The Human Plutonium
Injection Experiments
Number 23 1995 Los Alamos Science
195
Other human experiments involved var-
ious toxic heavy-metal radioisotopes
that were either materials important for
the development of the atomic weapons
(polonium and uranium) or were part of
a comparative evaluation of health haz-
ards (radium). The polonium studies
helped to develop techniques for the
similar but later studies with plutonium
(see “Polonium Human-Injection
Experiments”).
One of the main problems in the polo-
nium studies was contamination.
Working with the material could easily
contaminate laboratory equipment used
in the analysis, which, in turn, could
bias results or even contaminate sam-
ples related to other studies. It was
thus anticipated that analysis procedures
for plutonium would require laborato-
ries that were absolutely free of alpha
contamination. A “clean laboratory”
was established at Los Alamos in Feb-
ruary 1945 in the Medical Labs Build-
ing, and the responsibilities in the plu-
tonium study were split. The Medical
Corps or the Rochester Project would
handle the clinical work, and Los
Alamos would analyze the resulting
biological samples.
The First Human Experiments
with Plutonium
Reports issued in 1945 show that three
human plutonium-injection studies were
authorized in April 1945—a study by
the Chicago Met Lab Health Group, an-
other by Hamilton’s group in Berkeley
and San Francisco, and a third study to
be done jointly by Warren at the Army
Medical Corp Hospital in Oak Ridge
(clinical) and the Los Alamos Health
Group (analytical). The three ap-
proaches would allow using plutonium
in two different valence states (+4 and
+6), two different chemical forms (cit-
rate and nitrate), and two different iso-
topes (plutonium-239 and plutonium-
238). Each group would be responsible
for analysis of excreta samples using
their own plutonium analysis technique
developed for that purpose (the cupfer-
ron-extraction method at Los Alamos,
the cation-exchange method at Chicago,
and the thiophenyltrifluoroacetone ex-
traction method at Berkeley).
The plutonium-239 dose decided on for
the Oak Ridge-Los Alamos and the
Chicago studies was 5 micrograms.
That quantity would enable the Chicago
group to detect plutonium accurately
using 100-milliliter urine-sample
aliquots of 24-hour collections and
would provide appropriate activity lev-
els for the Los Alamos method, which
used full 24-hour urine samples. The
Berkeley site, however, would use a
different isotope, plutonium-238, at a
different dose level; the injected mass
would only be 0.2 microgram, but be-
cause of a much higher specific acti-
tivy, it would have 10 times the ra-
dioactivity. As a result, the excreta
samples at Berkeley would also be ex-
pected to have more than ten times the
activity of corresponding samples from
the other two studies, increasing the
accuracy and precision of the alpha
measurements on the excreta samples.
Oak Ridge. The first human plutonium
injection occurred on April 10, 1945,
barely two weeks after the meeting in
Los Alamos between Friedell, Hempel-
mann, and others. The person chosen
for the experiment was a 55-year old
man and a patient at the Manhattan
Project Army Hospital in Oak Ridge.
(Although the man was the first patient
injected with plutonium, he was later
grouped in reports with other patients
injected at the Rochester site and was
identified as HP-12.)* He had been
hospitalized because of injuries in an
automobile accident, and bones in his
right forearm, left thigh, and right knee
were broken. Some of the fractures
were “in poor position,” which meant
an operation to properly set the bones
would be necessary. Except for those
injuries and “a chronic urethral dis-
charge which he has had for 10-15
years [his clinical record states this may
have been due to chronic gonorrhea],”
HP-12 had always been employed as a
cement mixer and was generally in
good health (“well developed, well
nourished”).
In a report for a conference on plutoni-
um, held May 14 and 15, 1945, Wright
Langham stated that “the person was an
elderly male whose age and general
health was such that there is little or no
possibility that the injection can have
At the present time the
hazards of workers at Site
Y are probably very much
more serious than those at
any other branch of the
Project. . . . it would be
appropriate that the med-
ical program of the Man-
hattan District consider
some of our problems
rather more intensely than
they have in the past.
*Many of the names of the people who were in-
jected with plutonium have been published else-
where. However, we did not want to intrude fur-
ther on the families of those people and so will
only identify the patients by case number.
any effect on the normal course of his
life.” HP-12 was 53 at the time of the
injection and lived another 8 years be-
fore dying, in 1953, of heart failure.
Late radiation effects, such as cancer,
were not expected to develop for ten to
fifteen years, if at all. For example, the
induction period in humans for radium-
induced cancer, especially malignancy
of the bones, was about 10 to 30 years
after exposure. Despite Langham’s
statement, we cannot, of course, dis-
count the fact that HP-12 might have
lived 20 or more years; although in
1945, fifty years of age was considered
to be fairly advanced. On the other
hand, the GIs at Los Alamos who were
heavily exposed to plutonium in 1945
while working in D Building under
poor industrial hygiene conditions (see
“On the Front Lines” on page 124)
were in their early twenties and were at
greater risk of developing late radiation
effects than was HP-12.
HP-12 was injected with 4.7 micro-
grams of plutonium (0.29 microcuries)
in the chemical form of the +4 citrate
salt. The material had been sent to Dr.
Friedell at Oak Ridge by Wright Lang-
ham, along with directions for its use
on a human subject. Langham stated
that citrate was chosen “to produce the
maximum deposition in the bone . . .
[so as to] produce an excretion rate
comparable to that of a worker having
absorbed the material at a slow rate.”
Urine samples were collected almost
continuously for the first 42 days, and
then intermittently until the 89th day
after injection. Regular stool samples
were collected as well over a 46-day
period. In accordance with the plan,
the Manhattan District Medical Office
conducted the clinical part of the exper-
iment, and the urine and fecal samples
were sent to Los Alamos for analysis.
Langham also reported at the May con-
ference that “the excretion during the
first day was surprisingly low [0.1 per
cent in the urine] and . . . the leveling
off of the excretion rate was much
slower than with rats.” Langham sug-
The Human Plutonium Injection Experiments
196
Los Alamos Science Number 23 1995
Polonium Human-Injection Experiments
In 1944, in response to concerns for the risk associated with occupational
exposures to polonium, the Army Medical Corps authorized Rochester to un-
dertake a study of the biological behavior of that element. The program was
started in August 1944 with animals, and by November, studies with humans
had begun. Eventually, tracer amounts of radioactive polonium-210 were in-
jected into four hospitalized humans and ingested by a fifth.
Polonium, the first element isolated by Marie and Pierre Curie from pitch-
blende in 1898, is an alpha emitter. When alpha particles from polonium-
210 collide with beryllium atoms, neutrons are ejected, and polonium-berylli-
um combinations had already served physicists as a convenient source of
neutrons. During the Manhattan Project, it was decided to use that neutron
source as an initiator of the chain reaction in the atomic bombs, thus making
polonium (and beryllium) an occupational health hazard for the people who
needed to develop and build the initiators.
In the Rochester work, the subjects of the excretion studies were volunteers.
The problem had been outlined to patients at the Rochester Hospital, who
were told that it would involve the intake of tracer amounts of a radioactive
substance followed by analysis of their excreta. Because polonium was not
classified at that time,* the doctors may have even told the patients what
substance they would be injected with. From the group of volunteers, four
men and one woman were selected for the studies. They ranged in age
from the early thirties to the early forties and were being treated for a variety
of cancers (lymphosarcoma and various leukemias). One patient died from
his cancer six days after the injection.
Four of the volunteers were injected with doses of polonium in a soluble
form that ranged from 0.17 to 0.3 microcurie per kilogram of body weight.
The fifth patient drank water containing 18.5 microcuries of polonium chlo-
ride, equivalent to 0.19 microcuries per kilogram of body weight. The
amount of polonium excreted in urine and feces were analyzed, and blood
samples were taken to determine the amount freely circulating in the blood.
Autopsy tissue samples were taken from the patient who died to determine
the distribution of polonium throughout the body.
Polonium-210 has a short half-life (138 days) and very high activity (4,490
microcuries per microgram). The high activity meant very small quantities
(of the order of nanograms, a factor of 1000 less than for plutonium) could
be administered and detected, so concerns of chemical toxicity were mini-
mal. The short half-life meant the substance would not remain in the body
so that concerns about long-term radiation effects were also minimized. In
1945, urine assays corresponding to the tolerance limits were 7 counts per
minute for plutonium-239 but 1500 counts per minute for polonium-210.
Such metabolic studies were possible at Rochester University in 1944 be-
cause polonium was available at that time. The research yielded important
information for the Manhattan Project on the hazards of polonium and
helped develop techniques for the similar but later studies of plutonium.
*Polonium was classified in July 1945 and given the code name “postum.”