|
![](/i/favi32.png) Character for Leadership: The Role of Personal Characteristicsparticipants demonstrating low, medium, and high levels of cooperativeness wasout participants demonstrating low, medium, and high levels of cooperativeness was
found statistically significant for visionary leadership,
χ
2
(2,
Ν
= 101)
= 18.40,
p
=
.00. This hypothesis was also supported, allowing rejection of the null hypothesis at
that level.
Hypothesis 5 proposed a difference in how visionary leadership was
enacted between groups based on measured levels for the character trait self-
transcendence. The difference between participants demonstrating low, medium,
and high levels of self-transcendence was not found statistically significant for
visionary leadership,
χ
2
(2,
Ν
= 101)
= 2.87,
p
= .24. These results did not allow the
researcher to reject the null hypothesis. Hypothesis 6 proposed a difference in
mature character (the combination of the character traits of self-directedness and
cooperativeness) based on measured levels for the character trait self-
transcendence. The difference between participants demonstrating low, medium,
and high levels of self-transcendence was not found statistically significant for
mature character,
χ
2
(2,
Ν
= 101)
= .11,
p
= .95. These results did not allow the
researcher to reject the null hypothesis.
Finally, Hypothesis 7 posited that one’s current level of involvement in a
ministry capacity while in school would result in differences in how visionary
leadership was enacted. The difference between participants involved in low,
medium, and high levels of in-school ministry leadership was not found statistically
significant for visionary leadership,
χ
2
(2,
Ν
= 101)
= 5.45,
p
= .07. These results
did not allow the researcher to reject the null hypothesis. However, it is appropriate
to note that these results are significant at
α
= .10.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|