments that seem to be

rather off-handed. One noted that something was "too groupy," i.e.

Oxford Groupy. But, my favorite was opposite the first three

paragraphs currently found on page 80 of the Big Book about making

amends: "Dangerous for the NUTS -- some could go higher than a kite."
And there is some real history here. On the pages containing the

dropped story "Ace Full -- Seven -- Eleven," Bill has written the

author's name (something which has not been, to my knowledge, so far

discovered) and includes a short comment on why the story has been

dropped. (I will refrain from sharing that information here since it

rightly belongs to the owner of this copy of the Original

Manuscript.)
Finally, it is interesting to note that none of the suggested

changes to Dr. Bob's story were taken. Someone -- in an effort to cut

the text -- had advised deleting three paragraphs and Dr. Howard

wanted the last line of his story to read: "Your FAITH will never

let you down!" Bob, obviously, thought the story should remain 'as

is.'
If you are anywhere within driving distance of New York City, I

would advise you to make a trip there this coming Friday, June 15th

through Wednesday, June 20th to see this remarkable piece of our

history and to "put your hands on the Book." It was a very moving

experience for both me and my sponsor who joined me for this trip!


Old Bill
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6030. . . . . . . . . . . . Background: Dr. Howard question

(Part 3 of 3)

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/20/2009 2:25:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
[Doug. B suggested that "Dr. Howard" was

Dr. James Wainwright Howard from Montclair,

New Jersey]
Message 4381 from "Doug B."

Jun 14, 2007


Re: Some Notes on the AA Original Manuscript Up for Auction
Bill,
Thanks for your observations...my spine was tingling!
I found the following Dr's that might fit your question:
Dr James Wainwright Howard from Montclair, NJ

graduated P&S in 1919


Dr Charles Russell Witherspoon from Rochester, NY

graduated Uof P in 1898


No mention of a Dr. Bevoise [any spelling]) in NY,

NJ or CT in 1936


Doug B.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 4409 from "Old Bill"

posted by "Fiona Dodd"

Jun 26, 2007
Jim Burwell's Copy of Original Manuscript
Given the current excitement surrounding the sale of the "Master Copy" of

the Original Manuscript, there was a request here for more information on

Jim Burwell's copy of the Original Manuscript and I will try to supply as

much detail about it below as possible.


My Lady Sara and I are the current owners of the Burwell copy of the

"Original Manuscript" -- one of the multilith copies of the proposed text of

the Big Book that were circulated in late 1938 and early 1939 for review and

comments ....


The book has been rebound twice. Once at some point in the past, Jim Burwell

had the book rebound with a uniform black cloth binding that had the title

"Alcoholics / Anonymous // Book No. 2. / of the / First Hundred Mimeographed

/ Copies" on the front cover in gilt lettering. By 1993, this second binding

was in need of replacement so an identical looking black cloth binding (with

exactly the same front cover title information) was created by Ron M. The

first black cloth binding has been separately preserved along with the

original endpapers from that binding ....


The unique features of this copy include ....
VERSO OF INDEX PAGE:
This originally blank page is filled with a wealth of historically important

information (written in blue ink by Jim) including ....

... a final major header: "Non Alcoholics Who Were So Helpful"

listing seven full names â“ Dorothy Snyder appearing in a different hand

at

the end. NOTE: Dr. Howard is listed here as being from "(N.J. State Hosp)"


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 4807 from "Arthur S"

Jan 20, 2008


[AA Comes of Age]
On page 165: "Had we not better make a prepublication copy of the text and

some of the stories and try the book out on our own membership and on every

kind and class of person that has anything to do with drunks?"

On page 167: "One of them came from Dr. Howard, a well-known psychiatrist of

Montclair, New Jersey. He pointed out that the text of our book was too full

of the words "you" and "must." [... also ...] "To make this shift throughout

the text of the book would be a big job."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message 5232 from John B

Sep 22, 2008


Re: Some Notes on the AA Original Manuscript

Up for Auction


Dr. Bevoise is Herb Debevoise (Herb D) from

South Orange, New Jersey.


John B
- - - -
Bill Schaberg had written:
I noticed that the name of Doctor Howard was

just about everywhere in the manuscript. He

sure had a LOT to say about edits to our book.

In addition, two other doctors I have never

before heard referenced as contributors of

Big Book suggestions list (Dr. Witherspoon

& Dr. Bevoise [sp?]) are also found here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Messsage 5321 from "John Barton"

posted by Glenn Chesnut

Oct 25, 2008
AA in South Orange, New Jersey (2 of 3)

The History of Alcoholism and Alcoholics Anonymous

in South Orange, New Jersey

Section 2 (of 3)


During an early Fall meeting of the trustees, Frank Amos popped up with the

idea


that one of his friends -- Gene Exman -- one of the religious editors of

Harpers


Magazine, might be interested in the book project. (Bill went to meet Exman,

who


was quite pleased with what Bill had written and said he could probably get

an

advance of $1,500 "If it could help things along." This would be deducted



from

the sale of the books when finished. Bill was uneasy with the thought that


Yüklə 11,49 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   ...   74




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə