The writer agrees that formal examinations are effective, but does not
believe these are the
only effective way to assess a student's abilities.
The writer thinks that there are disadvantages
of examinations so continual
assessment is a good way to balance this.
Model Answer
Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's
performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is
not a satisfactory way to do this.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many educational establishments such as schools and universities are
choosing to assess their students through course work and projects
undertaken during term time rather than the traditional examinations.
Continual assessment can be an effective way to evaluate student’s abilities,
but formal examinations should also be maintained.
There are two principal benefits of formal examinations. Firstly, they are a
fair system as every student has an equal opportunity
since they all sit the
same exam at the same time, meaning that those students who work hard
should be rewarded with a high grade. In addition to this, it is also difficult
to cheat if the exam is properly invigilated. However,
some students
naturally excel in exams, whereas others find it difficult to work under these
stressful and time-constrained conditions. Formal exams, may not, therefore,
always reflect a student’s true ability.
Continual
assessment, on the other hand, allows those students who work at
a slower pace more time to work on their course work and projects. The
teacher can also observe and assist students who may be weaker, thus
providing them with the opportunity to improve during the term. Not only
this,
projects encourage team work, an important skill that is necessary for
future employment. Focusing only on formal exams may mean that this
important component of children’s development is not seen as important by
teachers or students.
To conclude, it is evident that both continual
assessment and formal
examinations are effective in different ways, but they also have weaknesses.
I would therefore argue that in order to have robust evaluation procedures in
the future, both should be used to assess students during their education.
(273 words)
