13
The Current View tool (see p.31, appendix 1 for copy of the tool) records:
• 30 presenting problems
7
(e.g. social anxiety, family relationship problems, carer management of child’s
behaviour)
• 4 contextual problems (relation to home, school, community, and service engagement)
• 2 education, employment or training issues (attendance and attainment),
Each rated “None”, “Mild”, “Moderate”, “Severe”, or “Not known”.
• 14 complexity factors (e.g. presence of learning disability, parental health issues, refugee status)Each rated
“Yes, “No”, or “Not known”.
Data on resource use (in terms of number of contacts)
8
and on ending of contact were collected from 11 NHS
outpatient CAMHS, amounting to some 4573 episodes of care with data that included Current View tool and
resource use information.
Attempts were made to derive needs-based groupings bottom-up from the data using a variety of statistical
techniques including: unsupervised cluster analysis (k-medoids cluster analysis) and supervised cluster analysis
(regression trees) (Wolpert, et al., 2015, p.23) However, no stable or meaningful groupings were identified
using these methods. In contrast, a “clinically driven classification approach” based on rigorous review of NICE
guidance and clinical practice resulted in clinically meaningful groupings, which were as good as or better than
statistical approaches (see algorithm development, below).
3. Development of an algorithm to potentially allocate children, young people and families
to groupings.
Two senior clinicians (consultant psychiatrist Professor Panos Vostanis and consultant psychologist Dr Roger
Davies), both members of the payment systems group, independently reviewed the 15 existing NICE guidelines
(11 specifically for children, and 4 for adults but with reference to children) in relation to factors affecting
resource use (Vostanis, et al., 2015). From this analysis it was found that the NICE guidelines related largely to
symptomatic severity and, to a lesser degree, impairment – but were not influenced or amended according
to contextual factors in the children’s or their families’ lives. In light of this, an algorithm was developed that
assigns children and young people mental health services clients to a NICE guidance category based on the
presenting problems rated on the Current View tool. Because of the lack of consideration of contextual factors
in the NICE guidance these elements on the Current View tool were not included in the algorithm, but it was
hypothesised that these factors might account for additional variance in resource use within each grouping.
What emerged from this work was an algorithm that allocated children, young people and families accessing
mental health services to three superordinate categories termed “getting advice” (analogous to the getting
advice grouping in THRIVE), getting help (as the THRIVE grouping) and getting more help (as the THRIVE
grouping). Within each of these categories there were subcategories (2 in getting advice, 13 in getting help and
4 in getting more help) leading to an overall set of 19 clusters (14 of which are guided by specific NICE guidance
and 5 of which are not) within the Payment System model (Wolpert, et al., 2015). The implications of these
categories and sub-categories for the THRIVE framework are discussed in more detail below. It should be noted
at this point that risk support and thriving were not groupings identified by the Payment Systems work, though
they were referred to in the final report to show how they could be aligned with the payment systems approach
(Wolpert, et al., 2015).
7
Ratings need not imply a diagnosis.
8
Data quality on inpatient work was not sufficient to be included in the analysis.
14
Mutually
exclusive
groupings
Getting Help: ADHD (Guided by NICE Guideline 72)
(ADH)
Getting Advice: Neurodevelopmental Assessment (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(NEU)*
Getting Advice: Signposting and Self-management Advice (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(ADV)
Getting More Help: Presentation Suggestive of Potential BDP (Guided by NICE Guideline 78)
(PBP)
Getting More Help: Psychosis (Guided by NICE Guidelines 155 and/or 185)
(PSY)†
Getting Help: Behavioural and/or Conduct Disorders (Guided by NICE Guideline 158)
(BEH)
Getting Help: Bipolar Disorder (Guided by NICE Guideline 185)
(BIP)†
Getting Help: GAD and/or Panic Disorder (Guided by NICE Guideline 113)
(GAP)
Getting Help: Social Anxiety Disorder (Guided by NICE Guideline 159)
(SOC)
Getting Help: Difficulties Not Covered by Other Groupings (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(DNC)
Getting Help: Autism Spectrum (Guided by NICE Guideline 170)
(AUT)
Getting Help: Depression (Guided by NICE Guideline 28)
(DEP)
Getting Help: OCD (Guided by NICE Guideline 31)
(OCD)
Getting Help: Self-harm (Guided by NICE Guidelines 16 and/or 133)
(SHA)
Getting Help: Co-occurring Emotional Difficulties (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(EMO)‡
Getting Help: PTSD (Guided by NICE Guideline 26)
(PTS)
Getting Help: Co-occurring Behavioural and Emotional Difficulties (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(BEM)‡
Getting More Help: Eating Disorders (Guided by NICE Guideline 9)
(EAT)
Getting More Help: Difficulties of Severe Impact (NICE Guidance as Relevant)
(DSI)
Getting
Advice
Getting
More Help
Getting
Help
‘Super groupings’
(n=3)
Needs-based groupings
(n=19)
Figure 4:
The payment
systems groupings
The payment systems groupings are outlined in the figure above.
The exact algorithm can be found in the Payment Systems report (Wolpert, et al., 2015. Appendix C). Key
elements are outlined overleaf.