28
3: Accounting conventions Part B The qualitative characteristics of financial information and the fundamental bases of accounting
IAS 1 applies to all
general purpose financial statements prepared and presented in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
2.2 Purpose of financial statements
The
objective of financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance
and cash flows of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions. They also
show the result of
management's stewardship of the resources entrusted to it.
In order to fulfil this objective, financial statements must provide information about the following aspects
of an entity's results.
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Income and expenses (including gains and losses)
Other changes in equity
Cash
flows
Along with other information in the notes and related documents, this information will assist users in
predicting the entity
future cash flows.
According to IAS 1, a complete set of financial statements includes the following components.
(a)
Statement of financial position
(b)
Income statement and/or statement of comprehensive income
(c)
Statement of changes in equity
(d)
Statement of cash flows
(e)
Accounting policies and explanatory notes
The preparation of these statements is the responsibility of the
board of directors. IAS 1 also encourages
a
financial review by management and the production of any other reports and statements which may
aid users.
2.3 Fair presentation and compliance with IASs/IFRSs
Most importantly, financial statements should
present fairly the financial position, financial performance
and cash flows of an entity.
Compliance with IASs/IFRS will almost always achieve this.
The following points made by IAS 1 expand on this principle.
(a)
Compliance with IASs/IFRSs should be disclosed
(b)
All relevant IASs/IFRSs must be followed if compliance with IASs/IFRSs is disclosed
(c) Use
of
an
inappropriate accounting treatment cannot be rectified either by disclosure of
accounting policies or notes/explanatory material
There may be (very rare) circumstances when management decides that compliance with a requirement of
an IAS/IFRS would be misleading.
Departure from the IAS/IFRS is therefore required to achieve a fair
presentation. The following should be disclosed in such an event.
(a)
Management confirmation that the financial statements fairly present the entity's financial position,
performance and cash flows
(b)
Statement that all IASs/IFRSs have been complied with
except departure from one IAS/IFRS to
achieve a fair presentation
(c)
Details of the nature of the departure, why the IAS/IFRS treatment would be misleading, and the
treatment
adopted
(d)
Financial impact of the departure
IAS 1 states what is required for a fair presentation.
(a)
Selection and application of
accounting policies
Part B The qualitative characteristics of financial information and the fundamental bases of accounting
3: Accounting conventions
29
(b)
Presentation of information in a manner which provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
understandable information
(c)
Additional disclosures where required
2.4 Accounting policies
We will look at accounting policies in more detail in Section 6 of this Chapter. However, accounting
policies should be chosen in order
to comply with International Financial Reporting Standards. Where
there is
no specific requirement in an IAS or IFRS, policies should be developed so that information
provided by the financial statements is:
(a)
Relevant to the decision-making needs of users.
(b)
Reliable in that they:
(i)
Represent faithfully the
results and financial position of the entity.
(ii) Reflect
the
economic substance of events and transactions and not merely the legal form.
(iii) Are
neutral, that is free from bias.
(iv) Are
prudent.
(v) Are
complete in all material respects.
(c) Comparable
(d) Understandable
We will look at these four characteristics in more detail in Section 3 of this chapter. IAS 1 then considers
certain important assumptions which underpin the preparation and presentation of financial statements
.
2.5 Going concern
The entity is normally viewed as a
going concern, that is, as continuing in operation for the foreseeable
future. It is assumed that the entity has neither the intention nor the necessity of liquidation or of curtailing
materially the scale of its operations.
This concept assumes that, when preparing a normal set of accounts, the business will
continue to
operate in approximately the same manner for the foreseeable future (at least the next 12 months). In
particular, the entity will not go into liquidation or scale down its operations in a material way.
The main significance of a going concern is that the assets
should not be valued at their 'break-up'
value; the amount they would sell for if they were sold off piecemeal and the business were broken up.
2.6 Example: Going concern
Emma acquires a T-shirt printing machine at a cost of $60,000. The asset has an estimated life of six
years, and it is normal to write off the cost of the asset to the income statement over this time. In this case
a depreciation cost of $10,000 per year is charged.
Using the going concern assumption, it is presumed that the business will continue its operations and so
the asset will live out its full six years in use. A depreciation charge of $10,000 is made each year, and the
value of the asset in the statement of financial position is its cost less the accumulated depreciation
charged to date. After one year, the
net book value of the asset is $(60,000 – 10,000) = $50,000, after two
years it is $40,000, after three years $30,000 etc, until it is written down to a value of 0 after 6 years.
This asset has no other operational use outside the business and, in a forced sale, it would only sell for
scrap. After one year of operation, its scrap value is $8,000.
The net book value of the asset, applying the going concern assumption, is $50,000 after one year, but its
immediate sell-off value only $8,000. It can be argued that the asset is over-valued at $50,000, that it
should be written down to its break-up value ($8,000) and the balance of its cost should be treated as an
expense. However, provided that the going concern assumption is valid, it is appropriate accounting
practice to value the asset at its net book value.
Key term