partially inhibited; thus, there may be inhibitor assay issues, or other
restrictions, on the inhibitors which can be applied downhole or topside.
2.5.1 Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatments
Scale inhibitor “squeeze” treatments provide one of the most common and
efficient methods for preventing the formation of sulphate and carbonate
scales in producer wells. The chosen product(s) must perform the following
tasks:
i.
Prevent or delay sulphate scale formation which will occur when
injected sea water (containing sulphate ions) mixes with formation
water (containing barium, calcium and strontium) in the near-wellbore
region over the production life of a particular field.
TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
23
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
Appropriate scale inhibitors must perform this task at very low
concentrations – sometimes referred to at the Threshold Concentration
(Ct), or the Minimum Inhibitor Concentration (MIC).
ii.
Prevent or delay carbonate scale formation which will occur at various
stages including the production tubulars, topside equipment and in the
near-wellbore formation area – as discussed, this is as a result of
pressure reduction during production. Appropriate scale inhibitors must
perform this task at very low concentrations (Ct or MIC).
iii.
Interact with reservoir substrates in order to give long inhibitor return
profiles at or above the Ct (or MIC) level.
Thus, it is not sufficient that a particular species inhibits scale
effectively, but it must also interact appropriately within the formation
so as to provide long squeeze lifetimes.
iv.
In addition to these properties, the selected squeeze treatment
chemical should be relatively stable to thermal degradation, under
downhole conditions, and compatible
with the particular brine system.
Brine compatibility is a major issue of concern, since premature
precipitation of inhibitor complexes during injection may lead to the
formation of a pseudo-scale with associated fines plugging.
Furthermore, when other treatment chemicals are applied with the
scale inhibitor, or remain in the near-wellbore area following
application, then compatibility of the applied scale inhibitor (with these
other treatment chemicals) must be addressed.
Two types of inhibitor squeeze treatment are routinely carried out where the
intention is either: one, to adsorb the inhibitor by a physico-chemical process;
or two, to extend the squeeze lifetime by precipitation (or phase separation).
This latter scenario is commonly carried out by adjusting the chemistry (
+
2
Ca
ion concentration, pH, temperature) of the polymeric and the phosphonate
inhibitor solutions.
TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
24
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
A schematic of a field squeeze treatment is shown in Figure 7 below:
Figure 7: Typical Scale Inhibitor Squeeze Treatment
E N
The procedure for applying a squeeze treatment normally involves the
following six stages:
1. A “spearhead” package (a demulsifier and/or a surfactant) is injected
which is thought to increase the water wetness of the formation and/or
improve injectivity.
2. A dilute inhibitor preflush is often applied to push the spearhead into
the formation and, in some cases to cool the near wellbore region.
3. The main scale inhibitor treatment is injected which contains the
inhibitor chemical, normally in the concentration range 2.5% to 20%.
4. A brine overflush is applied which is designed to push the main
treatment to the desired depth in the formation away from the wellbore.
5. A shut-in or soak period (usually about 6 - 24 hours) is allowed which is
the time needed for the inhibitor to adsorb (phosphonate/polymers) or
precipitate (polymers) onto the rock substrate.
6. Finally, the well is brought back into production.
Several chemical and physical processes, in these steps of a scale inhibitor
squeeze treatment, may affect the inhibitor adsorption and phase separation
characteristics. In addition, these same factors may be responsible for various
types of damage in the reservoir formation.
Adsorption of scale inhibitors is thought to occur through electrostatic and van
der Waals interactions between the inhibitor and formation minerals.
TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
25
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
This interaction may be described by an adsorption isotherm
(C)
Γ
, which is a
function of pH, temperature, mineral substrate and involves cations such as
+
2
Ca
(Vetter, 1973; King, 1989; Pardue, 1991; Meyers, 1985; Przybylinski,
1989; Yuan, 1993; Kan, 1991; Kan, 1992; Sorbie, 1993a; Sorbie, 1993b;
Breen, 1991; Graham, 1994).
The precise form of
(C)
Γ
determines the squeeze lifetime, as has been
described in detail in a number of previous papers (Sorbie, 1991a; Sorbie
1991b; Sorbie, 1992; Hong, 1987; Yuan, 1992).
The “precipitation squeeze” process is based on the formation of an
inhibitor/calcium salt, usually of phosphino-polycarboxylic acid (PPCA) or
polyacrylic acid (PAA) scale inhibitor, within the formation. The process almost
certainly goes through an adsorption stage then a phase separation which is
controlled either by temperature and/or pH (Carlberg, 1983; Carlberg, 1987;
Olsen, 1992; Wat, 1993).
The level of inhibitor in the return curve is then thought to be governed by the
solubility of the inhibitor/calcium complex and the rate of release of inhibitor
into the produced water.
In high salinity brines, in particular those containing high levels of calcium
cations, fears of reservoir engineers (with respect to premature precipitation of
the injected phosphonate or polyacrylate-based inhibitor) have often led to
their de-selection on compatibility grounds. However, in many cases, such
incompatibility aspects may be overcome with appropriate application
strategies using combinations of pre-flushes and chelating agents.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |