92
key, which Chopin freely used. As Chopin taught, it is important to keep the same fingering as
much as possible in all exercises.
The second step is practicing the top voice while reducing the lower voice (Ex. 4.53).
Teachers can allow students to play the thumb naturally loud at first, but focus on playing the
correct notes with good rhythm. Once students accomplish this, teachers can direct them to
control the thumb to play softly.
Example 4.53: Preparatory Exercise of the Top Melody in Double Notes
The third step is practicing the lower voice (Ex. 4.54). The preparatory exercise is based
on Chopin’s five-finger pattern exercise with various touches. For a warm-up, students can work
on the lid of the piano by folding the thumb in – out – in a couple of times. Students can slightly
lift the wrist toward to the left side when moving to F-sharp. Finally, students can play the
passage as written with a singing tone.
93
Example 4.54: Preparatory Exercise of the Lower Voice in Double Notes
Different mood within each section
One of the big challenges in the B Minor Waltz is creating an appropriate mood within
each section. Teachers and students can discuss the mood of each section together. The first
section or “waltz 1” can be interpreted as having a sentimental mood. Teachers can help students
think about their own lives when they experienced sadness, such as the death of a pet.
The “waltz 2” section can be lively and have more forward motion because the phrases
are shorter than in the previous waltzes (Ex. 4.55). In order to internalize the rhythm, students
can dance to the waltz. Students should have a wider step on the first beat of mm. 33-36 in order
to mirror the longer note value of the first note in these measures. The shorter steps can be taken
on the eighth notes. Teachers and students can move together while singing the melody.
Example 4.55: Frédéric Chopin, Waltz, Op. 69, no. 2, mm. 33-36 (“waltz 2”)
94
The trio section has a key change from B minor to B major (Ex. 4.56). Teachers can help
students think about happy experiences such as a birthday party. By the dance approach, teachers
can explain that the neighboring motion on the first three notes in the beginning of the trio is
similar to a dancer’s turning motion. A half note on the following measure can be imagined as a
big swing motion.
Example 4.56: Frédéric Chopin, Waltz, Op. 69, no. 2, mm. 65-68 (trio)
95
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of this dissertation is to identify Chopin as a pianist and teacher, discuss the
appropriate editions for teaching, highlight the technical and musical challenges in the works,
and provide pedagogical suggestions for teachers and students. The Chopin Waltzes, Opus 64
and 69 were used as a case study.
The study begins with an overview of Chopin’s teaching methodology based on his own
method [Sketch for a Method]. Moreover, it includes insights into Chopin’s pianism and his
stylistic characteristics through documentation provided by his contemporaries and students. In
addition, Chopin’s integral relation to dance as both a dancer and dance accompanist is briefly
discussed.
The discussion on Chopin’s editions will assist in the selection of appropriate editions for
teaching and performing the waltzes. Chopin’s compositional process and the circumstance of
his publications are discussed. For the purposes of this project, five editions were selected: the G.
Schirmer Edition from 1879 (Schirmer edition); The Fryderyk Chopin Institute Polish Music
Publications Edition of 1949 (Paderewski edition); the G. Henle Edition of 1978 (Henle edition);
an Alfred Masterwork Edition from 2007 (Alfred edition); and the National Edition of the Works
of Fryderyk Chopin of 2001 and 2007 (National edition).
The five editions of Chopin’s Waltzes, Opus 64 and 69, were compared in order to
identify their similarity and differences and to provide the appropriate editions for teaching. The
general elements of differences were layout, fingerings, phrase markings, dynamics, notes, pedal
indications, and others such as tempo markings, terms, ornamentations, articulations, rhythms,
96
and ties. The ten versions of the waltzes, Opus 69, have numerous differences including different
measure numbers, but are similar based on their main sources.
I recommend the National edition for teaching and performing the Chopin waltzes. The
main reason for this recommendation is that more research has gone into the production of this
edition than any of the others. Also, the inclusion of Chopin’s fingerings and performance
markings, the incorporation of many different versions of the waltzes, and the practical layout of
the pagination all contribute to making this my most highly recommended edition.
The next chapter provides a pedagogical analysis of Chopin Waltzes, Opus 64 and 69, by
adopting Chopin’s teaching methodology along with practice suggestions and preparatory
repertoire. The analysis starts with key techniques for playing the Chopin waltzes. The main
items are the left-hand accompaniment, melodic line, balance, contrast between sections, playing
in a fast tempo, and the use of pedal. Afterwards, each of the five waltzes was investigated
individually, highlighting specific technical and musical challenges found in each individual
work.
My overall approach to the pedagogical analysis of Chopin Waltzes, Opus 64 and 69 is
based on how Chopin played and taught. Chopin’s main concept regarding piano playing was
based on a natural physiological approach. This led him to emphasize the need for a comfortable
and relaxed position for the entire upper body from the fingertips to the shoulder. Chopin
stressed playing with a flexible wrist in order to move the hands smoothly on the keyboard.
Also, Chopin innovative approach to fingerings was in contrast to many of the traditions at his
time.
Chopin’s contemporaries commented not only on his virtuosity but also on the beauty of
his tone. Very much influenced by Italian opera, Chopin emphasized the singing melodic line in
97
his teaching and playing. In his teaching method, he discussed the relationship between human
speech and musical phrasing, identifying the need for breathing and inflection in both. In
addition to the virtuosity and the beauty of his playing, Chopin was known for his improvisatory
style. His students commented that he played his own compositions differently in every
performance.
The author hopes this study can encourage piano teachers to adopt Chopin’s pianism and
teaching methodology for teaching students with his waltzes and confidently choose the
appropriate editions for teaching and performing the Chopin waltzes.
Suggestions for Further Study
A possible topic beyond this study is the complete pedagogical analysis of Chopin’s
waltzes along with a suggested order of study. Continued study on the dance in Chopin’s time as
it related to his pianism and his teaching is another suggestion. Finally, a comparison study of
various editions of other Chopin works, such as the Preludes and Mazurkas, will be useful to
teachers.
98
REFERENCES
Biography
Atwood, William Goodson. The Parisian Worlds of Frédéric Chopin. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1999.
Chopin, Frédéric. Selected Correspondence of Fryderyk Chopin: Abridged from Fryderyk
Chopin’s Correspondence. Translated and edited by Arthur Hedley. London: Heinemann,
1962; Korespondencja Fryderyka Chopina [Correspondence of Fryderyk Chopin].
Collected and annotated by Bronislaw Edward Sydow. 2 vols. Polish. Warsaw:
Panstwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1955.
Goldberg, Halina. Music in Chopin’s Warsaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Hadden, James Cuthbert. Chopin. 6th ed. London: Dent, 1934.
Harasowski, Adam. The Skein of Legends around Chopin. Glasgow, MacLellan, 1967.
Hedley, Arthur. Chopin. Rev. ed. by Maurice J. E. Brown. London: Dent, 1974.
Kobylańska, Krystyna. Chopin in his Own Land. Translated by Claire Grece-Dabrowska and
Mary Filippi. Cracow: Polish Music Publications, 1955.
Niecks, Frederick. Frederick Chopin as a Man and Musician. 3rd ed., 2 vols. London: Novello,
1902.
Samson, Jim. Chopin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Zamoyski, Adam. Chopin: A New Biography. New York: Doubleday, 1979.
Style and Works
Abraham, Gerald. Chopin’s Musical Style. 5th ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1968; 1st
ed., 1939.
Eitan, Zohar. “Style and Gesture: A Study of Melodic Peaks.” PhD diss., University of
Pennsylvania, 1991.
Kallberg, Jeffrey. Chopin at the Boundaries: Sex, History, and Musical Genre. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1996.
99
McGinnis, Francis Frederick. “Chopin: Aspects of Melodic Style.” PhD diss., Indiana
University, 1968.
Rink, John, and Jim Samson. editors. Chopin Studies 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1994.
Rubinstein, Artur. “Foreword,” In The Life and Death of Chopin by Casimir Wierzynski. New
York: Simon and Schuster, 1949.
Samson, Jim. editor. Chopin Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Samson, Jim. editor. The Cambridge Companion to Chopin. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1992.
Samson, Jim. The Music of Chopin. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
Walker, Alan. The Chopin Companion: Profiles of the Man and the Musician. Rev. ed. New
York: Norton, 1973; 1st ed., London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1966.
Chopin’s Pianism and Teaching
Bailie, Eleanor. Chopin: A Graded Practical Guide. London: Kahn and Averill, 1998.
Dunn, John Petrie. Ornamentation in the Works of Frederick Chopin. New York: Da Capo Press,
1971; 1st ed., London: Novello, 1921.
Eigeldinger, Jean-Jacques. Chopin: Pianist and Teacher as Seen by his Pupils. Translated by
Naomi Shohet with Krysia Osostowicz and Roy Howat. Edited by Roy Howat. 3rd ed.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986; Chopin: Vu par Ses Élèves. French.
Neuchâtel: La Baconnière, 1970.
Fritz, Thomas. “How did Chopin Want his Ornament Signs Played?” The Piano Quarterly 29,
no. 113 (1981): 45-52.
Gerig, Reginald. Famous Pianists & Their Technique. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press, 2007.
Higgins, Thomas. “Chopin Interpretation: A Study of Performance Directions in Selected
Autographs and Other Sources.” PhD diss., University of Iowa, 1966.
Higgins, Thomas. “Chopin’s Practices.” The Piano Quarterly 29, no. 113 (1981): 38-41.
Higgins, Thomas. “Tempo and Character in Chopin.” The Musical Quarterly 59, no. 1 (1973):
106-120.
100
Hipkins, Edith J. How Chopin Played: From Contemporary Impressions Collected from the
Diaries and Notebooks of the Late A. J. Hipkins. London: Dent, 1937.
Hollander, Jeffrey. “Shaping the Interpretation, Interpreting the Shape: A Comparative
Performance Study of Selected Works of Frederic Chopin.” PhD diss., University of
California, 1993.
Holland, Jeanne. “Chopin’s Teaching and his Students.” Microfilm. PhD diss., University of
North Carolina, 1972.
Holland, Jeanne. “Chopin the Teacher.” American Liszt Society 17 (1985): 39-48.
Houle, Arthur, and Walden Hughes. “Fingering Choices with Chopin’s Music.” Clavier 37, no. 2
(February 1998): 11-13.
Hughes, Walden. “The Dedicated Teaching of Frédéric Chopin.” Clavier 34, no. 5 (May/June
1995): 13-17.
Kleczyński, Jean. Frederic Chopin: An Interpretation of his Works. Translated by W. Kirkbride.
Followed by Luis Ripoll. Chopin’s Pianos. Translated by Alan Sillitoe. Palma de
Mallorca: Mossèn Alcover, 1970.
Kleczyński, Jean. How to Play Chopin. The Works of Frederic Chopin, their Proper
Interpretation. Translated by Alfred Whittingham. 6th ed. London: William Reeves,
1913. Original edition: date unknown, c. 1880.
Kiorpes, George Anthony. “Arpeggiation in Chopin: Interpreting the Ornament Notations.” The
Piano Quarterly 29, no. 113 (1981): 53-59.
Kiorpes, George Anthony. “The Performance of Ornaments in the Works of Chopin.” 2 vols.
DMA diss., Boston University, 1975.
Letnanova, Elena. “Frédéric Chopin as Teacher.” Clavier 37, no. 2 (February 1998): 7-10 and 49.
Magrath, Jane. “Chopin’s Teaching.” Clavier Companion 2, no. 3 (May/June 2010): 8-9.
Methuen-Campbell, James. Chopin Playing rrom the Composer to the Present Day. London:
Gollancz, 1981.
Mikuli, Carl. “Frédéric François Chopin.” In Waltzer: Pianoforte-Werke by Frédéric Chopin.
Vol. 8. German. Leipzig: Fr. Kistner, 1879. Reprinted as “Frédéric François Chopin.” In
Waltzes: Complete Works for the Piano by Frédéric Chopin. English Translation by
Unknown. Vol. 1. New York: G. Schirmer, 1949.
Robert, Walter. “Chopin’s Tempo Rubato in Theory and Practice.” The Piano Quarterly 113
(1981): 42-44.
101
Schonberg, Harold Charles. The Great Pianists. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Simon and Schuster,
1987.
Strauss, John. “The Puzzle of the Chopin Rubato.” Clavier 22 (May 1983): 22-25.
Trechak, Andrew. “Pianists and Agogic Play: Rhythmic Patterning in the Performance of
Chopin’s Music in the Early Twentieth Century.” DMA diss., University of Texas, 1988.
Editions and Sources
Brown, Maurice John Edwin. Chopin: An Index of his Works in Chronological Order. 2nd rev.
ed. London: Macmillan, 1972.
Chechlińska, Zofia. “The Fryderyk Chopin Society in Warsaw.”
http://www.chopin.pl/edycja_1999_2009/spis_tresci/index_en.html#homepage accessed
February 22, 2015.
Dymarska, Natalia. “On Chopin’s Creative Process in the Waltzes, op. 64.” Chopin in the World:
Journal of the International Federation of Chopin Societies no. 18 (2004): 16-18.
Ekier, Jan. Introduction to the Polish National Edition of the Works of Fryderyk Chopin. Part 1.
Editorial Issues. Translated by John Comber. Warsaw: Fryderyk Chopin Polish Music
Publishing, 1974.
Grabowski, Christophe, and John Rink. Annotated Catalogue of Chopin’s First Editions.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Kallberg, Jeffrey. “The Chopin Sources: Variants and Versions in Later Manuscripts and Printed
Editions.” Microfilm. PhD. diss., University of Chicago, 1982.
Melville, Derek. Chopin: A Biography, with a Survey of Books, Editions, and Recordings.
London: Bingley, 1977.
Michałowski, Kornel, and Jim Samson. “Chopin, Fryderyk Franciszek.” In The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., edited by Stanley Sadie, 5:706-736.
London: Macmillan, 2001.
Paderewski, Ignacy Jan. Chopin: A Discourse. Translated by Laurence Alma Tadema. London:
Adlington, 1911.
Rink, John. “CFEO Chopin’s First Editions Online.” http://www.cfeo.org.uk/ London: King’s
College London, 2005.
Smialek, William. Frédéric Chopin: A Guide to Research. New York: Galand, 2000.
102
Szklener, Artur. “The Fryderyk Chopin Institute.” http://en.chopin.nifc.pl/chopin/ accessed
February 22, 2015.
Musical Scores
Chopin, Frédéric. Valses for Piano. Edited and commented by Alfred Denis Cortot. Study
edition. Paris: Editions Salabert, 1941-1947. Reprinted in 1976 with same firm with
English Translation by John Schneider.
Chopin, Frédéric. Walzer. Edited by Ewald Zimmermann, fingered by Hans-Martin Theopold.
Urtext edition. Munich: G. Henle, 1978.
Chopin, Frédéric. Waltzer: Pianoforte-Werke. Edited and fingered by Carl Mikuli. The
Completed Works, Vol. 8. Leipzig: Fr. Kistner, 1879. Reprinted as Waltzes: Complete
Works for the Piano, Vol. 1. New York: G. Schirmer, 1949.
Chopin, Frédéric. Waltzes: Complete Works for the Piano, Vol. 1. Edited and fingered by Rafael
Joseffy. New York: G. Schirmer, 1894-1898. Reprinted in 1915 with same firm.
Chopin, Frédéric. Waltzes. Edited by Willard Aldrich Palmer. 2nd ed. New York: Alfred
Publishing Company, 2007.
Chopin, Fryderyk. Walce: Op. 18-64. The Complete Works, series A, vol. 11. Edited by Jan
Ekier and Paweł Kamiński. Warsaw: National Edition of the Works of Fryderyk Chopin,
2001.
Chopin, Fryderyk. Walce: Published Posthumously. The Complete Works, series B, vol. 27.
Edited by Jan Ekier and Paweł Kamiński. Warsaw: National Edition of the Works of
Fryderyk Chopin, 2007.
Chopin, Fryderyk. Waltzer. Klavierwerke I. Edited by Ignacy Friedman. Leipzig: Breitkopf and
Härtel, 1913. Reprinted in 1989 with same firm.
Chopin, Fryderyk. Waltzes. Edited by Christophe Grabowski. Urtext edition. Leipzig: Edition
Peters, 2008.
Chopin, Fryderyk. Waltzes. Edited by Ignacy Jan Paderewski, Ludwik Bronarski, and Józef
Turczyński. The Complete Works, Vol. 9. Warsaw: The Fryderyk Chopin Institute Polish
Music Publications, 1949.
Related Materials
Chan, Felix Chung-chuen. “The Development of Technique for Playing the Waltzes of Frédéric
Chopin.” EdD diss., University of Illinois, 1992.
103
Charlton, David, and Michael Musgrave. “Logier, Johann Bernhard.” In The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., edited by Stanley Sadie, 15:75-77. London:
Macmillan, 2001.
Dziewanowska, Ada. Polish Folk Dances and Songs: A Step-by-Step Guide. New York:
Hippocrene Books, 1997.
Fallows, David. “Leggero [leggiero].” In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians,
2nd ed., edited by Stanley Sadie, 14:481. London: Macmillan, 2001.
Hummel, Johann Nepomuk. Ausführliche theoretisch-practische Anweisung zum Piano-Forte-
Spiel. 3 vols. Vienna: Tobias Haslinger, 1828. Translated in English as A Complete
Theoretical and Practical Course of Instruction on the Art of Playing the Piano Forte.
London: T. Boosey, 1829.
Jander, Owen, and Ellen T. Harris. “Bel Canto.” In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and
Musicians, 2nd ed., edited by Stanley Sadie, 3:161-162. London: Macmillan, 2001.
Lamb, Andrew. “Waltz.” In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., edited
by Stanley Sadie. 27:72-78. London: Macmillan, 2001.
McKee, Eric. Decorum of the Minuet, Delirium of the Waltz: A Study of Dance-Music Relations
in 3/4 Time. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.
Mendelssohn, Felx. Letters of Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy: From 1833 to 1847. Edited by Paul
Mendelssohn Bartholdy and Carl Mendelssohn Bartholdy. Compiled by Julius Rietz.
London: Longman, 1863.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |