741
Adam Smith
Fourthly, such taxes, by subjecting at least the dealers in the
taxed commodities, to the frequent visits and odious examination
of the tax-gatherers, expose them sometimes, no doubt, to some
degree of oppression, and always to much trouble and vexation;
and though vexation, as has already been said, is not strictly speak-
ing expense, it is certainly equivalent to the expense at which ev-
ery man would be willing to redeem himself from it. The laws of
excise, though more effectual for the purpose for which they were
instituted, are, in this respect, more vexatious than those of the
customs. When a merchant has imported goods subject to certain
duties of customs; when he has paid those duties, and lodged the
goods in his warehouse; he is not, in most cases, liable to any
further trouble or vexation from the custom-house officer. It is
otherwise with goods subject to duties of excise. The dealers have
no respite from the continual visits and examination of the excise
officers. The duties of excise are, upon this account, more un-
popular than those of the customs; and so are the officers who
levy them. Those officers, it is pretended, though in general, per-
haps, they do their duty fully as well as those of the customs; yet,
as that duty obliges them to be frequently very troublesome to
some of their neighbours, commonly contract a certain hardness
of character, which the others frequently have not. This observa-
tion, however, may very probably be the mere suggestion of fraudu-
lent dealers, whose smuggling is either prevented or detected by
their diligence.
The inconveniencies, however, which are, perhaps, in some de-
gree inseparable from taxes upon consumable communities, fall
as light upon the people of Great Britain as upon those of any
other country of which the government is nearly as expensive.
Our state is not perfect, and might be mended; but it is as good,
or better, than that of most of our neighbours.
In consequence of the notion, that duties upon consumable
goods were taxes upon the profits of merchants, those duties have,
in some countries, been repeated upon every successive sale of the
goods. If the profits of the merchant-importer or merchant-manu-
facturer were taxed, equality seemed to require that those of all the
middle buyers, who intervened between either of them and the
consumer, should likewise be taxed. The famous alcavala of Spain
seems to have been established upon this principle. It was at first a
tax of ten per cent. afterwards of fourteen per cent. and it is at
present only six per cent. upon the sale of every sort of property
whether moveable or immoveable; and it is repeated every time
the property is sold. {Memoires concernant les Droits, etc. tom. i,
p. 15} The levying of this tax requires a multitude of revenue of-
ficers, sufficient to guard the transportation of goods, not only
from one province to another, but from one shop to another. It
742
The Wealth of Nations
subjects, not only the dealers in some sorts of goods, but those in
all sorts, every farmer, every manufacturer, every merchant and
shopkeeper, to the continual visit and examination of the tax-gath-
erers. Through the greater part of the country in which a tax of
this kind is established, nothing can be produced for distant sale.
The produce of every part of the country must be proportioned to
the consumption of the neighbourhood. It is to the alcavala, ac-
cordingly, that Ustaritz imputes the ruin of the manufactures of
Spain. He might have imputed to it, likewise, the declension of
agriculture, it being imposed not only upon manufactures, but
upon the rude produce of the land.
In the kingdom of Naples, there is a similar tax of three per
cent. upon the value of all contracts, and consequently upon that
of all contracts of sale. It is both lighter than the Spanish tax, and
the greater part of towns and parishes are allowed to pay a compo-
sition in lieu of it. They levy this composition in what manner
they please, generally in a way that gives no interruption to the
interior commerce of the place. The Neapolitan tax, therefore, is
not near so ruinous as the Spanish one.
The uniform system of taxation, which, with a few exception of
no great consequence, takes place in all the different parts of the
united kingdom of Great Britain, leaves the interior commerce of
the country, the inland and coasting trade, almost entirely free.
The inland trade is almost perfectly free; and the greater part of
goods may be carried from one end of the kingdom to the other,
without requiring any permit or let-pass, without being subject to
question, visit or examination, from the revenue officers. There
are a few exceptions, but they are such as can give no interruption
to any important branch of inland commerce of the country. Goods
carried coastwise, indeed, require certificates or coast-cockets. If
you except coals, however, the rest are almost all duty-free. This
freedom of interior commerce, the effect of the uniformity of the
system of taxation, is perhaps one of the principal causes of the
prosperity of Great Britain; every great country being necessarily
the best and most extensive market for the greater part of the pro-
ductions of its own industry. If the same freedom in consequence
of the same uniformity, could be extended to Ireland and the plan-
tations, both the grandeur of the state, and the prosperity of every
part of the empire, would probably be still greater than at present.
In France, the different revenue laws which take place in the
different provinces, require a multitude of revenue officers to sur-
round, not only the frontiers of the kingdom, but those of almost
each particular province, in order either to prevent the importa-
tion of certain goods, or to subject it to the payment of certain
duties, to the no small interruption of the interior commerce of
the country. Some provinces are allowed to compound for the