TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Energy Efficiency
Table 1: Cost of Implementing the NAMA to Develop a National Energy Efficiency
Support System
Phase
State Budget
($)
International Support
Total ($)
Cost ($)
Notes
1
0
100,000
Design and deployment of SER automation
100,000
2
122,800
380,000
Technical assistance, capacity
building
502,800
3
250,000
1,500,000
Technical assistance for web-based knowledge platform
1,750,000
4
450,000
750,000
Capacity building
1,200,000
Total
822,800
2,730,000
3,552,800
National public funds will be the initial source of financial support for the NAMA, at least during
Phase 1. The Government of Kazakhstan requests financial support in the amount of $100,000 for
the Phase 1 design, development, and deployment of the EESS. An additional $2,730,000 in financial
support is requested for Phases 2 through 4. This includes targeted technical assistance for the on-
line automated information system custodian and energy auditors; the sharing of best available
technologies, benchmarking, and public awareness materials
for the SER knowledge platform; and
assistance with technical design and development of the energy registry and marketplace.
E.2.1 Estimated incremental cost of implementation
0.00
Conversion to USD
E.2.2 Comments on estimated incremental cost of implementation
F Support required for the implementation of the mitigation action
F.1.1 Amount of financial support
2,730,000
Conversion to USD
F.1.2 Type of required financial support
Grant
Carbon finance
Loan (sovereign)
Other
Loan (Private)
Concessional loan
Guarantee
Equity
F.1.3 Comments on Financial Support
F.2.1 Amount of Technological Support
0.00
Conversion to USD
F.2.2 Comments on Technological Support
TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Energy Efficiency
F.3.1 Amount of capacity building support
0.00
$ (Dollars)
Conversion to USD
F.3.2Type of required capacity building support
Individual level
Institutional level
Systemic level
Other
F.3.3 Comments on Capacity Building Support
F.4 Financial support for implementation required
F.5 Technological support for implementation required
F.6 Capacity building support for implementation required
G Estimated emission reductions
G.1 Amount 0.0016
G.2 Unit MtC02e/yr
G.3 Additional information (e.g. if available, information on the methodological approach followed)
The estimate of direct GHG emission reductions includes avoided emissions from paper disposal (10
tCO
2
e), printing (0.462 tCO
2
e) and travel to deliver hard copies of the SER reports (1,596 tCO
2
e),
which comes to 1,606.5 tCO
2
e annually.
The indirect emission reductions of this NAMA are potentially much greater than the direct reduc-
tions. However they are not quantified for this NAMA concept. JSC Institute of Power Development
and Energy Saving will conduct further studies and surveys to determine the potential energy sav-
ings that can be attributed to the increased access to energy efficiency data versus those that will
result from other energy efficiency measures implemented by the government.
H.1 Other indicators of implementation
I.1 Other relevant information including co-benefits for local sustainable development
The following co-benefits are expected from the NAMA:
(i) Energy savings and energy security. Energy efficiency improvements will lead to reduced
demand for energy,
hi h i tur ill redu e Kazakhsta ’s depe de e o e erg i ports
and decrease the strain from extraction of domestic hydropowercarbon reserves.
(ii) Health/air quality. Public health improvements will result from improved air quality when
the energy and transport sectors become more efficient, use best-available technologies,
a d de rease the de a d for e tra tio of Kazakhsta ’s h dropo er ar o resources.
(iii) Productivity and competitiveness. Promotion of energy efficient technologies through the
SER knowledge
platfor a d arketpla e ill i pro e o pa ies’ otto li es a d glo al
competitiveness.
(iv) Policy setting. The SER streamlines the process of data gathering, management, and analysis.
It also significantly improves access to statistical information on energy savings, energy effi-
TA 8119 NAMA Report_FINAL_Appendix 5 NAMA Registry Submission Form _ KAZ Energy Efficiency
ciency, and energy consumption, which is important for evaluating and setting national poli-
cy.
(v) Job creation. Investment in the energy sector and promotion of energy efficient technolo-
gies creates technical jobs with good compensation. The training programs
implemented
under Phase 3 will provide technical training to currently unskilled workers.
J Relevant National Policies strategies, plans and programmes and/or other mitigation action
J.1 Relevant National Policies
The Government of Kazakhstan has adopted a voluntary quantitative commitment to reduce GHG
emissions by 15% by 2020 and 25% by 2050 (relative to a 1992 baseline). In 2012, Kazakhstan further
revised this goal and declared its readiness to reduce emissions by 5% to 7% from the 2013 to 2020
period. The go er
e t’s goal of li iti g gro th i GHG e issio s is odified
i a offi ial strat-
egy documents, most importantly in the 2013 Concept of Transition of the Republic of Kazakhstan
to a Green Economy which among other items sets a goal of reducing the energy intensity of GDP by
10% by 2015, 25% by 2020, 30% by 2040, and 50% by 2050 (compared to the 2008 baseline).
In addition, the government has introduced several laws and programs to specifically promote ener-
gy efficiency, including the following:
(i)
The Law on Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency Improvement (2012, with amendments in
2015);
(ii)
The Law on Changes and Amendments to Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on
Issues of Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency (2012, 2015);
(iii) National Complex Plan on Energy Saving (2011);
(iv) Program for Energy Saving 2020 (2013);
(v)
“trategi Pla for the Repu li of Kazakhsta ’s De elop e t up to
;
(vi)
O erall atio al pla o the i ple e tatio of the Preside t’s Message “trateg Kazakh-
stan
— 5
;
(vii) Governmental Program of Forced Industrial and Innovative Development of the Republic
of Kazakhstan for 2015
–2019 (2014);
(viii)
Progra of Go er
e t I frastru ture De elop e t Nurl -)hol for
5–2019 (2015);
and
(ix) An additional 16 regional and three sectors plans and strategic plans of individual minis-
tries to implement the above laws and programs
J.2 Links to other mitigation actions
K Attachments
K.1 Attachment description
K.2 File
Browse
L Support received
L.1 From outside
the Registry