37
water (ca. 1:10 dilution) is necessary prior to application. When Earthtec solution is
added into the canal at one site, effective concentrations of copper (0.2-0.4 mg/l) may
extend 5 to 6 miles downstream.
5.3.1.4
Calculation of Earthtec Dosing
Prior to treatment it is important to accurately determine water flow rates. Such data
may be available from SRP headquarters. If not, it may be necessary to estimate flow in
the field. To do this, estimate velocity by measuring off a short distance along the canal
(e.g., 50 feet). Then drop a floating object at the upper end of the measured section and
record the time it takes for the object to reach the lower end of the section in seconds.
The velocity is the distance traveled divided by the travel time. The measurement should
be repeated three times. Flow may be calculated as follows:
Flow, cfs = average width (feet) x average depth (feet) x velocity (feet/second) x 0.9
Equation 5.3
The amount of Earthtec needed to maintain the drip rate for a defined period of time can
be calculated using the following formula:
Drip rate (L/min) = 1699 L/min/cfs x Canal flow (cfs) x Targeted concentration in canal
÷
Earthtec concentration
Equation 5.4
Where: Canal flow = CFS estimated with previous formula; Targeted concentration = 0.2-
0.5 mg/l; Earthtec concentration = 60,000 mg/l
.
5.3.1.5
Initial and Prolonged Treatment Effectiveness Interval
The initial copper application may be applied to the canal system in early summer (June
or July) when the growth of blue-green algae mats
begins to accelerate and MIB
concentrations approach 10 ng/L.
Re-treatment of a canal section is necessary when significant re-growth of blue-green
algae mats begins to appear on the surfaces of the submerged canal walls. A four-week
interval between consecutive treatments is usually sufficient. Copper treatments appear
to have an effective treatment length of about 5 to 6 miles.
5.3.1.6
Operational Issues
A 2- to 3-day advance notice is required for the SRP crew to prepare for copper
application. Copper should be ordered by SRP two to four weeks prior to June to ensure
its availability for application.
38
A
B
C
D
5.3.2 Canal Wall Brushing
5.3.2.1
Principle of Canal Wall Brushing
The biological basis of canal wall brushing rests on the fact that most, if not all, T&O
culprit organisms are periphyton, growing along with other microorganisms in microbial
mats attached to the canal walls. Although exact reasons are unknown, the culprit
species usually exhibit slower growth rates compared to many non-producers, and thus
represent minor populations within a complex microbial community. Removing microbial
mats from the canal walls by physical means, such as brushing, has proved to be an
effective approach to prevent culprit organisms from proliferating, and to reduce the
production of MIB and geosmin. Microbial mats removed from the canal walls and
floating downstream did not cause significant spikes of MIB/geosmin concentration at
downstream sites.
5.3.2.2
Method of Canal Wall Brushing
Brushing can be conducted by a SRP tractor-mounted custom-designed revolving metal
brush, which measures 150 cm long and 80 cm in diameter and is operated at 60 rpm.
An operator can clean both sides of the canal at a rate of about 1 to 2 miles/day (Figure
5-5).
Figure 5-5. Mechanical Brushing Arizona Canal walls with custom designed device developed by SRP (A,
B). Canal wall with algae mats before brushing (C) and canal wall without algae mats after
brushing (D).
39
5.3.2.3
Initial and Prolonged Effectiveness
As with copper treatment, the initial brushing event should take place when periphyton
appear as thin blue-green mats on the submerged canal walls. This usually occurs in
early summer months (June to July). Brushing should be conducted on both sides of the
canal, starting from the upper end of a treated section. Some 70-80% of periphyton
biomass may be removed from the canal walls by brushing, resulting in reduced
production of MIB and geosmin.
Periodic brushing will be needed to ensure the maximum effectiveness of the treatment.
A recommended time interval between consecutive treatments is two to three weeks.
5.3.2.4
Limitations of Brushing
There are a number of physical limitations to the brushing technique. Brushing is not
effective in canal sections where water depth is low (2 to 4 feet).
Brushing is also difficult
at the head of the canal, where water velocities are high. Water flowing at high velocity
makes it difficult to maneuver the brush effectively because of the drag forces generated.
Canal sections with elevated banks also make it impossible to reach the canal walls with
the brushing arm. For this reason, brushing cannot be done effectively at the upper end
of the Arizona Canal.
For canal brushing, two weeks advance reservation notice to SRP is required. Since a
brushing unit can brush only 1 to 2
miles per day, the brushing procedure may be time-
consuming if large reaches of the canal are to be treated.
5.3.3 Identification of hotspots
It is critical to identify MIB/geosmin production hotspots and, ideally, hotspots of the
culprit organisms along the canal system in order to maximize the effectiveness and
efficiency of copper treatment and canal wall brushing. Two reoccurring hotspots have
been identified along the Arizona Canal:
•
between the Beeline Highway and Mesa Drive (Figure 5-6)
•
between the Squaw Peak and Deer Valley WTPs (Figure 5-7)
Hotspots can be readily identified by weekly sampling along the length of the Arizona
Canal and analysis for MIB/geosmin concentrations. Rapid increases in MIB/geosmin
over relatively short canal stretches represents “hotspots” of production.