weather patterns. The problems
of our oil dependence
were especially highlighted by the massive 2010 oil
spill in the Gulf of Mexico. What has yet to become
clear to the average person, however, are the problems
with water shortages, an issue that will greatly affect
everyone. United Nations Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon has repeatedly stated that wars will most
likely be fought over water sources in our lifetime.
So significant is this stressor that National Geographic
dedicated an entire issue in April 2010 to the topic of
water and our thirsty world. Here are some facts that
will impact you now and in the years to come:
■
About 97.5 percent of the earth’s water is salty, with
only 2.5 percent of earth’s water considered fresh.
■
Two-thirds of all fresh water is frozen.
■
Many Western states (e.g., Texas, Arizona, and
California) are draining underground aquifers
quicker than they can be naturally restored.
■
Many fresh-water streams contain hormones
and antibiotics from prescription drugs flushed
down toilets and agricultural run-off containing
petrochemical fertilizers.
■
Americans use approximately 100 gallons of
water at home each day, compared to 5 gallons/
day in developing nations.
■
It takes 2,500 gallons of water to make 1 pound
of hamburger and 1,800 gallons to grow enough
cotton for a pair of blue jeans.
■
Clean water is a huge issue in China, so much
so that it tried (and failed)
to license and export
fresh water from the Great Lakes region in the
United States and Canada.
■
The Three Gorges Dam in central China will
cause the earth’s axis to tilt by nearly an inch.
Perhaps the most subtle warning about this discon-
nect from our environment is the news that for the
first time it has been noted that Americans are not
getting enough vitamin D, as explained by nutritionist
and New York Times reporter, Jane Brody. Vitamin D
deficiency is due to a lack of exposure to sunlight and
poor dietary habits. Sunlight is often referred to as the
sunshine vitamin because, as sunlight reaches the skin,
it reacts to help form vitamin D. Today people spend
little time outdoors, denying themselves exposure to
adequate amounts of sunlight.
Americans may be lacking in the social graces, but in
the face of global calamities, such as the 2010 earth-
quake in Haiti or the 2008 tsunami in Indonesia,
Americans are renowned the world over for giving
generously to the needy in far-away lands. However,
texting a donation during the Superbowl for earth-
quake relief is far different than face-to-face contact
and polite social interactions. It’s the direct social con-
tact skills that prove to be sorely lacking in American
culture today. How good are your social skills in this
age of incivility? You can begin to find out by com-
pleting Exercises 1.7 and 1.8.
Environmental Disconnect
Even if you don’t listen to the news regularly, it’s hard
to ignore the impact humanity is having on the state of
the planet. With a population exceeding 7 billion people,
the word sustainable has entered the American lexicon
with great regularity, even if the concept is largely
ignored by most citizens. Modern society can be said to
be suffering from an environmental disconnect, a state in
which people have distanced themselves so much from
the natural environment that they cannot fathom the
magnitude of their impact on it. It was predicted many
years ago by a great many experts and luminaries that
as humanity distances itself from nature, people will
suffer the consequences, primarily in terms of com-
promised health status. The term nature deficit disorder
was coined by award-winning author Richard Louv, in
Last Child in the Woods, to describe the growing abyss
between people and the outdoor world. Kids, as it turns
out, would rather play video games or surf online than
play outside—where there are no outlets or WiFi access.
There is an age-old question that states, “How many
angels can dance on the head of a pin?” Today that
imponderable question has become, “How many
humans can sustainably live on planet Earth?” It’s inter-
esting to note that some of the earliest studies on stress
physiology involved placing an abnormally high number
of mice in a cage. As their environment, personal space,
food availability, and quality of life decreased with each
additional occupant, tension significantly increased.
The parallels between the environment and behavior of
those mice and humans today are unavoidable.
By now everyone has not only heard of the issues on
global warming, but also has experienced the prelimi-
nary effects first hand: violent storms, warm winters,
hotter summers, more intense droughts, and severe
The Nature of Stress
19
9781284103625_CH01_Print.indd 19
12/4/15 4:20 PM
planetary healing.” Lipton uses the model of holism
(where all parts are respected and come together for
a greater purpose) as the template for his optimism.
Lipton is among a growing group of social luminaries,
including Barbara Marx-Hubbard, Jean Houston,
Christine Page, Edgar Mitchell, Elizabeth Sartoris,
and Gregg Braden, who share this optimistic para-
digm of humanity’s shifting consciousness (Schlitz,
2010). In the words of the rock musician Sting, “Yes
we are in an appalling environmental crisis, but I
think as a species, we evolve through crises. That’s
the only glimmer of hope, really” (Richter, 2010).
Exercise 1.9 invites you to evaluate your relationship
to the planet’s health.
Race and Gender Stress
One cannot address the issue of the sociology of stress
without acknowledging the issue of race and gender
stress. The United States, a nation of immigrants, has
often been described as a melting pot, but recently
another metaphor has been used to describe the make-
up of its citizens: a tossed salad, where assimilation
meets head on with cultural diversity. Race and ethnic
issues continually make headline news with regard to
illegal alien issues nationwide, disenfranchised black
voters in Florida, poverty in New Orleans, and Muslim
Americans facing episodes of discrimination, to name
a few. Race and gender tensions, however, are not new.
It could be argued that they are as old as humanity
itself. Since time began, people have been threat-
ened by other people of different skin color, ethnicity,
gender, or sexual preference. The 2008 election of the
first African American president has helped jumpstart
a national discussion on race, but it hasn’t resolved the
issue of intolerance. Like race issues, gender issues
(and to this we can add sexual orientation issues) are
also threads in the social fabric once dominated by a
white patriarchal society, yet this is changing. Despite
the demographic shifts, the dated cultural perceptions
of superiority/inferiority persist, and with them the
biases that go with them.
Stress, you will remember, is defined as a perceived
threat, a threat generated by the ego. These threats
manifest in a variety of ways including stereotyping,
prejudice, discrimination, harassment, and even phys-
ical harm. Race and gender stress may begin early in
life, too; many children can attest to being bullied in
school, or excluded and teased by social cliques. The
Vitamin D isn’t the only nutritional/environmental
problem. People who saw the documentary film
Food, Inc. (or who read the book by Karl Weber) are
acutely aware that the move away from family farms
to industrial farms in the last few decades has greatly
compromised the quality of food, primarily chicken
and beef, and encouraged the proliferation of products
that use high fructose corn syrup. Changes in the food
industry, along with inadequate exercise, help explain
the recent dramatic increase in national obesity levels.
Genetic engineering of food crops is suggested as a pri-
mary reason for the decimation of half of the world’s
bee population, which is creating a problem regarding
the pollination of many crops. But bat and frog pop-
ulations are being decimated as well. The balance of
nature is, in no uncertain terms, out of balance.
Some of the world’s leading scientists are not opti-
mistic about the future of humanity, given the stresses
we have put on our environment and, in turn, our-
selves. Physicist Stephen Hawking’s current outlook
for humanity is grim at best, unless we learn to change
our ways, and quickly. In a 2010 interview with the
Huffington Post he stated, “We are entering an increas-
ingly dangerous period in our history. There have been
a number of times in the past when survival has been a
question of touch and go. We are rapidly depleting the
finite natural resources that Earth provides, and our
genetic code carries selfish and aggressive instincts.”
Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson and others now refer
to the loss of biodiversity in our modern era as the
“sixth mass extinction” on Earth, with hunting and
fishing, loss of natural habitat, and pollution as the
primary causes (Eldridge, 2001). Meanwhile, sociolo-
gist Jared Diamond, author of the best selling book,
Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail on Success (2005),
has this message: If positive changes are not made with
regard to our use of resources and our relationship to
our natural environment, we, too, will face extinction.
Not all views of humanity are so dire or fatalistic.
Several, in fact, are quite optimistic—with the caveat
that we must act now. Consider that of cell biologist
and philosopher Bruce Lipton. In his book Sponta-
neous Evolution, he states: “Society is beginning to
realize that our current beliefs are detrimental and
that our world is in a very precarious position. The
new science (the nexus of quantum physics, psy-
chology, and biology) paves a way into a hopeful story
of humanity’s potential future, one that promotes
Chapter 1
20
9781284103625_CH01_Print.indd 20
12/4/15 4:20 PM