4
to assist them in their shooting investigations. Police officers also became additional, around the
clock, eyes and ears for probation and parole authorities.
The results of the use of probation/parole information by field personnel were also
integrated into future Strategic Tactical Deployment meetings in order to implement an
evidence-based policing approach to the gun violence problem in Joliet. This “feedback loop”
allowed Joliet to evaluate their successes and failures and to apply what they learned on a real-
time basis. For example, a number of specific applications of sharing probation and parole
information were utilized:
Gang-involved parolees and probationers were identified, monitored, and cross-checked
on a regular basis with shooting incidents.
Joliet police officers assisted Illinois Department of Corrections parole officers when
they conducted sweeps of parolees.
Top ten lists of problem individuals were collectively created increasing information
among participating agencies,
Joliet police notified probation and parole of problem probationers/parolees, thus
enabling them to attend STD meetings and share additional information on these persons.
Attending STD meetings apprised probation and parole officers of current hotspots in
Joliet, thereby increasing probation and parole officer safety.
Joliet police officers accompanied probation officers when they confiscated weapons
after a court conviction, thereby reducing the number of weapons available on the street.
Probation and parole violations were used to apprehend suspects and witnesses in
homicide and shooting investigations who might be willing to provide information once
they were in custody.
Joliet police officers cooperated in building cases on parolees and probationers who had
violated the terms of their release.
5
These and other applications of probation/parole information were continually analyzed at the
STD meetings in order to determine the best practice use of probation and parole information as
well as other collaborative approaches to addressing gun violence.
Finally, community policing has demonstrated the importance of involving citizens in law
enforcement efforts. Whether the police are successful or not, citizens are often more satisfied
with police efforts that include the local community. As such, Joliet’s Strategic Tactical
Deployment program was expanded to include a marketing campaign to enlist the cooperation of
local residents. This campaign not only sought citizen input, but also targeted community
members who witnessed shootings and were reluctant to come forward with information.
While violent crime in Joliet has decreased following the national trend, the purpose of this
study is to determine what percentage of this reduction can be attributed to the STD process.
Before beginning the evaluation, Joliet personnel and Loyola University researchers reviewed
the relevant academic research in order to gain a greater understanding of evidence-based and
hot-spot policing, as well as police corrections partnerships. A review of this research is
contained in the following section.
Literature Review
The Joliet Strategic Tactical Deployment (STD) initiative is a crime reduction strategy
aimed at reducing gun violence. The STD process involves identifying areas with the highest
rates of violent crime and allocating additional police resources to these areas in an effort to
reduce gun-related crime. The STD effort is supplemented by an exchange of information with
probation and parole authorities in an effort to identify and remove violent offenders from the
community. Thus this effort not only targets geographic areas, but also active offenders. As such,
the STD process combines both elements of hot-spot policing and police/probation partnerships.
6
This research follows an evidence-based approach. The goal of evidence-based policing is to turn
research into practice. This section provides an overview of the literature on hot-spot policing,
police/probation partnerships, as well as a review of evidence-based policing.
Hot-Spot policing
A hot spot is an area that has a greater than average number of crimes or where people have
a greater than average risk of victimization. Hot-spot policing is a police strategy that directs
additional police resources to these areas to suppress crime through preventive patrol and
criminal apprehension. Hot-spot policing has become a core strategy of American policing.
Directed patrols, problem-solving, and proactive arrest strategies are all routinely used by police
agencies to apprehend criminals in high-crime areas. Hot-spot policing emerged from a body of
research suggesting that crime is not spread evenly across the urban landscape, but concentrated
in high-risk places (Sherman, Gartin, and Buerger, 1989; Weisburd, Maher, and Sherman, 1992).
The emergence of hot-spot policing contrasted with earlier views of crime control. Studies
such as the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment (Kelling et al, 1974), research on calling
the police in Minneapolis (Spelman and Brown, 1984), and the RAND Criminal Investigation
Study (Greenwood, Chaiken, and Petersilia, 1977) all challenged the ability of the police to
control crime. Recent research, however, has shed new light on the effectiveness of the police.
For example, Weisburd and Sherman (1995) conducted research that challenged the findings of
the Kansas City Preventative Patrol Experiment. Working with the Minneapolis Police
Department, the authors studied the effect of increases in patrols at 55 of 110 crime hot spots
within the city. Hot spots were defined as small clusters of addresses with frequent calls for
police service. After one year of study, the authors concluded that substantial increases in patrol
reduced crime and disorder in high crime areas.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |