Stakehold


of Lyme borreliosis in United Kingdom patients: A position statement by the British



Yüklə 1,22 Mb.
səhifə6/14
tarix15.08.2018
ölçüsü1,22 Mb.
#62981
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14

of Lyme borreliosis in United Kingdom patients: A position statement by the British

Infection Association. J Infect. 2011 May;62(5):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.03.006.

http://www.aldf.com/pdf/BIA%202011statement%20on%20Lyme%20disease.pdf

Thank you for your comment on the

issue of the classification of early and

late Lyme disease as described in the

consultation version of the scope. We

have invited stakeholders to provide

comment on this in a specific question

at consultation to ensure that we

collected the widest views on this

issue. We now propose to present the

guideline committee with the

stakeholder feedback on this issue to

allow them to determine the best

approach for the guideline to take. As

such, we have removed the detail

linked to the definitions of early and

late Lyme disease from the final

scope.

Lyme Disease UK

3

79

The term 'definitive treatment’ should be replaced with ‘standard treatment’ as there is no

proof that the treatment currently being offered for Lyme disease by the NHS is effective in

the majority of cases. In fact this study showed that ‘over 63% of the Lyme disease cases

had at least one diagnosis associated with PTLDS’ (post treatment Lyme disease

symptoms) following early standard treatment (Adrion et al, 2015). Patients would argue

that a continuation of symptoms does not mean that the treatment was ‘definitive’ or

successful.

This information is available on Lymedisease.org’s website: ‘The International Lyme and

Associated Diseases Society (ILADS), recently published new treatment guidelines. These

guidelines contained a rigorous assessment of the evidence and found treatment failure

rates ranging from 16% to 39% for early treatment. Estimates for patients with chronic

Lyme disease are much higher, ranging from 26% to 50%. (Johnson 2004)’

Whether ongoing symptoms are due to a continuing infection or due to a past infection is

uncertain, but with many studies showing Borrelia’s ability to persist, ongoing infection

cannot be ruled out and therefore treatment cannot be described as ‘definitive’.

For those who have been treated, the patient experience often seems to be that people

are told categorically by GPs that they cannot possibly still have Lyme disease following a

standard course of antibiotics from the NHS. The ILADS guidelines state that, ‘there is no

compelling evidence to support routinely withholding antibiotic retreatment from ill patients.

While antibiotics are not always effective, the importance of providing patients with the

opportunity to receive an adequate trial of antibiotic therapy is heightened by the lack of

other effective treatment approaches. Palliative care may be helpful in addressing some

symptoms in some cases, but it is important to bear in mind that palliative interventions

also carry risks. Additionally, clinicians must not assume that palliative interventions would

provide adequate treatment in the face of an underlying persistent infection. Therefore, in

the panel’s judgment, antibiotic retreatment will prove to be appropriate for the majority of

patients who remain ill’ (Cameron et al, 2014).

References:

1. Adrion, ER, Aucott, J, Lemke, KW and Weiner, JP. Health care costs, utilization and patterns of care following Lyme disease. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 4;10(2):e0116767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116767. eCollection 2015 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116767

2. Lymedisease.org: Chronic https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-basics/lyme-disease/chronic-lyme/

3. Cameron DJ, Johnson LB, Maloney EL. Evidence assessments and guideline recommendations in Lyme disease: the clinical management of known tick bites, erythema migrans rashes and persistent disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Sep;12(9):1103-35. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.940900 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

4. List of 700 Articles Citing Chronic Infection Associated with Tick-Borne Disease

Compiled By Dr Robert Bransfield http://www.ilads.org/ilads_news/2015/list-of-700-articles-

citing-chronic-infection-associated-with-tick-borne-disease-compiled-by-dr-robert-

bransfield/

Thank you for your comment. The

term ‘definitive’ has been removed.

Lyme Disease UK Lyme Disease UK

4

4

102-

108

94-

95

An extra point for ‘Main Outcomes’ needs to be included (point 8) and the evidence should

be reviewed on issues of chronic complex sequelae and comorbidity which may relate to

Lyme disease such as heart problems, gallbladder and thyroid disease, to name a few.

Many Lyme disease patients appear to suffer from the conditions mentioned above and so

searching for and assessing the literature on these issues and potential connections, may

lead to a greater understanding and improvements in Lyme disease patient outcomes.

An extra point should be added here (point 4.6) to include groups of patients who are

immunocompromised, who have co-morbidities, who are pregnant, and who have other

concurrent tick-borne infections. The BIA position statement from 2011 refers to

immunocompromised patients on page 334.

Children may also present differently clinically and require different treatment and this

should be reflected in the guidelines.

This article from Lymedisease.org highlights this point: ‘Children with Lyme disease have

special issues. Since they can’t always explain what feels wrong, they may just come

across as cranky and irritable. They suffer when their bodies hurt, when their illness

disrupts their sleep at night, when they struggle in school, when they don’t even feel like

playing. They may feel confused, lost and betrayed by parents and teachers who fail to

recognize that they are sick and need help. Children with Lyme often have trouble in the

classroom, because the disease can contribute to learning disabilities and behavioral

problems.’

References:

1. British Infection Association. The epidemiology, prevention, investigation and treatment

of Lyme borreliosis in United Kingdom patients: A position statement by the British

Infection Association. J Infect. 2011 May;62(5):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.03.006.

http://www.aldf.com/pdf/BIA%202011statement%20on%20Lyme%20disease.pdf

2. Lymedisease.org. Children with Lyme disease

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-basics/lyme-disease/children/

Thank you for your comment. For the

purpose of the scope, we believe this

is already covered in the outcomes

and would be addressed by the

outcome ‘cure’

The guideline committee will agree the

key outcomes for each review and will

use their expertise to determine

whether the results of relevant studies

are significant.

The guideline committee will review

the evidence about diagnostic test

accuracy and management strategies

in pregnant women and

immunocompromised people. It is

anticipated that these populations will

form sub-groups in each of our

evidence reviews to ensure that,

where evidence exists on these

issues, the committee are able to

make evidence-based

recommendations to the NHS.

These subgroups have been included

in the equality impact assessment for

this guideline.

Children are already detailed in the

scope and will form a separate group

to ensure that the evidence is

appropriately identified, considered

and interpreted. We plan to recruit

three paediatricians to the committee

for this purpose.

While people with co-infections will not

be excluded from the evidence

reviews, the focus of this guideline is

the diagnosis and management of

Lyme disease. However, the guideline

committee will give mention to any

groups who require special

consideration when linking evidence

to recommendations.

Lyme Disease UK

7

138-

139

The draft scope mentions that early symptoms of Lyme disease ‘are similar to those for

flu.’ However, it is also important to note that Lyme disease can mimic many other

conditions and present in numerous different ways, including neuropsychiatric

manifestations. Fallon and Nields, in this study state that, ‘up to 40% of patients with Lyme

disease develop neurologic involvement of either the peripheral or central nervous system.

Dissemination to the CNS can occur within the first few weeks after skin infection’ and that

early signs include meningitis, encephalitis, cranial neuritis, and radiculoneuropathies.’



This quote reflects what appears to happen frequently in the patient community: ‘Time and

again, Fallon, an expert in hypochondria, had seen frustrated doctors dismiss medically ill

patients as psychiatric cases due to their own inability to diagnose the disease. With Lyme,

the mistake was especially damaging since a delay in treatment could turn a curable, acute

infection into a chronic, treatment-resistant disease’ (Weintraub, 2008).

It is important to include in the scope and guidelines that initial symptoms of Lyme disease

are not always concurrent with a dismissable flu-like illness. Doctors must be made aware

of the wide variety of ways in which Lyme disease may present and not assume symptoms

are restricted to those of flu in the initial stages, especially as without a known tick bite or

EM rash, it is often hard to distinguish between an acute early infection and a

disseminated infection.

References:

1. Fallon, B. A. and Nields, J. A. (1994). Lyme disease: a neuropsychiatric illness. The

American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(11), 1571–83. doi:10.1176/ajp.151.11.1571

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7943444

2. Weintraub, P. Lyme Disease: The Great Imitator. Psychology Today, May 1st 2008.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200805/lyme-disease-the-great-imitator

Thank you for your comment. We

used the phrase “similar to flu” to

reflect that the symptoms can be non-

specific. We have amended the

wording in the scope to read: “ …early

symptoms are non-specific and can

be similar to those for flu.”

Lyme Disease UK

7

141

The sentence ‘Lyme disease is frequently self-limiting and resolves spontaneously’ should

be removed or rephrased. It is not representative of the general patient experience and it

does not take into consideration existing and emerging evidence that Lyme disease can be

a persistent infection. Furthermore, in the absence of 100% reliable tests, it cannot be

proven that Lyme disease has been eradicated from a patient’s body.

This is highlighted in this study: ‘Clinicians have no diagnostic tests to check for the

persistence of live borreliae. B. burgdorferi, having a complex genetic structure, is a highly

adaptable organism capable of evading immune response through different processes’

(Perronne, 2014).

The ILADS guidelines state that ‘ongoing symptoms at the completion of active therapy

were associated with an increased risk of long-term failure in some trials and therefore

clinicians should not assume that time alone will resolve symptoms’ (Cameron et al, 2014).

References:

1. List of 700 Articles Citing Chronic Infection Associated with Tick-Borne Disease

Compiled By Dr Robert Bransfield http://www.ilads.org/ilads_news/2015/list-of-700-articles-

citing-chronic-infection-associated-with-tick-borne-disease-compiled-by-dr-robert-

bransfield/

2. Perronne C (2014) Lyme and associated tick-borne diseases: global challenges in the

context of a public health threat. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:74. doi:

10.3389/fcimb.2014.00074

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00074/full

3. Cameron DJ, Johnson LB, Maloney EL. Evidence assessments and guideline

recommendations in Lyme disease: the clinical management of known tick bites, erythema

migrans rashes and persistent disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Sep;12(9):1103-

35. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

Thank you for your comment however

we do not feel any change is required

to the wording currently used. We

continue to present information in this

section linked to the issues when

Lyme Disease has not resolved

spontaneously to present the fullest

range of experience.

Lyme Disease UK

7

143

As there is no test that can rule out an active Lyme disease infection, the term ‘post-

infectious Lyme disease’ should not be used, especially when there is evidence that the

infection can persist. This study states, ‘extensive evidence now shows that persistent

symptoms of Lyme disease are due to chronic infection with the Lyme spirochete in

conjunction with other tick-borne coinfections’ (Stricker and Johnson, 2011). It would be

more effective to review evidence and consider alternative terminology for ongoing

symptoms consistent with Lyme disease.

References:

1. List of 700 Articles Citing Chronic Infection Associated with Tick-Borne Disease

Compiled By Dr Robert Bransfield http://www.ilads.org/ilads_news/2015/list-of-700-articles-

citing-chronic-infection-associated-with-tick-borne-disease-compiled-by-dr-robert-

bransfield/

2. Stricker, R.B, Johnson. L. Lyme disease: the next decade. Stricker, R.B, Johnson, Infect

Drug Resist. 2011; 4: 1–9. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S15653

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108755/

Thank you for your comment. We

have deleted this phrase.

Lyme Disease UK

7

146

The evidence on how to define relapse should be reviewed as the ILADS guidelines state:

given that prior B. burgdorferi infections do not provide durable immunoprotection,



clinicians should consider the possibility that the patient was re-infected and seek

information to confirm or dispel that this occurred. In the absence of clear evidence of re-

infection, clinicians and patients will need to consider the relative risks and benefits of

assuming that relapsing symptoms such as EM lesions or flu-like symptoms in the summer

are indicative of ongoing infection and not re-infection’ (Cameron et al, 2014).

References:

1. Cameron DJ, Johnson LB, Maloney EL. Evidence assessments and guideline

recommendations in Lyme disease: the clinical management of known tick bites, erythema

migrans rashes and persistent disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Sep;12(9):1103-

35. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

Thank you for your comment. The

definition of relapse has not been

prioritised as an area for a review

question; however, management of

Lyme disease in people who have

Lyme disease refractory to treatment

will be addressed. The Guideline

Committee will discuss and agree the

exact protocol for this review question

based on the scope.

Lyme Disease UK

7

148

The statement ‘early treatment is almost always successful’ requires an evidence review.

This is not reflective of the overwhelming number of people in the patient community who

report ongoing health problems despite standard treatment for Lyme disease. Follow ups

often do not occur, especially if patients move on to seek private Lyme disease treatment

after feeling let down by the NHS, as is often the case based on anecdotal evidence from

patients. The ILADS guidelines observe that ‘the optimum duration of post-treatment

observation for EM has not been determined, in part, because while disease relapse is

known to occur, the duration of the latent period is variable and can be prolonged’

(Cameron et al, 2014).

This study shows that following early treatment, 63% patients treated for Lyme disease still

had symptoms which were then attributed to ‘post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms

(PTLDS)’ (Adrion et al, 2015). In our opinion, this does not reflect ‘successful’ treatment.

Furthermore, ‘clinicians have no diagnostic tests to check for the persistence of live

borreliae. B. burgdorferi, having a complex genetic structure, is a highly adaptable

organism capable of evading immune response’ (Perronne, 2014).

The ILADS guidelines also state that ‘the harms associated with restricting treatment of an

EM rash to 20 or fewer days of oral azithromycin, cefuroxime, doxycycline and

phenoxymethylpenicillin/amoxicillin outweigh the benefits. In assessing the risk–benefit

profile, the panel determined that the failure rates for antibiotic treatment of 20 or fewer

days were unacceptably high and that for those who failed treatment, the magnitude of the

potential harm created by delaying definitive treatment, which includes the increased risk

of developing a chronic and more difficult to treat form of the disease, was too great’

(Cameron et al, 2014).

References:

1. Cameron DJ, Johnson LB, Maloney EL. Evidence assessments and guideline

recommendations in Lyme disease: the clinical management of known tick bites, erythema

migrans rashes and persistent disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Sep;12(9):1103-

35. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14787210.2014.940900

2. Adrion, ER, Aucott, J, Lemke, KW and Weiner, JP. Health care costs, utilization and

patterns of care following Lyme disease. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 4;10(2):e0116767. doi:

10.1371/journal.pone.0116767. eCollection 2015

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116767

3. Perronne C (2014) Lyme and associated tick-borne diseases: global challenges in the

context of a public health threat. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:74. doi:

10.3389/fcimb.2014.00074

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00074/full

Thank you for your comment. The

topic of early treatment will be

addressed by an evidence review as

outlined in section 1.5

Lyme Disease UK

Yüklə 1,22 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə