Analysis Vol

Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 161-162.
Pettit, Philip and Price, Huw. “Bare functional desire”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 162-169.
Miller, Alexander “An objection to Writhg`s treatment of intention”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 169-173.
Kurkla, André and Rebecca Kurkla: “Meaning holism and itentiona psychology”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 173-175.
Ehring, Douglal. “The “only t<sub>1</sub> though t<sub>2</sub>” principle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 176-177.
Lowe, E. J. “Impredicative identity criteria and Davidson`s criterion of event identity”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 178-181.
Hincliff, Mark. “Plantinga`s defence of seious actualism”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 182-185.
Bringsjord, Selmer. “Grim on logic and omniscience”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 186-189.
Dale, J and Tanesini, A. “Why are Italians more reasonable than Australians?” Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 189-194.
Rowlands, Mark N. J. “Property exemplification and proliferation”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 194-197.
Owens, David. “Disjunctive Laws. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 197-202.
Bamford, Greg. “Watkins and the pragmatic problem of induction”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 203-205.
Beck, Simon. “Parfit and the Russians”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 205-209.
Waller, Bruce N. “Uneven starts and just deserts”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 209-213.
McMahon, Christopher. “The better endowed and the difference principle”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 213-216.
Rainbolt, George W. “Gauther on Cooperating in prisoner`s dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 216-220.
Broome, John. “An economic Newcomb problem”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 220-222.
McCall, Storrs and Armstrong, D. M. “God`s lottery”. Analysis, v. 49, n. 4, New Series n. 224, AÑO, p. 223-224.

Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO
Drange, Theodore M. “Liar syllogisms”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 1-7.
Hazen, Allen. “A variation on a paradox”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 7-8.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Moor, James and Fogelin, Robert. “A defence of modus tollens”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 9-16.
Teichmann, Roger. “Actually”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 16-19.
Branquinho, Joâo. “Are Salmon`s “guises” disguised Fregean senses?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 19-24.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Honderich on the indispensability of the mental”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 24-28.
Smilansky, Saul. “Van Inwagen on the “obviousness” of libertarian moral responsibility”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 29-33.
White, V. Alan. “How to Mind one`s Ethics: a reply to van Inwagen”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 33-35.
Archard, David. “Paternalism defined”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 36-42.
Kraemer, E. R. “Is the best really necessary?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 42-43.
Schwartz, Stephen P. “Intuitionism versus degrees of truth”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 43-46.
Perez Laraudogottia, Jon. “A doxastic paradox”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 1, New Series n. 225, AÑO, p. 47-48.

Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO
Hollis, Martin. “Moves and motives in the games we play”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 49-62.
Blackburn, Simon. “Filling in space”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 62-65.
Papineau, David. “Why supervenience?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 66-71.
Ray, Christopher. “Paradoxical tasks”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 71-74.
Morton, Adam. “Double conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 75-79.
Lowe, E. J. “Conditionals, context and transitivity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 80-87.
Bennett, Jonathan. “Why is belief involuntary?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 87-107.
Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip. “Program explanation: a general perspective”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 107-117.
Ben-Zeev, Aaron. “Why did Psammenitus not pity his son?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 118-126.
Kapitan,Tomis. “Action, uncertainty and divine impotence”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 127-133.
Jackson, Frank. “Classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 2, New Series n. 226, AÑO, p. 134-147.

Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO
Whyte, J. T. “Success semantics”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 149-157.
Noonan, Harold W. “Vaguer identity yet again”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 157-162.
Ramachandran, Murali. “Contingent identity in counterpart theory”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 163-166.
Forbes, Graeme. “Counterparts, logic and metaphysics: reply to Ramachandran”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 167-173.
Ramachandra, Murali. “Unsuccessful revisions of CCT”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 173-177.
Gillon, Brendan S. “Truth theoretical semantics and ambiguity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 178-181.
Percival, Philip. “Fitch and intuitionistic knowability”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 182-187.
D. S. Clarke, Jr.: “Two uses of “know”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 188-190.
Mendola, Joseph. “Intending and motivation”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 190-193.
Mele, Alfred R. “Intending and motivation: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 194-197.
Barnes, Annette. “When do we deceive others?” Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 197-202.
Hartogh den, Govertg. “Rationality in conversation and neutrality on politics”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 202-205.
Shiner, Roger A. “The divestiture puzzle dissolved” Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 205-210.
Watkins, John. “The pragmatic problem of induction: a reply to Gower and Bamford”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 3, New Series n. 227, AÑO, p. 210-212.

Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990
Graid, Edward. “Davidson and the sceptic: the thumbnail version”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 213-214.
Dudman, V. H. “Grammar, semantics and conditionals”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 214-224.
Crane, Tim. “An alleged analogy between numbers and propositions”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 224-230.
Cam, Philip. “Insularity and the persistence of perceptual illusion”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 231-235.
Slezak, Pete. “Reinterpreting images”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 235-243.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Externalism and experience”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 244-250.
Mele, Alfred R. “He wants to try”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 251-253.
Norcross, Alastair. “Consequentialism and the unforeseeable future”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 253-256.
Smilansky, Saul. “Utilitarianism and the “punishment” of the innocent: the general problem”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 256-261.
Adler, Jacob. “Murphy and mercy”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 262-268
Ehring, Douglas. “Nonbranching and nontransitivity”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 268-271.
Grim, Patrick. “On omniscience and a “set of all truths”: a reply to Bringsjord”. Analysis, v. 50, n. 4, New Series n. 228, 1990, p. 271-276.

Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991
Harold W. Noonan: Object-depedent thoughts and psychological redundancy. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 1-9.
Michael McKinsey: Ant-individualism and privileged access. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 9-16.
Rrobert Kirk: Why shouldn`t we be able to solve the mind-body problem? Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 17-23.
Cynthia McDonald and Graham MacDonald: Mental causation and non-reductive monism. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 23-31.
Tim Crane: Why indeed? Papineau on supervenience. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 32-37.
David Papineau: The reason why: response to Crane. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 37-40.
Daniel Seymour: Remnants of schiffer`s principle (P). Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 40-43.
Rod Bertolet: Salmon on the a priori. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 443-48.
Eugene Mills: Forbes`s branching conception of possible worlds. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 48-50.
Richard B. Miller: Reply of a Mad Dog. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 50-54.
Emilio Kosrovani: Hornsby`s puzzles: rejoinder to Wreen and Hornsby. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 55-61.
Anthony Brueckner: Unfa5ri to Nozick. Analysis, v. 51, n. 1, New Series n. 229, 1991, p. 61-63.

Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991
Whyte, J.T. “The normal rewards of success”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 65-73.
McCulloch, Gregory. “Making sense of words”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 63-78.
Sartorelli, Joseph. “McGinn on concept skepticism and Kripke`s skeptical argument”. 79-84.
Neville Kemp, G. “Metaphor and aspect-perception”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 84-90.
Casati, Robert and Dokig, Jérôme. “Brainsd in a vat, language and metalanguage”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 91-93.
Seager, William. “Disjuntive laws and supervenience”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 93-98.
Foley, Richard. “Evidence and reasons for belief”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 98-102.
Philip Goggans: “Epistemic obligations and doxastic voluntarism”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 102-105.
Neil, Alex and Ridley, Aaron. “Burning passions”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 106-108.
Adams, Frederick. “He doesn`t really want to try”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 109-112.
Cahn, Steven M. “Principled divestiture and moral integrity”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 2, New Series n. 230, 1991, p. 112.

Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991
Cubitt, Robin P. and Hollis, Martin. “The mutual investment game: peculiarities of indifference”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 113-119.
Schlesinger, George N. “The credibility of extraordinary events”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 120-126.
Lowe, E. J. “Jackson on classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 126-130.
Dudman, V. H. “Jackson classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 131-136.
Jackson, Frank. “Classifying conditionals II”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 137-143.
Williams, C. J. F. “You and she”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 143-146.
Slateer, B. H. “Lair syllogisms and related paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 146-153.
Oderberg, David S. “A paradox about authority”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 153-160.
Mason, Andrew. “Community and autonomy: logically incompatible values?” Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 160-165.
Honderich, Ted. “Better the Union Theory”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 166-173.
Jordan, Jeff. “Duff and the Wager”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 174-176.
Correction. Analysis, v. 51, n. 3, New Series n. 231, 1991, p. 176.

Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991
Reimer, Marga. “Do demonstrattions have semantic significance?” Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 177-183.
Jones, O. R. “Moore`s paradox, assertion and knowledge”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 183-186.
Heller, Mark. “Indication and what might have been”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 187-191.
Lowe, E. J. “One-level versus two- level identity criteria”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 192-194.
Williamson, Timothy. “Fregean directions”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 194-195.
Genova, C. “Craug on Davidson: a thumbnail refutation”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 195-198.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The omniscient interpreter reides again”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 199-205.
Everitt, Nicholas. “Strawson on laws and regularities”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 206-208.
Strawson, Galen. “The contingent reality of antural necessity”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 209-213.
Irzik, Gürol. “Armstrong`s account of probabilistic laws”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 214-217.
McGinn, Maire.“Westphal on the physical basis of colour incompatibility”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 218-222.
Widerker, David, “Frankfurt on “Ought implies Can” and alternative possibilities”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 222-224.
Mele, Alfred R. “He wants to try again: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 225-228.
Correction, Announcement. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 229.
COMPETITION SUPPLEMENT
J Whyte,. T. “Competition report”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 231-235.
Crane, Tim. “Coherence and the causation of beliefs”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 235-243.
Shiffrin, Seana. “All God has to do”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 244-254.
Hajek, Alan. “Moral autonomy and agent-centred options”. Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 254-264.
Sider, Theodorore R. “Might theory X be a theory of diminishing marginal value?” Analysis, v. 51, n. 4, New Series n. 232, 1991, p. 265-271.

Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995
Analyst announcement.1.
Arló Costa, Horacio, Collins, John & Levi, Isaac. “Desire-as-belief implies oponionation or indifference”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p.2-5.
Broome, John. “The two-envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 6-11.
Landesma, Cliff. “When to teminate a charitable trust?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 12-13.
Noonan, Harold W. “E. J. Lowe: on vague identity and quantum indeterminacy”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 14-19.
French, Steven & Krause, Décio. “Vague identity and quantum non-individuality”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 20-26.
Weir, Alan. “Gruesome perceptual spaces”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 27-36.
Divers, John & Miller, Alexander “Platitudes and attitudes: a minimalist conception of belief”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 37-44.
Ludlow, Peter. “Externalism, self-knowledge, naf the prevalence of slow switching”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 45-49.
Brock, Gillian. “Is redistribution to help the needy unjust?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 50-59.
New, Christopher. “Punishing times: reply to Smilansky”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 1, New Series n. 245, 1995, p. 60-62.

Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995
Hale, Bob. “Modal fictionalims - a simple dilemma”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 63-67.
Rosen, Gideon. “Modal fictionalism fixed”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 67-73.
Hale, Bob. “A desperate fix”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 74-80.
Edwards, Jim. “Modal fictionalism cannot deliver possible world semantics”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 81-89.
Tennant, Neil .“On negation, truth na dwarranted assertibility”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 90-97.
Hazen, P. “Is even minimal negation constructive?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 98-104.
Yaffe, Gideon. “Velleman on intentions as reasons for action”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 105-107.
Smilansky, Saul. “May we stop worrying about blackmail?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 107-115.
Mateavers, Derek. “Beliefs and fictional narrators”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 116-120.
McGrew, Tim. “Two cheers for Bayes`s theorem”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 121-125.
Tye, Michael. “What what it`s like is really life”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 2, New Series n. 246, 1995, p. 125-126.

Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995
Melia, Joseph. “The significance of non-standard models”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 127-134.
Daly, Chris. “Does physicalism need fixing?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 135-141.
Pettit, Philip. “Microphysicalism, dottism and reduction”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 141-146.
Brueckner, Anthony. “The characteristic thesis of anti-individualism”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 146-148.
Brown, Jessica. “The incompatibility of anti-individualism and privileged access”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 149-156.
Ludlow, Peter. “Social externalism, selg-knowledge, and memory”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 157-159.
Dodd, Jualin. “MCDowell and identity theories of truth”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 160-165.
Denkel, Arda. “Theon`s tale: Does a Cambridge change result in a substantial change?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 166-170.
Lowe, E. J. “Coinciding objects: In defence of the “standard account”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 171-178.
Lowe, E. J. “The problem of the many and the vagueness of constitution”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 179-182.
Keeffe, Rosanna. “Contingent identity and vague identity”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 183-190.
O`Leary-Haethorne, John. “The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indescernibles”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 191-196.
Hardy, James. “Is Yablo`s paradox Liar-like?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 197-198.
Tennant, Neil. “On paradox without self-reference”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 199-207.
Schlesinger, George N. “Measuring degress of confirmation”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 208-212.
Milne, Peter. “A Bayesian defence of Popperian science?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 213-215.
Cargile, James. “Justificaiton and misleading defeaters”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 216-220.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Dying quickly but painfully”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 3, New Series n. 247, 1995, p. 221-222.

Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995
Melia, Joseph. “On what there`s not”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 223-229.
Kukla, André. “Scientifc realism and theoretical unification”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 230-238.
Papineau, David. “Prababilities and the many minds interpretaiton of quantum mechanics”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 239-246.
Markosian, Ned. “On the arguemnt from quantum cosmology against theism”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 247-251.
Byron, Michael. “Rationality is not fair”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 252-260.
Davenport, John. “Deontology and Alan Donagan`s problem of exception-rules”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 261-270.
Ruse, Michael. “Gay rights and affirmative action: a reponse to Satrelli”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 271-274.
Carlson, Reik. “Brink`s and Pietroski`s obligaton execution principle”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 275-279.
Gillon, Brendan S. “Peirce`s challenge to material implication as a model of “if”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 280-282.
Ramachandran, Murali. “Bach on behalf of Russell”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 283-287.
Ganeri, Jonardon. “Contextually incomplete descriptions – a new counterexample to Russell?” Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 287-290.
Stanley, Jason & Williamson, Timothy. “Quantifiers and context-dependence”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 291-295.
Lau, Joe. “Pietroski on possible worlds semantics for belief sentences”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 295-298.
Sheldon Davies, Paul. “Defending” proper functions”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 299-305.
Merricks, Trenton. “On behalf of the coherentist”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 306-309.
McNamara, Paul. “The confinement problem: how to terminate your Mon with her trust”. Analysis, v. 55, n. 4, New Series n. 248, 1995, p. 310-313.