Angol itk origó írásbeli minta-vizsgafeladatok megoldási javaslattal
Yüklə 150,14 Kb.
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- Vagy: II.
- III. Irányított fogalmazás I.
- IV. Fordítás idegen nyelvről magyarra Fordítsa magyarra! Maximális pontszám: 20 pont CAMERAS WILL TAPE CAR CRASHES
- IV. Fordítás idegen nyelvről magyarra A kamerák felveszik az ütközéseket
- V. Szövegértést ellenőrző feladat
- So who wants to marry a perk
III. Irányított fogalmazás. Maximális pontszám: 20 pont. Kérjük, hogy a feladat megoldása során - a titkosítás érdekében - ne használja saját adatait. I. Írjon fogalmazást angolul 22-25 sor terjedelemben, amelyben kitér az alábbi kérdésekre! Ön dönti el, hogy melyik kérdéseket fejti ki részletesebben, és melyekre ad rövidebb választ. Fontos, hogy a fogalmazás egységes szöveget alkosson, ezért kérjük, hogy az egyes gondolatkörök közötti átmenetet biztosítsa. Ügyeljen arra, hogy ne lépje túl az előírt terjedelmet!
Vagy: II. Írjon fogalmazást angolul 22-25 sor terjedelemben, amelyben kitér az alábbi kérdésekre! Ön dönti el, hogy melyik kérdéseket fejti ki részletesebben, és melyekre ad rövidebb választ. Fontos, hogy a fogalmazás egységes szöveget alkosson, ezért kérjük, hogy az egyes gondolatkörök közötti átmenetet biztosítsa. Ügyeljen arra, hogy ne lépje túl az előírt terjedelmet!
Megoldás III. Irányított fogalmazás I. Most of us say that honesty is the best policy, but how many of us live by this maxim? Others say that honesty is an outmoded policy, and that nice guys finish last. Of course, neither of these sayings provides us with the complete truth. Society would crumble without a certain level of honesty in every human relation, whether it be financial transaction, family relationships, friendship, or relations with our co-workers. On the other hand, it is not always possible, or even advisable, to tell the whole truth. Personally, I like honest people, and I am honest in all my relationships whenever possible. However, there are some things that are just not anybody else's business, and I don't hesitate to conceal information about those from nosey people. Nor do I think it is wrong to tell a white lie to protect somebody's feelings. Unfortunately, it is easier and easier to encounter lying and cheating for profit these days. If you have some repairs made on your house, then you will immediately see what I mean. It's hard to avoid a rip-off. And it is so in most spheres of activity, including politics, unfortunately. Luckily, none of my family or friends has ever double-crossed me, and I'd feel awful if they did. If I see that someone has been insincere, I always point it out to them in no uncertain terms. Of course, it would be trying to live in a world of totally honest people. We would have to get used to people telling us when we looked awful, or when we were idiots. And perhaps our spouses telling us that they don't love us anymore. But there would be no locks on doors, and there would be no money; a promise would be enough.
Equality of the sexes is an important issue in today's society, a society in which the constitution enshrines equal rights for all, but in which, sadly, we cannot often attain this lofty goal. Certainly, great strides have been made in the area of women's rights. Women have the right to vote, and, at least in theory, to hold any job. More and more women are becoming well educated. In fact, women do better in school. There are plenty of women doctors, and a growing number of women lawyers, for example. Yet many women face tremendous discrimination at work, starting with the interview. It is always the same: a human resources manager is leery of hiring a woman for a career slot, out of fear that she will leave in a short time to have babies. Once the children arrive, it is more of the same: what will happen if her children are ill, and she has so be on sick leave all the time? Perhaps this is one of the reasons that all of the top positions seem to be reserved for men. At home, the situation is even worse: the traditional roles of men and women remain unchanged. After a long day at the office, the wife is still expected to have dinner ready and on the table when the husband arrives with a hale and hearty "Honey, I'm home!" The number of hours worked daily by men pales in comparison with that of women if housework is also included. And yet she must still fit the mythic ideal of the modern woman: slim, trim, beautiful, fresh and mild. I personally don't see why a woman can't take on any job she proves worthy of. There are effective women pilots, soldiers, and presidents. Conversely, there is no reason a man cannot take on his fair share of the work at home; his wife has worked just as hard or harder at the office. Filling the role of the ideal male is no piece of cake, either of course: successful, ambitious, quick-minded and wealthy. This is a bit easier to achieve, of course, if there is a subservient woman helping in the background.
Smart video cameras that are automatically triggered to save footage of crashes onto computers are to go on trial in a bid to put the brakes on reckless drivers. Video footage of collisions will be automatically recorded to provide evidence about their cause, which could then be used to prosecute motorists. The new cameras work by continuously recording an accident-prone area. Footage is not recorded on tape, but rather stored digitally on a computer that can be either integrated within the camera box or located at a traffic-surveillance centre. The computer stores footage in a loop, re-recording over past scenes until the camera senses a collision. Then, the past five minutes of digitised footage are stored in a separate file that is not recorded over again so it can be used by the police to determine the cause of the accident. The system knows when an accident has happened because it will be linked to computers that monitor traffic flows through sensors buried in the road and adjust the sequence of traffic lights accordingly. Sophisticated software will enable the traffic-light computer to know when there has been an accident, by detecting any dramatic change in the flow of vehicles, and trigger the computer to save the preceding five minutes of footage. The system, due to be tested in London initially, is far more advanced than the police cameras at crossroads which catch drivers jumping red lights. A similar scheme has already been successfully tried in Japan. It uses a crash-sensitive microphone to "listen" for collisions at junctions in Tokyo. Originally designed to allow golfers to study their swing frame-by-frame on video by using the sound of the club striking the ball as a trigger, it stores a before-and-after sequence whenever the sound of crunching metal is detected. The Sunday Times Megoldás IV. Fordítás idegen nyelvről magyarra A kamerák felveszik az ütközéseket Annak megkísérlésére, hogy a gyorshajtókat lefékezzék olyan okos videokamerák kerülnek kipróbálásra, amelyek automatikusan bekapcsolják a computert, hogy tárolják a balesetek lefolyását. Az ütközések videofelvétele automatikusan készül, hogy bizonyítékul szolgálhasson az autósok bírósági tárgyalásán. A kamerák folyamatos felvételre vannak állítva a balesetveszélyes helyeken. A felvétel nem szalagra kerül, hanem egy computer digitálisan tárolja, amely a kamera dobozába, vagy a közlekedés felügyeleti központban helyezhető el. A computer végtelenített szalagon tárolja az információt, folyamatosan felvéve az eseményeket és a korábbiakat törölve, egészen addig, amíg a kamera egy ütközést nem észlel. Ekkor az elmúlt 5 perc digitalizált anyaga egy másik "file"-ba kerül át, amely immár nem törlődik le, és így felhasználható a rendőrségen a baleset okának megállapítására. A rendszer a baleset megtörténését felismeri, mert egy olyan computerhez lesz kapcsolva, amely az úttestbe épített érzékelők alapján figyeli a forgalom folyamatát és ennek megfelelően állítja be a közlekedési lámpákat. Egy bonyolult software arra teszi képessé a lámpairányító computert, hogy felismerje mikor történik baleset, mert érzékeli a járművek folyamatának hirtelen megváltozását és utasítja a computert, hogy mentse el az előző 5 perc anyagát. Az először Londonban kipróbálásra kerülő rendszer jóval fejlettebb, mint a kereszteződésekben a rendőrség által elhelyezett kamerák, amelyek a piros lámpán áthajtókat hivatottak elcsípni. Egy hasonló programot már sikeresen kipróbáltak Japánban. Az ütődés hangjára érzékeny mikrofont használ fel, hogy a tokiói kereszteződésekben történő összeütközéseket "meghallja". Eredetileg arra tervezték, hogy a golfozók tanulmányozhassák az ütésüket videón képről képre. A labdák elütésének hangjával indul be a felvétel és tárolja az ütés előtti és utáni képsort, akárhányszor a fémes ütődés hangját érzékeli.
If marriage is so wonderful, why is the prime suspect in any murder case always the spouse? The entire legal machine, from the highest judge to the lowliest plod, knows that a spouse never needs a motive. The bare fact that they were married to the victim is motive enough. Nobody has better reasons for killing you than the person who loves you most. This rule applies equally to couples who live together, without the benefit of bell, book and candle. Similarly, people who live "in sin" will assure you a split is just as painful without a piece of paper or the legal palaver of a divorce. Living in sin is now so unremarkable that the Right Rev Gavin Reid, Bishop of Maidstone, did not turn a hair when one of his adult children elected to live with a partner. This, however, has not stopped the Church of England's rearguard action against the declining power of a proper, old-fashioned marriage. Last week, Dr John Habgood, Archbishop of York, celebrated St Valentine's Day by asking the government to provide tax incentives to prod couples towards the altar. Recent legislation, he claimed, tended to treat cohabiting couples as if they were married. "And society seems to be saying, through the tax system, that it doesn't matter." Habgood means well, but he ended up implying that the state of marriage is so dreadful, nobody in their right minds would do it unless you paid them. Denise Knowles, of Relate, complained: "This pulls the rug from under the feet of love. The responsibility for making a relationship last lies with the couple, not with the government. Marrying for tax incentives would be like marrying for money." Our church leaders do have a way of putting their feet in their mouths, and Habgood caused more annoyance than pleasure - particularly among cohabiting couples, who were deeply nettled by the hint that they decided not to get married because they did a few sums on the back of an envelope and worked out that there was no financial point. This old horse bolted ages ago, and waving a fiscal carrot is unlikely to tempt it back into the stable. Over the years, the government has been chipping away at the differences between the married and the single. Since 1979, the real value of tax relief for married couples has been nearly halved; and couples who shacked up together after 1988 can no longer claim two helpings of mortgage tax relief. There is, however, a great deal more to it than money. In the bad old days, children born outside wedlock were stigmatised, and deserted paramours had little legal redress. The powers that be deserve nothing but praise for equalising the rights of the unmarried and their families. The numbers are so huge, there was really no choice. This summer, the Church of England is expected to publish a report which, though not finalised, is unlikely to condemn cohabitation - and that will amount to the church condoning "living in sin". When the report comes before the General Synod in November, traditionalists will make the usual fuss about the sanctity of Christian marriage, but any such resolution will probably be defeated - another victory for the trendy liberals. Is it kind, or even Christian, to try to discourage divorce? Before the laws were liberalised, millions of people were shackled to partners who made them miserable. Being divorced in spirit is still a divorce, and creating any obstacle, legal or financial, is sheer cruelty. If Habgood really wants to lower the divorce rate, he should make couples live together for at least a year before allowing them near the altar. There is another solution that would encourage the stability of marriage and provide useful extra revenue for the government. The archbishop made his remarks last week in response to a survey carried out by BBC Wales, which revealed that one in eight men and one in 16 women admitted to being unfaithful to their partners. An infidelity tax, applied equally to married and cohabiting couples, would make the profits from North Sea oil look like chicken feed. And the church could take comfort from the fact that though we may not get married for financial gain, we are less likely to misbehave if it means financial loss.
Megoldás V. Szövegértést ellenőrző feladat 1. Egy házasságban miért mindig az egyik felelt gyanúsítják azzal, hogy megölte a párját?
2. Milyen lépést tett az Anglikán egyház a házasság népszerűsítése érdekében és ezt mivel indokolja?
3. Hogyan reagáltak az élettársi kapcsolatban élő párok az egyház javaslatára?
4. Mi szól az élettársi kapcsolatban élők mellett?
5. Mi tehetné tartósabbá a házasságokat, és miért?
Yüklə 150,14 Kb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|