Sunset Clauses in International Law and their Consequences for eu law



Yüklə 0,84 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə62/62
tarix15.04.2023
ölçüsü0,84 Mb.
#105810
1   ...   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62
IPOL STU(2022)703592 EN

Document Outline

  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • 1. Origins, definition and typology of sunset clauses in international law
    • 1.1. Introduction: the objective and approach of this study
    • 1.2. Origin and definition of Sunset Clauses
    • 1.3. The nature of Sunset Clauses
  • 2. Typology of Sunset Clauses
    • 2.1. Entire and sectional
    • 2.2. Direct and indirect
    • 2.3. Conditional and unconditional
      • 2.3.1. Expiration date based on a condition
      • 2.3.2. Activation of the sunset clause based on a condition
    • 2.4. Concluding remarks on the construction of the sunset clause
  • 3. sunset clauses in international agreements; benefits and challenges
    • 3.1. Sunset clauses in multilateral and bilateral treaties
    • 3.2. Sunset clauses in investment treaties
    • 3.3. Sunset Clauses in Energy Charter Treaty
    • 3.4. Rationale of Sunset Clauses in multilateral and bilateral treaties
    • 3.5. Rationale of Sunset Clauses in Investment Treaties
      • 3.5.1. Legal protection to investors
      • 3.5.2. Legal certainty in the interplay between stability and flexibility
  • 4. Legal effects of Sunset Clauses in International Treaties and the Impact on the powers of legislators under EU treaties
    • 4.1. Legal Effect: temporary duration and entrenchment
      • 4.1.1. Automatic expiration
      • 4.1.2. Entrenchment effect of sunset clauses
    • 4.2. Limit on legislative power
    • 4.3. Legitimate expectations and the treaty making power
  • 5. Sunset Clauses in ECT and Conflict with OTHER TREATIES
    • 5.1. Conflict between international agreements
    • 5.2. The conflict between EU Treaties and other International Treaties
    • 5.3. The conflict between EU Treaties and the ECT
      • 5.3.1. The approach of Investment Tribunals before Komstroy
      • 5.3.2. CJEU and the Komstroy Decision
    • 5.4. The conflict between ECT and Paris Agreement
  • 6. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONs
    • 6.1. Remaining in the ECT and raising procedural and substantive objections before investment tribunals
      • 6.1.1. Procedural objections
      • 6.1.2. Substantive objections
    • 6.2. Withdrawal the sooner the better?
    • 6.3. The in-advance expiration of the ECT
    • 6.4. The revision of the ECT
      • 6.4.1. Agreement to amend the duration of the sunset clause
      • 6.4.2. Agreement to amend the substantive content of the ECT
    • 6.5. The ultimum refugium of the modification of the ECT among the Member States of the EU and then termination
    • 6.6. Concluding remarks
  • REFERENCES
  • Appendix
    • Energy Charter Treaty
    • Vienna Convention of the Law of the Treaties
    • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
    • Paris Agreement

Yüklə 0,84 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə