noted above, by the progressive income tax.
139
However, in the early
1870s the income tax was dropped—and then declared unconsti-
tutional by the Supreme Court. Th
e Fourteenth Amendment had
promised “all persons” the equal protection of the laws. Th
ough this
proved a dead letter so far as the freedmen were concerned, the
corporations—who enjoyed the legal status of persons—successfully
invoked it against measures for corporate taxation and regulation.
Th
ese and other reactionary developments might themselves have
increased the willingness of the trade unions to back a labor party.
Indeed, those trying to organize general or industrial unions aimed
at the mass of workers realized that they needed the support of gov-
ernment. But Archer argues that many key craft leaders—especially
Samuel Gompers—had greater industrial bargaining power and
feared that their organizations might be put at risk if they teamed
up with political adventurers.
Several key trade unions had been inspired by the agitation
surrounding the IWA and Marx’s writings on the importance of
self-organization by the workers. Several US unions were to describe
themselves as International organizations—the International
Longshoremen or International Garment Workers Union and so
forth—an echo of the IWA. Sometimes the “International” was
justifi ed by its reference to organizing in Canada, but it had a reso-
nance beyond this. If Marx’s followers—many of them German
Americans—can take a share of the credit for the impetus given to
trade union organization, they must also accept some of the blame
for the failure of the US workers’ movement to develop a labor
party and for the related tardy development and weakness of the
US welfare state. Indeed, some blame the infl uence of Karl Marx
for these failures.
140
Yet Marx favored both trade unions and social democratic or
socialist parties in the 1870s, as may readily be seen in the case
of Germany. Th
e German SPD was clearly linked to and sup-
portive of organized labor, but its Erfurt program committed it to
139 W.
Elliot Brownlee, Federal Taxation in America, Cambridge 1996, p. 26.
140 Messer-Kruse
in
Yankee International and Archer in Why Is Th
ere No
Labor Party in the United States? come close to this but ultimately concede that
on such questions there was a large gap between Marx and those in the US who
regarded themselves as his followers. (Th
ese included Samuel Gompers.)
introduction 85
revolutionary and democratic objectives and to immediate reforms.
It campaigned for votes for women and the defense of the German
forests. It supported rights for homosexuals and an end to Germany’s
imperial exploits in Africa, and it debated the “agrarian question.”
141
Th
e breadth of the SPD’s program did not, of course, wholly stem
from Karl Marx but came also from several other currents, includ-
ing the Lassalleans. Th
ough Marx had tenaciously fought against
what he saw as Lassalle’s misguided belief in the progressive char-
acter of the German state, he nevertheless went out of his way to
cultivate Lassalle’s acquaintance, gently to warn him of his mis-
takes, and above all to remain in touch with the tens of thousands
of German socialists who were infl uenced by him. Marx stressed
the great potential and attractive power of the working class, but in
his “Critique of the Gotha Programme” he combated the idea that
labor was the only source of value, insisting that land (by which he
meant nature) was a vital source of use values.
142
Th
e programmatic scope of the SPD is not the only evidence
of the approach favored by Marx and Engels. Th
e program of the
French workers party was directly inspired by a conversation with
Marx. Its very fi rst clause declared, “the emancipation of the class
of producers involves all mankind, without distinction of sex or
race.”
143
Its immediate program committed it to universal suff rage
and equal pay for equal work. No doubt that economism still lurks
in it, but in 1879 a platform like this was not such a bad start-
ing point. Th
e idea that trade unions and political organization are
mutually exclusive put supposedly Marxian US Socialists and trade
unionists at odds with their mentor.
Th
e paternalist ethos of the early socialist movement rendered
its commitment to equal rights for women ethereal and abstract.
141 I have a very brief discussion of the programmatic ideas of the SPD in
“Fin de Siècle: Socialism After the Crash,” New Left Review, 1:185, January/
February 1991. For the evolution of the party’s positions on sexuality in the late
nineteenth and early twentieth century, see David Fernbach, “Biology and Gay
Identity,” New Left Review, 1:228, 1998.
142 Marx and Engels, “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” in Marx, Th e
First International and After, pp. 339–59.
143 “Introduction to the Program of the French Workers Party,” Th e First
International and After, p. 376.
86 an unfinished revolution
But as women were drawn into the labor movement in the 1880s,
female activists challenged the idea that a woman’s place was in
the home. While male labor organizers were prone to support the
notion that the male worker should earn a “family wage,” the social-
ist organizations, especially those infl uenced by the German SPD,
took a diff erent stance: they urged that women would not be truly
emancipated until they entered the world of paid labor on equal
terms with men. August Bebel, one of the historic leaders of the
SPD, wrote a book on the topic, Woman Under Socialism (1879),
which was widely read in both German and English. Bebel urged
that domestic labor should be lightened, and women’s employment
promoted, by the provision of free communal child-care facilities
and restaurants. Th
ough they did not anticipate twentieth-century
feminism and often romanticized patriarchal features of the family,
the socialists of this era did pay some attention to the issue of gender
equality.
144
Female members of the Socialist Labor Party were able
to off er a feminist interpretation of Bebel’s ideas and to use them
to argue for the importance of organizing women workers. Given
the employment of large numbers of women in new branches of the
economy, socialist women became a signifi cant force.
In 1887 Engels paid tribute to the giant strides being made by the
American workers movement, embracing momentous class battles
in Illinois and Pennsylvania, the spread of the Eight Hour Leagues,
the growth of the Knights of Labor, the sacrifi ces that had established
May 1
as International Labor Day, and the electoral achievements
of the fi rst state-level labor parties.
145
But appreciative as he was, he
insisted that the whole movement would lose its way unless it could
develop a transformative program: “A new party must have a dis-
tinct platform,” one adapted to American conditions. Without this,
any “new party would have but a rudimentary existence.” However,
beyond saying that the kernel of this program would have to be
public ownership of “land, railways, mines, machinery, etc.” he did
not speculate as to what problems that program should address.
Engels rebuked the doctrinaires of the heavily German American
Socialist Labor Party for their hostility to unions and their failure
144 Mari Jo Buhle, Women and American Socialism, Urbana 1981, pp. 1–48.
145 See Frederick Engels, “Preface to the American Edition,” Th e Condition
of the Working Class in England, New York 1887, reprinted in this volume.
introduction 87
Dostları ilə paylaş: |