to nail down the structure of the line, which he did
admirably.
3J. J. Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry:
Sound Patterns as a Literary Device," in De Fructu Oris
Sui: Essays in Honour of Adrianus van Selms, ed I. H.
Eybers et al. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1971), p. 78. Percy
G. Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to
Poets," Publications of the Modern Language Association of
America 88 (1973):16. Cf. Bruno Hildebrandt, "Linguistic
Analysis of Sound and Rhyme in Poetry," in Papers from the
Alliteration may be designated as phonological
repetition.1 It is a device used to heighten the feeling
of sameness in a text, thereby expressing its cohesive
unity in phonetic form. In short, alliteration is a
synthesis of sound and sense. There is need for a
standardization of terminology. Pardee observes the
disparity between the definition of alliteration in the
Oxford English Dictionary as "the commencement of certain
accented syllables in a verse with the same consonant or
consonantal group" and a broader definition, which is
reflected in the Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and
Poetics, allowing for "any repetition of the same sound(s)
or syllable in two or more words of a line (or line
group), which produces a noticeable artistic effect."2
This study will operate under the broader description.
Thus, Shakespeare's play on initial alliteration in the
____________________
1977 Mid-America Lingusitics Conference, ed. D. M. Lance
and D. E. Gulstad (Columbia, MS: University of Missouri,
1978), p. 454.
1Akhmanova, Linguostylistics: Theory and
Method, p. 23; Raimo Anttila, "Comments on K. L. Pike's and W. P.
Lehman's Papers," in The Scope of American Linguistics, ed.
Robert Austerlitz (Lisse: The Peter De Ridder Press,
1975), p. 60. Where the phonaesthetic pattern "slide,
slip, slouch, slime, slush, sludge, slither, slink, sleek,
etc." is noted.
2Pardee, "Ugaritic and Hebrew Poetry:
Parallelism," p. 31, n. 57. A. Preminger, F. J. Warnke,
and O. B. Hardison, ed. Princeton Encylopedia of Poetry and
Poetics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), p.
15. Cf. also P. Kiparsky, "Linguistics in a Theory of
Poetry," pp. 241-42.
title "Love's Labour's Lost" may be compared to
medial alliteration of "that brave vibration" of Robert Herrick.1
Final alliteration forms a type of rhyme:
The 'age demanded' chiefly a mould in plaster,
Made with no loss of time.
A prose kinema, not assuredly, alabaster
Or the 'sculpture' of rhyme.
Fussell reiterates how "plaster" and "alabaster" are drawn
together by the end alliteration (rhyme) for comparison in
sound and also for semantic contrast.2 Such close
reading should be beneficially employed in the analysis of
biblical poetry. Multiple unit repetitions may also
reverse the order of vowels and consonants. While little
more than a simple mentioning of this phenomenon has
appeared in biblical studies, the work of Margalit has not
only demonstrated this feature in Ugaritic but has also
circumscribed parameters for discovering it elsewhere.3
He suggests that:
To be significant, a letter should occur: (a) at
least three times per seven verse-unit verse; and/or
(b) twice in a single word or once in each of two
adjacent words (especially at the beginning); and/or
(c) as a repeated sequence of two or more adjacent
____________________
1Examples are taken from the Princeton
Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, pp. 15, 16.
2Paul Fussell, Poetic Meter and Poetic Form
(New York: Random House, 1979), pp. 110-11.
3Margalit, "Introduction to Ugaritic Prosody," pp.
310-13. Pardee also confirms this in his Ugaritic studies
restricting it to a consonantalism. ("Type and
Distributions of Parallelism in Ugaritic and Hebrew
Poetry," p. 5).
letters, not necessarily in the same order, and not
necessarily in the scope of a single word.1
O'Connor offers a parsimonious caution that
alliteration should not be confused with word repetition
and that prefix and suffix repetitions be taken cum granis
salis and not as proof of alliteration per se.2 Because
alliteration may be seen as a repetitional feature, this
writer, while observing O'Connor's caution from his
poetically sensitive perspective, suggests that the
repetition of certain words appear to be selected as much
on the basis of phonetics as semantics, as will be shown
perhaps in Proverbs 11:7-12 with the repeated use of the
preposition בְּ. Gluck is correct when he states,
"Alliteration is part of many proverbs and popular idioms,
reinforcing a truism with a chime."3 One tenet of this
paper will be to demonstrate the use of this device in the
proverbial text. This scheme of phonetic repetition was
used not only to scintillate aesthetically, but also like
other forms of repetition, to provide a linguistic
cohesion on the intra- and inter-line level, as
well as on the "strophic" levels of the proverbial
____________________
1Margalit, "Introduction to Ugaritic Prosody," p.
