Analysis Vol

Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 203-205.
Teller, Paul. “The rotating disk argument and Humean supervenience: cutting the Gordian knot”. 205-210.
Meyer, Ulrich. “Prior and the Platonist”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 211-216.
Stone, Jim. “Why sortal essentialism cannot solve Chrysippus`s. puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 216-223.
O`Neill, John. “Lewis and the flawed nihilist”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 223-225.
Mackie, Penelope. “Deep contingency and necessary a posteriori truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 225-236.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Refuse disposal”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 236-241.
Hawthorne, John. “Lewis, the lottery and the preface”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 242-251.
Beebee, Helen. “Contingent laws rule: reply to Bird”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 252-255.
Psillos, Stathis. “Salt soes dissolve in water, but not necessarily”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 255-257.
Bird, Alexander. “On whether some laws are necessary”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 257-270.

Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002
Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie. “Indexicality, binding, anaphora and a priori truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 271-281.
Lange, Marc. “Baseball, pessimistic inductions and the turnover fallacy”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 281-285.
Recanati, Francois. “The Fodorian Fallacy”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 285-289.
Sayward, Charles. “Convention T and Basic Law V”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 289-291.
Dorr, Cian. “Sleeping Beauty: in defence of Elga”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 292-296.
Wiland, Eric. “On the rationality of desiring the forbidden”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 296-299.
Beali, Jc. “Deflactionism and gaps: untying not`s in the debate”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 299-305.
Meyer, Ulrich. “Is science first-order?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 305-307.
Weatherson, Brian. “Misleading indexicals”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 308-310.
Predelli, Stefano. “Intentions, indexicals and communication”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 310-316.
Gillett, Carl. “The dimensions of realization: a critique of the Standard view”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 316-323.
Shipley, G. J. “Imagination and fission futures”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 324-327.
Rieger, Adam. “Pardox without Basic Law V: a problem with Frege`s ontology”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 327-330.
Kremer, Michael. “Intuitive consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 330-336.
Joyce, Richard. “Expressivism and motivation internalism”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 336-344.
Freidman, Kennth S. “A small infinite puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 344-345.
Blck, Robert. “Solution of a small infinite puzzle”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 345-346.
Index to Volume 62. Analysis, v. 62, n. 4, New Series n. 276, 2002, p. 347.

Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003
Sanford, David H. “Fusion confusion”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 1-4.
Parsons, Josh. “A-theory for tense logicans”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 4-6.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “On Wrigth`s inductive definition of coherence truth for arithmetic”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 6-15.
Worley, Sara. “Conceivability, possibility and physicalism”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 15-23.
Bradley, Darren & Fitelson, Branden. “Monty Hall, Doomsday and confirmation”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 23-31.
Goldstein, Laurenc. “Farewell to Grelling” Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 31-32.
Sullivan, Peter M. “A note on incompleteness and heterologicality”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 32-38.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “On our alleged a priori knowledge that water exists”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 38-41.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The coherence of scepticism about self-knowledge” Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 41-48.
Brown, James Robert. “Science and constructive mathematics”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 48-51.
Papineau, David. “Why you don’t want to get in the box with Schrödinger`s cat”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 51-58.
Yi, Byeong-Uk. “Wright and Suárez on the Verification Principle”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 58-61.
Bringsjord, Selmer & van Heuveln, Bran. “The “mental eye” defence of an infinitized version of Yablo`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 61-70.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Scanlon`s contractualism and the redundancy objection”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 70-76.
Smith, Michael & Stoljar, Daneil. “Is there a Lockean argument against expressivism?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 76-86.
Jackson, Frank & Pettit, Philip. “Locke, expressivism, conditionals”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 1, New Series n. 277, 2003, p. 86-92.

Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003
Noë, Alva. Causation and perception: the puzzle unravelled. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 93-100.
Rayo, Agustín. “When does “everything” mean everything?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 100-106.
Barker, Stephen & Dowe, Phi. “Paradoxes of multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 106-114.
McCall, Storrs & Lowe, E. J. “3D/4D equivalence, the twins paradox and absolute time”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 114-123.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, Jon. “A variant of Benardete`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 124-131.
Lycan, William G. & Ryder, Zena. “The loneliness of the long-distance truck driver”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 132-136.
Vision, Gerald. “Lest we forget “the correspondence theory of truth” Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 136-141.
Wenar, Leif. “Epistemc rights and legal rights”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 142-146.
Smilansky, Saul. “Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 146-151.
Buen, Otávio & Colyvan, Mark. “Pardox without satisfaction”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 152-156.
Noordhof, Paul. “Tooley on backward causation”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 157-162.
Read, Stephen. “Freeing assumptions from the Liar paradox”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 162-166.
Denyer, Nicholas. “Rieger`s problem with Frege`s ontology”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 166-169.
Fitzgerals, Henry. “Nominalist things”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 2, New Series n. 278, 2003, p. 170-171.

Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003
Fricke, Martin F. & Snowdon, Paul. “Solidity and impediment”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 173-178.
Weintraub, Ruth. “The time of a killing”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 178-182.
Nichols, Shaun. “Imagination and the puzzles of iteration”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 182-187.
Steiner, Hillel & Wolf, Jonathan. “A general framework for resolving disputed land claims”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 188-189.
Knobe, Joshua. “Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 190-194.
Fitelson, Branden. “A probabilistic theory of coherence”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 194-199.
Monton, Bradley. “Presentists can believe in closed timelike curves”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 199-202.
Sawyer, Sarah. “Sufficient absences”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 202-208.
Weatphal, Janthan. “A new way with the Consequence Argument, and the fixity to the laws”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 208-212.
Noonan, Harold W. “A flawed argument for perdurance”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 213-215.
Aranyosi, István. “(Con)fusing the un(con)fusable”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 215-220.
Bird, Alexander. “Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 221-228.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts: reply to Bird”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 229-237.
Yi, Byeong-Uk. “Newcomb`s pardox and Priest`s prince`le of rational choice”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 237-242.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Examining boxing and toxin”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 242-244.
Fischer, John Martin. “Ought-implies-can”, causal determinism and moral responsibility”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 244-250.
Bruckner, Anthony. “Not wanting to know”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 250-256.
T.Cook, Roy. “Still counterintuitive: a reply to Kremer”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 257-261.
Hanfling, Oswald. “A Gettier drama”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 262-263.
Smith, Peter. “Constructivism expoded?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 263-266.
Bradley, Darren. “Sleeping Beauty: a note on Dorr`s argument for 1/3”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 3, New Series n. 279, 2003, p. 266-268.

Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003
Stanley, Jason. “Context, interest relativity and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 269-280.
Milne, Peter. “Bayesianism v. scientific realism”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 281-288.
Stone, Jim. “On staying the same”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 288-291.
Ketland, Jeffrey “Can a many-valued language functionally represent its own semantics?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 292-297.
Moretti, Luca “Why the Converse Consequence Condition cannot be accepted”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 297-300.
Milne, Peter “The simplest Lewis-style triviality proof yet?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 300-303.
Brueckner, Anthony. “What missed clues cases show”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 303-305.
Sanford, David H. “Reply to Mr. Aranyosi”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 305-308.
McDaniel, Kris. “No paradox of multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 309-311.
Beebee, Helen & Rush, Michael. “Non-paradoxical multi-location”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 311-316.
FitzPatrick, William J. “Acts, intentions, and moral permissibility: indefence of the doctrine of double effect”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 317-321.
Watherson, Brian. “Nine objections to Steiner and Wolff on land disputes”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 321-327.
McNaughton, David & Rawling, Piers. “Can Scanlon avoid redundancy by passing the buck?” Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 328-331.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Scanlon, permissions, and redundancy: response to McNaughton and Rawling”. 332-337.
Ridge, Michael. “Contractualism and the new and improved redundancy objection”. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 337-342.
Index to Volume. 63. Analysis, v. 63, n. 4, New Series n. 280, 2003, p. 343.

Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004
Olum, Ken D. “Conflict between anthropic reasoning and observation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 1-8.
Weintraub, Ruth. “Sleeping Beauty: a simple solution”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 8- 10.
Horgan, Terry. “Sleeping Beauty awakened: new odds at the dawn of the new day”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 10-21.
Nerlich, Graham. “How the twins do it: STR and the clock paradox”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 21-29.
Beall, Jc. & Ripley, David. “Analetheism and dialetheism”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 30-35.
Warfield, Ted A. “When epistemic closure does and does not fail: a lesson from the history of epistemology”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 35-41.
Breckner, Anthony. “Brewer on the McKinsey problem”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 41-43.
Gertler, Brie. “We can`t know a priori that H₂O exists. But can we know that water does?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 44-47.
Noordhof, Paul. “Outsmarting the McKinsey-Brown argument?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 48-56.
Brown, Jessica. “Wright on transmission failure”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 57-67.
Rosenkranz, Sven. “Fitch back in action again?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 67-71.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “The Bundle Theory is compatible with distinct but indiscernible particulars”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 72-81.
J Corlett,. Angelo. “Evi”l. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 81-83.
Dreier, James. “Lockean and logical truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 84-91.
Noonan, Harold W. “Against absence-dependent thoughts”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 1, New Series n. 281, 2004, p. 92-93.

Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004
Benthem, Johan Van. “What one may come to know”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 95-105.
Timmermann, Jens. “The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 106-112.
Read, Stephen. “Identity and harmony”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 113-119.
Rayo, Agustín. “Frege`s correlation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 119-122.
Bourne, Craig. “Future contingents, non-contradiction, and the law of excluded middle muddle”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 122-128.
Uzquiano, Gabriel. “An infinitary paradox of denotation”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 128-131.
Noonan, Harold W. “Are there vague objects?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 131-134.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Vagueness, phenomenal concepts and mind-brain identity”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 134-138.
Samir Okasha: “Wright on the transmission of support: a Bayesian analysis”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 139-146.
Kistler, Max. “Some problems for Lowe`s four-category ontology”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 146-151.
Lowe, E. J. “The four-category ontology: reply to Kistler”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 152-157.
Tappenden, Paul. “The ins and outs of Schrôdinger`s cat box: a response to Papineau. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 157-164.
Ketland, Jaffrey. “Bueno and Colyvan on Yablo`s paradox.” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 165-172.
Adams, Fred & Steadman, Annie. “Intentional action in ordinary language: core concept or pragmatic understanding?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 173-181.
Knobe, Joshua. “Intention, intentional action and moral considerations”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 181-187.
McKay, Phyllos. “Newcomb`s problem: the causalists get rich”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 187-189.
Seibel, Mark. “On Fitelson`s measure of coherence”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 2, New Series n. 282, 2004, p. 189-190.

Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004
Poidevin, Robin Le. “Space, supervenience and substantivalism”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 191-198.
Brabbon-Mitchell, David. “How do we know it is now now?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 199-203.
Miller, Kristie. “The twins` paradox and temporal passage”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 203-206.
Katzav, Joel. “Dispositions and the principle of lest action”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 206-214.
Borg, Emma. “Formal semantics and intentional states”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 215-223.
Crawford, Sean. “A solution for Russellians to a puzzle about belief”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 223-229.
Recanatyi, Francois. “That” -clauses as existential quantifiers”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 229-235.
Braddon-Mitchell, David & Miller, Kristie. “The loneliness of stages”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 235-242.
Burke, Michael B. “Doin, Thoen, and many-thikers problem”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 242-250.
Jacquette, Dale. “Grelling`s revenge”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 251-256.
Campbell, Scott. “Rapid psychological chance”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 256-264.
Nathan, N. M. L. “Stoics and sceptics: a reply to Brueckner”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 264-268.
Adams, Fred & Steadman, Annie. “Intentional action and moral considerations: still pragmatic”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 268-276.
Nadelhoffer, Thomas. “The Butler problem revisited”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 277-284.
Bou-Habib, Paul & Olsaretti, Serena. “Lands disputes and auctions: a response to Steiner and Wolff”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 3, New Series n. 283, 2004, p. 284-287.

Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004
Morton, Adam. “Indicative versus subjunctive in future conditionals”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 289-293.
Morton, Adam. “Against the Ramsey test”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 294-299.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 299-309.
MacBride, Fraser. “Can structuralism solve the “access” problem?” Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 309-317.
Whittle, Bruno. “Dialetheism, logical consequence and hierarchy”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 318-326.
Ehring, Douglas. “Distinguishing universals from particulars”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 326-332.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Strategies for refuting closure for knowledge”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 333-335.
Israel, Rami. “Two interpretations of “grue” -or how to misunderstand the new riddle of induction”. 335-339.
Brown, Jessica. “Non-inferential justification and epistemic circularity”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 339-348.
Williams, John N. “Moore`s paradoxes, Evans`s principle and self-knowledge”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 348-353.
Sawyer, Sarah. “Absences, presences and sufficient conditions”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 354-357.
Forrest, Peter. “The real but dead past: a reply to Braddon-Mitchell”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 358-362.
Ellis, Jonathan. “Context, indexicals and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 362-364.
Parsons, Josh. “The Eleatic hangover cure”. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 364-366.
Index to Volume 64. Analysis, v. 64, n. 4, New Series n. 284, 2004, p. 367.