redefining a movement / 97
has played in the collection’s development. Johanna Fateman
explained, “It definitely helped that Lisa is a close friend, and that
I trusted her to have a sensitivity to the issues surrounding the
project.”
33
Similarly, for Hanna, the decision to donate her papers
to Fales Library appeared to be directly linked to Darms’s posi-
tion there as senior archivist. “I really don’t think I would’ve been
interested if someone else, besides Lisa Darms, had approached
me,” explained Hanna. “It just felt like the universe lined up and
it was meant to be.”
34
In a sense, the universe had lined up, as the
following origin story recounted by Hanna suggests:
Lisa and I and our friend Johanna had gone to an event
about feminism and the archive at Fales before she got a job
there and I LOVED Marvin, the head of Fales, from the sec-
ond he started talking. As we were leaving Jo and I started
joking about how great it would be if they did a Riot Grrrl
Archive so we could get rid of all the stuff we’d kept over the
years. 6 months later Lisa was hired as Fales’ senior archi-
vist and called us up saying “What if a Riot Grrrl Archive
really existed, would you all be involved?” I was completely
thrilled. It was a dream come true scenario.
35
While Darms emphasizes her historical connection to Riot Grrrl
(for example, the fact that she was in Olympia in the early 1990s
when Riot Grrrl was taking shape), Hanna emphasizes that
Darms’s present connection to the donors is at least as essen-
tial as her historical link to the movement: “I really trust Lisa’s
intelligence and her ability to make great things happen. . . . Her
proximity to the places and events that shaped RG make things
a lot easier for sure, but to me, that’s secondary. More important
is the fact that she has a great sense of humor which I think is
pretty important if you’re going to put something together of
this magnitude.”
36
Although many women who came of age in the 1990s and
beyond feel a personal connection to the papers in the Riot
Grrrl Collection, it is not necessarily their archive. That so many
women have interpreted the collection as an archive of an entire
98 / redefining a movement
generation of feminists rather than a collection that contains
several individuals’ personal papers, however, is not entirely sur-
prisingly. Documents and artifacts connected to traditionally
marginalized groups have historically been more likely to enter
archives because they represent a demographic or cultural phe-
nomenon than on basis of their connection to individuals. Many
collections of women’s archival materials, for example, are com-
prised of diaries and letters written by anonymous or unknown
women writers rather than writers who gained notoriety for their
work; the materials are valuable because they tell us something
about the conditions of women’s everyday lives in a particular era
and not because they tell us something about the individual writ-
ers. In many respects, the zine collections at both Barnard College
and Duke University extend this tradition of collection develop-
ment in women’s archives. While both collections contain zines
produced by or about the women whose papers are also housed
in the Riot Grrrl Collection, it is important to bear in mind that
even the same zine may represent something different in the col-
lections at Barnard College or Duke University than it does in the
collection at Fales Library. As Jenna Freedman, the founder and
librarian responsible for the Barnard Zine Library, emphasizes,
her collection is one that belongs to and represents “every girl.”
A zine by or about Kathleen Hanna in the Barnard Zine Library
is there as part of a larger and still growing collection of zines by
girls and women and gender-queer subjects. By contrast, Darms
emphasizes that her collection focuses on Riot Grrrl and more
specifically on the papers of some women connected to the move-
ment’s development. In this context, a zine by or about Hanna is
not representative of DIY publishing or “girl power,” as it might
be elsewhere. At Fales Library, it is one document among many
that tells us something about Hanna’s development as an artist,
performer, and activist.
By creating a collection with a mandate “to collect unique
materials that provide documentation of the creative process
of individuals and the chronology of the movement overall”
(emphasis my own), Darms is not only creating the first collection
redefining a movement / 99
of Riot Grrrl papers, but she is also effectively relocating and
redefining Riot Grrrl in ways that will profoundly impact how
writers will consider Riot Grrrl and particular Riot Grrrl fig-
ures in the future.
37
This collection’s development, including the
combined geographic and symbolic acts of relocation it entails,
represents a realignment of Riot Grrrl that highlights both the
movement’s intellectual and artistic lineages and, by extension,
the archive’s status as a historiographic technology.
Continental Drift
Like many observers, when I first heard about the develop-
ment of the Riot Grrrl Collection at Fales Library, I immediately
questioned the choice of location. After all, while Riot Grrrls
were active in New York in the early 1990s, the city was neither
an early site of Riot Grrrl activity nor was Riot Grrrl NYC neces-
sarily typical of the form Riot Grrrl scenes took in other cities.
38
More importantly, I questioned whether Riot Grrrl could have
emerged when it did and with such impact had it been conceived
by a group of college-age women at a small liberal arts college
in New York rather than one located in a bucolic setting on the
Northwest Coast. Beyond the fact that finding space on a stage
in New York is presumably more difficult than finding space on
a stage in Olympia, especially if you are a young women with a
limited performance history, other circumstances would have
made New York an unlikely scene for Riot Grrrl’s emergence in
the early 1990s.
From 1989 to 1992, while Riot Grrrl was taking shape at
Evergreen State College in Olympia, rising rates of HIV infec-
tion and HIV-related deaths combined with government apathy
at the municipal, state, and federal levels had left New York’s
downtown scene caught in a cycle of death, mourning, and
activism. Young queer women were by no means immune to
the impact of AIDS and the political and cultural movements it
incited, even if few were ever infected by the virus. As revealed
in the interviews that comprise Jim Hubbard and Sarah Schul-
man’s ACT UP Oral History Project, an extensive online archive
Dostları ilə paylaş: |