have her number but he's on vacation for two months.
From: Jim M . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/24/2010 1:57:00 AM
(mental obsession) and 15% physical (physical allergy).
most of all by Renée Matte in France.
Jim M.
From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/24/2010 6:29:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Yes, Anne Smith's notes on early (OG) meetings in Akron, at Brown.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6657. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Minority opinion and the secret
convention hotel).
members of the AAHistoryLovers to meet. So if you have some free time, come
and sit down and have a cup of coffee and chat. I'll be there when I'm not
agreed to briefly chat with us. A good chance to learn more about the
resources in the New York AA Archives.
Arthur S. of the AAHistoryLovers will be one of the 3 speakers participating
the Archives AA History Workshop at the MRW (Marriott River Walk).
Crockett Suite A/B, at the Grand Hyatt Hotel. Or just sit down and have a
hospitality suite at the Grand Hyatt in the Bonham Room.
****3:00-5:00 p.m.
MAIN A.A. HISTORY LOVERS GET-TOGETHER
Hotel. No program, just come in and sit down and have a chat, and get to
some of your fellow AAHL members over a good cup of coffee.
Hilton Palacio del Rio, 200 South Alamo Street.
This original play dramatizes the first-hand accounts of the
of special composition groups in the fellowship. Performed
by a group of the SF fellowship.
make any major changes in the first year. It is rather ironic looked at in
light.
--- On Fri, 6/18/10, Richard H wrote:
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] No major changes in the first year
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 6:56 AM
Â
Warm greetings from West Virginia Area 73 Archives,
Many members share the suggestion that no major changes be made in the first
year of your sobriety to newcomers. Does anyone know of any source for this
train of thought? AA or otherwise.
See ya in San Antonio,
Richard Humway
Area 73 Archivist
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6660. . . . . . . . . . . . Best Literature on Anonimity / Dr.
Bob & Bill W.
From: Marsha Finley . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/24/2010 10:20:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Heya Folks:
I am doing some research on anonymity (for personal knowledge and as a
meeting topic. There is also a side issue of taking notes in a meeting -
seems that it makes some uncomfortable - and the anonymity implications).
What to you recommend as the best, definitive reading? Yes, GSO has the
pamphlet "Understanding Anonymity", and Bill W did an article or two...
Wasn't there a statement by Dr. Bob too?
I am keenly interested about Anonymity at all three levels:
Recovery Anonymity for the Individual
Unity Anonymity for the Group
Service Anonymity for the Whole
I thank you in advance for your responses... On or off-list!
Marsha F in VA
4-4-86
____________________________________________________________
Send your photos by email in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6661. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Best Literature on Anonimity /
Dr. Bob & Bill W.
From: Jenny or Laurie Andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/25/2010 4:01:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Why not try the Grapevine digital archive and other search engines?
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
From: ms1finley@inbox.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:20:21 -0400
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Best Literature on Anonimity / Dr. Bob & Bill W.
Heya Folks:
I am doing some research on anonymity (for personal knowledge and as a
meeting topic. There is also a side issue of taking notes in a meeting -
seems that it makes some uncomfortable - and the anonymity implications).
What to you recommend as the best, definitive reading? Yes, GSO has the
pamphlet "Understanding Anonymity", and Bill W did an article or two...
Wasn't there a statement by Dr. Bob too?
I am keenly interested about Anonymity at all three levels:
Recovery Anonymity for the Individual
Unity Anonymity for the Group
Service Anonymity for the Whole
I thank you in advance for your responses... On or off-list!
Marsha F in VA
4-4-86
__________________________________________________________
Send your photos by email in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6662. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Best Literature on Anonimity /
Dr. Bob & Bill W.
From: aalogsdon@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/25/2010 2:27:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In DR BOB AND THE GOOD OLDTIMERS starting on page 264 is a clear explanation
of
Dr.Bob's approach to anonymity. "He (Dr. Bob) said there were two ways to
break
the anonymity tradition: (1) by giving your name at the public level or
press or
radio; (2) by being so anonymous that you can't be reached by other drunks."