311. Cf. O'Connor, Hebrew Verse Structure, p. 143.
2O'Connor, "The Rhetoric of the Kilamuwa
Inscription," BASOR 226 (1977):16, 17.
3Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry: Sound
Patterns as a Literary Device," p. 78. His examples
include Prov 6:2; 11:1a, 22a; 13:3a, 12; 14:1.
sentence literature.
Assonance is an artistic use of vowel repetition
in stressed syllables of adjacent words.1 Adams notes
that, in general, alliteration (consonance) is more
noticeable.2 Gluck shows that assonance in passages such
as Isaiah 1:18-20 and 5:2 is often supportive of
alliterative (consonantal) features.3 Because of the
problem with Hebraic vocalization and the tendency of
vowels to change with time, one must be cautious about
this aspect of phonological repetition.4 This feature
will not be systematically studied in the corpus.
Another sound pattern which is used with great
effect is paronomasia. Gluck provides a brilliant article
in which he distinguishes six types of this trope in
Isaiah. While this form of word play or punning is often
regarded as a mark of doltishness in modern culture it was
____________________
1Edward P. J. Corbett, Classical Rhetoric for the
Modern Student (New York: Oxford Universtiy Press, 1971),
pp. 471-72.
2Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to
Poets," p. 8.
3Gluck, "Assonance in Ancient Hebrew Poetry: Sound
Patterns as a Literary Device," pp. 82-83.
4Adams, "The Historical Importance of Assonance to
Poets," p. 8. Pardee ("Types of Distributions of
Parallelism in Ugaritic and Hebrew Poetry," p. 5) has tried
his hand at vocalization of Ugaritic texts looking for
assonance and has "come up with very little on vowel
patterning."
not so regarded in ancient Israel.1 A thorough
investigation of this trope has not been performed in the
proverbial corpus. However, a few examples from a cursory
examination of the text should suggest the fruitfulness of
such an approach. (1) The equivocal pun, where a single
grapheme may have two diverse semantic meanings (double
entendre) which are played upon (Prov 3:3, 8; 6:2). An
example is provided by Moffatt who manifests this feature
in his translation of Proverbs 10:6b and 10:11b. The
Hebrew colon is exactly the same; yet in one he takes
as "to cover" and in the other as "to conceal." His
suggestion accommodates the context and influence of the
bi-colon rather than just the clausal context.2 Another
possible case may be seen in the Revised Standard Version
of Proverbs 11:7, where אוֹנִים is translated "iniquity"
rather than "power" or "strength."3 (2) The metaphony
creates ambiguity by the mutation of vowels (Isa 1:29).
(3) Parasony interchanges a consonant resulting in an
unexpected meaning (Isa 1:28). (4) Farrago refers to
____________________
1Gluck, "Paronomasia in Biblical Literature,"
Semitics 1 (1970):52. In a footnote, Gluck notes the pun:
"The bun is the lowest form of wheat" (The pun is the
lowest form of wit) (p. 52). Cf. also A. Guillaume,
"Paronomasia in the Old Testament," JSS 9 (1964):282-90.
2James Moffatt, A New Translation of the Bible (New
York: Harper and Brothers Pub., 1922).
3BDB, p. 20.
words which sound chaotic from their semantic content, but
which produce an imagery nevertheless (Isa 8:1; 28:10).
The word play on diverse and unexpected meanings may be
seen in Proverbs 10:2, where "treasures" and "riches" are
said to be of no "value." This play focuses on the
contrast between the wicked, for whom normally positive
things are of no profit, and the righteous, for whom even
the negative experience of death is escapable.
(5) Associative puns twist diction by taking two
components, which are normally not associated, and
juxtaposing them in order to create new imagery (e.g.,
uncircumcised of heart Lev. 26:41). An example of this
type may be seen in Proverbs 10:21, where it is the lips
of the righteous which feed many, rather than, the usual
conception that lips should be fed. (6) Assonantic puns
are word plays which are accompanied by a recurrence of
sound, thus catching the ear and binding the significant
words together phonetically (Isa 7:13-14; 24:17). A
possible example may be seen in Proverbs 10:5 where a is
added to בַּקַיִץ (in summer), thus resulting in בַּקָּצִיר (in
harvest). This causes the reader to reflect on slothful
sleep of one who slumbers, even through the time when all
helpers are needed (harvest), as compared to the
industriousness of the diligent, who is sedulous with
productive labor even during the slow summer season. So,
too, in Proverbs 11:13 there is an assonantic play with
the words מְגַלֶּה־סּוֹד (spreads a secret) and מְכַסֶּה דָבָר (hides
a matter), where a secret (סוֹד) which is spread is
alliteratively linked to the concealing of a דָּבָר which is
normally open to be proclaimed. Thus the assonance
reveals that the ordering of the participles should have
been reversed. In Proverbs 11:18, שֶׁקֶר (deceptive) and שֶׂכֶר
(wages) are sound-bound. They unite the bi-colon via a
common sound but have diverse and contrastive meanings.
That is, the wages of the wicked are deceptive but he who
sows righteousness obtains true wages. These words
emphasize the contrast between the results of the wicked,
who seek only money and get deceptive wages, and those who
sow righteousness, who actually get that which is desired
by the wicked: wages.
A final phonetic feature of poetry is
onomatopoeia--the formation of words to sound like that
which they describe (Ps 93:4; Judg 5:22).1 While this
trope is not overly abundant in Proverbs, it does occur.
For example, in Proverbs 10:18 the soft hissing of the
malignant murmurer may be heard in the repeated silibants
which are graphemically written by three different letters
( ס, שׂ, שׁ).
____________________
1Gottwald, "Poetry, Hebrew," p. 835.
In summary, it has been shown that phonetic
features are important both in terms of the poet's
endeavor to use sound patterns creatively and of the
audience's expectations. Cognizance of these devices will
lead the reader to a more complete picture of the poetic
moment. In a day when Hebrew in America is so poorly read
orally, the reminder of the importance of phonetic
features for composition and audience response suggests
that the oral reading of Hebrew is not done simply for
purist or pedantically pedagogical reasons but for
aesthetic and exegetical reasons as well. The systems of
meter were discussed in order to point out the superiority
of replacing the muddled maze of meter with a more
descriptively verifiable system of syntax. A syntactical
base should not eliminate stress patterns, phonological
schemes, and tropes from a close reading of the text, but
should help define the most basic unit, i.e., the line
itself.
Semantic Analysis
Standard Description Approach1 to
Semantic Parallelism
The discussion of the history of the notion of
parallelism as applied to Hebrew poetry has been developed
____________________
1Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 176-79
(Ibn Ezra and Kimchi), 201-3 (dei Rossi). Cf. also A.
Baker, "Parallelism: England's Contribution to Biblical
Studies," CBQ 35 (1973):433-36. Kugel also treats the work
exhaustively in Kugel's Idea of Biblical Poetry. Lowth
was obviously anticipated by Jewish scholars like Azariah
dei Rossi, David Kimchi and Ibn Ezra. Kugel does an
excellent job specifying precisely how each contributed to
the overall historical development of this idea.1 For
purposes of this study, the discussion will proceed as
follows: (1) an enumeration of Lowth's model; (2)
modifications at the hands of Gray, Robinson et al.; (3)
exploration of other semantic descriptions; (4) the
problems of this type of semantic approach; and (5) other
semantic line binders (word pairs; repetitions; merismus,
etc.). The intention is not to reiterate all that has
been done on this subject, but is merely to illustrate how
this system looks at poetry, to point out its flaws, and
then to indicate the direction that may preserve a
semantic approach. This approach to poetry is being
assaulted and/or neglected by those of the metrical and
syntactic schools.
Lowth's insight was not that parallelism was
employed in poetry, for many had seen and classified it as
a trope or figure. Rather, for Lowth, parallelism was no
mere ornament; it was an evidence of lineation.1 Lowth
____________________
of Lowth in relation to his contemporary Schoettgen whose
ten rules and use of rhetoric were a foretaste many of
Lowth's "discoveries" yet avoided many of the Lowthian
problems (Kugel, Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 266-72.)
1Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 285-86.
defined parallelism as "The correspondence of one verse or
line with another."1 Normal definitions mention
parallelism of thought and sense between lines perhaps
adding that the word units in one line will usually be
answered in the corresponding line.2 Hence von Rad speaks
of a "stereometric" way of thinking.3 More recently, two
different definitions (approaches) have been beneficial.
Kugel has generalized the concept by acknowledging that
the symmetry between the two lines may range from
one-hundred percent correspondence (repetition) to zero
correspondence. He describes the relationship of the
colon as: "parallelistic not because B is meant to be a
parallel of A, but because B typically supports A, carries
it further, backs it up, completes it, goes beyond it."4
Thus B has a "what's more" character in relation to A, and
may take many semantic shapes.5 Most would agree with
____________________
1R. Lowth, Isaiah. A new translation; with a
preliminary dissertation (London: Charles R. and George
Webster, 1794), p. x. Cited from Baker, "Parallelism:
England's Contribution to Biblical Studies," p. 431.
2Young, "Ugaritic Prosody," p. 132; Robinson,
The Poetry of the Old Testament, p. 26.
3von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 13. The connection
of such a trope to thought patterns is a bit presumptuous
linguistically and demonstrates the need for an integration
of recent linguistic poetics and wisdom studies.
4Kugel, The Idea of Biblical Poetry, pp. 7, 52.
5Ibid., pp. 43, 57. For a similar conception vid.
Adele Berlin's superb article, "Grammatical Aspects of
Biblical Parallelism," p. 41.
Greenstein:
Biblicists have for centuries used the term
'parallelism' to refer to the repetition of the
components of one line of verse in the following line
or lines. It could be a repetition of sense, or
words, or sound, or rhythm, or morphology, or syntax,
or any combination of these.1
While O'Connor's major contribution has already been
mentioned, his designation of semantic parallelism as a
trope rather than as the sole feature of poetry--is also
of great significance.2
It is well known that Lowth divided parallelism
into: synonymous, antithetic, and synthetic. These
categories have been understood as follows. Anderson
defines synonymous parallelism, as being "where the same
thought is repeated by the other line, in different but
synonymous words."3 An example may be seen in Proverbs
16:18:
____________________
1Greenstein, "How Does Parallelism Mean?" p. 43.
2O'Connor, Hebrew Verse Structure, pp. 88, 96;
3A. A. Anderson, Psalms, vol. 1, New Century Bible
ed. R. E. Clements and M. Black (Greenwood, SC: the Attic
Press, Inc., 1977), p. 41; he follows G. B. Gray, The Forms
of Hebrew Poetry, The Library of Biblical Studies, ed. H.
M. Orlinsky (New York: KTAV Publishing House, 1972
reprint), pp. 49, 59. Cf. also Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72:
An Introduction and Commentary on Books I and II of the
Psalms, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove,
IL: Inter-Varsity Press, 1973), p. 3; and Leopold
Sabourin, The Psalms: Their Origin and Meaning, p. 26.
These, as well as other sources which could have been
cited, are to demonstrate the prolific acceptance of
Lowth's categories.
Pride goes before destruction,
A haughty spirit [goes] before a fall.1
This is usually diagrammed A B C//A' B' C' where A and A'
(and so forth) are synonyms. Similarly, antithetic
parallelism is described as balancing "the parallel lines
through opposition or contrast of thought."2
Hatred stirs up dissension
Love covers over all wrong (Prov 10:12).
Again, the terms may be matched (A B C// A' B' C').
Finally, synthetic parallelism has been largely rejected
today, although it is still found in some noteworthy
scholarly commentaries. Synthetic parallelism occurs when
the second line continues (rather than repeats or
contrasts) the thought of the first line. Many have
objected to its being called parallelism at all. Gottwald
designates it as "formal parallelism" because the thoughts
are not strictly parallel, though there is allegedly a
parallelism in form.3
____________________
1Biblical quotations are purposefully given in
English without Hebrew accompaniment.
2Anderson, Psalms, p. 41. Cf. also Toy, Proverbs,
ICC (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1904); C. F. Keil and F.
Delitzsch, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, vol. 6
Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1973 reprint), p. 8; McKane,
Proverbs, p. 463; and W. O. E. Oesterley, The Book of
Proverbs: With Introduction and Notes (London: Methuen
and Co., 1929), p. xiv.
3Gottwald, "Poetry, Hebrew," p. 832. Hemmingsen
provides a very concise discussion of all three in "An
Introduction to Hebrew Poetic Structure and Stylistic
Techniques," pp. 14-25. It is interesting that McKane
The blessing of the Lord brings wealth,
and he adds no trouble with it
(Prov 10:22).
Lowth's ideas were given "canonical" shape at the
hands of G. B. Gray (1915). With Gray and T. H. Robinson,
the movement was away from any metrical allowances to a
strictly parallelistic approach--which is ultimately
reflected in Young's metrical nihilism.1 Not only was
there a de-emphasis of meter, but also the notion of
parallelism itself was restricted to a thought or a
semantic unit phenomenon which "controls the form which
every line of Hebrew poetry takes."2 A new addition to
the classifications was the idea of complete/incomplete
parallelism with/without compensation. Complete
____________________
still accepts this category (Proverbs, p. 463), which again
illustrates the need to connect poetic studies and the text
of Proverbs. An interesting chart, giving the frequencies
of the various types of parallelisms in Proverbs by chapter
is found in Robert Chisholm's, "Literary Genres and
Structures in Proverbs," A Paper Presented to Prof. Donald
Glenn at Dallas Theological Seminary (May, 1980), p. 36.
Cf. Stuart S. Cook, "The Nature and Use of the Proverbs of
Solomon" (Th.M. thesis, Dallas Theological Seminary, 1975),
pp. 35-36; von Rad, Wisdom in Israel, p. 29; Thompson, The
Form and Function of Proverbs, pp. 61-62; and a summarizing
chart by Udo Skladny, Die altesten Spruchsammlungen in
Dostları ilə paylaş: |