Texniki Yardım üzrə Hesabatı
Yüklə 15,04 Kb. Pdf görüntüsü
|
- Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- APPENDIX 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form UZB Small Hydropower
- NAMA Seeking Support for Implementation
- Table1 : Cost of Implementing the NAMA to Accelerate Small Hydropower Activity Cost ($ million) State Budg- et International
- Total 646.18 82.47 728.65
TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Natural Gas for Transport 4 / 6 F.3.3 Comments on Capacity Building Support F.4 Financial support for implementation required F.5 Technological support for implementation required F.6 Capacity building support for implementation required G Estimated emission reductions G.1 Amount 7.8 G.2 Unit MtC02e/yr G.3 Additional information (e.g. if available, information on the methodological approach followed): The potential GHG emission reductions are calculated in the Long-range Energy Alterna- tives (LEAP) system and include both upstream and tailpipe GHG emissions resulting from the baseline and converted vehicles. The GHG emission reductions that can be achieved by this NAMA depend on the amount of refueling infrastructure to be constructed and the number and type of vehicles to be converted to natural gas. Since JSC KazTransGas is still conducting feasibility studies and market analyses to clarify these amounts, the estimate of potential GHG abatement presented is based on two different scenarios: Scenario 1: All vehicle fleets under the control of JSC KazTransGas and its partners are con- verted to CNG by 2025; and Scenario 2: Optimistic scenario where 8% of cars, buses and trucks are converted to natural gas by 2025. The estimated cumulative emission reductions are 14 MtCO 2 e by 2025. H.1 Other indicators of implementation I.1 Other relevant information including co-benefits for local sustainable development the NAMA is expected to create the following co-benefits: (i) reduced local air pollution; (ii) health co-benefits from reduced local air pollution; (iii) increased energy security; (iv) income and job generation; (v) increased disposable income due to reduced fuel costs; (vi) increased private enterprise in fields related to fuel switching and vehicle conversions; (vii) accelerated turnover of outdated vehicle stock (e.g., through imports of original equip- ment manufacturer CNG vehicles); and (viii) development of domestic CNG vehicle production capacity (eventually) with potential for exports. J Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action J.1 Relevant National Policies TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Natural Gas for Transport 5 / 6 The government of Kazakhstan has adopted a voluntary quantitative commitment to reduce GHG emissions by 15% by 2020 and 25% by 2050 (relative to a 1992 baseline). In 2012, Kazakhstan further revised this goal and declared its readiness to reduce emissions by 5% to 7% from the 2013 to 2020 period. The goal of limiting growth in emissions is codified in several official strategy documents, most importantly in the 2013 Concept of Transition of the Republic of Kazakhstan to a Green Econ- omy. Among the key areas addressed in this concept is the creation of a “clean” transport system and the plan to bring natural gas infrastructure to regions such as Akmola and Karaganda Oblasts by 2020, and to North and East Kazakhstan by 2030. Specific plans for increasing the use of natural gas in transport are also included in the following existing and draft government strategies: (i) National Program of Development and Integration of Transport Infrastructure of the Repub- lic of Kazakhstan until 2020 (2014): (ii) Plan of Action for Switching Transport Vehicles to Environmentally Friendly Types of Fuel and Creation of Relevant Infrastructure (under consideration by the government) (iii) General Scheme of Gasification of the Republic of Kazakhstan to 2030 (2014) (iv) National Program on Energy Saving—2020 (2013) For example, the General Scheme of Gasificiation specifies that by 2020 the use of natural gas by public transport and public vehicles must be at least 30% in Astana and Almaty and at least 10% in other cities. By 2030 the share of natural gas must be at least 50% in Almaty and Astana and 30% in other regional cities. Other priorities put forth in the above documents include: (i) creating incentives for mechanisms to accelerate vehicle stock turnover through the pur- chase of fuel-efficient vehicles with the goal of reducing fuel consumption by 30%; (ii) using energy-efficient buses; (iii) engaging in fleet renewal and modernizing railway locomotives; (iv) designing measures to develop energy-efficient transport infrastructure for inclusion in na- tional development programs; (v) introducing Euro standards for road transport (Euro 4-2014; Euro 5-2015; and Euro 6-2020); and (vi) adopting international standards for vehicle efficiency. J.2 Links to other mitigation actions NS-124 NAMAs for Low-Carbon Urban Development in Ka- zakhstan K Attachments K.1 Attachment description K.2 File Browse L Support received L.1 From outside the Registry L.2 From within the Registry Source Amount Date TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Natural Gas for Transport 6 / 6 TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 1 / 6 NAMA Seeking Support for Implementation A Overview A.1 Party To be determined A.2 Title of Mitigation Action Accelerating Deployment of Small-Scale Hydropower A.3 Description of mitigation action i. The goal of this NAMA is to accelerate and expand the development of small hydropower in Uzbekistan by supplementing governmental plans for implementation with analysis and comprehensive identification of steps to accelerate that implementation. This includes clari- fying the institutional arrangements governing small hydropower; modifying the tariff struc- ture to incentivize investment; improving technical skills for evaluating, planning, and con- structing small hydropower plants (SHPs); and introducing measures to accelerate the utili- zation of public and private capital to finance planned hydropower capacity. In addition, the NAMA includes a component to invest in the rehabilitation of three existing small hydro- power plants or construction of 19 new facilities, based on the priorities set forth in the Min- istry of Agri ulture a d Water Resour es’ proposed Program for Hydropower Development (to be approved in 2015). The specific activities proposed for the NAMA include: (i) Analysis of institutional issues and elaboration of suggestions to optimize the insti- tutional structures related to the development of small hydropower; (ii) A comprehensive study of legal issues, primarily the problems of ownership of hy- dropower generating assets or other impediments to private investment, and de- velopment of solutions; (iii) Clarification of the dispatch of hydropower and development of the means to pro- vide potential investors with assurance that their electricity will be purchased as long as it is economically viable; (iv) Analysis and development of a proposal introducing a special tariff for small hy- dropower production; (v) Consideration of incentives for importing small hydropower equipment and specif- ic steps to promote its domestic production, if viable; (vi) Developing proposals for attracting foreign and domestic private investment to the sector; (vii) Education, training and capacity building in the field of small hydropower, includ- ing curriculum development, student exchange and study abroad programs, and targeted workshops and conferences; (viii) Development of an updated atlas of small hydropower potential in Uzbekistan; and (ix) Investment in the construction and modernization of small hydropower plants. For this NAMA, small hydropower is defined as hydropower plants with installed capacity of less than 30 MW. The acceleration of the rehabilitation and construction of these plants in Uzbekistan will avoid the use of fossil fuel-based electricity generation, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 2 / 6 A.4 Sector Energy supply Transport and its Infrastructure Residential and Commercial buildings Industry Agriculture Forestry Waste management Other A.5 Technology Bioenergy Cleaner Fuels Energy Efficiency Geothermal energy Hydropower Solar energy Wind energy Ocean energy Carbon Capture and Storage Low till / No till Land fill gas collection Other A.6 Type of action National/ Sectoral goal Strategy National/Sectoral policy or program Project: Investment in machinery Project: Investment in infrastructure Project: Other Other: A.7 Greenhouse gases covered by the action CO 2 CH 4 N 2 O HFCs PFCs SF 6 Other B National Implementing Entity B.1.0 Name Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources B.1.1 Address B.1.2 Contact Person Alternative Contact Person B.1.3 Phone Alternative Phone B.1.4 Email Alternative Email + Add Additional entity Uzbekenergo C. Expected timeframe for the implementation of the mitigation action C.1 Number of years for completion 16 C.2 Expected start year of implementation 2015 D.1 Used Currency USD Conversion to USD E Cost E.1.1 Estimated full cost of implementation 728,650,000 TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 3 / 6 Conversion to USD E.1.2 Comments on full cost of implementation The cost estimate provided with this NAMA is preliminary, as it is based on Ministry of Agriculture a d Water Resour es’ draft Progra for De elop e t of “ all Hydropo er. Table1 : Cost of Implementing the NAMA to Accelerate Small Hydropower Activity Cost ($ million) State Budg- et International Support Total Construction of 19 new SHPs 499.38 80.92 580.3 (including 326 for equipment) Rehabilitation of three existing SHPs 146.80 146.80 Research, analysis, training, and education 1.55 1.55 Total 646.18 82.47 728.65 Note: SHP = Small hydropower plant In its current form, the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources program envisions construction of 19 new small hydropower plants with a total installed capacity of 210 MW and a cost of $580.3 million (including $326 million for equipment) and rehabilitation of three existing HPPs at the cost of $146.80 million. This adds up to a total cost of $728.65 million. Included in this total is foreign investment sought by the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Re- sources in the amount of $80.92 million to finance construction of the first three new SHPs on the list. The other measures in this NAMA (i.e., research, analysis, training, and education) have a com- bined cost of $1.55 million. Funds to cover this cost are requested from international sources in the form of technical assistance and capacity building E.2.1 Estimated incremental cost of implementation 0.00 Conversion to USD E.2.2 Comments on estimated incremental cost of implementation F Support required for the implementation of the mitigation action F.1.1 Amount of financial support 82,470,000 Conversion to USD F.1.2 Type of required financial support Grant Carbon finance Loan (sovereign) Other Loan (Private) Concessional loan TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 4 / 6 Guarantee Equity F.1.3 Comments on Financial Support F.2.1 Amount of Technological Support 0.00 Conversion to USD F.2.2 Comments on Technological Support F.3.1 Amount of capacity building support 0.00 $ (Dollars) Conversion to USD F.3.2Type of required capacity building support Individual level Institutional level Systemic level Other F.3.3 Comments on Capacity Building Support F.4 Financial support for implementation required F.5 Technological support for implementation required F.6 Capacity building support for implementation required G Estimated emission reductions G.1 Amount 40.87 G.2 Unit MtC02e/yr G.3 Additional information (e.g. if available, information on the methodological approach followed): The potential GHG emission reductions are calculated in the Long-range Energy Alternatives (LEAP) system and includes emissions from both fuel production and combustion. If all three existing small hydropower plants are rehabilitated and the proposed 19 new facilities are constructed, the NAMA will result in emission reductions of 40.87 MtCO 2 e per year by 2030 and cumulative total emission reductions of 540 MtCO 2 e by 2030. H.1 Other indicators of implementation I.1 Other relevant information including co-benefits for local sustainable development Implementation of the NAMA will produce the following co-benefits: (i) reduced emissions of local air pollutants and associated negative health effects; (ii) increased energy security; (iii) enhanced quality, sustainability, and operational maneuverability of power supply; (iv) growth in agricultural production and food processing resulting from a more stable supply of energy; (v) increased food security and supply of raw materials; TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 5 / 6 (vi) creation of new jobs and reductions in local unemployment; (vii) improved technical capacity for local developers and operators of small hydropower plants; (viii) maximum use of local resources and labor and minimal reliance on imports; and (ix) increased income and quality of life for the local population. J Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action J.1 Relevant National Policies O May , , the Preside t of Uz ekista , I. Kari o , sig ed resolutio # O the Progra of Measures to Lower Energy Intensity and Implement Energy Efficient Technologies and Systems in the E o o y a d “o ial “phere fro to 9. The resolutio stresses the i porta e of re- newable energy and approves a wide-ranging Road Map of 33 activities that must be undertaken in order to achieve the stated goals. Item #20 of the Road Map requests the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, Uzbekenergo, and the design institute Hydropowerproject to develop the State Program for Development of Hydropower for 2016-2020. The program must be approved by the end of of 2015. Existing drafts of the program, foresee construction of 76 new HPPs with a total generating capacity of 2,512 MW and rehabilitation of 33 existing HPPs that would increase their capacity to 1,973 MW. In addition, in Spring 2015, a new Program for Development of Small Hydropower during 2015 –2030 was developed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources and is going through the apprais- al process within the government. This new program provides for the construction of 19 SHPs with a total capacity of 210 MW and requires investment of $727.2 million. With passing of the Resolution 2343 and approval of the road map, this program will become a part of the wider program of hydro- power development for 2016 –2020. J.2 Links to other mitigation actions K Attachments K.1 Attachment description K.2 File Browse L Support received L.1 From outside the Registry L.2 From within the Registry Source Amount Date TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ UZB Small Hydropower 6 / 6 Yüklə 15,04 Kb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|