548
Chapter 33
8
l.c., pp.42, 43, 44.
9
l.c., vol.ii, p.5.
10
“Land, to be an element of colonisation, must not only be waste, but it must be public property,
liable to be converted into private property.” (l.c., Vol.II, p.125.)
11
l.c., Vol.I, p.247.
12
l.c., pp.21, 22.
13
l.c., Vol.II, p.116
14
l.c., Vol.I, p.131.
15
l.c., Vol.II, p.5.
16
Merivale, l.c., Vol.II, pp.235-314 passim. Even the mild, Free Trade, vulgar economist, Molinari,
says: “Dans les colonies où l’esclavage a été aboli sans que le travail forcé se trouvait remplacé par
une quantité équivalente de travail libre, on a vu s’opérer la contre-partie du fait qui se réalise tous les
jours sous nos yeux. On a vu les simples travailleurs exploiter à leur tour les entrepreneurs d’industrie,
exiger d’eux des salaires hors de toute proportion avec la part légitime qui leur revenait dans le
produit. Les planteurs, ne pouvant obtenir de leurs sucres un prix suffisant pour couvrir la hausse de
salaire, ont été obligés de fournir l’excédant, d’abord sur leurs profits, ensuite sur leurs capitaux
mêmes. Une foule de planteurs ont été ruinés de la sorte, d’autres ont fermé leurs ateliers pour
échapper à une ruine imminente.... Sans doute, il vaut mieux voir périr des accumulations de capitaux
que des générations d’hommes [how generous Mr. Molinari!]: mais ne vaudrait-il pas mieux que ni les
uns ni les autres périssent? [In the colonies where slavery has been abolished without the compulsory
labour being replaced with an equivalent quantity of free labour, there has occurred the opposite of
what happens every day before our eyes. Simple workers have been seen to exploit in their turn the
industrial entrepreneurs, demanding from them wages which bear absolutely no relation to the
legitimate share in the product which they ought to receive. The planters were unable to obtain for
their sugar for a sufficent price to cover the increase in wages, and were obliged to furnish the extra
amount, at first out of their profits, and then out of their very capital. A considerable amount of
planters have been ruined as a result, while others have closed down their businesses in order to avoid
the ruin which threatened them ... It is doubtless better that these accumulations of capital should be
destroyed than that generations of men should perish ... but would it not be better if both survived?]
(Molinari, l.c., pp.51,52.) Mr. Molinari, Mr. Molinari! What then becomes of the ten commandments,
of Moses and the prophets, of the law of supply and demand, if in Europe the “entrepreneur” can cut
down the labourer’s legitimate part, and in the West Indies, the labourer can cut down the
entrepreneur’s? And what, if you please, is this “legitimate part,” which on your own showing the
capitalist in Europe daily neglects to pay? Over yonder, in the colonies where the labourers are so
“simple” as to “exploit” the capitalist, Mr. Molinari feels a strong itching to set the law of supply and
demand, that works elsewhere automatically, on the right road by means of the police.
17
Wakefield, l.c., Vol.II, p.52.
18
l.c., pp.191, 192.
19
l.c., Vol.I, p.47, 246.
20
“C’est, ajoutez-vous, grâce à l’appropriation du sol et des capitaux que l’homme, qui n’a que ses
bras, trouve de l’occupation et se fait un revenu... c’est au contraire, grâce à l’appropriation
individuelle du sol qu’il se trouve des hommes n’ayant que leurs bras.... Quand vous mettez un
homme dans le vide, vous vous emparez de l’atmosphère. Ainsi faites-vous, quand vous vous emparez
du sol.... C’est le mettre dans le vide le richesses, pour ne la laisser vivre qu’à votre volonté.” [It is,
you add, a result of the appropriation of the soil and of capital that the man who has nothing but the
strength of his arms finds employment and creates an income for himself ... but the opposite is true, it
is thanks to the individual appropriation of the soil that there exist men who only possess the strength
549
Chapter 33
of their arms. ... When you put a man in a vacuum, you rob him of the air. You do the same, when you
take away the soil from him ... for you are putting him in a space void of wealth, so as to leave him no
way of living except according to your wishes] (Collins, l.c. t.III, pp.268-71, passim.)
21
Wakefield, l.c., Vol.II, p.192.
22
l.c., p.45.
23
As soon as Australia became her own law-giver, she passed, of course, laws favorable to the
settlers, but the squandering of the land, already accomplished by the English Government, stands in
the way. “The first and main object at which new Land Act of 1862 aims is to give increased facilities
for the settlement of the people.” (“The Land Law of Victoria,” by the Hon. C. G. Duffy, Minister of
Public Lands, Lond., 1862.)