There continues several paragraphs of discussion of this topic.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marsha Finley
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, Jun 24, 2010 7:20 pm
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Best Literature on Anonimity / Dr. Bob & Bill W.
Heya Folks:
I am doing some research on anonymity (for personal knowledge and as a
meeting topic. There is also a side issue of taking notes in a meeting -
seems that it makes some uncomfortable - and the anonymity implications).
What to you recommend as the best, definitive reading? Yes, GSO has the
pamphlet "Understanding Anonymity", and Bill W did an article or two...
Wasn't there a statement by Dr. Bob too?
I am keenly interested about Anonymity at all three levels:
Recovery Anonymity for the Individual
Unity Anonymity for the Group
Service Anonymity for the Whole
I thank you in advance for your responses... On or off-list!
Marsha F in VA
4-4-86
__________________________________________________________
Send your photos by email in seconds...
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3
Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6663. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Best Literature on Anonimity /
Dr. Bob & Bill W.
From: bent_christensen5 . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/25/2010 8:28:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In Grapevine 1969 dr. Bob is quoted:
Dr. Bob on Tradition Eleven
"We need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and
films."
Dr. Bob, co-founder of AA, commented on Tradition Eleven as follows: "Since
our
Tradition on anonymity designates the exact level where the line should be
held,
it must be obvious to everyone who can read and understand the English
language
that to maintain anonymity at any other level is definitely a violation of
this
Tradition.
"The AA who hides his identity from his fellow AA by using only a given name
violates the Tradition just as much as the AA who permits his name to appear
in
the press in connection with matters pertaining to AA.
"The former is maintaining his anonymity ABOVE the level of press, radio,
and
films, and the latter is maintaining his anonymity BELOW the level of press,
radio, and films - whereas the Tradition states that we should maintain our
anonymity AT the level of press, radio, and films."
Reprinted from the February 1969 Grapevine
http://www.district38-aa.org/drBob.htm
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "Marsha Finley"
wrote:
>
> Heya Folks:
>
> I am doing some research on anonymity (for personal knowledge and as a
> meeting topic. There is also a side issue of taking notes in a meeting -
> seems that it makes some uncomfortable - and the anonymity implications).
>
> What to you recommend as the best, definitive reading? Yes, GSO has the
> pamphlet "Understanding Anonymity", and Bill W did an article or two...
> Wasn't there a statement by Dr. Bob too?
>
> I am keenly interested about Anonymity at all three levels:
> Recovery Anonymity for the Individual
> Unity Anonymity for the Group
> Service Anonymity for the Whole
>
> I thank you in advance for your responses... On or off-list!
>
> Marsha F in VA
> 4-4-86
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Send your photos by email in seconds...
> TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3
> Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social
networks.
>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6664. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Best Literature on Anonimity /
Dr. Bob & Bill W.
From: Bill Lash . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/25/2010 8:13:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
There is alot of info on the 12 Traditions by going to the following:
http://www.justloveaudio.com/resources.php?cat_id=2
Just Love,
Barefoot Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Marsha Finley
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:20 PM
To: AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AAHistoryLovers] Best Literature on Anonimity / Dr. Bob & Bill
W.
Heya Folks:
I am doing some research on anonymity (for personal knowledge and as a
meeting topic. There is also a side issue of taking notes in a meeting -
seems that it makes some uncomfortable - and the anonymity implications).
What to you recommend as the best, definitive reading? Yes, GSO has the
pamphlet "Understanding Anonymity", and Bill W did an article or two...
Wasn't there a statement by Dr. Bob too?
I am keenly interested about Anonymity at all three levels:
Recovery Anonymity for the Individual
Unity Anonymity for the Group
Service Anonymity for the Whole
I thank you in advance for your responses... On or off-list!
Marsha F in VA
4-4-86
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6665. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: State-of-the-Art Recovery circa
1818
From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/25/2010 10:39:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
*Page from inside a family bible dated mid 1800's, Butler, Pennsylvania USA
jpg copy is attached to this email
(The Pledge, by the way, was pretty much all the "program" that
the Washingtonians had. Otherwise they had one drunk helping
another....but no step work as we know it.)
*
Family Temperance Pledge
*God Bless Our Home*
* *
*Why Sign the Pledge?*
Because
1. Moderate drinking tends to drunkenness, while total abstinence
directly from it.
2. While no one means to become a drunkard, there is said to be over six
hundred thousand confirmed drunkards in our country to-day.
3. Intoxicating drinks can do no good as a beverage, and there are always
safer and surer remedies to use in case of sickness.
4. The idea of moderation is full of deceit, and out estimate of the
power of our own will is usually a mistaken one.
5. The drinking habit is the cause of the larger portion of the misery,
poverty and crime in our land.
6. Both science and experience prove that even moderate drinking is
injurious to health.
7. Eternal interests are often forfeited through drink, for the Bible
declares that no drunkard shall enter heaven.
8. The Bible pronounces no blessing upon drinking, but many upon total
abstinence.
9. It is easier to keep a pledge publicly, solemnly given than a simple
resolution.
10. The pledge protects us from the solicitations of friends, and removes
us from the temptations of the saloon.
11. Persons miscalculate their ability to drink in moderation, and become
slaves to the drinking habit before they are aware of it.
12. Intemperance obstructs civilization, education, religion and every
useful reform.
We the undersigned solemnly promise
BY THE HELP OF GOD
to abstain from the use of all intoxicating drinks as a beverage.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:18 PM, kevinr1211 wrote:
>
>
> The following is from The Idiot, a Boston, MA newspaper Saturday March 14,
> 1818 vol 1, no 10
>
> Five reasons for not using Spirituous Liquors.
> A Touchstone.
>
> 1) Because it poisons the blood and destroys the organs of digestion
> 2) Because an ENEMY should be kept without the gate.
> 3) Because I am in health and need no medicine.
> 4) Because I have my senses and wish to keep them.
> 5) Because I have a soul to be saved or lost.
>
> To the man whose mind is untouched by all or any of the above reasons, a
> volume on the subject would be useless. He is unfitted for society; and
the
> sooner he is in his grave the better- Better for society and for
himself-For
> society- Because of his example- For himself- because his further torment
> will be less.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6666. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Use of the word sponsor
From: John Moore . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/17/2010 7:40:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
*
I would like to add to this question.
I have heard that the term "sponsor" as it was in general use in the US when
Bill and Bob were getting started, carried with it an implied financial
responsibility.
Generally speaking, if you sponsored someone, it meant that you would be
picking up their tab.
For example, if my brother was to sponsor me at City Hospital, he would be
paying for my treatment
If this is correct, it would be a logical reason why the term "sponsor" does
not appear in the first 164 pages.
In time, the meaning of the word changed.
John M
South Burlington, Vermont
*
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, royslev wrote:
>
>
> I have an early AA history question. Most of us are aware that the actual
> term "sponsor" is not mentioned in the first 164 pages of our basic text
> (the equivalent term "spiritual adviser" is used on page 63).
>
> Yet when listening to AA pioneer Clarence Snyder's recordings in which he
> talks a lot about early program history when they were still going to
Oxford
> Group meetings before 1939 he refers to Dr. Bob as his "sponsor."
>
> So my question is really for Oxford Group history experts: Was the term
> sponsor a common Oxford Group usage? Was it a common term used by members
of
> the "alcoholic squadron" of the Akron or New York Oxford groupers even
> though it was omitted by Bill in our basic text?
>
> When did the actual word sponsor come into common usage among AA members
> (we all know it's on every other page of the 12&120 ?
>
> I've done a search for the discussion thread on the word "sponsor" in the
> AA historylovers group but this is a more precise question.
>
> Thanks for feedback.
>
> Roy L. ( class of `78 )
> royslev@verizon.net
royslev@yahoo.com
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6667. . . . . . . . . . . . Secret of AA: After 75 Years, We
Don''t Know How It Works
From: Fiona Dodd . . . . . . . . . . . . 6/26/2010 3:02:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Secret of AA: After 75 Years, We Don't Know How It Works
* By Brendan I. Koerner Email Author
* June 23, 2010 |
* 12:00 am |
* Wired July
Dostları ilə paylaş: