(jennylaurie1 at hotmail.com)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6766
>
> The May-June 2004 issue of "Markings", the AA GSO Archives newsletter,
records
the visit to Rome in 1972 of two Irish and English AA members for an
audience
with Pope Paul VI. He presented them with a medallion of the Good Shepherd,
which is on display in the archives at GSO New York. There was (and maybe
still
is) a photograph of the Pope with the AA members, Sackville M. and Travers
C.,
at Stepping Stones. The visit to Rome was suggested by Archbishop Enrici
because, he told a convention at Bristol, England, in 1971, the Vatican "was
poorly acquainted with the work of the Fellowship". Sackville's story
appeared
in the Big Book under the title "The Career Officer" (page 411 in
"Experience,
Strength and Hope").
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6877. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: The Holy Grail
From: Shakey1aa@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/17/2010 12:21:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The long awaited book published by the multilith's owner, Ken R., and
available at _www.Abookman.com_ (http://www.Abookman.com) is finally out and
I think it will cause some interest amongst the members of AAHL. I was
wondering if the members of AAHL who are familiar with the handwriting of
the
early members of AA can now identify who wrote what in the changes to the
pre-publication in this "Holy Grail." How do we, as members of AAHL, go
about
piecing it all together by using AAHL as a resource; utilizing members who
are familiar with the handwriting without making dozens of posts and making
sure that what is said is proof positive and not conjecture. In speaking
with Keith of A Book Man .Com, several years back , it was discussed that a
select group of AA Historians including Mitchell K, Mel B, Ernie K, and
others would get a chance to review the multilith and identify who wrote
what
before this "book that started it all" was published. That didn't happen.
I have only skimmed through the many pages and am so far much impressed by
this book which now sits on my coffee table. I await the comments of my
friends at AAHL. I am sure that this book will be much talked about at the
NAW
later on in the month. I will take my copy there if for no other reason
than to have my friend Mel B sign it if he will. I hope to see you all there
too.
Yours in Service,
Shakey Mike Gwirtz
Phila, Pa. USA
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6878. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bill W''s two books on
philosophy at Towns?
From: MattD . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/16/2010 7:34:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The two books were the Little Flowers of St. Francis
and the Varieties of Religious Experience
- - - -
See Message #5955
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/5955
From "mdingle76" (mdingle76 at yahoo.com)
Re: St. Francis, Bill W., and Alcoholics Anonymous
Dear AAHL group:
I can't help putting my 2 cents in on the topic
of St. Francis and the 12&12 (or AA for that
matter). I can't shed any light on the wording
of the prayer or the mistaken author of the prayer
(I thought it was St. Francis myself till a few
years ago).
But I thought I'd mention a little about Bill's
love for Francis (as told to me by Tom Powers —
12&12 editor/co-author). Tom said that after
Bill had his famous spiritual experience in
Towns that Ebby went back to the Oxford Group
telling them about what happened to Bill and
asked what he should do to help him. They said
bring him 2 books.
Many people in AA know that this is when the
book The Varieties of a Religious Experience
hit the scene, but many people don't know that
Ebby also brought Bill another book: The Little
Flowers of St. Francis.
=============================================
TWO OF THE VERSIONS OF THE LITTLE FLOWERS
OF ST. FRANCIS ONLINE ARE:
http://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/flowers.htm
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/ugolino/flowers.html
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/ugolino/flowers.toc.html
=============================================
It's very believable to think that this event
(getting that book at that time) lead to Bill's
love for Francis. The Little Flowers of St.
Francis has a number of little stories, and
many of them telling of sudden mystical/spiritual
experience. It is known that Francis had a
Bill W. experience (or really the other way
around) and then suffered from depression
afterwards.
Both Tom and Bill were fascinated with the nature
and after-effects of spiritual experience (for
they both had this kind of experience themselves
and they both had years of what we would now be
mislabel as "mental illness" that followed).
I don't have the book "Pass it on" in front of
me but Tom Powers quotes Francis in it saying
something like, "After my conversion, I've never
been well."
Bill also studied Francis on the money front —
using the modern day Franciscan virtue of "poverty"
for the society of Alcoholics Anonymous.
One last thing that Tom said about Bill and St.
Francis is that Bill used to say that Francis
was the patron saint of the society of Alcoholics
Anonymous. Francis may be more important to out
movement than we know?
Matt D. (AAHL member)
_________________________________________
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "jax760" wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever determined what the second book was that Bill was
supposedly
reading at Towns? I assume one of the books that Silkworth refers to would
had
to have been Varieties of Religious Experience.
>
> John B.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6879. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bill W''s two books on
philosophy at Towns?
From: corafinch . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/16/2010 8:46:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Wouldn't the "now a director in a large corporation" phrase eliminate Bill?
The
last line indicates that Silkworth had other patients who had "initiated
such
groups," so one of those presumably was Bill.
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com, "jax760" wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever determined what the second book was that Bill was
supposedly
reading at Towns? I assume one of the books that Silkworth refers to would
had
to have been Varieties of Religious Experience.
>
> John B.
> __________________________________
>
> Reclamation of the Alcoholic
> W.D. Silkworth
> Medical Record, April 21, 1937.
>
> http://www.silkworth.net/silkworth/reclamation.html
>
> Case IV (Hospital No. 1152). - A broker, who had earned as much as $25,000
a
year, and had come, through alcohol, to a position where he was being
supported
by his wife, presented himself for treatment carrying with him two books on
philosophy from which he hoped to get a new inspiration: His desire to
discontinue alcohol was intense, and he certainly made every effort within
his
own capabilities to do so. Following the course of treatment in which the
alcohol and toxic products were eliminated and his craving counteracted, he
took
up moral psychology. At first, he found it difficult to rehabilitate himself
financially, as his old friends had no confidence in his future conduct.
Later
he was given an opportunity, and is now a director in a large corporation.
He
gives part of his income to help others in his former condition, and he has
gathered about him a group of over fifty men, all free from their former
alcoholism through the application of this method of treatment and "moral
psychology." To such patients we recommend "moral psychology," and in those
of
our patients who have joined or initiated such groups the change has been
spectacular.
>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6880. . . . . . . . . . . . RE: Bill W''s two books on
philosophy at Towns?
From: J. Lobdell . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/16/2010 9:05:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Not VARIETIES, which was brought to him at Towns
by Shep and (presumably) Ebby.
> From: jax760@yahoo.com
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:57:09 +0000
> Subject: Bill W's two books on philosophy at Towns?
>
> Has anyone ever determined what the second book was that Bill was
supposedly
reading at Towns? I assume one of the books that Silkworth refers to would
had
to have been Varieties of Religious Experience.
>
> John B.
> __________________________________
>
> Reclamation of the Alcoholic
> W.D. Silkworth
> Medical Record, April 21, 1937.
>
> http://www.silkworth.net/silkworth/reclamation.html
>
> Case IV (Hospital No. 1152). - A broker, who had earned as much as $25,000
a
year, and had come, through alcohol, to a position where he was being
supported
by his wife, presented himself for treatment carrying with him two books on
philosophy from which he hoped to get a new inspiration: His desire to
discontinue alcohol was intense, and he certainly made every effort within
his
own capabilities to do so. Following the course of treatment in which the
alcohol and toxic products were eliminated and his craving counteracted, he
took
up moral psychology. At first, he found it difficult to rehabilitate himself
financially, as his old friends had no confidence in his future conduct.
Later
he was given an opportunity, and is now a director in a large corporation.
He
gives part of his income to help others in his former condition, and he has
gathered about him a group of over fifty men, all free from their former
alcoholism through the application of this method of treatment and "moral
psychology." To such patients we recommend "moral psychology," and in those
of
our patients who have joined or initiated such groups the change has been
spectacular.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6881. . . . . . . . . . . . Font used for initial capitals in
Big Book?
From: schaberg43 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/19/2010 11:24:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I was asked by a friend if it was possible to identify the name of the
typeface
used for the capital letters on the first word of each chapter in the Big
Book.
(NOTE: the first three editions are all identical – the fourth edition
font is
changed a bit, although it is clearly trying to mimic the font that was used
in
the first three editions.)
My own resource provided the following reply:
Not a clue, I'm afraid. It's probably closest to Snell Roundhand, but it
might
even be hand-drawn.
Remember how type was made then -- lead poured into a mold that had been
created
with hand-carved punches. This doesn't look like it was created in this way,
and
certainly not with the precision and grace that is normally seen with
hand-carved letters.
Initial caps originated in the hand-lettered texts of the monasteries, were
almost always unique to the copyist, and always hand-drawn. Not sure if
print
houses had their own unique set of initial caps, or drew them as needed, but
it
wouldn't surprise me.
A few things lead me to think that this might be "home-made."
First, the stroke width is roughly the same -- there is no variability in
the
bottom or sides. Most professional calligraphers used a broad or flat nib
pen to
give their letters character and distinction as they turned the pen
throughout
the creation of the letter. What stroke variability there is appears here to
be
more like the pressure one puts on a normal pen when writing, rather than a
formal calligraphic letter.
Second, the beginning of the letter (left side) starts with a tiny serif, as
if
the ink gathered at the point of the pen before it was applied to the paper,
but
is heavy, almost like a little ball on the end of the letter (right-side),
where
the letterer left the pen on the page too long. Again, no self-respecting
calligrapher would let that happen.
I'm winging this a bit here since I don't have my type references and I've
been
out of the design game for years. That said, I'm fairly confident in my
observations. If it turns out to be some famous set of initial caps hailed
throughout the world as the highest form of typographic art, I will blush
accordingly!
Does anyone on this list (or a graphic designer friend of yours) have any
better
ideas on what this typeface might be?
Thanks,
Old Bill
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6882. . . . . . . . . . . . One thousand of us and our families
From: Geoff Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/19/2010 7:33:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hi all,
In Bill's story, it mentions that 'in a western town there are
thousands of members," yet when the book was written there were fewer than
100.
Was this added to Bill's story later? I don't think so, as it's in my
1st edition. What is the explanation for this mismatch?
Many thanks,
Geoff
- - - -
From Glenn C. the moderator:
I think Geoff is referring to the passage found on pp. 15-16 in the current
(4th) edition:
"In one western city and its environs there are one thousand of us and our
families. We meet frequently so that newcomers may find the fellowship they
seek. At these informal gatherings one may often see from 50 to 200 persons.
We are growing in numbers and power."
According to my notes, the "western city" was Cleveland, and in the second
printing of the 1st edition, among the changes made:
On page 25 line 23, 80 of us was changed to 500 of us.
And on page 25 line 26, 40-80 persons was changed to 50-200 persons.
Later on, in the third printing of the 1st edition, on page 25 line 23, 500
of
us was changed to 1000 of us.
Is this the passage that you are asking about, Geoff?
There is still the question of the Big Book's original statement that in
1939
there were 80 people in the Cleveland area (even if we count families as
well as
the alcoholics themselves), with 40 to 80 people attending "informal
gatherings"
there. Has this group ever looked at those numbers? Are they are all
possible?
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6883. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Bill W. - 1944 - many roads to
recovery
From: tomper87 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/16/2010 7:02:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
From: "tomper87" and "Dov"
(tomper99 at yahoo.com)
and (dovwcom at gmail.com)
Laurie Andrews asked "when and where did Bill Wilson say/write in 1944
'there
are many roads to recovery'?"
White was quoting Bill W from comments in the Sept 1944 Grapevine to a
Grapevine
article by Philip Wylie. Wylie (who was not a member of A.A.) had written
about
his own recovery and part of Bill's response was:
"It is tradition among us that the individual has the unlimited right to his
own
opinion on any subject under the sun. He is compelled to agree with no one;
if
he likes, can disagree with everyone. And, indeed, when on a 'dry bender,'
many
AAs do. Therefore, no AA should be disturbed if he cannot fully agree with
all
of Mr. Wylie's truly stimulating discourse. Rather shall we reflect that the
roads to recovery are many; that any story or theory of recovery from one
who
has trod the highway is bound to contain much truth. Mr. Wylie's article is
like
an abundance of fresh fruit. Perhaps we should take the advice of the
housewife
who says, 'We shall eat all we can, and then can what we can't.'"
For the full text of Bill W's comments see the text in silkworth.net:
http://silkworth.net/grapevine/bwresponsetopw.html
- - - -
For Philip Wylie's original article (which Bill W. was commenting on) see
AAHistoryLovers Message 354 (and also 374 which seems to be a duplicate):
The A.A. Grapevine, September 1944 - Philip Wylie Jabs A Little Needle
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/354
From: Jim Blair
The early issues of the GV carried a substantial number of articles written
by
non AAs. Of of the earliest was this article by Philip Wylie which caused a
"bit
of a stir" and Bill W. responded with an article which can be found in
"Language
of the Heart."
The A.A. Grapevine, September 1944
Philip Wylie Jabs A Little Needle
Into Complacency
An editor of The Grapevine called on me and asked me for a piece. He asked
because I recently reviewed a book about a drunk - Charles Jackson's The
Lost
Weekend. He thought that what I'd said in the review showed I had an
interest in
alcoholism. I have. The editor didn't know that I am one.
I quit solo - by which I mean that no organized group like AA was around to
assist or advise. But I had plenty of assistance and expert advice, much of
which curiously parallels what I know now about AA. To reach a point where I
can
say that I am not drinking and have not been drinking for a long time, took
years. It took an unconscionable amount of energy. It left me with a few
ideas
that I'd like to pass along. It left me with a couple of hunches that I'd
like
to ask about.
The things I did are, maybe, the things that others are doing. I was
psychoanalyzed twice. I studied psychology after that - Jungian, Freudian,
Alderian, behavioristic. Then I read all the basic religious books. Then I
read
the philosophies. Then I went to insane asylums and looked at them. Here are
some of the ideas that came my way:
One of the "reasons" I had given myself for drinking was that I was then
able to
do easily a great many things other men could do sober and I could not. So I
did
them sober. I did everything without a drink that I had done when drunk,
excepting for the destructive trouble making ones. Everything. That was
useful
to me.
I had jitters that there is not the literary skill to describe - though
Charles
Jackson has come as close as any writer ever did. Every fear, phobia and
compulsion entered my head - and not so always just when I was hung over. So
I
got into the habit - a suggestion of a psychiatrist - of writing down in
detail
the nature and formidability of these mental distresses. Maybe the fact that
I
am a writer gave that system special merit. But I found I couldn't endlessly
retail the awfulness of my obsessions - sitting perfectly comfortably in a
quiet
room. On paper - they weren't gigantic and overwhelming. They grew silly.
They
made me laugh at myself and do deflated themselves.
Dr. Jung himself suggested that I look at a few asylums. I don't know why
until
I made the visit. Then it became evident to me that the inmates were not
like me
at all. Thus I got to know that my alcoholism was not the onslaught of
insanity
- and I got to know I had been subconsciously afraid of precisely that.
The Jungians, incidentally, give a different name to the "religious
experience"
which you discuss in AA. They arrive at that "experience" by different
methods -
methods which conform to their scientific psychological technique. They call
the
spiritual quantum which gives rise to the experience a "transcendent
symbol."
Naturally, I haven't room to describe the method here: it would take more
than
this magazine - a book perhaps. But, whether you call it a religious
experience
or a transcendant symbol does not matter - and it may be of interest to
alcoholics who are semi-knowingly engaged in protesting formal, churchly
"religions" to learn that there are thoroughly abstract, non-religious
routes to
the same, universal, human contact with inner integrity, truth, and the
"nature
of nature itself."
Of course, I read everything about alcoholism I could find. And I became
interested in the care and condition of alcoholic friends. Among them I
noticed
two who still make me wonder about the possible relationship of epilepsy to
alcoholism in some cases. These two friends of mine had had fits. They both
had
the epileptic "picture" on the electroencephalogram. The new drugs that
avert or
postpone epileptic attacks seemed to aid these two men in stopping their
alcohol
addiction. I know that if I were a doctor - and an alcoholic - I'd
investigate
Dostları ilə paylaş: