Analysis Vol



Yüklə 0,81 Mb.
səhifə6/10
tarix25.11.2017
ölçüsü0,81 Mb.
#12269
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10
Fischer, John Martin. “Pike`s Ockhamism”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 57-63.
McGrath, P.J. “Evil and the existence of a finite God”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 1, New Series n. 209, 1986, p. 63-64.

Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986
Buckne, Dean and Smith, Peter. “Quotation and the Liar Parodox”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 65-67.
Menzel, Christopher. “On set theoretic possible worlds”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 68-72.
Tienson, John. “An observation on common names and proper names”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 73-76.
Slater, B. H. “Prior`s analytic”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 76-81.
Dale, J. “If A and B then A”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 81-83.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Dale”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 83-85.
Bckner, D. K. “Transparently false: reply to Hardin”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 86-87.
Noonan, H. W. “AE or EA?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 87-89.
Costa, Michael J. “Hume`s argument for the temporal priority cause over effect”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 89-92.
Thalebrg, Irving. “The immateriality of “abstract objects” and the mental”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 93-97.
Newton, Natika. “Churchland on direct introspection of brain states”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 97-102.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Nozick, justice, and the sorites”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 102-106.
Leaman, Oliver. “Harris on noon-vicious choice”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 106-107.
Duff, Antonym. “Pascal`s wger anf infinite utilities”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 107-109.
Rein, Andrew. “Repeatable miracles?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 109-112.
Correction. Analysis, v. 46, n. 2, New Series n. 210, 1986, p. 112.

Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986
Williamson, Timothy. “The contingent a priori: has it anything to do with indexicals?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 113-117.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 117-121.
Williams, S. G. “On the logical possibility of time without change”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 122-125.
Denise, Theofore C. “Redundancy and INUS conditionality”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 126-130.
Jacobson, Anne Jaap. “Causality and the supposed counterfactual conditional in Hume`s Enquiry”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 131-133.
Waters, Kenneth. “Why Chisholm`s analysis of justification won`t do”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 134-137.
Lemke, Lorry. “Kvanvig and Swain on the basing relation”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 138-144.
Costa, Michael J. “Acting intentionally and minimal abilities”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 144-147.
Montamquet, James. “Prosthesis and pre-emption”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 147-152.
White, Alan R. “Ways of speaking of imagination”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 152-156.
Smith, Peter. “Metaphysical realism and historical interpretation”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 157-158.
Lowe, E. J. “Noonan on naming and predicating”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 159.
Crisp, Roger. “The avoidance of the problem of evil: a reply to McGrath”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 3, New Series n. 211, 1986, p. 160.

Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986
Alexander, Peter and others. “Open letter to the international philosophical community”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 161.
Priest, Graham. “Tense and truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 162-166.
Mellor, D. H. “Tense`s tenseless truth conditions”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 167-172.
Moore, W. “How significant is the use/mention distinction?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 173-179.
Cook, Monte. “Indeterminacy of identity”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 179-186.
Grim, Patrick. “On sets and worlds: a reply to Menzel”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 186-191.
Goldstein, Laurence. “False stipulation and semantical paradox”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 192-194.
Lowe, E. J. “On a supposed temporal/modal parallel”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 195-197.
Over, D. E. “Is there a temporal slippery slope paradox?” Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 197-200.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Over”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 200.
Over, D. E. “Reply to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 201.
Jennings, Richard C. “Tarski - an ambiguity”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 201-205.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Garrett”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 205-211.
Shand, John. “Grayling, Feyerabend and the constancy of sense”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 211-212.
Sanford, David H. “The possibility of transparent white”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 212-215.
Spinks, Graham. Noonan on temporal parts. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 215-216.
Hollis, Martin. “More paradoxical epistemics”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 217-218
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Lowe”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 218-221.
Clark, Andy. “Superman, the image”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 222-224.
“Correction”. Analysis, v. 46, n. 4, New Series n. 212, 1986, p. 224.

Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987
Davies, David. “How not to out Smart the anti-realist”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 1-8.
Pettit, Philip. “Rights, constraints and trumps”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 8-14.
Cummiskey, David. “Desert and entitlement: a Rawlsian consequentialist account”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 15-19.
Gillett, G. R. “The generality constraint and conscious thought”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 20-24.
Helm, Paul. “On pan-critical irrationalism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 24-28.
Ehring, Douglas. “Non-simultaneous causation”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 28-32.
Rasmussen, Stig Alstrup. “Causal sufficiency reconsidered”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 32-34.
Ruben, David-Hillel. “Explaining contrastive facts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 35-37.
Widerker, David. “On an argument for incompatibilism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 37-41.
Hooker, Brad. “Williams` argument against external reasons”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 42-44.
Lowe, E. J. “Not a counterexample to modus ponens”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 44-47.
Bodanszky, Eva. “Parfit on selves and their interests”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 47-50.
Enring, Douglas. “Survival and trivial facts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 50-54.
McGrath, P. J. “Atheism or agnosticism”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 54-57.
Burk, Michael B. “Theodicy with a God of limited power: a reply to McGrath”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 57-58.
Colterjohn, Julia and MacIntosh, Duncan. “Gerald Vision and indexicals”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 58-60.
Sipmson, Paul. Here and now. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p.58-60.
Sturgeon, Scott. “Foley on causation and rationality”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 1, New Series n. 213, 1987, p. 62-64.

Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO
Editorial. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 65
Patton, Thomas E. “On a persistent fallacy regarding the de re”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 65-71.
Blacksburn, William K. “Davidson on force and convention”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 72-74.
Dudman, V. H. “Apiah on “if””. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 74-79.
Tsohatzidis, Savas L. “Deontic trouble in speech act botany”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 80-83.
Sayward, Charles. “Prior`s theory of truth”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 83-87.
Hochberg, Herbert. “Quantification, description, and identity”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 87-92.
Englebrestsen, George. “Morris on identity”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 92-93.
Lamrque, Peter. “The puzzle of the flash stockeman: a reply to David Lewis”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 93-95.
Broackes, Justin. “Thoughts and definitions”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 95-100.
Rea, George. “How many minds has a tredecim?” Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 100-102.
Williams, C. “Knowledge, belief and existence”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 103-110.
Nathan, N. “Evidential insatiability”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 110-115.
Leon, Mark. “Solipsism regained”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 116-120.
Wreen, Michale. “Two “by” ways”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 120-124.
Vision, Gerald. “Antiphon”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 2, New Series n. 214, AÑO, p. 124-128.

Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO
Hunt, G. “Determinism, predictability and chaos”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 129-133.
Elliot, Robert. “Moral realism and the modal argument”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 133-137.
Lee, Richard. “Williams, ought, and logical form”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 137-142.
Over, D. E. “Assumptions and the supposed counterexamples to modus ponen”s. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 142-146.
Forbes, Graeme. “Free and classical counterparts: response to Lewis”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 147-152.
Lowe, E. J. “Lewis on perdurance versus endurance”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 152-154.
Williamson, Timothy. “On Knowledge and the unknowable”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 154-158.
Kennedy, Ralph. “Salmon versus Kripke on the a priori”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 158-161.
Kvanvig, Jonathan L. “On Lemke`s defence of a causal basing requirement”. 162-167.
Montmarquet, James. “A first-person asymmetry”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 167-170.
Rasmussen, Sitg Alstrup. “Sense, reference, and meaning-incommesurability”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 170-173.
Rockingham Gill, R. R. “Frege on infinite axiom-systems”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 173-175.
Cahn, Steven M. “A puzzle concerning divestiture”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 3, New Series n. 215, AÑO, p. 175-176.

Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO
Clark, Michael. “The truth about heaps”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 177-179.
Schawartz, Stephen P. “Intuitionism and sorites”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 179-183.
Pirest, Graham. “Tense, tense and TENSE”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 184-187.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Spinks on temporal parts”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 187-188.
Oppy, Graham. “Williamson and contingent a priori”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 188-193.
Appiah, Anthony. ““If” again”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 193-199.
Teichmann, Roger. “Tu quoque”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 199-201.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Noonan”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 201-203.
Garrett, B. J. “A further reply to Noonan”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 204-206.
Lipton, Peter. “A real contrast”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 207-208.
Ehring, Douglas. “Compound emphasis and causal relata”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 209-213.
Loui, R. P. “Nozick`s acceptance rule and the lottery paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 213-215.
Doris Olin: “On an epistemic paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 216-217.
Rea, George. “A variation on Hollis` paradox”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p.

218-220.
White, Alan R. “Visualizing and imagining seeing”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 221-224.


Brennan, Andrew A. “Survival and importance”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 225-230.
Gale, Richard M. “Parfit`s arguments against partially relativized theories of rationality”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 230-236.
McGrath, P. J. “Children of a lesser God? A reply to Burke and Grisp”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 236-238.
Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Wreen”. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 238.
White, Alan R. ““By” and “by””. Analysis, v. 47, n. 4, New Series n. 216, AÑO, p. 239-240.

Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO
Editorial. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p.1
Lewis, David. “Ayer`s first empiricist criterion of meaning: Why does it Fail?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 1-3.
Hunter, Geoffrey. “Is consistency enough for existence in mathematics?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 3-5.
Rice, D. H. ““Exist” and two types of quantification”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 5-9.
Levin, Michael. “On an argument of Armstrong against Nominalism”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 9-12.
Sharlow, Mark F. “Lewis`s modal realism: a rely to Naylor”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 13-15.
Gjelsvik, Olav. “A note on objects and events”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 15-17.
Watkins, John. “The pragmatic problem of induction”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 18-20.
Double, Richard. “Fear of sphexisheness”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 20-25.
Seidel, Asher. “Searle on the biological basis of cognition”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 26-28.
Siderits, Mark. “Ehring on Parfit`s relation R”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 29-32.
Fleming, Noel. “Why is there something rather than nothing?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 32-35.
Nathan, N. M. L. “Explicability and the unpreventable”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 36-40.
Charlton, William. “Mary Mothersill on aesthetic pleasure”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 40-44.
Mellema, Gregory. “Causation, foresight and collective responsibility”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 44-50.
David Gordon: “Clark on tracing mental images”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 50-51.
Bringsjord, Selmer. “Tracing Superman again: a reply to Clark”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 52-54.
Clark, Andy. “Superman and duck/rabbit: a reply to Gordon Bringsjord”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 54-57.
Simmons, Howard “Nathan on evidential insatiability”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 57-59.
McArthur, Robert P. “Nathan on global justification”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 60-61.
Flint, Thomas P. “Williams on what the president knew”. Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 61-63.
Williams, C. J. F. “How much did the president know?” Analysis, v. 48, n. 1, New Series n. 217, AÑO, p. 64.

Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO
Cohen, L. Jonathan “Are inductions warranted?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 1-4.
Mellor, D. H. “Induction is warranted”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 5-7.
Cohen, L. Jonathan “What use are belief that we do not take to be warranted?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 7-8.
Gower, Barry. “Corroboration versus borrocoration”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 8-10.
Milne, Peter. “Schlesinger on justified belief and probability”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 11-16.
Clark, Michael. “A paradox of conditional probability”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 16-20.
Denyer, Nichola.“The principle of harmony”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 21-22.
Priest, Graham and Sylvan, Ricahrd. “Contradiction, assertion and “Frege” point”. 23-26.
Deas, Robert. “Sorensen`s sorites”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 26-31.
Rea, George. “Degrees of truth versus intuitionism”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 31-32.
Carter, W. R. “Can substantial changes be qualitative changes?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 33-35.
Arsenijevíc, Milós. “How many physically distinguished parts can a limited body contain?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 36-42.
Pettit, Philip. “Determinism with deliberation”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 42-43.
Waller, Bruce. “Denying responsibility: the difference in makes”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 44-47.
Hardin, C. L: “Idle colours and busy spectra”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 1, New Series n. 221, AÑO, p. 47-48.

Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO
Hunt, G. M. K. “Hypothesizing for testing”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 49-56.
Kukla, André “Is Al an empirical science?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 56-60.
Campbell, Randall K. “The prisoner`s dilemma and the symmetry argument for cooperation”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 60-65.
Nathan, N. “Democracy and impartiality”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 65-70.
Taylor, Paul. “Insight and metaphor”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 71-77.
Newton, Natika. “Visualizing is imagining seeing: a reply to White”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 77-81.
White, Alan R. “Imaginary imagining”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 81-83.
Moser, Paul K. “Inferential justification and Foley`s foundations”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 84-88.
Foley, Ricahrd. “Reply to Moser”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 89-92.
Dale, J. “Adams on Modus Tollens”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 93-96.

Analysis, v. 49, n. 3, New Series n. 223, Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. AÑO, p.
Over, D. E. “Vague objects and identity”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 97-99.
Sainsbury, R. M. “What is a vague object?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 99-103.
Johnsen, Bruce. “Is vague identity incoherent?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 103-112.
Burgess, J. A. “Vague identity: Evans misrepresented”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 112-119.
Haslanger, Sally. “Endurence and temporary intrinsics”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 119-125.
Baxter, Donald M. L. “Identity through time and the discernibility of identicals”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 125-131.
Ramachandran, Murali. “An alternative translation scheme for counterpart theory”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 131-141.
Tye, Michael. “Supervaluatonism and the law of excluded middle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 141-143.
Grim, Patrick and Mar, Gary. “On situations and the world”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 143-148.
Schlossberger, Eugene “Civil disobedience”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 148-153.
Gordon, David and Sadowsky, James. “Morally principled divestiture”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 153-155.
Cahn, Steven M. “A note on divestiture”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 156-157.
Rea, George. “Inexplicability and the unpreventable”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 157-158.
Watkins, Michael. “The knowledge argument against “The Knowledge Argument””. Analysis, v. 49, n. 2, New Series n. 222, AÑO, p. 158-160.

Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO
Craig, E. J. “Nozick and the sceptic: the thumbnail version”.
Yüklə 0,81 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə