The Human
Plutonium Injection Exper-
Number 23 1995 Los Alamos Science
205
District.
The Rochester Patients. Eleven pa-
tients (HP-1 through HP-11 in Table 2,
page 208) were injected with plutonium
at the Rochester site during a period
from October 1945 through July 1946.
The patients included seven men and
four women who ranged in age from 41
through 68, with the exception of one
18-year-old. None of the patients were
chronic arthritics or carcinoma patients,
however, they had various afflictions,
ranging from a hormonal deficient dis-
ease (Addison’s) to alcoholism, that re-
quired hospitalization.
In the undated (1947 or 1948) draft re-
port of Bassett and Langham, it was
stated:
Preference was given to those who
might reasonably gain from contin-
ued residence in the hospital for a
month or more. Special treatments
and other therapy thought to be of
benefit to the patients were carried
out in the usual manner. . . . Pa-
tients with malignant disease were
. . . omitted from the group on the
grounds that their metabolism
might be affected in an unknown
manner. . . . As a rule, the subject
chosen was past 45 years of age
and suffering from a chronic disor-
der such that chance of survival for
ten years or more was improbable.
These last criteria, it was hoped, would
avoid “late radiation effects [such as
cancer]” and present the opportunity, in
some cases, to “obtain post mortem ma-
terial.” There were exceptions to the
“rule”: three of the Rochester patients
were younger than 45 (18, 41, and 44),
although the 18-year-old was seriously
ill (Cushing’s syndrome) and only lived
another year and a half.
Ten of the 11 patients were cared for in
the special metabolic ward of Strong
Memorial Hospital in Rochester (the
eleventh was in the hospital but his
condition was so serious he was not
moved into the ward). The control pe-
riod lasted about 10 days, during which
time the patient was instructed in the
quantitative collection of urine and fecal
samples and the necessary adjustments
were made to the ward routine and the
patient’s diet. After the patient had
proven capable of cooperation, a series
of control urine and fecal samples were
collected and physical and laboratory
Estimating Effects of the Injection Dose
Several methods were used to estimate the potential effects of the amount of
plutonium being injected into the human subjects. These methods were out-
lined in the various documents written at the time or published later in the
fifties, and here, we summarize two of these.
Acute toxicity. An accepted approach, especially for chemical toxicity, was
to determine the acute-toxic LD50 dose for animals (the amount that caused
death in 50 per cent of the animals) and then set the safe level for humans at
least 10 times lower. Plutonium injections in rats showed (on the basis of mi-
crograms per kilogram of body weight): 700 to 1000 micrograms caused half
the animals to die in 30 days; 200 to 600 micrograms caused half to die in
150 days; and 10 micrograms caused no deaths after 420 days. The “safe”
acute-toxicity dose would thus appear to be 20 to 60 micrograms per kilo-
gram of body weight (1500 to 4600 micrograms total for a 170-pound per-
son). Using acute toxicity is most applicable for terminal cases, such as the
three Chicago patients (see Table 2, page 208). The injection dose for CHI-1
was about 0.06 microgram per kilogram of body weight, more than a hundred
times lower than the observed no-effects dose in rats. CHI-2 and CHI-3 were
each given the maximum injection dose of any patient in the various studies,
and this dose was about 2.5 micrograms per kilogram of body weight, still 4
times lower than the no-effects dose in rats and about 10 times lower than
the “safe” acute-toxicity dose. The Chicago scientists were thus able to con-
clude in a report discussing CHI-1 and CHI-2 that “insofar as can be deter-
mined the clinical course in neither of the two cases was influenced by the in-
jection of plutonium.” (Clinical data for CHI-3 were never documented.)
An alpha-emitter safe dose. In a draft report authored by Bassett and Lang-
ham in 1947 or 1948, they stated that an accepted safe dose to irradiated tis-
sue for an alpha emitter was 0.01 rep per day (where 1 rep, a “roentgen
equivalent physical,” corresponds to the absorption of 93 ergs per gram of tis-
sue). They felt that “a dose of this [size] appears to carry little likelihood of in-
jury to cells.” Using the activity of plutonium-239 and the energy of its alpha
particles, they calculated that this dose corresponds to 32.6 micrograms of
plutonium if the plutonium is distributed uniformly throughout the body and 5.2
micrograms if the plutonium is concentrated in the skelton with a uniform dis-
tribution in bone. “Unfortunately,” they wrote, “radioautographs reveal a far
from uniform distribution of plutonium in bone.” Furthermore, “early localiza-
tion of a large fraction of the dose in the liver . . . is a distinct possibility.”
They estimated that, in the regions where the plutonium concentrated, a 5-mi-
crogram body burden could result in a dose to tissue that was ten times high-
er than the accepted safe dose of 0.01 rep per day. Thus, they were aware
of the fact that a 5-microgram dose most likely exceeded accepted standards,
depending on the assumptions regarding distribution in the body.