But this tragical fate could break only
the national power of the Jews, not their hatred of
Christianity. They caused the death of Symeon, bishop of Jerusalem (107); they were particularly
active in the burning of Polycarp of Smyrna; and they inflamed the violence of the Gentiles by
eliminating the sect of the Nazarenes.
The Rebellion under Bar-Cochba. Jerusalem again Destroyed.
By severe oppression under Trajan and Hadrian, the prohibition of circumcision, and the
desecration of Jerusalem by the idolatry of the pagans, the Jews were provoked to a new and
powerful insurrection (a.d. 132–135). A pseudo-Messiah, Bar-Cochba (son of the stars, Num.
24:17), afterwards called Bar-Cosiba (son of falsehood), put himself at the head of the rebels, and
caused all the Christians who would not join him to be most cruelly murdered. But the false prophet
was defeated by Hadrian’s general in 135, more than half a million of Jews were slaughtered after
a desperate resistance, immense numbers sold into slavery, 985 villages and 50 fortresses levelled
to the ground, nearly all Palestine laid waste, Jerusalem again destroyed, and a Roman colony,
Aelia Capitolina, erected on its ruins, with an image of Jupiter and a temple of Venus. The coins
of Aelia Capitolina bear the images of Jupiter Capitolinus, Bacchus, Serapis, Astarte.
Thus the native soil of the venerable religion of the Old Testament was ploughed up, and
idolatry planted on it. The Jews were forbidden to visit the holy spot of their former metropolis
upon pain of death.
19
8 Only on the anniversary of the destruction were they allowed to behold and
bewail it from a distance. The prohibition was continued under Christian emperors to their disgrace.
Julian the Apostate, from hatred of the Christians, allowed and encouraged them to rebuild the
temple, but in vain. Jerome, who spent the rest of his life in monastic retirement at Bethlehem (d.
419), informs us in pathetic words that in his day old Jewish men and women, "in corporibus et in
habitu suo iram a Domini demonstrantes," had to buy from the Roman watch the privilege of
weeping and lamenting over the ruins from mount Olivet in sight of the cross, "ut qui quondam
emerant sanguinem Christi, emant lacrymas suas, et ne fletus quidem i eis gratuitus sit."
20
9
The
same sad privilege the Jews now enjoy under Turkish rule, not only once a year, but every Friday
beneath the very walls of the Temple, now replaced by the Mosque of Omar.
21
0
The Talmud.
After this the Jews had no opportunity for any further independent persecution of the
Christians. Yet they continued to circulate horrible calumnies on Jesus and his followers. Their
learned schools at Tiberias and Babylon nourished this bitter hostility. The Talmud, i.e. Doctrine,
of which the first part (the Mishna, i.e. Repetition) was composed towards the end of the second
century, and the second part (the Gemara, i.e. Completion) in the fourth century, well represents
the Judaism of its day, stiff, traditional, stagnant, and anti-Christian. Subsequently the Jerusalem
Talmud was eclipsed by the Babylonian (430–521), which is four times larger, and a still more
19
As reported by Justin M., a native of Palestine and a contemporary of this destruction of Jerusalem. Apol. l.c. 47. Tertullian
also says (Adv. Jud. c. 13), that, "an interdict was issued forbidding any one of the Jews to linger in the confines of the district."
20
Ad Zephan. 1:15 sqq. Schürer quotes the passage, p. 363.
21
"The Wailing Place of the Jews" at the cyclopean foundation wall is just outside of the Mosque El Aska, and near "Robinson’s
Arch." There I saw on Good Friday, 1877, a large number of Jews, old and young, men and women, venerable rabbis with
patriarchal beards, others dirty and repulsive, kissing the stone wall and watering it with their tears, while repeating from Hebrew
Bibles and prayer-books the Lamentations of Jeremiah, Psalms 76
th
and 79
th
, and various litanies. Comp. Tobler, Topographie
von Jerusalem I. 629.
28
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
distinct expression of Rabbinism. The terrible imprecation on apostates (pratio haereticorum),
designed to deter Jews from going over to the Christian faith, comes from the second century, and
is stated by the Talmud to have been composed at Jafna, where the Sanhedrin at that time had its
seat, by the younger Rabbi Gamaliel.
The Talmud is the slow growth of several centuries. It is a chaos of Jewish learning, wisdom,
and folly, a continent of rubbish, with hidden pearls of true maxims and poetic parables. Delitzsch
calls it "a vast debating club, in which there hum confusedly the myriad voices of at least five
centuries, a unique code of laws, in comparison with which the law-books of all other nations are
but lilliputian." It is the Old Testament misinterpreted and turned against the New, in fact, though
not in form. It is a rabbinical Bible without inspiration, without the Messiah, without hope. It shares
the tenacity of the Jewish race, and, like it, continues involuntarily to bear testimony to the truth
of Christianity. A distinguished historian, on being asked what is the best argument for Christianity,
promptly replied: the Jews.
22
1
Unfortunately this people, still remarkable even in its tragical end, was in many ways cruelly
oppressed and persecuted by the Christians after Constantine, and thereby only confirmed in its
fanatical hatred of them. The hostile legislation began with the prohibition of the circumcision of
Christian slaves, and the intermarriage between Jews and Christians, and proceeded already in the
fifth century to the exclusion of the Jews from all civil and political rights in Christian states. Even
our enlightened age has witnessed the humiliating spectacle of a cruel
Judenhetze
in Germany and still
more in Russia (1881). But through all changes of fortune God has preserved this ancient race as
a living monument of his justice and his mercy; and he will undoubtedly assign it an important part
in the consummation of his kingdom at the second coming of Christ.
§ 15. Causes of Roman Persecution.
The policy of the Roman government, the fanaticism of the superstitious people, and the
self-interest of the pagan priests conspired for the persecution of a religion which threatened to
demolish the tottering fabric of idolatry; and they left no expedients of legislation, of violence, of
craft, and of wickedness untried, to blot it from the earth.
To glance first at the relation of the Roman state to the Christian religion.
Roman Toleration.
The policy of imperial Rome was in a measure tolerant. It was repressive, but not preventive.
Freedom of thought was not checked by a censorship, education was left untrammelled to be
arranged between the teacher and the learner. The armies were quartered on the frontiers as a
protection of the empire, not employed at home as instruments of oppression, and the people were
diverted from public affairs and political discontent by public amusements. The ancient religions
of the conquered races were tolerated as far as they did not interfere with the interests of the state.
The Jews enjoyed special protection since the time of Julius Caesar.
22
On the literature of the Talmud see the articles in Herzog, and in McClintock & Strong, and especially Schürer, Neutestamentl.
Zeitgeschichte (Leipz. 1874), pp. 45-49, to which I add Schürer’s essay:
Die Predigt Jesu Christi in ihrem Verhältniss zum Altem
Testament und zum Judenthum, Darmstadt, 1882. The relation of the Talmud to the Sermon on the Mount and the few resemblances
is discussed by Pick in McClintock & Strong, vol. ix. 571.
29
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.