Aa history Lovers 2010 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 25,47 Mb.
səhifə35/173
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü25,47 Mb.
#49655
1   ...   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   ...   173

1073.therefore I must set about undoing the damage to the best of my

1074.ability. It would be advisable to make a list of all the

1075.persons I had hurt or with whom I had bad relations. People I

1076.disliked and those who had injured me should have preferred

1077.attention, provided I had done them injury or still entertained

1078.any feeling of resentment towards them . Under no sircumstances

1079.was I to consider their defects or wrong doing , then I was to

1080.approach these people telling them I had commenced a way of life

1081.which required that I be on friendly and helpful terms with every

1082.body; that I recognized I had been at fault in this particular

1083.that I was sorry for what I had done or said and had come to set

1084.matters right insofar as I possibly could. Under no circumstances

1085.was I to engage in argument or controversy. My own wrong doing

1086.was to be admitted and set right and that was all. Assurance was

1087.to be given that I was prepared to go to any length to do the

1088.right thing. Again I was warned that obviously I could not

1089.make amends at the expense of other people, that judgment and

1090.discretion should be used lest others should be hurt. This sort

1091.of situation could be postponed until such conditions became such

1092.that the job could be done without harm to anyone. One could

1093.be contented in the meanwhile by discussing such a matter frankly

1094.with a third party who would not be involved and of course on a

1095.strictly confidential basis. Great was to be taken that one

1096.did not avoid situations difficult or dangerous to oneself on

as possible

1097.such a pretext . The willingness to go the limit a s fast had

1098.to be at all times present. This principle of making amends

1099.was to be continued in the future for only by keeping myself free

1100.of bad relationships with others could I expect to receive the

1101.Power and direction so indespensable to my new and larger useful-

1102.ness . This sort of discipline would helped me to see others as

1103.they really are; to recognize that every one is plagued by various

1104.of self will; that every one is in a sense actually sick with

1105.some form of self; that when men behave badly they are only dis-

1106.playing symptoms of spiritual ill health .

1107. one is not usually angry or critical of another when he

1108. suffers from some grave bodily illness and I would

how


1109. presently see senseless and futile it is to be disturbed

1110. by those burdened by their own wrong thinking . I was to

1111. entertain towards everyone a quite new feeling of tolerance

1112. patience and helpfulness I would recognize more and more

1113. that when I became critical or resentful I must at all

1114. costs realize that such things were very wrong in me

1115. and that in some form otro or other I still had the very

1116. defects of which I complained in others. Much emphasis

1117. was placed on the development of this of mind toward others.

1118. No stone should be left unturned to acheive this end.

1119. The constant practice of this principle frequently ask-

1120. ing God for His help in making it work under trying

112l. circumstances was absolutely imperative . The drunkard

1122. especially had to be most rigorous on this point for one

1125. burst of anger or self pity might so shut him out from his

1124. new found strength that he would drink again and with us

1125. that always means calamity and sometimes death.

1126. This was indeed a program, the thought of some of the

to

1127. things I would have admit about myself to other people



1128. was most distasteful - even appalling. It was only to o

1129. plain that I had been ruined by my own colosal egotism

1130. and selfishness, not only in respect to drinking but with

1131. regard to everything else. Drinking had been a symptom

1132. of these things. Alcohol had submerged my inferiorities

1135. and puffed up my self esteem, body had finally rebelled

1134. and I had some fatally affected , my thinking and action

1135. was woefully distorted thru infection from the mire of

1136. self pity, resentment, fear and remorse in which I now

1137. wallowed . The motive behind a certain amount of generosity,

1138. kindness and the meticulous honesty in some directions

1139. upon which I had prided myself was not perhaps not so

1140. good after all. The motive had been to get personal

1141. satisfaction for myself, perhaps not entirely but on the

1142. whole this was true. I had sought the glow which comes

applause


1143. with thexflaws and Praise rendered me by others.

1144. I began to see how actions good in themselves might avail

1145. little because of wrong motive , I had been like the man

1146. who feels that all is well after he has condesendingly

1147. taken turkeys to the poor at Xmas time . How clear it

1148. suddenly became that all of my thought and action, both

1149. good and bad, had arisen out of a desire to make myself

1150. happy and satisfied. I had been self centered instead of

1151. God centered. It was now easy to understand why the taking

this


1152. of a simple childlike attitude toward God plus a drastic

1153. program of action which would place himx would bring

1154. results. How evident et became that mere faith in God

1155. was not enough. Faith had to be demonstrated by works

1156. and there could be no works or any worth while demonstrations

1157. until I had fitted myself for the undertaking and had be-

1158. come a suitable table agent thru which God might express Himself.

