Definition of Object-Oriented frbr



Yüklə 1,5 Mb.
səhifə23/33
tarix04.08.2018
ölçüsü1,5 Mb.
#60823
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   33

3.4. FRSAD to FRBROO Mappings


FRSAD section number

Unit of Information

Condition

Mapping

Comment

[3.2]

Work




F1 Work




5.1

Work: has subject




F1 Work P129 is about E1 CRM Entity



















3.4

Thema




E1 CRM Entity

Appears as the reference to any entity without specifying a specific way in which the entity appears in the work. MD: relational expression to anything => class = E1

4.1.1

Thema: Type of thema




E1 CRM Entity. P2 has type E55 Type




4.1.2

Thema: Scope note




E1 CRM Entity. P3 has note E62 String




5.1

Thema: is subject of




E1 CRM Entity P1029i is subject of F1 Work




5.2

Thema: has appellation




E1 CRM Entity P1 is identified by F12 Nomen




5.3.1.1

Thema: Generic relationship




IsA

OR

E55 Type P127 has broader term (has narrower term) E55 Type






5.3.1.2

Thema: Whole-part relationship




a) for E55 Type:

SKOS broader partitive


b) a series of CRM properties relating to inclusion to be listed




5.3.1.3

Thema: Instance relationship




E55 Type P2i is type of E1 CRM Entity




5.3.1.4

Thema: Polyhierarchical relationship







This is a statement about the cardinality of the relationships enumerated in section 5.3 of FRSAD, rather than a distinct relationship in its own right

5.3.1.5

Thema: Other hierarchical relationship










5.3.2

Thema: Associative relationships




Any other “related to” relationship.

No model necessary
















3.5

Nomen

F12 Nomen







4.2.1

Nomen: Type of nomen




F12 Nomen P2 has type E55 Type




4.2.2

Nomen: Scheme




F35 Nomen Use Statement R35 is specified by F34 KOS

FRSAD:Scheme = KOS, FRAD “authority file” ⊃ E32 Authority Document.

The scheme in which the nomen is established, including value encoding schemes (subject heading lists, thesauri, classification systems, name authority lists, etc.) and syntax encoding schemes (standards for encoding dates, etc.).



4.2.3

Nomen: Reference source of nomen

Warning! Only if Nomen is uniquely defined by one symbolic form

F35 Nomen Use Statement R32 is warranted by F52 Name Use Activity




4.2.4

Nomen: Representation




F12 Nomen. P2 has type E55 Type




4.2.5

Nomen: Language




F35 Nomen Use Statement (instantiated as E33 Linguistic Object) R54 has nomen language E56 Language




4.2.6

Nomen: Script

The script type in the sense of ISO15924

F12 Nomen P2 has type E55 Type




4.2.7

Nomen: Script conversion




F35 Nomen Use Statement R36 uses script conversion F36 Script Conversion




4.2.8

Nomen: Form




F35 Nomen Use Statement R55 has nomen form E55 Type



4.2.9


Nomen: Time of validity of nomen




F35 Nomen Use Statement R35 is specified by F34 KOS R34 has validity period E52 Time-Span

Only validity status of participation in KOS release

4.2.10

Nomen: Audience




F35 Nomen Use Statement R39 is intended for E74 Group

Audience is not usage status

4.2.11

Nomen: Status




F35 Nomen Use Statement R35 is specified by {R35.1 has status E55 Type} F34 KOS




5.2

Nomen: is appellation of




F12 Nomen P1i identifies E1 CRM Entity




5.4.1

Nomen: Equivalence relationship




F35 Nomen Use Statement R56 has related use {R56.1 has type E55 Type = “equivalence”} F35 Nomen Use Statement




5.4.2

Nomen: Whole-part relationship




F35 Nomen Use Statement P106 is composed of E90 Symbolic Object







Yüklə 1,5 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   33




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə