August 2013 Plutonium Mountain Inside the 17-year mission to secure a dangerous legacy of Soviet nuclear testing By Eben Harrell & David E. Hoffman Project on Managing the Atom



Yüklə 333,26 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə2/18
tarix05.03.2018
ölçüsü333,26 Kb.
#29689
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   18

Plutonium Mountain: Inside the 17-year mission to secure a dangerous legacy of Soviet nuclear testing

2

Two years later, in 1997, Siegfried S. Hecker, just retiring as director of Los Alamos, decided to 



look more closely. Hecker, who helped pioneer cooperation with his counterparts in the Soviet 

and later Russian nuclear weapons laboratories, used personal connections to push for action. He 

succeeded in enlisting the cooperation of Russian nuclear scientists who had been involved in the 

testing program in Kazakhstan before the Soviet collapse. 

Source: U.S. Department of Defense

Monument commemorating the completion of the Degelen Mountain Proliferation Prevention Program 

in English, Kazakh, and Russian languages.

Scientists and engineers from the United States, Russia, and Kazakhstan overcame deep-rooted 

suspicions in their governments to find technical solutions to the plutonium threat at Degelen 

Mountain. The operation was based almost entirely on ad-hoc agreements struck at a lower level, 

and was carried to a conclusion without elaborate, negotiated state-to-state agreements of the 

kind used for arms control during the Cold War. Each country played a crucial role. 

The operation took 17 years to complete, a period in history that saw the rise of al-Qaeda and its 

nuclear ambitions, the 9/11 attacks, and spanned three different U.S. administrations, the latter 

two of which proclaimed nuclear terrorism the greatest threat to U.S. security and spent billions 

of dollars to prevent it. Serious logistical difficulties were just one reason the Semipalatinsk op-

eration took so long. Another was lingering mistrust, inertia and excessive secrecy. Until prodded 

by the scientists, the governments had done very little about the plutonium abandoned at the test 

site. 

The informal approach was effective, but slow, and it left some issues unresolved or partly unex-



plored. For example, although Kazakhstan signed the 1968 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 

1993 and had a legal obligation to declare all the fissile material on its territory, the three coun-

tries overseeing the operation decided not to formally notify or involve the International Atomic 

Energy Agency. Each country felt it had good reasons for excluding the IAEA. They shared a 

concern that information leaks from the agency would compromise the secrecy of the operation. 

Now, the IAEA and Kazakhstan face long-term uncertainties about whether the material can be 

safely left in its current form forever, or whether it may pose a risk that someone might seek to 



Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs  |  

Harvard Kennedy School

3

recover it someday, or that it could cause environmental contamination beyond the radiation al-



ready polluting some portions of Semipalatinsk.  

This paper begins with a narrative reconstruction of the threat reduction work at Semipalatinsk. It 

is based on interviews with U.S., Russian, and Kazakh scientists and officials—conducted in the 

United States and Kazakhstan—and is supported by documents provided to the authors. It con-

cludes with observations about the lessons for future efforts to reduce and ultimately eliminate 

the threat posed by nuclear weapons and the essential nuclear materials needed to construct them. 

Source: Autonavi / Basarsoft / Google

Map of Soviet test site at Semipalatinsk within Kazakhstan.



Plutonium Mountain: Inside the 17-year mission to secure a dangerous legacy of Soviet nuclear testing

4

The Mountain and its Legacy

The town once known as Semipalatinsk-21 is an isolated, misbegotten city built at great human 

cost on the steppes of eastern Kazakhstan by prisoners between 1947-1949 for the purpose of 

providing a staging ground for Soviet nuclear weapons testing.

4

 In the post-Soviet vacuum of the 



early 1990s, the conditions at Semipalatinsk-21 resembled the apocalypse that nuclear weapons 

have long portended. A city of 40,000 that was once serviced by two daily direct flights from 

Moscow had been transformed into a dystopia of a few thousand stragglers and feral dogs whose 

main challenge was finding food and warmth.

5

 Many regions of the former Soviet Union were 



impoverished in the first years after the collapse; this one was so poor and lawless that people 

who lived there resorted to scavenging the nuclear testing infrastructure. Even the highest-rank-

ing officials were desperate. The Russian director of Semipalatinsk-21 was dismissed in 1993 on 

charges of selling equipment from the site’s facilities.

6

  

From 1949 to 1961, the Soviet Union had turned the area around Semipalatinsk-21 into the 



equivalent of a nuclear battlefield, detonating 116 nuclear blasts in the atmosphere.

7

 The last 



Soviet air test was in December, 1962. Following a global outcry over the ecological and health 

effects of atmospheric testing, the Soviets moved the testing program underground, where they 

conducted 340 underground explosions. The United States had conducted atmospheric testing in 

Nevada, and primarily in the Pacific. The United States similarly shifted to underground testing 

in this period, and ceased atmospheric testing in 1963 upon entering into a limited test ban treaty 

with the Soviet Union.

At Semipalatinsk, a sprawling 

network of tunnels built under 

a series of hills near Semi-

palatinsk-21 known locally as 

Degelen Mountain became a 

central location for the un-

derground testing program. A 

ragged mound of granite, De-

gelen Mountain rises from the 

prairie grass of the steppes like 

the crested back of a half-sub-

merged, prehistoric beast.  To 

many local Kazakhs, the tests 

imbued it with a sinister air. 

“Out there,” one senior Kazakh 

scientist once told a reporter, 

4

   After Kazakhstan’s independence, the city was renamed Kurchatov City.



5

   See: Russian Television Network, April 28, 1994, in JPRS-TND-94-012, “Reduced Staffing Causes Problems at Semipala-

tinsk,” June 7, 1994, p. 34 and “Glowing, But Not With Health,” The Economist, July 25, 1998, pp. 3-4.

6

   See: Izvestiya, “Semipalatinsk Chief Removed from Test Site,” December 28, 1993, in FBIS-USR-94-001, January 5, 1994, p. 



31.

7

   Hecker, “Dealing with Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Legacy,” p. 16. 



Source: Carl Willis

Abandoned building in Center of Kurchatov City, 2012.


Yüklə 333,26 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   18




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə