Related Drug Problems [NCCA], 1998).
Drug Problems. It was founded by Father Ralph
was one of the four most published AA authors.
See http://www.nccatoday.org/
Each year the council has a national conference,
a volume called the Blue Book.
These volumes are a gold mine of material from
well known figures. There are talks not only by
Dowling, and many other people.
or seminary. The Indianapolis Archdiocesan
some volumes missing.
In one of these volumes, there is a transcript
responsible for their alcoholism -- i.e. to what
regarded as a sin in Catholic moral theology.
Pfau's position, as I understand it, was that
responsible for his or her abuse of alcohol.
swallowed or inhaled down our throats).
was not itself a sin any longer.
To be a mortal sin, in traditional Catholic
and willing violation of a known law of God.
I can't remember now what Father Dowling's position
sides.
I wish somebody would find a copy of the
transcript of that debate, and put it online.
From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/25/2010 6:28:00 PM
(mfmargetis at yahoo.com)
"What about Bill W. and Father Pfau? Did they get along?
Did they know each other well?"
1958 -- falling out with Bill W. over anonymity: Ralph began a long
friendship
with Bill Wilson when he and Bill met one another in San Diego in 1948 and
then
traveled to Ensenada, Mexico together. The two of them also appeared on the
same speakers platform in Austin in June of that same year, and remained
lifelong friends, except for this dispute over the anonymity principle which
put
them temporarily at odds with one another for a period of time.
Ralph had long had his detractors within A.A. Letters in the New York A.A.
Archives complained for example, because Ralph would give A.A. groups an
up-front charge to speak at conferences and conventions ($75.00 to speak at
a
meeting in Philadelphia in 1962 for example) and he also asked them to allow
him
to sell his books at places where he spoke. He did this to cover his travel
expenses but also to pay his yearly living expenses. Under his arrangement
with
the Archbishop, he received no salary from the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.
He
may have received room and board free from Sister Austin and the Magdalen
nuns
at the Convent of the Good Shepherd in Indianapolis in return for acting as
their confessor, or he may have had to pay them a nominal amount for that.
This
is unclear, but we do know that his overall expenses were in the
neighborhood of
$600 a year when he first began devoting his full time to his A.A. work. He
was
eventually able to purchase a fairly nice automobile towards the end of his
life, to use in traveling about giving talks, but continued to live in the
three
rooms which the convent allowed him to use (using one room as an office
during
the day and as a place to sleep during the night), in monastic austerity.
But the issue that actually caused the break between Ralph and Bill W. was a
different one, the anonymity issue. Ralph had headed the National Clergy
Conference on Alcoholism openly and under his full name from the time of its
founding in 1949. His niece said he felt he could do a lot more good by
breaking his anonymity in that fashion, no matter the consequences to his
own
priestly career. A priest in A.A.? Ralph wanted people to stop and realize,
well why not, and of course!
Bill W. did not openly criticize Ralph's role in the NCCA, but finally
became
angered by Ralph's breaking of his anonymity in the publication of his
autobiography in Look magazine in 1958. It not only gave his full name, but
there were also a number photographs showing Ralph's face, portraying him in
full ecclesiastical vestments celebrating mass, and so on. In Bill Wilson's
letters, he linked this with Lillian Roth's publication of her
autobiography,
I'll Cry Tomorrow four years earlier, in which she also broke her anonymity
and
spoke of her A.A. membership in print in public. Bill W. roundly condemned
both
of them to the rest of the A.A. fellowship.
It should be said, however, that Bill Wilson himself had been on the road
promoting A.A. all across the country during the 1940's, and allowing his
photograph to be taken and printed in the local newspapers with great
regularity. See for example his full face photo in the August 9, 1942 issue
of
the Knoxville Journal. Bill had changed his mind by the 1950's, but not
everyone in A.A. believed that the newly devised and far stricter rules
about
anonymity were wise or good.
