mouth width was significantly
different between spe-
cies (D. microcephalus > S. vigilans). Two results may
explain this finding: the weak correlation found in
both species between mouth width and prey size and
the generalist diet. We propose that diet specializa-
tion is more likely to allow for a relationship between
predator and prey morphometry in anurans (Lynch &
Duellman, 1997). For a relationship between anuran
morphometry and prey size in other hylid assemblag-
es see for instance: Toft (1980a, 1981), Duré & Kehr
(2001) and Jiménez & Bolaños (2012).
In conclusion, at the locality of this study,
D. microcephalus and
S. vigilans occupy the same mi-
crohabitats and the potential for space competition
would be high if perch sites were limited; nonetheless,
segregation of their diets would reduce competition
and favor their coexistence. The composition of their
diets is biased toward the generalist end of the contin-
uum of prey specialization in anurans (ant-specialist,
non-ant specialist and generalist).
RESUMEN
La coexistencia de especies con requerimientos ecológi-
cos similares (alimento, espacio, tiempo) típicamente ha
atraído a los investigadores porque se espera que la com-
petencia por recursos sea alta. La dieta y la ocupación de
microhábitat de dos especies morfológica y ecológicamente
similares de Hylidae (Anura) se analizaron en una locali-
dad al noroeste de Venezuela, con el objetivo de evaluar el
potencial para competencia entre ellas. La dieta se estimó
a través del análisis de los contenidos estomacales y la ocu-
pación del microhábitat por medio de registros del tipo y
altura de la percha y la distancia horizontal al agua. Se
identificaron 36 categorías de presa (32 familias, 4 órde-
nes); 30 en D. microcephalus
y 21 en S. vigilans.
Las
presas más importantes (RII) en D. microcephalus
fue-
ron Agelenidae (11,1%), Tachinidae (9,32%) y Lepi-
doptera-larva (7,96%). Gryllidae (14,13%), Cicadidae
(9,1%), Cicadellidae (8,3%) and Delphacidae (8,02%)
fueron las más importantes en S. vigilans.
Ambas especies
tienen dietas relativamente generalistas. La superposición
de las dietas fue relativamente baja (0,32). Ambas espe-
cies ocuparon el mismo tipo de perchas (hojas y tallos de
dicotiledóneas y monocotiledóneas) a las mismas alturas.
El potencial para la competencia por espacio es alto si las
perchas fuesen escasas, pero se espera que la competencia
por el alimento sea baja.
Palabras-Clave: Dieta; Generalista; Superposición
de nicho; Partición de recursos; Microhábitat; Mor-
fometría.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was preformed with permission of the
landowners of Hacienda La Guáquira. We are indebt-
ed to C. Rivero-Blanco, I. Guevara and the students
of the 2012-Herpetology Course (Biology School,
Universidad Central de Venezuela) for their logistic
support at the study site. D. Llavaneras kindly helped
with prey identification. S. Boher and H. Guada re-
vised the original project, and E. Zeuch gently read
this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Aiken, M. & Coyle, F.A. 2000. Habitat distribution, life history
and behaviour of Tetragnatha spider species in the Great Smoky
Mountains National Park. Journal of Arachnology, 28:97-106.
Alatalo, R.V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in
ecology. Oikos, 37:199-204.
Anderson, A.; Haukos, D. & Anderson, J. 1999. Diet
composition of three anurans from the Playa wetlands of
northwest Texas. Copeia, 1999:515-520.
Armesto, O.; Esteban, B. & Torrado, R. 2009. Fauna de anfibios
del Municipio de Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia.
Herpetotropicos, 5:57-63.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L. 1998. Sistemática y biogeografía de los
anfibios (Amphibia) de Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica,
18:1-93.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L. 2009. Riqueza y Endemismo.
In: Molina,
C.; Señaris, J.C.; Lampo, M. & Rial, A. (Eds.). Anfibios de
Venezuela; Estado del conocimiento y recomendaciones para su
conservación. Caracas, Ediciones Grupo TEI. p. 25-39.
Barrio-Amorós, C.L.; Díaz de Pascual, A.; Mueses-Cisneros,
J.; Infante, E. & Chacón, E. 2006. Hyla vigilans, Solano,
1971, a second species of the genus Scarthyla, redescription and
distribution in Venezuela y Colombia. Zootaxa, 1349:1-18.
Bevier, C.R. 1997. Breeding activity and chorus tenure of two
neotropical hylids frogs. Journal of Herpetology, 32:607-611.
Bolaños, F.; Santos-Barrera, G.; Solís, F.; Ibáñez, R.;
Wilson, L.D.; Savage, J.; Lee, J.; Trefaut Rodrigues,
M.; Caramaschi, U.; Mijares, A. & Hardy, J. 2008.
Dendropsophus microcephalus. In: The IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species 2008: e.T55558A11318242. DOI.
Downloaded on 02/02/2017.
Caldwell, J.P. 1996. The evolution of myrmecophagy and its
correlates in poison frogs (Family Dendrobatidae). Journal of
Zoology, London, 240:75-101.
Caldwell, J.P. & Vitt, L.J. 1999. Dietary asymmetry in leaf litter
frogs and lizards in a transitional northern Amazonian rain
forest. Oikos, 84:383-397.
Candia, R. 1997. Cambios en la estructuración de la comunidad
de insectos asociados a una sucesión secundaria en la sabana
natural del Parque Nacional Aguaro-Guariquito (Edo. Guárico).
Doctoral Diss., Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de
Venezuela, Caracas.
Cardoso, A.J.; Andrade, G.V. & Haddad, C.F.B. 1989.
Distribuição espacial em comunidades de anfíbios (Anura) no
sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 49:241-249.
Christian, K.A. 1982. Change in the food niche during
postmetamorphic ontogeny of the frog Pseudacris triseriata.
Copeia, 1982:73-80.
Fonseca-Pérez, K.A.
et
al
.: Diet and microhabitat Hylinae
102
Cope, E.D. 1886. Thirteenth contribution to the herpetology of
tropical America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, 23:271-287.
Crump, M.L. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran
community. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of
Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 61:1-68.
Donnelly, M.A. 1991. Feeding patterns of the strawberry poison
frog Dendrobates pumilio (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Copeia,
1991:723-730.
Drewry, G.E. & Rand, A.S. 1983. Characteristics of an acoustic
community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus.
Copeia, 1983:941-955.
Duellman, W.E. 1970. The Hylid frogs of Middle America.
Kansas, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptile. 2v.
(Monograph of the Museum of Natural History, the University
of Kansas).
Duellman, W.E. 1993. Amphibians in Africa and South
America: evolutionary history and ecological comparisons. In:
Goldblatt, P. (Ed.). Biological relationship between Africa and
South America. Yale University Press. p. 200-243.
Duellman, W.E. & Trueb, L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians.
Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.
Duré, M. & Kehr, A. 2001. Differential exploitation of trophic
resources by two pseudid frogs from Corrientes, Argentina.
Journal of Herpetology, 35:340-343.
Emerson, S.B. 1985. Skull shape in frogs, correlations with diet.
Herpetologica, 41:177-188.
Freed, A.N. 1980. Prey selection and feeding behavior in the green
treefrog (Hyla cinerea). Ecology, 61:461-465.
Giller, P.S. 1984. Community Structure and the Niche. London,
Chapman and Hal.
Gordon, C.E. 2000. The coexistence of species. Revista Chilena de
Historia Natural, 73:175-198.
Hammer, O.; Harper, D. & Ryan, P. 2001. PAST: Paleontological
statistics package for education and data analysis.
Palaeontological Electronics, 4:9.
Hirai, T. & Matsui, M. 2000. Myrmecophagy in a ranid frog Rana
rugose: specialization or weak avoidance to ant eating.
Zoology
Science, 17:459-466.
Hurlbert, S.H. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and
some relatives. Ecology, 59:67-77.
Hutchenson, K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the
Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29:151-154.
Jiménez, R. & Bolaños, F. 2012. Use of food and spatial resources
by two frogs of the genus Dendropsophus (Anura: Hylidae)
from La Selva, Costa Rica. Phyllomedusa, 11:51-62
Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. California, Addison-
Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc. Benjamin/Cummings.
La Marca, E.; Rueda J.V. & Castro, F. 2004. Scarthyla vigilans.
In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004:
e.T55688A11340990. DOI. Downloaded on: 02/02/2017.
Labanick, G.M. 1976. Prey availability, consumption and selection
in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans (Amphibia, Anura: Hylidae).
Journal of Herpetology, 10:293-298.
Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some
Theoretical Explorations. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University
Press.
Lima, A.P. 1998. The effects of size on the diets of six sympatric
species of postmetamorphic litter anurans in Central
Amazonia. Journal of Herpetology, 32:392-399.
Lima, A.P. & Magnusson, W.E. 1998. Partitioning seasonal time:
interaction among size, foraging activity and diet in leaflitter
frogs. Oecología, 116:259-266.
Lima, A.P. & Moreira, G. 1993. Effects of prey size and foraging
mode on the ontogenetic change in feeding niche of Colostethus
stepheni (Anura: Dendrobatidae).
Oecología, 95:93-102.
Lomolino, M.; Riddle, B.R. & Brown, J.H. 2006. Biogeography.
3.ed. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates.
Lotzkat, S. 2007. Taxonomía y zoogeografía de la herpetofauna del
Macizo de Nirgua, Venezuela. Undergraduate Diss., Biological
Sciences Department, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main.
Lynch, J.D. & Duellman, W.E. 1997. Frogs of the genus
Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactilydae) in western Ecuador:
systematics, ecology and biogeography. University of Kansas,
Museum of Natural History, Special Publications, 23:1-236.
Macale, D.; Vignoli, L. & Carpaneto, G.M. 2008. Food
selection strategy during the reproductive period in three
syntopic hylid species from a subtropical wetland of north-east
Argentina. Herpetological Journal, 18:49-58.
Menéndez-Guerrero, P.A. 2001. Ecología trófica de una
comunidad de anuros del Parque Nacional Yasuní en la
Amazonía Ecuatoriana. Undergraduate Diss., Facultad de
Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontificia Universidad Católica
del Ecuador, Quito.
Menin, M.; Rossa-Feres, D. & Giaretta, A. 2005. Resource use
and coexistence of two syntopic hylid frogs (Anura: Hylidae).
Revista Brasileria de Zoologia, 22:61-72.
Muñoz-Guerrero, J.; Serrano, V. & Ramírez-Pinilla, M.P.
2007. Uso del microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en
cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales
(Anura: Hylinae). Caldasia, 29:413-425.
Parmelee, J.R. 1999. Trophic ecology of a tropical anuran
assemblage. Scientific Papers of the Natural History Museum of
the University of Kansas, 11:1-59.
Pianka, E.R. 1994. Evolutionary Ecology. New York, Harper Collins
College Publishers.
Piñero, J. & Durant, P. 1993. Dieta de una comunidad de anuros
de la selva nublada en los Andes Merideños. Ecotropicos, 6:1-9.
Rojas-Runjaic, F.J.M.; Barrio-Amorós, C.L.; Molina, C.;
Señaris, J.C. & Fedón, I.C. 2008. Notes on geographic
distribution. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae, Scarthyla vigilans:
Range extensions and new states records from Delta Amacuro
and Miranda states, Venezuela. Check List, 4:301-303.
da Rosa, I.; Canavero, A.; Maneyro, R.; Naya, D.E. & Camargo,
A. 2002. Diet of four sympatric anuran species in a temperate
environment. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Uruguay,
13:12-20.
Runemark, A.; Perera, F.; Carrero, J.C.; Camacho Agüero,
L.A.; Medina, R.; Jiménez, R.; Hernández, V.; De Los
Llanos, V. & Urrutia-Guada, V. 2005. Proyecto para el
establecimiento de la Reserva Natural La Guáquira en el Cerro
Zapatero, Estado Yaracuy. Sartenejas, Universidad Simón
Bolívar, Departamento de Estudios Ambientales.
Ryan MJ. 1985. The Túngara Frog. A Study of Sexual Selection and
Communication. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Savage, J.M. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica.
Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Schoener, T.W. 1974. Some methods of calculating competition
coefficients from resource-utilization spectra. American
Nauralist, 108:332-340.
Smith, J.M.; Downie, J.R.; Dye, R.F.; Ogilvy, V.; Thornham,
D.G.; Rutherford, M.G.; Charles, S.P. & Murphy, J.C.
2011. Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae Scarthyla vigilans (Solano,
1971): Range extension and new country record for Trinidad,
West Indies, with notes on tadpoles, habitat, behavior and
biogeographical significance. Check List, 7:574-577.
Smith, R. & Silva, G. 1970. Claves para Artrópodos Terrestres
Latinoamericanos. Barquisimeto, Instituto Pedagógico de
Ciencias Experimentales.
Solano, H. 1971. Una nueva especie del género Hyla (Amphibia:
Anura) de Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, 7:211-218.
Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 57(7), 2017
103
Solé, M. & Pelz, B. 2007. Do male tree frogs feed during the
breeding season? Stomach flushing of five syntopic hylids
species in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Natural History,
41:41-44.
Stebbins, R.C. & Cohen, N.W. 1995. A Natural History of
Amphibians. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
Strussmann, C.; Ribeiro do Vale, M.B.; Meneghini, M.H. &
Magnusson, W.E. 1984. Diet and foraging mode of Bufo
marinus and Leptodactylus ocellatus. Journal of Herpetology,
18:138-146.
Tárano, Z. 2010. Advertisement calls and calling habits of frogs
from a flooded savanna of Venezuela. South American Journal
of Herpetology, 5:54-75.
Toft, C. 1980a. Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species
of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecología,
45:131-141.
Toft, C. 1980b. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian
litters frogs and their prey: a comparison of wetter and drier
sites. Oecología, 47:34-38.
Toft, C. 1981. Feeding ecology of Panamanian litter anurans:
patterns in diet and foraging mode. Journal of Herpetology,
15:139-144.
Toft, C. 1985. Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles.
Copeia, 1985:1-21.
Van Sluys, M. & Rocha, C.F. 1998. Feeding habits and
microhabitat utilization by two syntopic Brazilian Amazonian
frogs (Hyla minuta and Pseudopaludicola sp.). Revista Brasileira
de Zoologia, 58:559-562.
Vignoli, L. & Luiselli, L. 2011. Dietary relationships among
coexisting anuran amphibians: a worldwide quantitative
review. Oecología, 169:499-509.
Vitt, L.J. 1991. Ecology and life history of the scansorial arboreal
lizard Plica plica (Iguanidae) in Amazonian Brazil. Canadian
Journal of Zoology, 69:504-511.
Whitney, C.L. & Krebs, J.R. 1975. Spacing and calling in
Pacific tree frogs, Hyla regila. Canadian Journal of Zoology,
53:1519-1527.
Wiggins, D.A. 1992. Foraging success of leopard frogs (Rana
pipiens). Journal of Herpetology, 26:87-88.
Wilczynski, W. & Brenowitz, E.A. 1988. Acoustic cues mediate
inter-male spacing in a neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour,
36:1054-1063.
Woolbright, L.L. & Stewart, M.M. 1987. Foraging success of
the tropical frog Eleutherodactylus coqui: the cost of calling.
Copeia, 1987:69-75.
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Aceito em: 08/02/2017
Publicado em: 16/03/2017
Editor Responsável: Marcelo Duarte
Publicado com o apo
io financeiro do
Programa de
Apoio às Publicações
Científicas Periódicas
da USP
Produzido e diagramado na
Seção de Publicações do
Museu de Zoologia da
Universidade de São Paulo
Os periódicos Papéis
A
vulsos de Zoolog
ia
e
Arquivos de Zoologia
estão licenciados so
b
uma Licença CC-BY
da Creative Commons.
Fonseca-Pérez, K.A.
et
al
.: Diet and microhabitat Hylinae
104