Xalqaro tadqiqotlarni amalga oshirish milliy markazi

PISA 2018

---

70
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yxati
American Press Institute (2014), How Americans get their news,
http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2014/03/The_Media_Insight_
Project_The_Personal_News_Cycle_Final.pdf.
Ananiadou, K. and M. Claro (2009), “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium
Learners in OECD Countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing,
Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.
Artelt, C., U. Schiefele and W. Schneider (2001), “Predictors of reading literacy”, European
Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. XVI/3, pp. 363-383,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173188.
Becker, M., N. McElvany and M. Kortenbruck (2010), “Intrinsic and extrinsic reading
motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study”, Journal of Educational
Psychology, Vol. 102/4, pp. 773-785, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020084.
Binkley, M. et al. (2011), “Defining Twenty-First Century Skills”, in Assessment and Teaching
of 21st Century Skills, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-
007-2324-5_2.
Binkley, M., K. Rust and T. Williams (eds.) (1997), Reading literacy in an international
perspective, U.S. Department of Education, Washington D.C.
Brand-Gruwel, S., I. Wopereis and Y. Vermetten (2005), “Information problem solving by
experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill”, Computers in Human Behavior,
Vol. 21, pp. 487–508, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005. 
Bråten, I. et al. (2011), “The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple
expository texts: Toward an integrated model”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 46/1, pp. 48-
70, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538647.
Bråten, I., H. Strømsø and M. Britt (2009), “Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source
Evaluation in Students’ Construction of Meaning within and across Multiple Texts”, Reading
Research Quarterly, Vol. 44/1, pp. 6-28, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.1.
Britt, M., S. Goldman and J. Rouet (eds.) (2013), Reading--From words to multiple texts,
Routledge, New York.
Britt, M. and J. Rouet (2012), “Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their
acquisition.”, in Kirby, J. and M. Lawson (eds.), Enhancing the Quality of Learning:
Dispositions, Instruction, and Learning Processes, Cambridge University Press, New York,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048224.017.
Brown, A., A. Palincsar and B. Armbruster (1984), “Instructing Comprehension-Fostering
Activities in Interactive Learning Situations”, in Mandl, H., N. Stein and T. Trabasso (eds.),
Learning and Comprehension of Text, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Brozo, W. and M. Simpson (2007), Content Literacy for Today’s Adolescents: Honoring
Diversity and Building Competence, Merrill/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Cain, K. and J. Oakhill (2008), Children’s Comprehension Problems in Oral and Written
Language, Guilford Press, New York.
[32] 
[7] 
[121] 
[109] 
[1] 
[41]
[66]
[77]
[74]
[14] 
[46] 
[122] 
[37] 
[64] 

---

71
Cain, K. and J. Oakhill (2006), “Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading
comprehension”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 697–708,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709905X69807. 
Cantrell, S. et al. (2010), “The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and 
strategy use of struggling adolescent readers”, Journal of Educational Psychology,
Vol. 102/2, pp. 257-280, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018212. 
Chard, D., J. Pikulski and S. McDonagh (2006), “Fluency: The Link between Decoding and
Comprehension for Struggling Readers”, in Rasinski, T., C. Blachowicz and K. Lems (eds.),
Fluency Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices, Guilford Press, New York.
Clark, C. (2014), Children’s and Young People’s Writing in 2013: Findings from the National
Literacy Trust’s Annual Literacy Survey, National Literacy Trust, London,
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk.
Coiro, J. et al. (2008), “Central Issues in New Literacies and New Literacies Research”, in
Coiro, J. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, New York.
Conklin, J. (1987), “Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey”, Computer, Vol. 20, pp. 17-41,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.1987.1663693. 
Cunningham, A. and K. Stanovich (1997), “Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading
experience and ability 10 years later”, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 33/6, pp. 934-945.
Dillon, A. (1994), Designing Usable Electronic Text Ergonomics Aspects of Human Information
Usage, Taylor & Francis, London.
Dreher, M. and J. Guthrie (1990), “Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks”,
Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 25/4, pp. 323-339, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747694.
Duggan, G. and S. Payne (2009), “Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging
through text under time pressure”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 15/3,
pp. 228-242, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016995
.
Eason, S. et al. (2013), “Examining the Relationship Between Word Reading Efficiency and Oral
Reading Rate in Predicting Comprehension Among Different Types of Readers”, Scientific
Studies of Reading, Vol. 17/3, pp. 199-223, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.652722.
Foltz, P. (1996), “Comprehension, Coherence and Strategies in Hypertext and Linear Text”, in
Rouet, J. et al. (eds.), Hypertext and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 
Gartner (2014), Forecast: PCs, Ultramobiles and Mobile Phones, Worldwide, 2011-2018, 4Q14
Update, 
https://www.gartner.com/doc/2945917/forecast-pcs-ultramobiles-mobile-phones.
Gerjets, P., Y. Kammerer and B. Werner (2011), “Measuring spontaneous and instructed
evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and
eye-tracking data.”, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 21/2, pp. 220-231,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.005.
[94] 
[123] 
[59] 
[33] 
[47] 
[27]
[2]
[26]
[67]
[70] 
[104] 
[28] 
[31] 
[71] 

---

72
Goldman, S. (2004), “Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple
texts”, in Shuart-Faris, N. and D. Bloome (eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and
educational research, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.
Gray, W. and B. Rogers (1956), Maturity in Reading: Its nature and appraisal, The University
of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Grisay, A. and C. Monseur (2007), “Measuring the Equivalence of item difficulty in the various
versions of an international test”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 33, pp. 69-86,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.006.
Guthrie, J., S. Klauda and A. Ho (2013), “Modeling the relationships among reading instruction,
motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents”, Reading Research Quarterly,
Vol. 48/1, pp. 9-26, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.035.
Guthrie, J. and A. Wigfield (2000), “Engagement and motivation in reading.”, in Kamil, M. et al.
(eds.), Handbook of reading research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, NJ.
Guthrie, J. et al. (1999), “Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and
Reading Amount”, Scientific Studies of Reading,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3.
Guthrie, J., A. Wigfield and W. You (2012), “Instructional Contexts for Engagement and
Achievement in Reading”, in Christenson, S., A. Reschly and C. Wylie (eds.), Handbook of
Research on Student Engagement, Springer Science, New York,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7.
Hacker, D. (1998), “Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading”, in Hacker, D.,
J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser (eds.), The Educational Psychology Series. Metacognition in
Educational Theory and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Heckman, J. and T. Kautz (2012), “Hard Evidence on Soft Skills”, Discussion Paper Series,
No. 6580, The Institute for the Study of Labor , Bonn, Germany.
Hofstetter, C., T. Sticht and C. Hofstetter (1999), “Knowledge, Literacy, and Power”,
Communication Research, Vol. 26/1, pp. 58-80,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365099026001004.
Hubbard, R. (1989), “Notes from the Underground: Unofficial Literacy in One Sixth Grade”,
Anthropology & Education Quarterly, Vol. 20/4, pp. 291-307,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3195740.
International Telecommunications Union (2014), Key 2005-2014 ICT data for the world, by
geographic regions and by level of development [Excel file], 
http://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/
Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2014.aspx.
International Telecommunications Union (2014), Measuring the Information Society Report
2014, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
Jenkins, J. et al. (2003), “Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and
Reading Fluency.”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95/4, pp. 719-729,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719.
[55] 
[48] 
[96] 
[39] 
[118] 
[110]
[38]
[79]
[119]
[49] 
[90] 
[6] 
[5] 
[63] 

---

73
Kamil, M. et al. (eds.) (2000), Handbook of Reading Research. Volume III, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Kintsch, W. (1998), Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Kirsch, I. (2001), The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS): Understanding What Was
Measured, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
Kirsch, I. et al. (2002), Reading for Change Performance and Engagement Across Countries:
Results From PISA 2000, OECD, Paris.
Kirsch, I. and P. Mosenthal (1990), “Exploring Document Literacy: Variables Underlying the
Performance of Young Adults”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 25/1, pp. 5-30,
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747985.
Klauda, S. and J. Guthrie (2015), “Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and
achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers”, Reading and Writing,
Vol. 28, pp. 239–269, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2.
Kuhn, M., P. Schwanenflugel and E. Meisinger (2010), “Aligning Theory and Assessment of
Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency”, Reading Research
Quarterly, Vol. 45/2, pp. 230–251, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4.
Kuhn, M. and S. Stahl (2003), “Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices”,
Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95/1, pp. 3–21, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-
663.95.1.3.
Lafontaine, D. and C. Monseur (2006), Impact of item choice on the measurement of trends in
educational achievement, Paper presented at the 2006 Annual AERA meeting, San Francisco,
CA, 
https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/aera/aera06/index.php?click_key=1&cmd=Mu
lti+Search+Search+Load+Publication&publication_id=49435&PHPSESSID=h5edlqu9juanjm
laaa6ece3e74. 
Lafontaine, D. and C. Monseur (2006), Impact of test characteristics on gender equity 
indicatorsin the Assessment of Reading Comprehension, University of Liège, Liège.
Landerl, K. and C. Reiter (2002), “Lesegeschwindigkeit als Indikator für basale
Lesefertigkeiten”, in Wallner-Paschon, C. and G. Haider (eds.), PISA Plus 2000. Thematische
Analysen nationaler Projekte, Studien Verlag, Innsbruck.
Legault, L., I. Green-Demers and L. Pelletier (2006), “Why do high school students lack
motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic a motivation and the role
of social support”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 98/3, pp. 567-582,
http://dx.doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567.
Leu, D. et al. (2015), “The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the 
reading achievement gap”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 50/1, pp. 37–59,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85.
Leu, D. et al. (2013), “New Literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy
instruction and assessment”, in Alvermann, D., Norman J. Unrau and R. Ruddell (eds.),
Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, International Reading Association, Newark.
[15] 
[20] 
[22] 
[8] 
[23] 
[108]
[105]
[58]
[98]
[99] 
[107] 
[120] 
[12] 
[11] 

---

74
Lundberg, I. (1991), “Reading as an individual and social skill”, in Lundberg, I. and T. Höien
(eds.), Literacy in a world of change: perspective on reading and reading disability;
proceedings, Literacy Conference at Stavanger Forum, Center for Reading
Research/UNESCO.
Mason, L., A. Boldrin and N. Ariasi (2010), “Searching the Web to Learn about a Controversial
Topic: Are Students Epistemically Active?”, Instructional Science: An International Journal
of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 38/6, pp. 607-633.
McNamara, D. and J. Magliano (2009), “Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension”,
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 51, pp. 297-384,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2.
Meyer, B. and G. Rice (1984), “The Structure of Text”, in Pearson, P. et al. (eds.), Handbook of
Reading Research, Longman, New York.
Mol, S. and A. Bus (2011), “To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from
infancy to early adulthood”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 137/2, pp. 267-96,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021890. 
Moore, P. (1995), “Information Problem Solving: A Wider View of Library Skills”,
Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 20/1, pp. 1-31,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1001.
Morgan, P. and D. Fuchs (2007), “Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading
skills and reading motivation?”, Exceptional Children, Vol. 73/2, pp. 165-183,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290707300203. 
Morrisroe, J. (2014), Literacy Changes Lives 2014: A new perspective on health, employment
and crime, National Literacy Trust, London, http://www.literacytrust.org.uk 
Naumann, J. (2015), “A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation,
and performance in digital reading”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 53, pp. 263–277,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.051. 
Oakhill, J., K. Cain and P. Bryant (2003), “The dissociation of word reading and text
comprehension: Evidence from component skills”, Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 18/4, pp. 443-468, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008. 
OECD (2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, OECD, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/19963777.
OECD (2014), PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised edition,
February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, PISA, OECD
Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en
.
OECD (2013), OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, OECD
Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.
OECD (2013), PISA 2015 Draft Frameworks, OECD, Paris,
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm 
[51] 
[52] 
[42] 
[91] 
[111] 
[68]
[112]
[50]
[36]
[43] 
[35] 
[130] 
[3] 
[13] 

---

75
OECD (2012), OECD Internet Economy Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264086463-en. 
OECD (2011), “Do Students Today Read for Pleasure?”, PISA in Focus, No. 8, OECD
Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9h362lhw32-en.
[103]
OECD (2011), PISA 2009 Results: Students On Line. Digital Technologies and Performance
(Volume VI), OECD Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en.
[25]
OECD (2010), PISA 2009 Assessment Framework, OECD, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/19963777.
OECD (2010), PISA 2009 Results: Learning to Learn: Student Engagement, Strategies and
Practices (Volume III), PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en.
OECD (2007), PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World: Volume 1: Analysis,
PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en.
OECD (2004), Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003, PISA, OECD
Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264006416-en.
OECD (2002), Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement across Countries: Results
from PISA 2000, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264099289-
en. 
OECD (2000), Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading,
Mathematical and Scientific Literacy, OECD, Paris.
O‘Reilly, T. and J. Sabatini (2013), Reading for Understanding: How Performance Moderators
and Scenarios Impact Assessment Design, ETS Research Report RR-13-31,
http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-13-31.pdf. 
Ozuru, Y. et al. (2007), “Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of
expository text comprehension”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 25/4, pp. 399-438,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632371.
Perfetti, C. (2007), “Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension”, Scientific Studies of
Reading, Vol. 11/4, pp. 357-383, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730. 
Perfetti, C. (1985), Reading Ability, Oxford University Press, New York.
Perfetti, C., M. Marron and P. Foltz (1996), “Sources of Comprehension Failure: Theoretical
Perspectives and Case Studies”, in Cornoldi, C. and J. Oakhill (eds.), Reading
Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Mahwah, NJ.
Perfetti, C., J. Rouet and M. Britt (1999), “Toward Theory of Documents Representation”, in van
Oostendorp, H. and S. Goldman (eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During
[30] 
[103] 
[42] 
[117] 
[124] 
[129]
[128]
[116]
[24]
[86] 
[87] 
[17] 
[16] 
[65] 
[56]

---

76
Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Pfost, M., T. Dörfler and C. Artelt (2013), “Students’ extracurricular reading behavior and the
development of vocabulary and reading comprehension”, Learning and Individual
Differences, Vol. 26, pp. 89-102, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008.
[113]
Pressley, M. (2000), “What Should Comprehension Instruction be the Instruction Of?”, in
Kamil, M. et al. (eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume III, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Mahwah, NJ. [125]
Rasinski, T. et al. (2005), “Is Reading Fluency a Key for Successful High School Reading?”,
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 49/1, pp. 22-27,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3. 
[100]
Rayner, K. et al. (2001), “How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading”,
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 2/2, pp. 31-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.00004.
[102]
Rayner, K. and E. Reichle (2010), “Models of the Reading Process”, Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews. Cognitive Science, Vol. 1/6, pp. 787-799, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.68.
[19]
Reeve, J. (2012), “A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement”, in
Handbook of research on student engagement, Springer, Boston, MA,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
[40]
Richter, T. and D. Rapp (2014), “Comprehension and Validation of Text Information:
Introduction to the Special Issue”, Discourse Processes, Vol. 51/1-2, pp. 1-6,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855533.
[45]
Rieh, S. (2002), “Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Quthority in the Web”,
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53/2, pp. 145-161,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017.
[73] 
Rosenshine, B. and C. Meister (1997), “Cognitive strategy instruction in reading”, in Stahl, S.
and D. Hayes (eds.), Instructional Models in Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Mahwah,NJ. [126]
Rouet, J. (2006), The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-based
Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. [9] 
Rouet, J. and M. Britt (2014), “Multimedia Learning from Multiple Documents”, in Mayer, R.
(ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
MA. [78] 
Rouet, J. and M. Britt (2011), “Relevance Processes in Multiple Document Comprehension”, in
McCrudden, M., J. Magliano and G. Schraw (eds.), Text Relevance and Learning from Text,
Information Age, Greenwich, CT. [53] 
Rouet, J. and B. Coutelet (2008), “The Acquisition of Document Search Strategies in Grade
School Students”, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 389–406,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1415. 
[69]
[113] 
[125] 
[100] 
[102] 
[19] 
[40]
[45]
[73]
[126]
[9] 
[78] 
[53] 
[69] 

---

77
Rouet, J. and J. Levonen (1996), “Studying and Learning with Hypertext: Empirical Studies and
Their Implications”, in Rouet, J. et al. (eds.), Hypertext and Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Rouet, J., Z. Vörös and C. Pléh (2012), “Incidental Learning of Links during Navigation: The
Role of Visuo-Spatial Capacity”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 31/1, pp. 71-81.
Routitsky, A. and R. Turner (2003), Item Format Types and Their Influences on Cross-national
Comparisons of Student Performance, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association (AERA), April 2003.
Rupp, A., T. Ferne and H. Choi (2006), “How Assessing Reading Comprehension With
Multiple-choice Questions Shapes the Construct: A Cognitive Processing Perspective”,
Language Testing, Vol. 23/4, pp. 441–474,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt337oa.
Sabatini, J. and K. Bruce (2009), “PIAAC Reading Components: A Conceptual Framework”,
OECD Education Working Papers, No. 33, OECD, Paris,
http://www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers. 
Sabatini, J. et al. (2014), “Broadening the Scope of Reading Comprehension Using Scenario-
Based Assessments: Preliminary findings and challenges”, L’Année Psychologique,
Vol. 114/4, pp. 693-723, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004059.
Sabatini, J. et al. (2015), “Improving Comprehension Assessment for Middle and High School
Students: Challenges and Opportunities”, in Santi, K. and D. Reed (eds.), Improving Reading
Comprehension of Middle and High School Students (Literacy Studies), Springer, New York.
Santini, M. (2006), “Web pages, Text types, and Linguistic Features: Some Issues”,
International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (CAME), Vol. 30, pp. 67-
86.
Scammacca, N. et al. (2007), Interventions for Adolescent Struggling Readers: A Meta-Analysis
With Implications for Practice, Center on Instruction at RMC Research Corporation,
Portsmouth, NH, 
http://www.centeroninstruction.org.
Schaffner, E., M. Philipp and U. Schiefele (2016), “Reciprocal Effects Between Intrinsic
Reading Motivation and Reading Competence? A Cross-lagged Panel Model for Academic
Track and Nonacademic Track Students”, Journal of Research in Reading, Vol. 39/1, pp. 19–
36, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12027.
Schiefele, U. et al. (2012), “Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading
Behavior and Competence”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 47/4, pp. 427–463,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030.
Schroeder, S. (2011), “What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading
time components on comprehension with and without text availability”, Journal of
Educational Psychology, Vol. 103/4, pp. 877-896, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023731.
Schwabe, F., N. McElvany and M. Trendtel (2015), “The School Age Gender Gap in Reading
Aachievement: Examining the Influences of Item Format and Intrinsic Reading Motivation”,
Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 50/2, pp. 219–232, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.92.
[29] 
[82] 
[95] 
[83] 
[106] 
[84]
[85]
[93]
[101]
[114] 
[115] 
[88] 
[97]

---

78
Smith, M. et al. (2000), “What Will Be the Demands of Literacy in the Workplace in the Next
Millennium?”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 35/3, pp. 378-383,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.3.3. 
Snow, C. and the RAND Corporation (2002), Reading for Understanding: Toward an R and D
Program in Reading Comprehension, RAND Reading Study Group, Santa Monica, CA,
http://www.rand.org/.
Spiro, R. et al. (eds.) (2015), Reading at a Crossroads? Disjunctures and Continuities in Current 
Conceptions and Practices, Routledge, New York
Stadtler, M. and R. Bromme (2014), “The Content–Source Integration Model: A Taxonomic
Description of How Readers Comprehend Conflicting Scientific Information”, in Rapp, D.
and J. Braasch (eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied
Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences, The MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Stadtler, M. and R. Bromme (2013), “Multiple Document Comprehension: An Approach to
Public Understanding of Science”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 31/2, pp. 122-129,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.771106.
Strømsø, H. et al. (2013), “Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple
Documents”, Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 31/2, pp. 176-203,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769994.
UNESCO (2014), Reading in the Mobile Era: A Study of Mobile Reading in Developing
Countries, UNESCO, Paris, 
http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en.
van den Broek, P., K. Risden and E. Husbye-Hartmann (1995), “The Role of Readers’ Standards 
of Coherence in the Generation of Inferences During Reading”, in Lorch, Jr., R. and
E. O‘Brien (eds.), Sources of Coherence in Text Comprehension, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Hilssdale, NJ.
Vidal-Abarca, E., A. Mañá and L. Gil (2010), “Individual Differences for Self-regulating 
Taskoriented Reading Activities”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 102/4, pp. 817-826,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020062.
Wagner, R. et al. (2010), Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension, Pro-Ed, 
Austin, TX.
Waters, H. and W. Schneider (eds.) (2010), Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction,
Guilford Press, New York
Wayman, M. et al. (2007), “Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in
Reading”, The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 41/2, pp. 85-120.
Werlich, E. (1976), A Text Grammar of English, Quelle and Meyer, Heidelberg.
White, S., J. Chen and B. Forsyth (2010), “Reading-Related Literacy Activities of American
Adults: Time Spent, Task Types, and Cognitive Skills Used”, Journal of Literacy Research,
Vol. 42, pp. 276–307, 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1086296X.2010.503552.
[4] 
[18] 
[10] 
[75] 
[76] 
[81]
[34]
[44]
[57]
[60] 
[127] 
[61] 
[92] 
[54] 

---

79
Wineburg, S. (1991), “On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach Between School
and Academy”, American Educational Research Joumal, Vol. 28/3, pp. 495-519.
Winne, P. and A. Hadwin (1998), “Studying as Self-regulated Learning”, in Hacker, D.,
J. Dunlosky and A. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
Woodcock, R., K. McGrew and N. Mather (2001), Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement,
Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL.
Zwaan, R. and M. Singer (2003), “Text comprehension”, in Graesser, A., M. Gernsbacher and
S. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Mahwah, NJ.
[89] 
[80] 
[62] 
[21] 

---

80

---

81

---

82

---

83

---

84

---

85

---

86

---

87