Proverbial poetry: its settings and syntax



Yüklə 6,58 Mb.
səhifə25/51
tarix09.08.2018
ölçüsü6,58 Mb.
#62171
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   ...   51

to nail down the structure of the line, which he did

admirably.



3J. J. Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry:

Sound Patterns as a Literary Device," in De Fructu Oris



Sui: Essays in Honour of Adrianus van Selms, ed I. H.

Eybers et al. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971), p. 78. Percy

G. Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to

Poets," Publications of the Modern Language Association of



America 88 (1973):16. Cf. Bruno Hildebrandt, "Linguistic

Analysis of Sound and Rhyme in Poetry," in Papers from the


Alliteration may be designated as phonological

repetition.1 It is a device used to heighten the feeling

of sameness in a text, thereby expressing its cohesive

unity in phonetic form. In short, alliteration is a

synthesis of sound and sense. There is need for a

standardization of terminology. Pardee observes the

disparity between the definition of alliteration in the

Oxford English Dictionary as "the commencement of certain

accented syllables in a verse with the same consonant or

consonantal group" and a broader definition, which is

reflected in the Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and



Poetics, allowing for "any repetition of the same sound(s)

or syllable in two or more words of a line (or line

group), which produces a noticeable artistic effect."2

This study will operate under the broader description.

Thus, Shakespeare's play on initial alliteration in the

____________________

1977 Mid-America Lingusitics Conference, ed. D. M. Lance

and D. E. Gulstad (Columbia, MS: University of Missouri,

1978), p. 454.

1Akhmanova, Linguostylistics: Theory and

Method, p. 23; Raimo Anttila, "Comments on K. L. Pike's and W. P.

Lehman's Papers," in The Scope of American Linguistics, ed.

Robert Austerlitz (Lisse: The Peter De Ridder Press,

1975), p. 60. Where the phonaesthetic pattern "slide,

slip, slouch, slime, slush, sludge, slither, slink, sleek,

etc." is noted.



2Pardee, "Ugaritic and Hebrew Poetry:

Parallelism," p. 31, n. 57. A. Preminger, F. J. Warnke,

and O. B. Hardison, ed. Princeton Encylopedia of Poetry and

Poetics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), p.

15. Cf. also P. Kiparsky, "Linguistics in a Theory of

Poetry," pp. 241-42.
title "Love's Labour's Lost" may be compared to

medial alliteration of "that brave vibration" of Robert Herrick.1

Final alliteration forms a type of rhyme:
The 'age demanded' chiefly a mould in plaster,

Made with no loss of time.

A prose kinema, not assuredly, alabaster

Or the 'sculpture' of rhyme.


Fussell reiterates how "plaster" and "alabaster" are drawn

together by the end alliteration (rhyme) for comparison in

sound and also for semantic contrast.2 Such close

reading should be beneficially employed in the analysis of

biblical poetry. Multiple unit repetitions may also

reverse the order of vowels and consonants. While little

more than a simple mentioning of this phenomenon has

appeared in biblical studies, the work of Margalit has not

only demonstrated this feature in Ugaritic but has also

circumscribed parameters for discovering it elsewhere.3

He suggests that:
To be significant, a letter should occur: (a) at

least three times per seven verse-unit verse; and/or

(b) twice in a single word or once in each of two

adjacent words (especially at the beginning); and/or

(c) as a repeated sequence of two or more adjacent

____________________



1Examples are taken from the Princeton

Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, pp. 15, 16.

2Paul Fussell, Poetic Meter and Poetic Form

(New York: Random House, 1979), pp. 110-11.



3Margalit, "Introduction to Ugaritic Prosody," pp.

310-13. Pardee also confirms this in his Ugaritic studies

restricting it to a consonantalism. ("Type and

Distributions of Parallelism in Ugaritic and Hebrew

Poetry," p. 5).
letters, not necessarily in the same order, and not

necessarily in the scope of a single word.1


O'Connor offers a parsimonious caution that

alliteration should not be confused with word repetition

and that prefix and suffix repetitions be taken cum granis

salis and not as proof of alliteration per se.2 Because

alliteration may be seen as a repetitional feature, this

writer, while observing O'Connor's caution from his

poetically sensitive perspective, suggests that the

repetition of certain words appear to be selected as much

on the basis of phonetics as semantics, as will be shown

perhaps in Proverbs 11:7-12 with the repeated use of the

preposition בְּ. Gluck is correct when he states,

"Alliteration is part of many proverbs and popular idioms,

reinforcing a truism with a chime."3 One tenet of this

paper will be to demonstrate the use of this device in the

proverbial text. This scheme of phonetic repetition was

used not only to scintillate aesthetically, but also like

other forms of repetition, to provide a linguistic

cohesion on the intra- and inter-line level, as

well as on the "strophic" levels of the proverbial

____________________

1Margalit, "Introduction to Ugaritic Prosody," p.

311. Cf. O'Connor, Hebrew Verse Structure, p. 143.



2O'Connor, "The Rhetoric of the Kilamuwa

Inscription," BASOR 226 (1977):16, 17.



3Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry: Sound

Patterns as a Literary Device," p. 78. His examples

include Prov 6:2; 11:1a, 22a; 13:3a, 12; 14:1.

sentence literature.

Assonance is an artistic use of vowel repetition

in stressed syllables of adjacent words.1 Adams notes

that, in general, alliteration (consonance) is more

noticeable.2 Gluck shows that assonance in passages such

as Isaiah 1:18-20 and 5:2 is often supportive of

alliterative (consonantal) features.3 Because of the

problem with Hebraic vocalization and the tendency of

vowels to change with time, one must be cautious about

this aspect of phonological repetition.4 This feature

will not be systematically studied in the corpus.

Another sound pattern which is used with great

effect is paronomasia. Gluck provides a brilliant article

in which he distinguishes six types of this trope in

Isaiah. While this form of word play or punning is often

regarded as a mark of doltishness in modern culture it was

____________________



1Edward P. J. Corbett, Classical Rhetoric for the

Modern Student (New York: Oxford Universtiy Press, 1971),

pp. 471-72.



2Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to

Poets," p. 8.



3Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry: Sound

Patterns as a Literary Device," pp. 82-83.



4Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to

Poets," p. 8. Pardee ("Types of Distributions of

Parallelism in Ugaritic and Hebrew Poetry," p. 5) has tried

his hand at vocalization of Ugaritic texts looking for

assonance and has "come up with very little on vowel

patterning."

not so regarded in ancient Israel.1 A thorough

investigation of this trope has not been performed in the

proverbial corpus. However, a few examples from a cursory

examination of the text should suggest the fruitfulness of

such an approach. (1) The equivocal pun, where a single

grapheme may have two diverse semantic meanings (double

entendre) which are played upon (Prov 3:3, 8; 6:2). An

example is provided by Moffatt who manifests this feature

in his translation of Proverbs 10:6b and 10:11b. The

Hebrew colon is exactly the same; yet in one he takes

as "to cover" and in the other as "to conceal." His

suggestion accommodates the context and influence of the

bi-colon rather than just the clausal context.2 Another

possible case may be seen in the Revised Standard Version

of Proverbs 11:7, where אוֹנִים is translated "iniquity"

rather than "power" or "strength."3 (2) The metaphony

creates ambiguity by the mutation of vowels (Isa 1:29).

(3) Parasony interchanges a consonant resulting in an

unexpected meaning (Isa 1:28). (4) Farrago refers to

____________________



1Gluck, "Paronomasia in Biblical Literature,"

Semitics 1 (1970):52. In a footnote, Gluck notes the pun:

"The bun is the lowest form of wheat" (The pun is the

lowest form of wit) (p. 52). Cf. also A. Guillaume,

"Paronomasia in the Old Testament," JSS 9 (1964):282-90.



2James Moffatt, A New Translation of the Bible (New

York: Harper and Brothers Pub., 1922).



3BDB, p. 20.

words which sound chaotic from their semantic content, but

which produce an imagery nevertheless (Isa 8:1; 28:10).

The word play on diverse and unexpected meanings may be

seen in Proverbs 10:2, where "treasures" and "riches" are

said to be of no "value." This play focuses on the

contrast between the wicked, for whom normally positive

things are of no profit, and the righteous, for whom even

the negative experience of death is escapable.

(5) Associative puns twist diction by taking two

components, which are normally not associated, and

juxtaposing them in order to create new imagery (e.g.,

uncircumcised of heart Lev. 26:41). An example of this

type may be seen in Proverbs 10:21, where it is the lips

of the righteous which feed many, rather than, the usual

conception that lips should be fed. (6) Assonantic puns

are word plays which are accompanied by a recurrence of

sound, thus catching the ear and binding the significant

words together phonetically (Isa 7:13-14; 24:17). A

possible example may be seen in Proverbs 10:5 where a is

added to בַּקַיִץ (in summer), thus resulting in בַּקָּצִיר (in

harvest). This causes the reader to reflect on slothful

sleep of one who slumbers, even through the time when all

helpers are needed (harvest), as compared to the

industriousness of the diligent, who is sedulous with

productive labor even during the slow summer season. So,

too, in Proverbs 11:13 there is an assonantic play with

the words מְגַלֶּה־סּוֹד (spreads a secret) and מְכַסֶּה דָבָר (hides

a matter), where a secret (סוֹד) which is spread is

alliteratively linked to the concealing of a דָּבָר which is

normally open to be proclaimed. Thus the assonance

reveals that the ordering of the participles should have

been reversed. In Proverbs 11:18, שֶׁקֶר (deceptive) and שֶׂכֶר

(wages) are sound-bound. They unite the bi-colon via a

common sound but have diverse and contrastive meanings.

