Commentaria
, pp.
–
).
. Bede,
Explanatio Apocalypsis
, Bk
(PL
:
BC).
. Melo,
Commentaria
, p.
: ‘Locus ergo iste totus de vero quodam Angelo, scilicet de
Michaele, vel alio intelligendus est, & de pace Ecclesiae, post mortem, & interitum Antichristi,
ut exponit Caelius…’ There follows a paraphrase of passages from Coelius’s
Collectanea
.
. See Robertus Bellarminus,
Opera Omnia
,
vols (Venice,
) Vol.
,
pp.
–
.
. I will use a slighter later edition,
Francisci Riberae Villacastinensis … In sacram Beati
Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistae Apocalypsin Commentarii
(Lyons,
). There were also editions
in
and
.
. There is thus an odd resemblance between Ribeira’s exegesis and the apocalyptic exegesis
of the ‘Dispensationalist’ Protestants, first advanced by John Nelson Darby (
–
). On
Ribeira, see Armogathe, ‘Interpretations of the Revelation of John:
–
’, pp.
–
;
‘Dall’escatologia alla storia’, pp.
–
; and the unpublished paper of my colleague, Michael
Murrin, ‘Francisco de Ribeira: Apocalypse as Science Fiction’.
. Bousset,
Die Offenbarung Johannis
, p.
.
. Ribeira,
Commentarii
, pp.
–
. Ribeira’s commentary on Apocalypse
makes up
about
per cent of his entire work, while Melo’s remarks constitute only about
per cent of
his lengthy book.
. Augustine’s
De civitate Dei
is cited some twenty-nine times. Other major authorities are
Jerome (ten), Saints Ambrose and Eusebius (each five), and Gregory I (three).
Notes to Chapter 8
370
. Ribeira,
Commentarii
, p.
: ‘quod mille anni intelliguntur usque ad consummationem
saeculi, nec potest ullo modo dici sanctos illius extremi temporis mille annos esse regnaturos
usque ad finem eiusdem saeculi’.
. Ibid., p.
: ‘Ex his profecto haud absurde colligi videtur multos annos restare usque
ad diem iudicii.’ Ribeira concludes his discussion with an argument for the heretical character
of millenarianism (pp.
–
).
. Reeves,
The Influence of Prophecy
, pp.
–
.
. Blasius Viegas,
Commentarii Exegetici in Apocalypsim Ioannis Apostoli
(Venice,
).
This edition contains
pp. in double columns. Viegas’s commentary was printed no fewer
than eleven times between
and
.
. See ibid., pp.
–
, and the discussion of Reeves,
Dostları ilə paylaş: |