ACCOUNTING CHOICES UNDER IFRS AND THEIR EFFECT
ON OVER-INVESTMENT IN CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
by
Mohamad Mazboudi
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Doctor of
Philosophy degree in Business Administration in
the Graduate College of
The University of Iowa
May 2012
Thesis Supervisor: Professor Daniel Collins
Copyright by
MOHAMAD MAZBOUDI
2012
All Rights Reserved
Graduate College
The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
_____________________________
PH.D. THESIS
_____________
This is to certify that the Ph.D. thesis of
Mohamad Mazboudi
has been approved by the Examining Committee
for the thesis requirement for the Doctor of Philosophy
degree in Business Administration at the May 2012 graduation.
Thesis Committee: _______________________________________________
Daniel Collins, Thesis Supervisor
________________________________________________
Douglas DeJong
________________________________________________
Paul Hribar
________________________________________________
Erik Lie
________________________________________________
Richard Mergenthaler
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to express my sincerest thanks to my dissertation chair, Professor Daniel
Collins, for his valuable guidance and help during my time at the University of Iowa. I
would also like to thank members of my dissertation committee, Professors Douglas
DeJong, Paul Hribar, Erik Lie, and Richard Mergenthaler, for their insights and
assistance in improving my dissertation. Thanks are also owed to Matt Glendening, Dolf
Kerklaan, Gerard Mertens, and workshop participants at the University of Iowa and at the
American University of Beirut. The financial assistance of the Henry B. Tippie College
of Business and the University of Iowa is gratefully acknowledged.
I owe special thanks to my mom and my family for their continuous support and
love. To my mom, I will be forever grateful for the many sacrifices she has made in order
that this goal was attained.
Above all and most of all, thanks and praises are owed to Allah, the one and only
God and Creator, who gave me the health and strength to finish my Ph.D. and made
everything easy for me.
Responsibility of any errors accrues solely to me.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
v
CHAPTER
I.
INTRODUCTION
1
II.
RELATED LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
10
2.1
Related Literature
10
2.1.1
Timely Loss Recognition and Over-investment
10
2.1.2
Accounting Choices for PPE before and after IFRS
12
2.2
Hypotheses Development
16
III.
MEASURES, RESEARCH DESIGN, AND SAMPLE SELECTION
18
3.1
Measures of Over-investment
18
3.2
Research Design
19
3.3
Sample Selection
21
3.3.1 Total Sample
21
3.3.2 Sub-samples based on Accounting Choices
23
IV.
RESULTS
25
4.1
Preliminary Results
25
4.1.1 The Frequency of Impairment Losses for PPE
before and after IFRS Adoption
25
4.1.2 Asymmetric Timeliness of Loss Recognition
26
4.2 Main Results
28
4.2.1 Test of H1
28
4.2.2 Test of H2
29
4.2.3 The Effect of the Economic Downturn and
other Institutional Factors
31
V.
SUPPLEMENTAL TEST
34
VI.
CONCLUSION
37
APPENDIX A. LIST OF VARIABLE DEFINITIONS
39
APPENDIX B. EXAMPLES OF IMPAIRMENT DISCLOSURES
41
APPENDIX C. FIGURES AND TABLES
43
REFERENCES
54
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table
C1. Comparison of Impairment Rules for PPE between IFRS
and Domestic GAAP
45
C2. Distribution by Country & Industry and Descriptive Statistics
46
C3. Accounting Choices for PPE under UK GAAP and IFRS
47
C4. Asymmetric Timeliness of Loss Recognition after IFRS Mandatory
Adoption
48
C5. Multivariate Analysis of the Effect on Over-investment after
IFRS Mandatory Adoption
49
C6. Univariate Analysis using Difference-in-Differences of the Effect on
Over-investment between HL_HS firms and FV_HS firms
50
C7. Multivariate Analysis of the Effect on Over-investment for HL_HS
firms and FV_HS firms
51
C8. Multivariate Analysis of the Effect on Over-investment among
UK firms
52
C9. Multivariate Analysis of the Effect on Over-investment based on
Managerial Ownership
53
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
C1. Frequency of Impairment Losses for PPE
44
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Beginning in 2005, listed firms in the European Union (EU) countries are
required to prepare their consolidated financial statements according to International
Financial Reporting Standards (
IFRS
). One key objective of accounting standards is to
efficiently allocate resources in an economy (Kothari et al. 2010). In this paper, I
examine the effect of accounting choices that firms can make under
IFRS
on corporate
investment efficiency, one dimension of efficient allocation of resources in an economy.
In particular, I exploit an exogenous shock,
IFRS
mandatory adoption in 2005, that
allowed EU firms to choose between two accounting alternatives (fair-value or historical
cost with impairment testing) for property, plant and equipment (
PPE
). Further, I
examine whether these two accounting alternatives are associated with a reduction in
over-investment in capital expenditures after
Dostları ilə paylaş: |