2447 Journal of Positive School Psychology
framework of words and are increasingly being
replaced by analytical correlates more and most. In
the Kyrgyz language, in addition to the affix - raak,
there are case affixes (affixes of the original case -
dan and dative case - ga), forming the name - the
object of comparison and derivational affixes.
With regard to the grammatical categories they are
expressing, adjectives in the languages under
consideration
differs
significantly.
Russian
adjectives have an ability to agree with the noun
they
define in gender, number and case, while
English and Kyrgyz adjectives are similar neither
in gender, nor in number.
Reference:
[1].
Alkhazov, L.D., & Kroitesku L.I. (1989). In a
kingdom where they speak English. Chisinau:
Shtiintsa, 224.
[2].
Aitmatov, Ch.T. (1982). Collection of works.
Part 1. Frunze: Kyrgyzstan, 448.
[3].
Babenko, L.G. (2004). Philological analysis of
the text. Basic theories, principles and aspects
of analysis. Textbook for universities.
Moscow: Academic Project; Yekaterinburg:
Business book, 464.
[4].
Belyaevskaya, E.G. (1987).
Semantics of the
word. Textbook for learners of English
language. Moscow: High school, 126.
[5].
Bloch, M.Ya. (2004). Theoretical basics of
grammar. 4
th
Edition, Moscow: High school,
239.
[6].
Dzholdoshbekov, A. (1970). German preposi-
tions and their functional
correspondences in
the Kyrgyz language. Frunze: Mektep, 92.
[7].
Dzhamasheva G.Z. (1989). Typological
category of comparativeness (in mat. English
and Kyrgyz): Thesis abstract. Philological
sciences, Tashkent, 18.
[8].
Klimova, Yu. A. (2008). Russian adjectives:
an
attributive
picture
of
the
world.
Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical
University. A. I. Herzen, (69), 122-127.
[9].
Malykh, L.M., & Kzar, Y.H. (2016). Degrees
of comparison of adjectives in the English,
Arabic and Russian languages. Multi-
lingualism in the educational space, (8), 79-87.
[10].
Maugham, W.S. (2009).
Collected Short
Stories. Vol, 4, Random House, 576.
[11].
Melnik, A.D. (2015). The problem of state
category
words in modern
linguistics
literature. Modern Problems of Science and
Education,
2-2,
URL:
https://science-
education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23004
[12].
Rezvin, I.I. (1962).
Some difficulties in
building
semantic
models
for
natural
languages. "Symposium on structural study of
sign systems." Moscow.
[13].
Ryashchina,
M.E.
(2016).
Unfigurative
comparative constructions in modern English.
Eurasian Union of Scientists, 2-2 (23), 142-
145.
[14].
Saiidyrakhimova, D., Ismailova, B., Usarova,
G., Kashkarieva, M., Abdimitalip kyzy, N.,
Ismailova,S., Rakhimbaeva, G., Zhumabaeva,
A., Zhumashova, R., Mirzakhidova, M.,
Kyrgyzbaeva, R.,
Abdullaeva, Z. (2022).
Speech Parts and Adverbial Lexemes
Interpretation in Turkic Linguistics. Journal
of Positive School Psychology, 6, 9, 3593-
3601.
[15].
Saidova, Y.M. (2013). Degrees of comparison
of adjectives in English and Rutul languages.
News of the Dagestan State Pedagogical
University.
Social and Human Sciences, 3
(24), 96-98.
[16].
Schwarzschild, R. (2008). The Semantics of
Comparatives
and Other Degree
Constructions
.
Language and Linguistics Compass,2, 308-
331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-
818X.2007.00049.x
[17].
Smirnitsky, A.I. (1959). Morphology of the
English language.
[18].
Toksonalieva, R.M. (2015).
Degrees of
comparison of adjectives in Russian and
Kyrgyz languages. Innovative Science, 11-1,
262-264.
[19].
Tolstoy, A.N. (1945). Peter the Great. Novel.
[20].
Zhigadlo, V.N., Ivanova, I.P., & Iofik, L.L.
(1956).
Modern
English:
Theoretical
Grammar Course: Textbook for special.
Language higher educational institutions.
Moscow, 349.