1159. There had to be a tremendous personal housecleaning, a

1160. sweeping away of the debris of past willfullness , a restoring

1161. of broken relationships and a firm resolve to make God's

1162. will my will . I must stop forcing things , I must stop

1163. trying to mold people and situations to my own liking.

1164. Nearly every one is taught that human willpower and ambition

1165. if good ends are sought are desirable attributes. I too

1166. had clung to that conception but I saw that it was not good

1167. enough, nor big enough , nor powerful enough . My own will had

1168. failed in many areas of my live. With respect to

1169. alcohol it had become absolutely inoperative . My ambitions,

1170. which had seemed worthy at some time, had been frustrated.

1171. Even had I been successful , the pursuit of my desires

1172. would have perhaps harmed others add their realization

1173. would have added little or nothing to anyone's peace,

1174. happiness or usefulness. I began to see that the clashing

1175. ambitions and designs of even those who sought what to them

1176. seemed worthy ends , have filled the world with discord and

1177. misery . Perhaps people of this sort created more havouqx

1178. havoc than those confessedly immoral and krucked croocked

1179. I saw even the most useful people die unhappy and defeated.

1180. All because some one else had behaved badly or they had
[archivist's note: the rest of this manuscript is currently missing]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6501. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: lee . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/1/2010 11:57:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The District Committee can do whatever the majority agrees upon. I would

vote


against such a motion. We have more Traditions than the formal Twelve. AA's

other Traditions are dictated by what's done over time and in concert with

what

other similar AA entities do. The long-established method of seating



treasurers

and secretaries is by election. I have never heard of it being done any

other

way. If the District officers are chosen by one person on the basis of



friendship, personal preference or subjective evaluation, we have completely

bypassed the "loving God" as expressed in the group conscience. It sounds

like a

power grab and demagogic to me. I do think that the DCM should have the



authority to appoint Standing Committee Chairpersons as he/she may have a

good


sense on these appointments and later would have the choice, if the Chairs

failed in their duties, to replace them. A call to GSO might provide a

little

guidance here.



lee
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, Jim Robbins

wrote:


>

> You might look at the AA Service Manual, Concept I.

>

>

> On 4/21/2010 1:58 PM, luv2shop wrote:



> >

> > Hi everyone!

> >

> > I have a question but first here is the scenario. I am truly not



> > looking for a debate, just if anyone has any experience with this and

> > could point me in the correct direction......

> >

> > Our District is wanting to change our service structure to where the



> > current chairman "appoints" the treasurer and secretary of the

> > district. In the past these positions have been filled through

> > elections. The rationale is that the chairman/person would be able to

> > appoint people to these positions that he/she feels comfortable with

> > and personally knows that they can perform the dutites. Tradition 2

> > states, in part, that "....our leaders are but trusted servants they

> > do not govern..." One (of the many) definitions of govern it to

> > "appoint." What if there are two people equally qualified in every way

> > but the chairperson chose his/her buddy because they are comfortable?

> >


> > Now the question. After reading the scenario, does anyone know where I

> > could find out more about this and educate myself? Is there anything

> > in literature anywhere that has dealt with this in the past? I would

> > greatly appreciate hearing from you and pointing me in the right

> > research direction.

> >


> > Thank you for everything that is done in this group! It is such a

> > treasure trove of information!!

> >

> > Yours in the fellowship



> > Donna W.

> >


> >

>

>



>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6502. . . . . . . . . . . . Women & Spirit

From: FAMBD . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/2/2010 2:21:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
http://www.womenandspirit.org/index.html
The Women & Spirit Exhibition is touring the US and will be in Cleveland

Ohio


from 09-MAY. Part of the exhibition is devoted to Ignatia and her work. The

material has been provided by the Sisters of Charity of St Augustine.

The link above is to the website which gives dates etc of where the

exhibition

will be.
Regards
Fiona
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6503. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: minority voice report

From: Tim DeRan . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/2/2010 5:05:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
"I am curious as to where, when and how the use of the "minority voice

report" was installed as a function of AA business meetings....


While I am pretty well versed in Roberts Rules of Order, I cannot recall

any such function, other than a motion to reconsider which requires a 2/3

vote. I cannot find mention of the minority voice report otherwise and was

hoping someone knew where and when this became a part of AA business meeting

protocol."
Look in the Service Manual.
tmd
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6504. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: minority voice report

From: Remi K. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/2/2010 5:14:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Concept V, found in the "secret" AA Service Manual, allows for the

"Right of Appeal", assuring that minority opinion will be heard.


It's testimonial of our co-founder Bill W.'s incredible foresight for

drafting the 12 Concepts... relinquishing the power and authority to the

fellowship.
In service,
Remi
doclandis@aol.com wrote:

>

> I am curious as to where, when and how the use of the "minority voice



> report" was installed as a function of AA business meetings.

>

> The question arose from a vote that was recently taken in our District



> Meeting regarding an AA function over the Founders Day weekend that

> includes

> a history skit, and then a spaghetti dinner. Apparently a few members

> felt


> it was not OK for the District to ask for donations to cover the cost of

> the


> meal, and when the project was approved by a vote of 5-2, those who did

> not


> support the project have demanded a "minority voice report" at the

> following

> months meeting.

>

> While I am pretty well versed in Roberts Rules of Order, I cannot recall



> any

> such function, other than a motion to reconsider which requires a 2/3

> vote.

> I cannot find mention of the minority voice report otherwise and was



> hoping

> someone knew where and when this became a part of AA business meeting

> protocol.

>

> thanks,



>

> Mark in the North Georgia Mountains

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



>

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6505. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: Tim DeRan . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/2/2010 5:02:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
"Is there anything in literature anywhere that has dealt with this in the

past?


I would greatly appreciate hearing from you and pointing me in the right

research direction."


You're best source of any information on this is the Service Manual. After

that


you might look in AA Comes Of Age. But, there is little that I know of that

speaks to this question.


However, I would point out something that I know of from personal experience

both in the organization and structure of AA and outside of it. One of the

reasons positions such as you speak of is to have a diversity of opinions,

experience and training. Having someone appoint people they are comfortable

with is dangerous in that while it might not happen, it could lead to a

committee of yes men who follow along behind the appointing authority. And,

being selected to sit in a position by someone has the possiblity of making

the


appointed in debt to the appointer.
In the end that tradition about ultimate authority in the group conscience

is

the ultimate authority and if an area, district or whatever decided to



follow

down a path they also have to live with the consequences of that choice.

Much

thought and deliberation needs to go into making decisions such as these.


tmd
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6506. . . . . . . . . . . . Bill W acknowlesdges Sam Shoemaker

as the 3rd co-founder of AA in 1963

From: tuchypalmieri . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/3/2010 4:27:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IN MEMORY OF Dr. SAM

By B. W.


On Thursday October 31st 1963 Dr. Sam

Shoemaker, The great Episcopal clergyman

and first friend of A. A. Passed from our sight

and hearing. He was one of those few without whose

ministration A. A. could never have been born in the

first place nor prospered since

From his teaching Dr Bob and I absorbed most of the

principles that were later embodied in the Twelve Steps of

A. A. Our ideas of self –examination, acknowledgement

of character defect s, restitution for harms done, and

working with others came straight from Sam. Therefore

he gave to us the concrete knowledge of what we could

do about our illness; he passed to us spiritual keys by

which so many of us have since been liberated

We who in A. A. early time were privileged to fall under

the spell of his inspiration can never be the same again.

We shall bless Sam's memory forever

Reprinted by permission from the book "And thy

neighbor" by Sam Shoemaker
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6507. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: minority voice report

From: Jenny or Laurie Andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/2/2010 3:50:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Perhaps it derives from Concept Five: "Throughout our structure, a

traditional

'Right of Appeal' ought to prevail, so that minority opinion will be heard

and


personal grievances receive careful consideration." Bill elaborates on this

in

his essay on the concept.


To: aahistorylovers@yahoogroups.com

From: doclandis@aol.com

Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 15:14:06 -0400

Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] minority voice report


I am curious as to where, when and how the use of the "minority voice

report" was installed as a function of AA business meetings.


The question arose from a vote that was recently taken in our District

Meeting regarding an AA function over the Founders Day weekend that

includes

a history skit, and then a spaghetti dinner. Apparently a few members

felt

it was not OK for the District to ask for donations to cover the cost of



the

meal, and when the project was approved by a vote of 5-2, those who did

not

support the project have demanded a "minority voice report" at the



following

months meeting.


While I am pretty well versed in Roberts Rules of Order, I cannot recall

any


such function, other than a motion to reconsider which requires a 2/3

vote.


I cannot find mention of the minority voice report otherwise and was

hoping


someone knew where and when this became a part of AA business meeting

protocol.


thanks,
Mark in the North Georgia Mountains
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________________________________________________________

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6508. . . . . . . . . . . . AA Historical books Reprinted and

now available a low prices

From: tuchypalmieri . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/3/2010 4:21:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Reprinted by Healing-habits.com available @ amazon

Classic republished Gems


"When Man Listens" Cecil Rose Was very Rare

A book of how to Listen to God.

In His preface Cecil Rose writes ?The chapters of this book are an attempt

to

set down briefly the simple elements of Christian living. I believe that



there

is nothing in them which cannot be found in the New Testament?. What Cecil

Rose

wrote was a model for living that went beyond the Christian faith. It became



one

of the sources of the 12 Step recovery program. Which has brought many

people to

God. It embodies universal principles that serves all of mankind. It is an

excellent guide for ; People of the Christian faith People who are

struggling

with their 12 step program. People seeking to deepen their Spiritual/

religious

connection People who are seeking to live a life of honor and integrity in a

world in filled with the opposite It is my honor and pleasure to have Cecil

Roses work reborn through this reprinting so that the masses can have access

to

his words and the principles he speaks of.


"Twice Born men" Harold Begbie.

A Famous English Author of the early 1900's writes stories of downtrodden

people

who were saved by the works of the Salvation Army. A movement that started



in

England and has spread to 116 countries today


"The Genius of Fellowship/ conversion of the Church" Sam Shoemaker

The Man who started it all.

Sam Shoemaker a pioneer in both the Oxford group movement and AA. presents

in

his book "The conversion Of The Church" How the Church needs to operate like



a

fellowship and that in reality the Fellowship is the Church. Sam mentions in

his

Forward that the original church was often called the fellowship. AA is



often

referred to as the Fellowship. Sam devotes an entire Chapter to the genius

of

fellowship. There he emphasizes the Importance of fellowship in The Church.



"When the Church is alive the desire for fellowship is alive. Sam gives his

definition of real fellowship. "the core and genius of real fellowship as I

see

it, is the power to live and work with people upon the basis of absolute



love

and honesty"


"Children of the second Birth" Sam Shoemaker

The movement that helped Bill W to recover

An early Sam Shoemaker book originally published in the 1920s, Children of

the


Second Birth is filled with stories of men and women who had their lives

changed


by turning to God; stories of people who, under the guidance of Sam,

utilized


the Oxford Group principles and found miracles. These men and women came

from


the depths of desperation and despair to places of happiness and joy. The

touching journeys that they went through gave others the hope that they too

could have a new life filled with peace and serenity. People today can

achieve


the same results as the people mentioned in this book. All that is required

is

to follow what they did. May these true-life accounts help you or your loved



ones find the Happiness of God.
"Life Changers 13th edition" Harold Begbie

Frank Buchman The man who started the oxford movement

Life Changers is comprised of century-old stories of men who had their lives

changed so profoundly and so dramatically that the original book was

reprinted

12 times. Now 100 years later, with its 13th printing, this precious classic

is

set to change the lives of many more men and women. The words in this book



are

as true today as they were then. Life Changers is also about a man, Frank

Buchman, who was first and foremost a teacher. Buchman could change the

lives of


students and scholars in the course of a single conversation; changing those

lives so profoundly and persuasively that the world was in disbelief.

Buchman

started a movement that reached the shores of America and lives today in the



form of many 12-step programs. While the original movement was founded on

Christianity, its principles and ideas moved beyond religion and

Christianity

into a more generic spiritual movement.


The Common Sense of Drinking

Written by Richard Peabody in the early 1930s, "The Common Sense of

Drinking"

describes alcoholism and the behavior of many alcoholics. Divided into four

sections, the book carefully details the condition of alcoholism, along with

the


diagnosis of the disease, first steps towards successful treatment, and "the

cure made effective." Republished in 2009 by Tuchy Palmieri as "To Drink or

Not

To Drink: The Common Sense of Drinking," this book, although somewhat dated



in

parts, still serves as a wonderful resource for anyone interested in

studying

the early research on the condition of alcoholism.

Twice Born Ministers
Twice-Born Ministers is a book of 12 personal stories of 12 ministers who

were


reborn and re-energized to do the real work of ministry by helping people to

become faithful followers in every sense of the word, specifically being

reborn

themselves to Christ and to his calling for them to do his work.



Inspired Children

Olive M. Jones written by the former President of The National Education

Association. It is a book about how the Oxford Group principles work in

lives of


children. True stories about real children and how their lives have been

transformed by employing the principles and making God real to children. Sam

Shoemaker in his introduction makes the point that he knew most of the

children


and that they were the happiest children he has ever known
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6509. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: Dolores . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/4/2010 8:14:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Lee, When I read what you have written. I thought of the General Service

Conference. That the Groups are the most important members and they vote to

send a GSR to the Area meeing. Here on the Continent, Intergroup is the next

group. There we express our voice in AA, by voting for the Chair, Sec. and

Treasurer. And this goes on to our Region and I believe in the States,

Districts, where again the members vote for the Chair, Sec and Treas. The

way

you said it was suggested seems like a business and AA is not a Business, we



are

a Fellowship. Our inverted Triangle helps us to remember that in service we

are trusted servants. All about this can be read in the "Language of the

Heart", a highly recommended book. In this structure that Bill W. gave us ,

we

have a voice. Please let me know how things turned our in your group. Yours



in AA, Dolores

----- Original Message -----

From: lee

To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 5:57 AM

Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Question regarding Area appointing trusted

servants rather than electing....
The District Committee can do whatever the majority agrees upon. I would

vote


against such a motion. We have more Traditions than the formal Twelve. AA's

other Traditions are dictated by what's done over time and in concert with

what

other similar AA entities do. The long-established method of seating



treasurers

and secretaries is by election. I have never heard of it being done any

other

way. If the District officers are chosen by one person on the basis of



friendship, personal preference or subjective evaluation, we have completely

bypassed the "loving God" as expressed in the group conscience. It sounds

like a

power grab and demagogic to me. I do think that the DCM should have the



authority to appoint Standing Committee Chairpersons as he/she may have a

good


sense on these appointments and later would have the choice, if the Chairs

failed in their duties, to replace them. A call to GSO might provide a

little

guidance here.



lee
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, Jim Robbins

wrote:


>

> You might look at the AA Service Manual, Concept I.

>

>

> On 4/21/2010 1:58 PM, luv2shop wrote:



> >

> > Hi everyone!

> >

> > I have a question but first here is the scenario. I am truly not



> > looking for a debate, just if anyone has any experience with this and

> > could point me in the correct direction......

> >

> > Our District is wanting to change our service structure to where the



> > current chairman "appoints" the treasurer and secretary of the

> > district. In the past these positions have been filled through

> > elections. The rationale is that the chairman/person would be able to

> > appoint people to these positions that he/she feels comfortable with

> > and personally knows that they can perform the dutites. Tradition 2

> > states, in part, that "....our leaders are but trusted servants they

> > do not govern..." One (of the many) definitions of govern it to

> > "appoint." What if there are two people equally qualified in every way

> > but the chairperson chose his/her buddy because they are comfortable?

> >


> > Now the question. After reading the scenario, does anyone know where I

> > could find out more about this and educate myself? Is there anything

> > in literature anywhere that has dealt with this in the past? I would

> > greatly appreciate hearing from you and pointing me in the right

> > research direction.

> >


> > Thank you for everything that is done in this group! It is such a

> > treasure trove of information!!

> >

> > Yours in the fellowship



> > Donna W.

> >


> >

>

>



>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6510. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: ricktompkins . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/3/2010 9:37:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In my experience and from what I've seen around the Fellowship, an

"appointed" service position is many times "Ad Hoc."


Ad Hoc can mean two things: 1) specific length of time or to accomplish a

specific goal, or 2) service in a specific task or position.


The AAWS Board and its service committees, for as long as I can remember,

have had Appointed Committee Members who serve Ad Hoc assisting the work of

the committee. I remember when the Fourth Edition stories were being

reviewed, Trustees Literature Committee had AAs as Appointed Committee

Members to help with its work. An old friend and past Delegate, who has

since passed away, applied for such a position when the Board request was

made, and his first 'assignment' was assisting in editing down the second AA

history book that languished through a few General Service Conference in the

early 1990s and never received approval to publish. The result of the

editing was "Collected Observations of AA" that was (and possibly still is,

in geographic-related sections from the AA Archives at GSO) available to

archivists working within the service structure. His next task was reviewing

submitted Fourth Edition personal stories for further consideration by

Trustees Literature. Then, when it came close to the time for final

Conference approval of the Fourth Edition, his work was done.
As to my Delegate Area and its Appointments, we have a few: Area Archivist

and Area Newsletter Editor come to mind. These are non-rotating service

positions that are loosely reaffirmed every two years, at the beginning of

the year following an Area election year. Our current Newsletter Editor has

been serving for over 10 years.
The Area Chairperson appoints these trusted servants and the Assembly

ratifies the selections by acclamation.


Hope this helps with your question; Ad Hoc is one effective way to look at

appointments. Example 1, I served my Area twice as Historian, once to

complete its history and a second time to update it, both times before the

Assembly's approval to publish it. Example 2, I was later appointed Area

Archivist and served for 5 years before my election to the Area Secretary

Committee---to establish an archives repository and manage the archival

items.
Rick, Illinois

In the end that tradition about ultimate authority in the group conscience

is the ultimate authority and if an area, district or whatever decided to

follow down a path they also have to live with the consequences of that

choice. Much thought and deliberation needs to go into making decisions such

as these.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6511. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants...

From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2010 4:27:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Benign anarchy and democracy is as Bill W said. He also said, They do not

govern.
In a message dated 5/5/2010 12:53:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,

dolli@dr-rinecker.de writes:
Our inverted Triangle helps us to remember that in service we are trusted

servants.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6512. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: gvanrobinson . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2010 11:37:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Donna,
Our Area used to allow the Area Chairperson to appoint the Area Secretary. A

while back it was the decision of the Area Fellowship that the Secretary

should

be an elected position. It was decided that this change would better serve



the

Area by allowing the Ultimate Authority to decide who would be allowed to

serve.
Now, that is not saying that this is the way everyone should do things,

which


leads me to my suggestion of literature one might consider in instances like

this.
It begins with Tradition 4 - Each group should be autonomous except in

matters

affecting other groups or AA as a whole. - Any response from GSO will most



likely refer you to this Tradition. Each Group, Intergroup, District, or

Area


is free do conduct their business however they wish provided that, in doing

so,


they don't interfere with any other AA body's ability to do the same.

Translation: Your District can absolutely allow your chair to appoint other

positions if they want to. If, at some point, they decide it doesn't work,

they


can change it back.
The guiding principles for this can be found in the 12 Concepts, a.k.a. "the

best kept secret in AA." In particular Concept 2 which speaks to the

delegation

of authority, and Concept 10 which speaks to service authority. More

importantly however, I would refer you to Concept 9 which speaks to the

importance of good service leaders and "sound and appropriate methods of

choosing them ..."
The bottom line is this: I doubt that you will ever find any definitive

answer


as to how your district should conduct your business, but, I am convinced

that,


by reviewing the guiding principles that our founders labored to leave us as

their legacy, one can find Good Orderly Direction.


Good luck.
GVR
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "luv2shop" wrote:

>

> Hi everyone!



>

> I have a question but first here is the scenario. I am truly not looking

for

a debate, just if anyone has any experience with this and could point me in



the

correct direction......

>

>

> Our District is wanting to change our service structure to where the



current

chairman "appoints" the treasurer and secretary of the district. In the past

these positions have been filled through elections. The rationale is that

the


chairman/person would be able to appoint people to these positions that

he/she


feels comfortable with and personally knows that they can perform the

dutites.


Tradition 2 states, in part, that "....our leaders are but trusted servants

they


do not govern..." One (of the many) definitions of govern it to "appoint."

What if there are two people equally qualified in every way but the

chairperson

chose his/her buddy because they are comfortable?

>

> Now the question. After reading the scenario, does anyone know where I



could

find out more about this and educate myself? Is there anything in literature

anywhere that has dealt with this in the past? I would greatly appreciate

hearing from you and pointing me in the right research direction.

>

> Thank you for everything that is done in this group! It is such a treasure



trove of information!!

>

> Yours in the fellowship



> Donna W.

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII


++++Message 6513. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Re: Question regarding Area

appointing trusted servants rather than electing....

From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/5/2010 5:57:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
When my wife was appointed as a Trustees' Committee Member in 2000, she

submitted the same kind of resume (cv) required for application to be

considered

as a Director or Trustee, through the Delegate from her Area, was

interviewed by

the Secretary and the current Trustee Chairman of the Committee, then her

name

was submitted to the Conference (with the names of nominated Trustees and



Directors) and approved. In the appointment of the Area Archivist, I believe

the local Area (59) -- like Rick's Area --requires at least Area Committee

(if

not Assembly) approval, so that, if if the Archivist is appointed, it's the



Area

Committee that does the appointing. The Appointed Committee Members of

Trustees' Committees serve regular four-year terms, or at least that was

what my


wife served -- not ad-hoc for a specific task. Also, Area 59 has ad-hoc

Committees, but those AAs serving as Chairs, and the members of the

Committees,

are appointed for a term certain of two years. In the most recent panel, the

Committees (Literature, Corrections, Treatment, CPC, PI, etc.) elected their

own


chairmen/ chairwomen, from among their members.
> To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com

> From: ricktompkins@comcast.net

> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:37:26 -0500

> Subject: RE: [AAHistoryLovers] Re: Question regarding Area appointing

trusted

servants rather than electing....



>

> In my experience and from what I've seen around the Fellowship, an

> "appointed" service position is many times "Ad Hoc."

>

> Ad Hoc can mean two things: 1) specific length of time or to accomplish a



> specific goal, or 2) service in a specific task or position.

>

>



>

> The AAWS Board and its service committees, for as long as I can remember,

> have had Appointed Committee Members who serve Ad Hoc assisting the work

of

> the committee. I remember when the Fourth Edition stories were being



> reviewed, Trustees Literature Committee had AAs as Appointed Committee

> Members to help with its work. An old friend and past Delegate, who has

> since passed away, applied for such a position when the Board request was

> made, and his first 'assignment' was assisting in editing down the second

AA

> history book that languished through a few General Service Conference in



the

> early 1990s and never received approval to publish. The result of the

> editing was "Collected Observations of AA" that was (and possibly still

is,


> in geographic-related sections from the AA Archives at GSO) available to

> archivists working within the service structure. His next task was

reviewing

> submitted Fourth Edition personal stories for further consideration by

> Trustees Literature. Then, when it came close to the time for final

> Conference approval of the Fourth Edition, his work was done.

>

>

>



> As to my Delegate Area and its Appointments, we have a few: Area Archivist

> and Area Newsletter Editor come to mind. These are non-rotating service

> positions that are loosely reaffirmed every two years, at the beginning of

> the year following an Area election year. Our current Newsletter Editor

has

> been serving for over 10 years.



>

> The Area Chairperson appoints these trusted servants and the Assembly

> ratifies the selections by acclamation.

>

>



>

> Hope this helps with your question; Ad Hoc is one effective way to look at

> appointments. Example 1, I served my Area twice as Historian, once to

> complete its history and a second time to update it, both times before the

> Assembly's approval to publish it. Example 2, I was later appointed Area

> Archivist and served for 5 years before my election to the Area Secretary

> Committee---to establish an archives repository and manage the archival

> items.


>

>

>



> Rick, Illinois

>

>



>

>

>



>

>

>



>

>

>



>

>

>



>

>


> In the end that tradition about ultimate authority in the group conscience

> is the ultimate authority and if an area, district or whatever decided to

> follow down a path they also have to live with the consequences of that

> choice. Much thought and deliberation needs to go into making decisions

such

> as these.



> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>



>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>

>

>



> ------------------------------------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links



>

>

>


_________________________________________________________________

The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with

Hotmail.

http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28

326:\
:T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5 [13]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6514. . . . . . . . . . . . Judge sentences man to get AA

sponsor


From: diazeztone . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2010 4:33:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Judge sentences a man to "obtain an Alcoholics

Anonymous sponsor." Has any one heard of this

before?
St Cloud, Minnesota, News
Dwight King Alexander, 34, St. Cloud; terroristic threats, Nov. 21, 2009;

imposition of sentence stayed on five years probation and 58 days in jail,

fined

$50 plus surcharges, ordered to complete a chemical dependency evaluation



and

domestic abuse program and follow recommendations, abstain from alcohol and

non-prescribed mood-altering substances, undergo random urinalysis, provide

a

DNA sample, have no same or similar violations during probation, remain law



abiding, have no contact with the victim, sign releases, attend weekly

Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, obtain an Alcoholics Anonymous sponsor and

participate in domestic violence court and comply with requirements. Judge:

Grunke.
LD Pierce

aabibliography.com
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6515. . . . . . . . . . . . Why was Fitz''s alcoholic problem so

complex?


From: martinholmes76@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/10/2010 4:17:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In the Big Book, in the Doctor's Opinion (p. xxxi) it says "this man's

alcoholic

problem was so complex". Why was his problem so complex?
- - - -
From Glenn C., the moderator: in trying to evaluate why Dr. Silkworth might

have


made this comment about Fitz Mayo, it would be well to run through some

background.


Dr. Silkworth's entire statement on the matter is found in the Big Book 4th

ed.,


on pp. xxxi-xxxii:
<case brought in by a physician prominent in New York.

The patient had made his own diagnosis and deciding his

situation hopeless, had hidden in a deserted barn deter-

mined to die. He was rescued by a searching party, and,

in desperate condition, brought to me. Following his

physical rehabilitation, he had a talk with me in which he

frankly stated he thought the treatment a waste of effort,

unless I could assure him, which no one ever had, that in

the future he would have the "will power" to resist the

impulse to drink.
His alcoholic problem was so complex and his depres-

sion so great, that we felt his only hope would be through

what we then called "moral psychology", and we doubted

if even that would have any effect.


However, he did become "sold" on the ideas contained

in this book. He has not had a drink for a great

many years [Fitz got sober in October 1935]. I see

him now and then and he is as fine a specimen of

manhood as one could wish to meet.>>
- - - -
The man in this story who had hidden in a barn was Fitz Mayo. His story in

the


BB is "Our Southern Friend."
- - - -
From silkworth.net:
"Our Southern Friend"
John H. F. (Fitz) M., Cumberstone, Maryland
(p. 226 in 1st edition, p. 460 in 2nd edition, p. 497 in 3rd edition, and p.

208


in 4th edition. In the first three editions it appeared under the section

"They


Nearly Lost All.")
They Lost Nearly All
"Pioneer A.A., minister's son, and southern farmer, he asked, 'Who am I to

say


there is no God?'"
Fitz' date of sobriety was October 1935. He was Bill's second or third

success


at 12th stepping after he returned from Akron in 1935. The first was Hank P.