1965 -- making peace in Toronto: At the Fourth A.A. International Convention
in
Toronto in 1965, Ralph and Bill W. restored their friendship. A Canadian
Catholic priest, Father Pete W., was present when Ralph and Bill W. met and
made
their peace with one another. He told me the story in a long telephone
conversation. Pete (who was a relative newcomer to A.A. at that time, and
had
not become a priest yet) was one of the A.A. people posted on guard duty in
the
hotel hallway on the floor where Bill W. had his hotel room. His
instructions
were to let no one disturb Bill, with one exception: if Father Ralph Pfau
came
up, he was to immediately take him to see Bill. Ralph did in fact come, and
went
into Bill's hotel room where the two of them talked for a long time, an hour
and
a half or two. Pete says that it was very clear from the expressions on
their
faces when Ralph came back out, and from the way the two men said good-by to
one
another, that they parted the best of friends once again. Both these great
A.A.
leaders were near the ends of their lives by that point: Ralph died only a
year
and a half later and Bill passed away on January 24, 1971.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6745. . . . . . . . . . . . Father Ed Dowling and Father Ralph
Pfau
From: Michael . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/24/2010 12:29:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi all,
What is known about Father Ed's and Father Ralph's interaction and or
friendship? I can't seem to find anything with regards to whether or not
they had much to do with each other.
Along that line, what about Bill W. and Father Pfau? Did they get along?
Did they know each other well?
Thanks,
Mike Margetis
Brunswick, MD
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6746. . . . . . . . . . . . Can anyone tell me a little more
history about Al S.
From: Claus R. Larosse . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/23/2010 11:45:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dear Group. My name is Claus, I'm an alcoholic.
Thanks for all the shares in this group. Can anyone tell me a little more
history about Al S. Besides what just immediately come forward by searching
for Div AA history pages.
I'm working to get to do a little service in AA, therefore I seek
knowledge/texts dealing with accountability, spirituality and so on.
I found out Al S. is the author of the AA accountability statement. And that
Al
came to AA in 1944, helped start the intergroup in New York. Al worked with
a George B. to get Knickerbocker Hospital to open a section just for
alcoholics who were sponsored by AA.
But this is basically what I can find.
Has Al a story in Big Book, perhaps? Having a "nickname"?
Who was his sponsor?
Last but not least. Has Al or other written anything about
accountability/responsibility in AA besides that I can find in Big Book and
12 +
12 :-)
Thank you very much. Love in AA. Claus.
--
Knus.
Claus Rask Larosse
Stubdrupvej 211.
7100 Vejle
Tlf. 23252344
Reminder from GOD.
"Just trust. I cannot and will not fail you."
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6747. . . . . . . . . . . . Fred''s story (Harry B.) in Big Book
pp. 39-43
From: martinholmes76@ymail.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/25/2010 4:22:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In the chapter "More about Alcoholism" it says
(Big Book p. 39) that "Fred" was in hospital with
"a bad case of jitters." Does anyone know how
long he was drinking before this?
- - - -
From Glenn C., Moderator
"Fred" = Harry Brick
AA historians believe that "Fred," described as a "partner in a well known
accounting firm" in the story in pp. 39-43 of the Big Book, was Harry Brick.
See
Harry's story "A Different Slant" in the first edition of the Big Book.
- - - -
For more information see the material collected by Nancy Olson et al. at
http://www.a-1associates.com/westbalto/HISTORY_PAGE/Authors.htm
A Different Slant
Harry Brick NY 2nd Board Chair
Original Manuscript #33, Big Book 1st ed. page 252
His date of sobriety was probably June 1938. It is said that he sued to get
the
money he had loaned A.A. to get the Big Book published refunded.
Harry was probably an accountant. He is believed to be "Fred, a partner in a
well known accounting firm" whose story is told on pages 39 through 43 of
the
Big Book.
He was happily married with fine children, sufficient income to indulge his
whims and future financial security. He was known as a conservative, sound
businessman. To all appearances he was a stable, well-balanced individual,
with
an attractive personality who made friends easily.
However, he missed going to his office several times because of drinking,
and
when he failed in efforts to stop on his own, had to be hospitalized -- a
blow
to his ego. At the hospital a doctor told him about a group of men staying
sober, and he reluctantly consented to have one of them call on him, only to
be
polite to the doctor. He refused help from the man who called on him, but
within
sixty days, after leaving the hospital the second time, he was pounding at
his
door, willing to do anything to conquer the vicious thing that had conquered
him.
He soon learned that not only had his drinking problem been relieved, but
quite
as important was the discovery that spiritual principles would solve all his
problems.
While his old way of living was by no means a bad one, he would not go back
to
it he would not go back to it even if he could. His worst days in the
fellowship
were better than his best days when he was drinking.
His story is the shortest in the 1st edition. He had only one point he
wanted to
make. Even a man with everything money can buy, a man with tremendous pride
and
will power to function in all ordinary circumstances, could become an
alcoholic
and find himself as hopeless and helpless as the man who has a multitude of
worries and troubles. Doctor Earl M. ("Physician Heal Thyself") described
this
as "the skid row of success," p. 345, 3rd edition.
Harry served on the first board of trustees of the Alcoholic Foundation,
replacing Bill Ruddell, who got drunk. Soon Harry was drunk, too.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6748. . . . . . . . . . . . Freemasonry and A.A.
From: Dougbert . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2010 9:20:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi Group,
I continue to see the esoteric references to Freemasonry throughout A.A.
literature, including the fact that our A.A. logo is directly taken from
Scottish Rite symbology.
I believe there is a book just waiting to be written if a group of A.A.
Freemasons could come together and find the deeper meanings underlying the
A.A.
philosophy and the root teaching of my beloved craft. For example, the
numeral
twelve goes back to the twelve tribes of Israel.
If there are any Masons out there that would like to take on this project,
please contact me. As Masons, we know our proud history is found in the
allegory
and symbology found in the Hebrew teachings.
doug
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6749. . . . . . . . . . . . Was Bill W. actually a stock broker?
From: Tom Hickcox . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2010 9:17:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The Big Book tells us on p. xv of the Fourth Edition that Bill W was
a stock broker.
In these days one must meet certain licensing requirements in order to be
one.
What were the requirements, if any, in Bill's time? Was he licensed?
[That means under the requirements as they existed back in the 1920's and
1930's, not under the modern requirements.]
So, what are some firm citations for or against Bill's status as a
stock broker?
Tommy H in Baton Rouge
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6750. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bill W. and Father Ralph Pfau
From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/26/2010 5:59:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I think this material from Barefoot Bill's site
was written by Nancy Olson:
While Father Pfau obviously had great affection for Bill Wilson, he
apparently
did not always agree with him. Four o'clock on Sunday afternoon July 3,
1955, at
the International A.A. Convention in St. Louis, was a watershed moment in
the
history of Alcoholics Anonymous. The fifth General Service Conference met
during
the Convention. This marked the end of the five-year trial period for the
Conference. Bill Wilson had campaigned for the Conference vigorously.
But Father Pfau, who was influential, though controversial, had announced he
was going to rise and speak against it. When Bill presented his resolution
and a
vote of approval was requested, reported Nell Wing, "We from the
office sat with baited breath." But Father Pfau did not object and the
resolution passed.
Tex Brown, who died October 5, 2000, told me this story at the International
Convention in Minneapolis a few months before his death. I asked him to
write it
for the AA History Buffs. Tex attended the first International A.A.
Convention
in Cleveland in 1950. He told me "At the 'Spiritual Meeting' on Sunday
morning
the main speaker's topic dealt with the idea that the alcoholic was to be
the
instrument that God would use to regenerate and save the world. He expounded
the idea that alcoholics were God's Chosen People and he was starting to
talk
about AA being 'The Third Covenant,' when he was interrupted by shouted
objections from the back of the room. The objector, who turned out to be a
small Catholic priest, would not be hushed up. There was chaos and
embarrassment as the meeting was quickly adjourned. I was upset and in full
sympathy with the poor speaker. I did not realize it at the time, but I had
seen Father Pfau in action and Father Pfau was right. I had heard the group
conscience and I rejected it."
Bill told the story like this:
"On Sunday morning we listened to a panel of four A.A.s who portrayed the
spiritual side of Alcoholics Anonymous -- as they understood it. ... A hush
fell
upon the crowd as we paused for a moment of silence. Then came the speakers,
earnest and carefully prepared, all of them. I cannot recall an A.A.
gathering
where the attention was more complete, or the devotion deeper.
"Yet some thought that those truly excellent speakers had, in their
enthusiasm,
unintentionally created a bit of a problem. It was felt the meeting had gone