10 □ INTRODUCTION: RHIZOME
and individuals contain microfascisms just waiting to crystallize. Yes,
couchgrass is also a rhizome. Good and bad
are only the products of an
active and temporary selection, which must be renewed.
How could movements of deterritorialization and processes of
reterri-torialization not be relative, always connected, caught up in one
another? The orchid deterritorializes by forming an image, a tracing of a
wasp; but the wasp reterritorializes on that image. The wasp is
nevertheless deterritorialized, becoming a piece in the orchid's
reproductive apparatus. But it reterritorializes the orchid by transporting
its pollen. Wasp and orchid, as heterogeneous elements, form a rhizome.
It could be said that the orchid imitates the wasp, reproducing its image in
a signifying fashion (mimesis, mimicry, lure, etc.). But this is true only on
the level of the strata—a parallelism between two strata such that a plant
organization on one imitates an animal organization on the other. At the
same time, something else entirely is going on: not imitation at all but a
capture of code, surplus value of code, an increase in valence, a veritable
becoming, a becoming-wasp of the orchid and a becoming-orchid of the
wasp. Each of these becomings brings about the deterritorialization of
one term and the reterritorialization of the other; the two becomings
interlink and form relays in a circulation of intensities pushing the
deterritorialization ever further. There is neither imitation nor
resemblance, only an exploding of two heterogeneous series on the line of
flight composed by a common rhizome that can no longer be attributed to
or subjugated by anything signifying. Rimy Chauvin expresses it well: "the
aparallel evolution of two beings that have absolutely nothing to do with
each other."
4
More generally, evolutionary schemas may be forced to
abandon the old model of the tree and descent. Under certain conditions,
a virus can connect to germ cells and transmit itself as the cellular gene
of a complex species; moreover, it can take flight, move into the cells of an
entirely different species, but not without bringing with it "genetic
information" from the first host (for example, Benveniste and Todaro's
current research on a type C virus, with its double connection to baboon
DNA and the DNA of certain kinds of domestic cats). Evolutionary
schemas would no longer follow models of arborescent descent going from
the least to the most differentiated, but instead a rhizome operating
immediately in the heterogeneous and jumping from one already
differentiated line to another.
5
Once again, there is aparallel evolution, of
the baboon and the cat; it is obvious that they are not models or copies of
each other (a becoming-baboon in the cat does not mean that the cat
"plays" baboon). We form a rhizome with our viruses, or rather our viruses
cause us to form a rhizome with other animals. As Francois Jacob says,
transfers of genetic material by viruses or through other procedures,
fusions of cells originating in different species, have results analogous to
I
NTRODUCTION: RHIZOME □ 11
those of "the abominable couplings dear to antiquity and the Middle
Ages."
6
Transversal communications between different lines scramble the
genealogical trees. Always look for the molecular, or even submolecular,
particle with which we are allied. We evolve and die more from our
polymorphous and rhizomatic flus than from hereditary diseases, or
diseases that have their own line of descent. The rhizome is an
anti-genealogy.
The same applies to the book and the world: contrary to a deeply rooted
belief, the book is not an image of the world.
It forms a rhizome with the
world, there is an aparallel evolution of the book and the world; the book
assures the deterritorialization of the world, but the world effects a
reterri-torialization of the book, which in turn deterritorializes itself in the
world (if it is capable, if it can). Mimicry is a very bad concept, since it
relies on binary logic to describe phenomena of an entirely different
nature. The crocodile does not reproduce a tree trunk, any more than the
chameleon reproduces the colors of its surroundings. The Pink Panther
imitates nothing, it reproduces nothing, it paints the world its color, pink on
pink; this is its becoming-world, carried out in such a way that it becomes
imperceptible itself, asignifying, makes its rupture, its own line of flight,
follows its "aparallel evolution" through to the end. The wisdom of the
plants: even when they have roots, there is always an outside where they
form a rhizome with something else—with the wind, an animal, human
beings (and there is also an aspect under which animals themselves form
rhizomes, as do people, etc.). "Drunkenness as a triumphant irruption of
the plant in us." Always follow the rhizome by rupture; lengthen, prolong,
and relay the line of flight; make it vary, until you have produced the most
abstract and tortuous of lines of n dimensions and broken directions.
Conjugate deterritorialized flows. Follow the plants: you start by delimiting
a first line consisting of circles of convergence around successive
singularities; then you see whether inside that line new circles of
convergence establish themselves, with new points located outside the
limits and in other directions. Write, form a rhizome, increase your
territory by deterritorialization, extend the line of flight to the point where
it becomes an abstract machine covering the entire plane of consistency.
"Go first to your old plant and watch carefully the watercourse made by
the rain. By now the rain must have carried the seeds far away. Watch the
crevices made by the runoff, and from them determine the direction of the
flow. Then find the plant that is growing at the farthest point from your
plant. All the devil's weed plants that are growing in between are yours.
Later... you can extend the size of your territory by following the
watercourse from each point along the way."
7
Music has always sent out
lines of flight, like so many "transformational multiplicities," even
overturning the very codes that structure or