____________________________________________________________________
Pred. Sign
Coefficient
t-stat
P-value
Intercept
+/-
-6.2475 ***
-7.32
<.0001
IFRS
+/-
-0.1260
-1.01
0.3142
OVER_INV
+
4.3423 ***
3.63
0.0003
IFRS*OVER_INV
-
-0.1741
-0.89
0.1878
FV_HS
+/-
-0.4303 *
-1.90
0.0603
IFRS*FV_HS
+/-
0.3250
1.24
0.2188
FV_HS*OVER_INV
+/-
0.7014 *
1.70
0.0918
IFRS*FV_HS*OVER_INV
-
-0.8284
**
-1.86
0.0328
SIZE
+
0.0874 *
1.54
0.0631
TANGIBILITY
+
1.2024 ***
5.04
<.0001
CFO_SALE
+/-
0.2015
0.27
0.7867
OPERATING_CYCLE
+/-
0.2612
1.53
0.1283
DIV
+/-
0.0547
0.22
0.8284
MTB
+
0.2090 *
1.48
0.0710
LOSS
-
-0.1803
-0.86
0.1954
CAP_STRUCTURE
+/-
0.2972
0.76
0.4462
Z_SCORE
-
0.0000
-0.47
0.3194
CLOSELY_HELD
+/-
-0.0027
-0.47
0.6385
BIG4_5
+/-
0.1141
0.28
0.7815
SIZE*OVER_INV
-
-0.1255
-1.23
0.1101
TANGIBILITY*OVER_INV
+
0.5451
1.22
0.1121
CFO_SALE*OVER_INV
+/-
1.0274
0.85
0.3950
OPERATING_CYCLE*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.8308 ***
-3.76
0.0003
DIV*OVER_INV
+/-
0.3425
0.83
0.4084
MTB*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.0618
-0.41
0.6801
LOSS*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.3539
-1.07
0.2878
CAP_STRUCTURE*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.7743
-1.25
0.2154
Z_SCORE*OVER_INV
+
0.0000
1.14
0.1290
CLOSELY_HELD*OVER_INV
-
0.0038
0.45
0.3273
BIG4_5*OVER_INV
-
0.0744
0.13
0.4500
Industry Fixed Effects
Observations
Adjusted R
2
+ β
5
IFRS
it
* FV_HS
it
+ β
6
FV_HS
it
* OVER_INV
it
+ β
7
IFRS
it
* FV_HS
it
* OVER_INV
it
+ β
8-18
CONTROLSit + β
19-29
CONTROLS
it
* OVER_INV
it
+ ε
it
Yes
776
This table presents the OLS regression estimates of the effect on over-investment for UK firms that used
historical cost accounting with loose impairment rules (HL) under UK GAAP and historical cost
accounting with strict impairment rules (HS) under IFRS relative to UK firms that used fair-value
accounting (FV) under UK GAAP and then switched to historical cost accounting with strict impairment
rules (HS) under IFRS. ***, **, * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. P-
values are one-tailed when a directional prediction is made. Statistics for all variables are from firm-years
between 2000 and 2009. The model includes industry fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the
firm-level. For variable definitions, see "List of Variable Definitions" in Appendix A.
CAPEX
it
= β
0
+ β
1
IFRS
it
+ β
2
OVER_INV
it
+ β
3
IFRS
it
* OVER_INV
it
+ β
4
FV_HS
it
+
60.27%
(7)
(7)
53
TABLE C9
Multivariate Analysis of the Effect on Over-investment based on
Managerial Ownership
_______________________________________________________________
+ β
6
IFRS
it
*HIGH
it
+ β
7
IFRS
it
*LOW
it
+ β
8
HIGH
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ β
9
LOW
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ β
10
IFRS
it
*HIGH
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ β
11
IFRS
it
*LOW
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ β
12-21
CONTROLS
it
+ β
22-31
CONTROLS
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ ε
it
Pred. Sign
Coefficient
t-stat
P-value
Intercept
+/-
-4.2221 ***
-8.13
<.0001
IFRS
+/-
-0.0756
-0.88
0.3778
OVER_INV
+
0.5931
0.82
0.2069
IFRS*OVER_INV
-
-0.2215 *
-1.43
0.0768
HIGH
+/-
0.0308
0.25
0.8062
LOW
+/-
-0.0325
-0.27
0.7867
IFRS*HIGH
+/-
0.1194
0.85
0.3957
IFRS*LOW
+/-
0.2276
1.55
0.1228
HIGH*OVER_INV
-
-0.0889
-0.40
0.3445
LOW*OVER_INV
+
-0.0248
-0.12
0.4520
IFRS*HIGH*OVER_INV
-
-0.0774
-0.28
0.3905
IFRS*LOW*OVER_INV
-
-0.5671 **
-2.04
0.0213
SIZE
+
0.0547 **
1.91
0.0283
TANGIBILITY
+
0.8894 ***
6.29
<.0001
CFO_SALE
+/-
0.5029
1.54
0.1247
OPERATING_CYCLE
+/-
-0.1129
-1.34
0.1802
DIV
+/-
-0.0529
-0.47
0.6391
MTB
+
0.0382 ***
3.10
0.0011
LOSS
-
-0.2837 ***
-2.79
0.0028
CAP_STRUCTURE
+/-
0.0724
0.36
0.7224
Z_SCORE
-
0.0000 *
-1.60
0.0556
BIG4_5
+/-
0.2391 *
1.82
0.0695
SIZE*OVER_INV
-
-0.0006
-0.01
0.4951
TANGIBILITY*OVER_INV
+
0.9984 ***
3.84
0.0001
CFO_SALE*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.4747
-1.11
0.2690
OPERATING_CYCLE*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.1241
-0.96
0.3386
DIV*OVER_INV
+/-
0.2603
1.32
0.1893
MTB*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.0278 *
-1.83
0.0687
LOSS*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.1287
-0.72
0.4690
CAP_STRUCTURE*OVER_INV
+/-
-0.6750 *
-1.82
0.0695
Z_SCORE*OVER_INV
+
0.0000 **
1.68
0.0470
BIG4_5*OVER_INV
-
-0.3443 *
-1.46
0.0731
Country Fixed Effects
Industry Fixed Effects
Observations
Adjusted R
2
Test:
β
10
= β
11
This table presents the OLS regression estimates of the effect on over-investment after IFRS mandatory adoption based
on managerial ownership. ***, **, * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. P-values are one-
tailed when a directional prediction is made. Statistics for all variables are from firm-years between 2000 and 2009. The
model includes country and industry fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the firm-level. For variable definitions,
see "List of Variable Definitions" in Appendix A.
F = 2.62 (p = 0.0728)
Yes
2,568
CAPEX
it
= β
0
+ β
1
IFRS
it
+ β
2
OVER_INV
it
+ β
3
IFRS
it
*OVER_INV
it
+ β
4
HIGH
it
+ β
5
LOW
it
Yes
50.25%
(8)
54
REFERENCES
Ahmed, A., and S. Duellman. 2010. Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in
monitoring managers’ investment decisions.
Accounting and Finance
51: 609-
633.
Ahmed, A., M. Neel, and D. Wang. 2010. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improves
accounting quality. Working paper. Texas A&M University.
Altman, E. 1968. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate
bankruptcy.
Journal of Finance
23: 589-609.
Ang, J., R. Cole, and J. Lin. 2000. Agency costs and ownership structure.
Journal of
Finance
55: 81-106.
Ball, R. 2001. Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public
financial reporting and disclosure.
Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial
Services
: 127-169.
Ball, R. 2006. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for
investors.
Accounting and Business Research
, International Accounting Policy
Forum: 5-27.
Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative
loss recognition timeliness.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
39: 83-128.
Ball, R., S.P. Kothari, and V. Nikolaev. 2011. On estimating conditional conservatism.
Working paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1758702
Barth, M. 2006. Research, standard setting, and global financial reporting.
Foundations
and Trends® in Accounting
1: 71-165.
Barth, M., W. Beaver, and W. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance
literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view.
Journal of
Accounting and Economics
31: 77-104.
Barth, M., W. Landsman, and M. Lang. 2008. International accounting standards and
accounting quality.
Journal of Accounting Research
46: 467-498.
Barth, M., W. Landsman, M. Lang, and C. Williams. 2012. Are IFRS-based and US
GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable?
Journal of Accounting and
Economics
(forthcoming).
Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
24: 3-37.
55
Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932.
The modern corporation and private property
. New
York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Biddle, G., and G. Hilary. 2006. Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment.
The Accounting Review
81: 963-982.
Biddle, G., G. Hilary, and R. Verdi. 2009. How does financial reporting quality relate to
investment efficiency?
Journal of Accounting and Economics
48: 112-131.
Brown, P.R. 1997. Financial data and decision making by sell-side analysts.
Journal of
Financial Statement Analysis
2: 43-48.
Bushman, R., and A. Smith. 2001. Financial accounting information and corporate
governance.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
32: 237-333.
Bushman, R., J. Piotroski, and A. Smith. 2011. Capital allocation and timely accounting
recognition of economic losses.
Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting
(forthcoming).
Callao, S., J. Jarne, and J. Lainez. 2007. Adoption of IFRS in Spain: Effect on the
comparability and relevance of financial reporting.
Journal of International
Accounting, Auditing and Taxation
16: 148-178.
Capkun, V., D. Collins, and T. Jeanjean. 2011a. Does adoption of IAS/IFRS deter
earnings management? Working paper. Available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1850228
Capkun, V., A. Cazavan-Jeny, T. Jeanjean, and L. Weiss. 2011b. Setting the bar:
Earnings management during a change in accounting standards. Working paper.
Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1870007
Chen, H., Q. Tang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Lin. 2010a. The role of International Financial
Reporting Standards in accounting quality: Evidence from the European Union.
Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting
21: 220-278.
Chen, F., OK. Hope, Q. Li, and X. Wang. 2010b. Financial reporting quality and
investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets.
The Accounting
Review
(forthcoming).
Christensen, H., E. Lee, and M. Walker. 2008. Incentives or standards: What determines
accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption? Working paper. Manchester
Business School.
Christensen, H., and V. Nikolaev. 2010. Does fair value accounting for non-financial
assets pass the market test? Working paper. The University of Chicago.
56
Committee of Central Balance Sheet Data Offices (CBSO). 2005. Main differences
between IFRS and national legislations. Available at:
http://www.bde.es/webbde/es/cenbal/colabora/differences.pdf
DeFond, M., X. Hu, M. Hung, and S. Li. 2010. The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption
on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. Working paper.
Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473889
Deloitte. 2011. IAS
Plus
. Available at: http://www.iasplus.com/index.htm
Deloitte & Touche. 2001. European Comparison: UK & France. Available at:
http://www.iasplus.com/dttpubs/uk_fra.pdf
Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm.
Journal of
Law and Economics
26: 375-390.
Dietrich, D., K. Muller, and E. Riedl. 2007. Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting
conservatism.
Review of Accounting Studies
12: 95-124.
Ernst & Young. 2010. Meeting today’s financial challenges. Impairment reporting:
Improving stakeholder confidence. Available at:
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Meeting_todays_financial_challeng
es_-_Impairment_reporting_-
_Improving_stakeholder_confidence/$FILE/EY_Meeting_todays_financial_chall
enges_-_Impairment_reporting.pdf
Financial Standards Foundation. 2011. E Standards Forum. Available at:
http://www.estandardsforum.org
Francis, J.R., and X. Martin. 2010. Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
49: 161-178.
Givoly, D. and C.K. Hayn. 2000. The changing time series properties of earnings, cash
flows, and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?
Journal
of Accounting and Economics
29: 287-320.
Givoly, D., C.K. Hayn, and A. Natarajan. 2007. Measuring reporting conservatism.
The
Accounting Review
82: 65-106.
Gow, I.D., G. Ormazabal, and D.J. Taylor. 2010. Correcting for cross-sectional and
time-series dependence in accounting research.
The Accounting Review
85: 483-
512.
Harford, J. 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions.
The Journal of Finance
54:
1969-1997.
57
Hirst, E., and P. Hopkins. 1998. Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’
valuation judgments.
Journal of Accounting Research
36: 47-75.
Holthausen, R.W., and R.L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature
for financial accounting standard setting.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
31: 3-75.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2000. IASC Foundation
Constitution. London: International Accounting Standards Committee
Foundation.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2003. Technical Summary (IAS 16,
36; IFRS 1). London: International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). 2007. EU
implementation of IFRS and the fair value directive. A report for the European
Commission. Available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/docs/studies/2007-
eu_implementation_of_ifrs_summary.pdf
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. 2011. Standards
(IFRSs). Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/IFRS.htm
Jensen, M. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers.
American Economic Review
76: 323-329.
Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency
costs and ownership structure.
Journal of Financial Economics
3: 305-360.
Kothari, S.P., K. Ramanna, and D. Skinner. 2010. Implications for GAAP from an
analysis of positive research in accounting.
Journal of Accounting and
Economics
50: 246-286.
KPMG. 2003. Implementing IFRS. Extract from: IFRS compared with US GAAP and
French GAAP. Available at:
http://www.kpmg.com.cn/en/virtual_library/Audit/IFRS_FrenchGAAP03.pdf
KPMG. 2003. Implementing IAS. Extract from: IAS compared with US GAAP and UK
GAAP. Available at: http://www.kpmg.co.uk/pubs/ias_comp_ukusgaap.pdf
KPMG. 2005. IFRS compared to Swedish GAAP: An overview. Available at:
http://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/documents/
IFRS-compared-to-Swedish-GAAP-O-200504.pdf
KPMG. 2006. IFRS compared to Dutch GAAP: An overview. Available at:
http://www.kpmg.co.uk/pubs/IFRS_to_Dutch_GAAP_06.pdf
58
Kvaal, E. 2005. Topics in accounting for impairment of fixed assets. BI Norwegian
School of Management. Department of Accounting, Auditing and Law.
LaFond, R., and S. Roychowdhury. 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting
conservatism.
Journal of Accounting Research
46: 101-135.
LaFond, R., and R.L. Watts. 2008. The information role of conservatism.
The
Accounting Review
83: 447-478.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and
the cost of capital.
Journal of Accounting Research
45: 385-420.
Leone, A., J. Wu, and J. Zimmerman. 2006. Asymmetric sensitivity of CEO cash
compensation to stock returns.
Journal of Accounting and Economics
42: 167-
192.
Lie, E. 2000. Excess funds and agency problems: An empirical study of incremental
cash disbursements.
The Review of Financial Studies
13: 219-247.
Mains, L., and L. McDaniel. 2000. Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on
nonprofessional investors’ judgments: The role of financial-statement
presentation format.
The Accounting Review
75: 179-207.
Richardson, S. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow.
Review of Accounting Studies
11: 159-189.
Schipper, K. 2005. Fair values in financial reporting. American Accounting Association
(AAA) 2005 annual meeting. Available at:
http://fars.org/2005AAAFairValueKSchipper.pdf
Srivastava, A., S. Sunder, and S. Tse. 2010. Timely loss recognition and the early
termination of unprofitable projects. Working paper. Available at:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=146598
Tian, X., D. Collins, and P. Hribar. 2009. The confounding effects of operating cash
flow asymmetric timeliness on the Basu measure of conditional conservatism.
Working paper. The University of Iowa.
Walters, P.D. 2010. IFRS Accounting Trends & Techniques. American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, Inc. New York.
Warner, J.B., R.L. Watts, and K.H. Wruck. 1988. Stock prices and top management
changes.
Journal of Financial Economics
20: 461-492.
Watts, R.L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications.
Accounting Horizons
17: 207-221.
59
Watts, R.L. 2006. What has the invisible hand achieved?
Accounting and Business
Research
, International Accounting Policy Forum: 51-61.
World Bank. 2005. Report on the observance of standards and codes (ROSC). Republic
of Poland. Accounting and Auditing. Available at:
http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/rosc_aa_pol_eng.pdf
Yu, G. 2010. Accounting standards and international portfolio holdings: Analysis of
cross-border holdings following mandatory adoption of IFRS. Working paper.
The University of Michigan.
Document Outline - part 1
- part 2
- part 3
- part 4
- part 5
Dostları ilə paylaş: |