derived from his book and from the brief notice of Jerome in his catalogue of illustrious men. But
few writers have impressed their individuality so strongly in their books as this African father. In
this respect, as well as in others, he resembles St. Paul, and Martin Luther. He was born about the
year 150, at Carthage, the ancient rival of Rome, where his father was serving as captain of a Roman
legion under the proconsul of Africa. He received a liberal Graeco-Roman education; his writings
manifest an extensive acquaintance with historical, philosophical, poetic, and antiquarian literature,
and with juridical terminology and all the arts of an advocate. He seems to have devoted himself
to politics and forensic eloquence, either in Carthage or in Rome. Eusebius calls him "a man
accurately acquainted with the Roman laws,"
1515
516
and many regard him as identical with the
Tertyllus, or Tertullianus, who is the author of several fragments in the Pandects.
To his thirtieth or fortieth year he lived in heathen blindness and licentiousness.
1516
517
Towards the end of the second century be embraced Christianity, we know not exactly on what
occasion, but evidently from deepest conviction, and with all the fiery energy of his soul; defended
it henceforth with fearless decision against heathens, Jews, and heretics; and studied the strictest
morality of life. His own words may be applied to himself: "Fiunt, non nascuntur Christiani." He
was married, and gives us a glowing picture of Christian family life, to which we have before
referred; but in his zeal for every form of self-denial, he set celibacy still higher, and advised his
wife, in case he should die before her to remain a widow, or, at least never to marry an unbelieving
husband; and he afterwards put second marriage even on a level with adultery. He entered the
ministry of the Catholic church,
1517
518
first probably in Carthage, perhaps in Rome, where at all
events he spent some time
1518
519
but, like Clement of Alexandria and Origen, he never rose above
the rank of presbyter.
Some years after, between 199 and 203, he joined the puritanic, though orthodox, sect of
the Montanists. Jerome attributes this change to personal motives, charging it to the envy and insults
of the Roman clergy, from whom he himself experienced many an indignity.
1519
520
But Tertullian
was inclined to extremes from the first, especially to moral austerity. He was no doubt attracted by
the radical contempt for the world, the strict asceticism, the severe discipline, the martyr enthusiasm,
and the chiliasm of the Montanists, and was repelled by the growing conformity to the world in the
Roman church, which just at that period, under Zephyrinus and Callistus, openly took under its
protection a very lax penitential discipline, and at the same time, though only temporarily, favored
the Patripassian error of Praxeas, an opponent of the Montanists. Of this man Tertullian therefore
says, in his sarcastic way: He has executed in Rome two works of the devil; has driven out prophecy
(the Montanistic) and brought in heresy (the Patripassian); has turned off the Holy Ghost and
1515
H. E. II. 2. He adds that Tertullian was "particularly distinguished among the eminent men of Rome," and quotes a passage
from his Apology, which is also translated into the Greek."
1516
De Resurr. Carn. c. 59, he confesses: "Ego me scio neque alia carne adulteria commisisse, neque nunc alia carne ad
continentiam eniti." Comp. also Apolog., c. 18 and 25; De Anima, c. 2; De Paenit., c. 4 and 12; Ad Scapul., c. 5.
1517
This fact, however, rests only on the authority of Jerome, and does not appear from Tertullian’s own writings. Roman
Catholic historians, with their dislike to married priests, have made him a layman on the insufficient ground of the passage:
"Nonne et Laici sacerdotes sumus? "De Exhort. Cast., c. 7.
1518
De Cultu Femin., c. 7. Comp. Euseb. II. 2.
1519
De Vir. illustr., c. 53: "Hic [Tert.] cum usque ad mediam aetatem presbyter ecclesia epermansisset, invidia et contumeliis
clericorum Romanae ecclesiae ad Montani dogma delapsus in multis libris novac prophetiae meminit."
510
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
crucified the Father.
1520
521
Tertullian now fought the catholics, or the psychicals, is he frequently
calls them, with the same inexorable sternness with which he had combated the heretics. The
departures of the Montanists, however, related more to points of morality and discipline than of
doctrine; and with all his hostility to Rome, Tertullian remained a zealous advocate of the catholic
faith, and wrote, even from his schismatic position, several of his most effective works against the
heretics, especially the Gnostics. Indeed, as a divine, he stood far above this fanatical sect, and
gave it by his writings an importance and an influence in the church itself which it certainly would
never otherwise have attained.
He labored in Carthage as a Montanist presbyter and an author, and died, as Jerome says,
in decrepit old age, according to some about the year 220, according to others not till 240; for the
exact time, as well as the manner of his death, are unknown. His followers in Africa propagated
themselves, under the name of "Tertullianists," down to the time of Augustin in the fifth century,
and took perhaps a middle place between the proper Montanists and the catholic church. That he
ever returned into the bosom of Catholicism is an entirely groundless opinion.
Strange that this most powerful defender of old catholic orthodoxy and the teacher of the
high-churchly Cyprian, should have been a schismatic and all antagonist of Rome. But he had in
his constitution the tropical fervor and acerbity of the Punic character, and that bold spirit of
independence in which his native city of Carthage once resisted, through more than a hundred
years’ war,
1521
522
the rising power of the seven-hilled city on the Tiber. He truly represents the
African church, in which a similar antagonism continued to reveal itself, not only among the
Donatists, but even among the leading advocates of Catholicism. Cyprian died at variance with
Rome on the question of heretical baptism; and Augustin, with all his great services to the catholic
system of faith, became at the same time, through the anti-Peligian doctrines of sin and grace, the
father of evangelical Protestantism and of semi-Protestant Jansenism.
Hippolytus presents several interesting points of contact. He was a younger contemporary
of Tertullian though they never met is far as we know. Both were champions of catholic orthodoxy
against heresy, and yet both opposed to Rome. Hippolytus charged two popes with heresy as well
as laxity of discipline; and yet in view of his supposed repentance and martyrdom (as reported by
Prudentius nearly two hundred years afterwards), he canonized in the Roman church; while such
honor was never conferred upon the African, though he was a greater and more useful man.
II. Character. Tertullian was a rare genius, perfectly original and fresh, but angular, boisterous
and eccentric; full of glowing fantasy, pointed wit, keen discernment, polemic dexterity, and moral
earnestness, but wanting in clearness, moderation, and symmetrical development. He resembled a
foaming mountain torrent rather than a calm, transparent river in the valley. His vehement temper
was never fully subdued, although he struggled sincerely against it.
1522
523
He was a man of strong
convictions, and never hesitated to express them without fear or favor.
Like almost all great men, he combined strange contrarieties of character. Here we are again
reminded of Luther; though the reformer had nothing of the ascetic gloom and rigor of the African
father, and exhibits instead with all his gigantic energy, a kindly serenity and childlike simplicity
1520
Adv. Prax. c. 1.
1521
B.C. 264-146,
1522
Comp. his own painful confession in De Patient. c. 1: "Miserrimus ego semper aeger caloribus impatientiae."
511
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.