61
Scandinavica Vol 52 No 2 2013
near but culturally still remote islands. And as he draws the public’s
attention, he invites them to discover more, predicting the touristic
development of the area with a mixture of environmental enthusiasm
and bourgeois advertising strategy, as in ‘Livet i Stockholms skärgård’
25
(Life in the Stockholm Archipelago) and ‘Brev från Sandhamn’
26
(Letter
from Sandhamn). If the task of the modern reporter was to make the
wide urban space familiar and recognizable for the growing reading
public, as Eckhardt Köhn has pointed out (1989), Strindberg actively
contributed, through these articles, to cross the border between society
and wilderness and thus incorporate the peripheral archipelago into
the urban sphere of Stockholm. The exciting sailing trip from Dalarö to
Sandhamn described in ‘Huruledes jag fann Sehlstedt’
27
(How I found
Sehlstedt) is also symbolically significant, because Elias Sehlstedt, the
grand old man Strindberg and his friends are visiting, was the first
writer to make the Stockholm archipelago a literary landscape in his
pleasant songs, poems and prose from mid-nineteenth century.
28
Although conventional, his output was a source of inspiration for
Strindberg.
Strindberg can already be seen in these early articles, where the
optimistic and curious bourgeois spirit prevails, to give expression to
his anarchistic and antisocial feelings, too. In ‘Post-skriptum till Brev
från Sandhamn’ (A Postscript to Letter from Sandhamn) the writer
considers that the state and the institutions appear, from the point
of view of an autumn and winter in Sandhamn, as ‘a fetish venerated
more than God, a notion void of reality, and yet as real as anything
can be’.
29
This meditation is connected to the episode of the clever
pilot, who owing to a wrong manoeuvre in a stormy November night
will undergo a trial and probably be imprisoned. This same episode
becomes a short story in ‘Marcus Larsson advokat’ (Marcus Larsson
the Lawyer)
30
, which is interesting from the spatial point of view, as
it describes the passage from the wild space among the skerries to
the trial at the Stockholm court. The narrator’s voice tends to express
solidarity with the pilot, showing his dangerous life and pointing out
extenuating circumstances. The pilot is however condemned in court,
also because of the artist Marcus Larsson’s clumsy intervention as a
defence lawyer. The wilderness does not seem to be allowed to exist
62
Scandinavica Vol 52 No 2 2013
outside the rules of legal society.
A minor but interesting role is played by the archipelago in
Strindberg’s breakthrough novel Röda Rummet (The Red Room) from
1879. Röda Rummet is mainly a Stockholm novel, but a contact with
the archipelago occurs when the protagonist Arvid Falk must be
literally cured of his two romantic illusions: social justice and love. To
do so, his friend doctor Borg takes him drastically out of town – out of
the polis, as it were, and the commitment it stands for – to the island
Nämndö over the summer. The contact with the sea and the natural
environment makes Falk healthy again, where being healthy means for
him, in the bitter final perspective of Röda Rummet, losing every form
of idealism and becoming a passive member of a ruthless society. As
such, Falk can go back to Stockholm at the end of the summer.
31
At the beginning of the Eighties Strindberg, now a married man, spent
four long summers with his wife and children on Kymmendö again,
an often glorious time.
32
During this period the author’s democratic
and utopian radicalism is strongest, and the contrast between the
constrained life in a rotten, urban society and the free outdoor life
outside of it becomes sharpest. The paradisiac existence on the island
confirms Strindberg’s creed of revolution, and it is not by chance, as
Gunnar Brandell observes, that his inflamed letters to Edvard Brandes,
in the initial phase of their pen friendship, occur when the Swedish
writer is on the island in summer.
33
On 22 July 1880 Strindberg
declares himself ‘Jean Jacques’ intimate when it comes to a return to
Nature’, and expresses, from this standpoint, the revolutionary hope
that the existing society may be blown up and started anew.
34
And on
26 June 1881 he goes on to explain that he can only believe in a rebirth
through a return to nature, the abolition of towns and the dissolution
of the state, replaced by village communities without any chiefs.
35
In a very accurate manner, Sven-Gustaf Edqvist dissertation from
1961 illustrates Strindberg’s reading of Jean-Jacques Rousseau as a
support for the Swedish writer’s revolutionary and anarchistic creed.
Together with Edqvist’s study, the other fundamental contribution
that helps us to explore the dimensions of Strindberg’s adaptations of
Rousseau’s ideas and literary universe is Elie Poulenard’s Strindberg
et Rousseau from 1959. Poulenard underscores an important
63
Scandinavica Vol 52 No 2 2013
circumstance in this inter-textual relation: Strindberg, a complex and
contradictory writer, adapts to his own needs the texts by Rousseau,
also highly complex and contradictory. The attraction felt by Strindberg
is probably also due to this affinity – the mix of temperament and
reason, religion and rationality we find in both authors. In Discours
sur les sciences et les arts (Discourse on the Arts and Sciences) and
Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes
(Discourse on the Origin of Inequality) Rousseau posits a radical
opposition between the virtuous and free natural state of mankind,
connected to the sphere of rural and rustic life, and the vicious and
constricted condition experienced in the civilized and urban society.
This opposition is important for Strindberg, as it reinforces his own
doubts about the goodness of material progress, and his conception
of art, science and industry as forms of luxury justifying and increasing
social unbalance. There is however in Rousseau’s Du contract social
(The Social Contract) also a more progressive and constructive legacy,
which is equally important for Strindberg’s democratic stance during
the first years of the 1880s: the free social contract of the origins, lost
in the constrictions of present society, is not given once and for ever,
but must be regained within the historical process.
36
This democratic stance is strong in Svenska Folket (The Swedish
People), published in 1881-82, and is expressed through the
author’s intention to write a Swedish history from the point of view
of the anonymous people and of everyday life (Ciaravolo 2011). The
archipelago plays a small but interesting part in this project, when
fishing in the Middle Ages is described.
37
Writing about medieval
herring fishing on the outer skerries called Huvudskären, in the south-
eastern archipelago, is skillfully transformed into writing about the
medieval traces in the Stockholm area at present, as the narrator
explains that Huvudskären had been in the Middle Ages as they still
were up to some decades previously (Berendsohn 1962: 28-29). The
fact that Strindberg’s field studies in the early Eighties, illustrated by
the painter and friend Carl Larsson
38
, could teach him something about
fishing practice in the Middle Ages, visualizes the threshold between
old and new, pre-modern and modern times, over which Strindberg
consciously lived and worked in his peculiarly Swedish experience of
Dostları ilə paylaş: |