That is, the wages of the wicked are deceptive but he who

sows righteousness obtains true wages. These words

emphasize the contrast between the results of the wicked,

who seek only money and get deceptive wages, and those who

sow righteousness, who actually get that which is desired

by the wicked: wages.

A final phonetic feature of poetry is

onomatopoeia--the formation of words to sound like that

which they describe (Ps 93:4; Judg 5:22).1 While this

trope is not overly abundant in Proverbs, it does occur.

For example, in Proverbs 10:18 the soft hissing of the

malignant murmurer may be heard in the repeated silibants

which are graphemically written by three different letters

( ס, שׂ, שׁ).

____________________



1Gottwald, "Poetry, Hebrew," p. 835.

In summary, it has been shown that phonetic

features are important both in terms of the poet's

endeavor to use sound patterns creatively and of the

audience's expectations. Cognizance of these devices will

lead the reader to a more complete picture of the poetic

moment. In a day when Hebrew in America is so poorly read

orally, the reminder of the importance of phonetic

features for composition and audience response suggests

that the oral reading of Hebrew is not done simply for

purist or pedantically pedagogical reasons but for

aesthetic and exegetical reasons as well. The systems of

meter were discussed in order to point out the superiority

of replacing the muddled maze of meter with a more

descriptively verifiable system of syntax. A syntactical

base should not eliminate stress patterns, phonological

schemes, and tropes from a close reading of the text, but

should help define the most basic unit, i.e., the line

itself.
Semantic Analysis
Standard Description Approach1 to

Semantic Parallelism


The discussion of the history of the notion of

parallelism as applied to Hebrew poetry has been developed

____________________

1Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 176-79

(Ibn Ezra and Kimchi), 201-3 (dei Rossi). Cf. also A.

Baker, "Parallelism: England's Contribution to Biblical

Studies," CBQ 35 (1973):433-36. Kugel also treats the work

exhaustively in Kugel's Idea of Biblical Poetry. Lowth

was obviously anticipated by Jewish scholars like Azariah

dei Rossi, David Kimchi and Ibn Ezra. Kugel does an

excellent job specifying precisely how each contributed to

the overall historical development of this idea.1 For

purposes of this study, the discussion will proceed as

follows: (1) an enumeration of Lowth's model; (2)

modifications at the hands of Gray, Robinson et al.; (3)

exploration of other semantic descriptions; (4) the

problems of this type of semantic approach; and (5) other

semantic line binders (word pairs; repetitions; merismus,

etc.). The intention is not to reiterate all that has

been done on this subject, but is merely to illustrate how

this system looks at poetry, to point out its flaws, and

then to indicate the direction that may preserve a

semantic approach. This approach to poetry is being

assaulted and/or neglected by those of the metrical and

syntactic schools.

Lowth's insight was not that parallelism was

employed in poetry, for many had seen and classified it as

a trope or figure. Rather, for Lowth, parallelism was no

mere ornament; it was an evidence of lineation.1 Lowth

____________________

of Lowth in relation to his contemporary Schoettgen whose

ten rules and use of rhetoric were a foretaste many of

Lowth's "discoveries" yet avoided many of the Lowthian

problems (Kugel, Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 266-72.)

1Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 285-86.

defined parallelism as "The correspondence of one verse or

line with another."1 Normal definitions mention

parallelism of thought and sense between lines perhaps

adding that the word units in one line will usually be

answered in the corresponding line.2 Hence von Rad speaks

of a "stereometric" way of thinking.3 More recently, two

different definitions (approaches) have been beneficial.

Kugel has generalized the concept by acknowledging that

the symmetry between the two lines may range from

one-hundred percent correspondence (repetition) to zero

correspondence. He describes the relationship of the

colon as: "parallelistic not because B is meant to be a

parallel of A, but because B typically supports A, carries

it further, backs it up, completes it, goes beyond it."4

Thus B has a "what's more" character in relation to A, and

may take many semantic shapes.5 Most would agree with

____________________



1R. Lowth, Isaiah. A new translation; with a

preliminary dissertation (London: Charles R. and George

Webster, 1794), p. x. Cited from Baker, "Parallelism:

England's Contribution to Biblical Studies," p. 431.

2Young, "Ugaritic Prosody," p. 132; Robinson,

The Poetry of the Old Testament, p. 26.

3von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 13. The connection

of such a trope to thought patterns is a bit presumptuous

linguistically and demonstrates the need for an integration

of recent linguistic poetics and wisdom studies.



4Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 7, 52.

5Ibid., pp. 43, 57. For a similar conception vid.

Adele Berlin's superb article, "Grammatical Aspects of

Biblical Parallelism," p. 41.

Greenstein:


Biblicists have for centuries used the term

'parallelism' to refer to the repetition of the

components of one line of verse in the following line

or lines. It could be a repetition of sense, or

words, or sound, or rhythm, or morphology, or syntax,

or any combination of these.1


While O'Connor's major contribution has already been

mentioned, his designation of semantic parallelism as a

trope rather than as the sole feature of poetry--is also

of great significance.2

It is well known that Lowth divided parallelism

into: synonymous, antithetic, and synthetic. These

categories have been understood as follows. Anderson

defines synonymous parallelism, as being "where the same

thought is repeated by the other line, in different but

synonymous words."3 An example may be seen in Proverbs

16:18:

____________________



1Greenstein, "How Does Parallelism Mean?" p. 43.

2O'Connor, Hebrew Verse Structure, pp. 88, 96;

3A. A. Anderson, Psalms, vol. 1, New Century Bible

ed. R. E. Clements and M. Black (Greenwood, SC: the Attic

Press, Inc., 1977), p. 41; he follows G. B. Gray, The Forms



of Hebrew Poetry, The Library of Biblical Studies, ed. H.

M. Orlinsky (New York: KTAV Publishing House, 1972

reprint), pp. 49, 59. Cf. also Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72:

An Introduction and Commentary on Books I and II of the

Psalms, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove,

IL: Inter-Varsity Press, 1973), p. 3; and Leopold

Sabourin, The Psalms: Their Origin and Meaning, p. 26.

These, as well as other sources which could have been

cited, are to demonstrate the prolific acceptance of

Lowth's categories.

Pride goes before destruction,

A haughty spirit [goes] before a fall.1


This is usually diagrammed A B C//A' B' C' where A and A'

(and so forth) are synonyms. Similarly, antithetic

parallelism is described as balancing "the parallel lines

through opposition or contrast of thought."2


Hatred stirs up dissension

Love covers over all wrong (Prov 10:12).


Again, the terms may be matched (A B C// A' B' C').

Finally, synthetic parallelism has been largely rejected

today, although it is still found in some noteworthy

scholarly commentaries. Synthetic parallelism occurs when

the second line continues (rather than repeats or

contrasts) the thought of the first line. Many have

objected to its being called parallelism at all. Gottwald

designates it as "formal parallelism" because the thoughts

are not strictly parallel, though there is allegedly a

parallelism in form.3

____________________

1Biblical quotations are purposefully given in

English without Hebrew accompaniment.



2Anderson, Psalms, p. 41. Cf. also Toy, Proverbs,

ICC (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1904); C. F. Keil and F.

Delitzsch, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, vol. 6

Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Wm. B.

Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1973 reprint), p. 8; McKane,

Proverbs, p. 463; and W. O. E. Oesterley, The Book of

Proverbs: With Introduction and Notes (London: Methuen

and Co., 1929), p. xiv.



3Gottwald, "Poetry, Hebrew," p. 832. Hemmingsen

provides a very concise discussion of all three in "An

Introduction to Hebrew Poetic Structure and Stylistic

Techniques," pp. 14-25. It is interesting that McKane

The blessing of the Lord brings wealth,

and he adds no trouble with it

(Prov 10:22).
Lowth's ideas were given "canonical" shape at the

hands of G. B. Gray (1915). With Gray and T. H. Robinson,

the movement was away from any metrical allowances to a

strictly parallelistic approach--which is ultimately

reflected in Young's metrical nihilism.1 Not only was

there a de-emphasis of meter, but also the notion of

parallelism itself was restricted to a thought or a

semantic unit phenomenon which "controls the form which

every line of Hebrew poetry takes."2 A new addition to

the classifications was the idea of complete/incomplete

parallelism with/without compensation. Complete

____________________

still accepts this category (Proverbs, p. 463), which again

illustrates the need to connect poetic studies and the text

of Proverbs. An interesting chart, giving the frequencies

of the various types of parallelisms in Proverbs by chapter

is found in Robert Chisholm's, "Literary Genres and

Structures in Proverbs," A Paper Presented to Prof. Donald

Glenn at Dallas Theological Seminary (May, 1980), p. 36.

Cf. Stuart S. Cook, "The Nature and Use of the Proverbs of

Solomon" (Th.M. thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary, 1975),

pp. 35-36; von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 29; Thompson, The



Form and Function of Proverbs, pp. 61-62; and a summarizing

chart by Udo Skladny, Die altesten Spruchsammlungen in


Yüklə 6,58 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   ...   51




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə