Fəlsəfə və sosial-siyasi elmlər – 2013, № 1
140
on
anthropology, considering the attempts to ‘naturalise’ the personality and
the risk of reductionism in the approach to the human person, now held to
be the result of pure psychic, biological and environmental determinism.
Stein's contribution shows that the characteristics of the immutable and
intangible ‘
ultima solitudo’ and “personal nucleus”, which place personal
individuality beyond any
material and formal element, mean that we cannot
reduce the specific aspect of each person to whatsoever worldly,
sociological or scientific category.
The intangibility of the person emerges from the delicacy and
sensitivity – typically female characteristics – with which Stein approaches
the concept of ‘singularity’: «For Stein, being a person means
feeling
oneself to be surrounded by an incommensurable depth in an
ultima
solitudo, qualitative elements that cannot be treated on the same level as
universal invariants that are susceptible to some kind of formalisation»
1
.
Particularly beautiful and evocative are the pages
where she speaks of the
“spiritual perception by feeling (
das Fühlen)”, understood as “the mood
[
Stimmung]” and “my present inner state of mind [
Verfassung]”, via which
the individual, as if by some “inner force”, «frees itself from any exterior
conditioning of simple living and raises itself up in the interior singularity of
its being, within which it moves freely»
2
. This “interiority” constitutes the
characteristic element by means of which the individual can «grasp with its
inner vision its full “being itself”. At the same time, it cleaves to its
singularity, distinguishing its own quality of being from those of other
that Stein did not have any specific training in medieval philosophy. It has
consequences
however in terms of her assessment of the medieval authors themselves. Indeed, when Stein
grasps and internalises the concept of ‘
ultima solitudo’, which in Scotus refers to the
person, as the expression of the singularity of the human being, she compares it with
Aquinas’ treatment of the foundation of the individual, highlighting its limits but not taking
account of Aquinas' reflection on the irreducibility (
incommunicabilitas) of the person in
relation to the ‘act of being’.
In reality, Aquinas himself had recognised the inadequacy of
‘
materia signata quantitate’ and identified the foundation of the ‘person’ in God’s direct
creative act (participation in the
actus essendi). See
Summa Theologiae I, 30, 4, ob 2. The
argument is explored further by G. B
ASTI
,
Filosofia dell’uomo, Edizioni Studio
Domenicano, Bologna 1995, pp. 338-340.
1
Ibid., p. 225.
2
Ibid., p. 201.
141
individuals outside itself»
1
. In this inner vision it perceives that its “being
itself” derives from an “ultimate source”, in which it lives “anchored to
itself and in complete aloneness”. The more the individual lives in
profundity, the more its «essential and irreducible nucleus that represents
the foundation of any actualisation» manifests itself
2
.
3. “Die Rezeption Edith Steins”: the first international
bibliography
Interest in the person and the thought of Edith Stein has resulted in a
substantial body of publications. In terms of content, they form a
heterogeneous
and variegated literature, comprising both scientific and
popular works. A fundamental research tool that has recently been made
available to scholars is the first international bibliography –
Die Rezeption
Edith Steins – drawn up by Father Francesco Alfieri
3
. The fruit of eight
years of thorough and painstaking study, it lists 2855 publications and is
currently being updated
in view of a new edition, which will also include an
index of authors that will facilitate its use
4
. It was originally published in the
form of a special issue of the
Edith-Stein-Jahrbuch, on the occasion of the
seventieth anniversary of Stein's death, at the invitation of the
Jahrbuch's
editor, P. Ulrich Dobham. The aim was to produce a
Festgabe for the
ninetieth birthday of the Carmelite
nun Maria Amata Neyer, who worked so
hard to set up the Edith Stein Archive in Cologne
5
. Sister Neyer’s
1
Ibid.
2
Ibid., p. 202.
3
F. A
LFIERI
,
Die Rezeption Edith Steins.
Internationale Edith-Stein-Bibliographie
(1942-2012). Festgabe für M. Amata Neyer OCD, Sondernummer des Edith Stein
Jahrbuches, Vorwort von U. Dobhan OCD, Geleitwort von H.-B. Gerl-Falkovitz – A. Ales
Bello, Einführung von F.
Alfieri OFM, Echter Verlag GmbH, Würzburg 2012, pp. 516.
4
The second edition is already in print. Updated with more than 8000 titles, a thematic
index and an index of names, the very nature of the enterprise means it will always be
‘incomplete’ and subject to periodic revision. I am grateful to the author for kindly
providing me with this information in advance.
5
The work was presented for the first time on the 22
nd
of April 2012 in the church of
the Carmelite convent of Cologne, which Stein entered as a postulant on the 14
th
of October
1933, remaining there until December 1938. The publication had a broad impact among