("The Unbeliever" in the 1st edition), and the second probably William R.,

"A

Business Man's Recovery" in the 1st edition.)


Fitz has been described as a blue blood from Maryland. Alcoholism may have

run


in his mother's side of the family. Fitz was, reportedly, quite handsome,

with


chiseled features. He had the quiet, easy charm of the landed gentry.

Indeed, he

was quite the Southern gentleman. Lois W. said Fitz was an impractical,

lovable


dreamer. His intellectual, scholarly qualities gave him common ground with

Bill


who - like Fitz - was also a dreamer.
He was the son of an Episcopalian minister. Alcoholism may have run in his

mother's side of the family. They never drank at home, but when Fitz took

his

first drink when at college, he discovered that it removed his fear and



sense of

inferiority.


He attempted to enlist during World War I, but could not pass the physical.

This


added to his sense of inferiority.
He had a good job with a large corporation until the Great Depression. Later

he

worked at various jobs: traveling salesman, teacher and farmer. But he



couldn't

stop drinking. He was drunk when his mother-in-law died, when his own mother

died, when his child was born.
His wife had heard of Towns Hospital in New York and urged him to go there.

Finally he agreed.


Another patient told him about a group of men who were worse than he was but

who


didn't drink any more. This patient had tried the program but had slipped.

He

knew it was because he hadn't been honest. He asked Fitz if he believed in



God.

Fitz did not. Later, in his bed, the thought came: "Can all the worth while

people I have known be wrong about God?" He took a look at his own history

and


suddenly a thought like a Voice came: "Who are you to say there is no God?"
Bill & Lois W. and Fitz M. and his wife became devoted friends, and visited

one


another often. Fitz frequently came up for the Tuesday night meeting at the

Wilson home in Brooklyn. It was while Bill and Lois were visiting Fitz in

Maryland in the summer of 1936 that Bill C., committed suicide. (See page 16

of

the Big Book.) And Fitz, as well as Hank P. often joined Bill and Lois at



Oxford

Group house parties before A.A. broke away from the Oxford Group.


During the writing of the Big Book, Fitz insisted that the book should

express


Christian doctrines and use Biblical terms and expressions. Hank and Jim B.

opposed him. The compromise was "God as we understood Him."


When the group was trying to decide on a name for the book, Fitz, because of

his


close proximity to Washington, was asked to go to the Library of Congress

and


find out how many books were called "The Way Out." His sister, Agnes, came

to

the their assistance when the printer refused to release the book he was



holding

- the first printing of Alcoholics Anonymous. Agnes loaned A.A. $1,000, the

equivalent of nearly $12,000 today.
Fitz later started A.A. in Washington. Florence R. ("A Feminine Victory" in

the


1st edition) joined him in Washington. It was Fitz who was called on to

identify


her body when she died. He sent one of his early sponsees (who never

recovered)

to see his old friend Jim B. in Washington ("The Vicious Cycle") when Jim

was


just coming off a binge.
In World War II, Fitz at last was able to join the Army, where he was found

to

be suffering from cancer. He died October 4, 1943, eight years after he



stopped

drinking. Fitz is buried on the grounds of Christ Episcopal Church at

Owensville, MD, where his father had once been pastor. He is buried just a

few


feet from Jim B.
- - - -
ANY IDEAS AS TO WHY DR. SILKWORTH WOULD HAVE REGARDED
FITZ' PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS AS "SO COMPLEX"?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6516. . . . . . . . . . . . The AA version of moral psychology

From: martinholmes76@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/10/2010 4:18:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
What was their version of moral psychology mentioned in the Big Book in the

Doctor's opinion?


- - - -
From Glenn C., the moderator
(BB 4th ed. p. xxvii) Dr. Silkworth had been unable to

devise a method of "moral psychology" which would help

alcoholics, until Bill Wilson came to him as a patient, and

devised a program of recovery which Dr. Silkworth

allowed him to try out on other patients, a program

involving a kind of "moral psychology" which repeatedly

brought long term sobriety to apparently hopeless cases:
<

of moral psychology was of urgent importance to alcoholics,

but its application presented difficulties beyond our concep-

tion. What with our ultra-modern standards, our scientific

approach to everything, we are perhaps not well equipped

to apply the powers of good that lie outside our synthetic

knowledge.
Many years ago one of the leading contributors to this

book [Bill W.] came under our care in this hospital and

while here he acquired some ideas which he put into practical

application at once.>>


(BB 4th ed., pp. xxxi-xxxii) The "moral psychology"

developed in Bill Wilson's program of recovery was

even able to get Fitz Mayo sober in October 1935, even

though Dr. Silkworth and the other staff did not believe it

could work on someone with all of Fitz's complex problems:
<


Yüklə 25,47 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   ...   173




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə