Analysis Vol

Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996
Smiley, Timothy. “Rejection”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 1-9.
Weir, Alan. “Ultramaximalist minimalism!” Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 10-22.
Nolan, Daniel & O`leary-Hawthorne, John. “Reflexive fictionalisms”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 23-32.
Hazen, P. “Worlds as complete novels” Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 33-38.
Williamson, Timothy. “Writh on the epistemic conception of vagueness”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 39-45.
Holton, Richard. “Davidson, McFetridge, and the counting problem”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 46-50.
Sorensen, Roy A. “Unbeggable questions”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 51-55.
Belzer, Marvin. “Notes on Relation R”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 1, New Series n. 249, 1996, p. 56-62.

Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996
Kennatt, Jenette & Smith, Michael. “Frog and Toad lose control”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 63-73.
Kirk, Robert. “Why ultra-extenalism goes too far”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 73-79.
Adler, Jonathan E. “An overlooked argument for epistemic conservatism”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 80-84.
Predelli, Stefano. “Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 85-91.
Schiffer, Stephen. “The hiddden-indexical theory`s logical –from problem: a rejoinder”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 92-97.
Ludlow, Peter. “The adicity of “believes” and the hidden indexical theory”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 97-101.
Kapitan, Tomis. “Incompatibilism and ambiguity in the practical modalities”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 102-110.
Qoward-Snyder, Frances. “A new argument for consequentialism? A rely to Sinnott-Armstrong”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 111-115.
Broome, John. “More pain or less?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 116-118.
Klein, Peter & Warfield, Ted A. “No hellp for the coherentist”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 118-121.
Cade Hetherington, Stephen. “Foley`s evidence and his epistemic reasons”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 2, New Series n. 250, 1996, p. 122-126.

Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996
Forrest, Peter. “How innocent is mereology?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 127-131.
Reimer, Marga. “Quotation marks: demonstratives or demonstrations?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 131-141.
Cogan, Ross. Opting out: “Bennett on classifying conditionals”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 142-145.
Butler, Keith. “Content, computation, and individualism in vision theory”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 146-154.
Swanton, Christine. “Is the moral problem solved?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 155-160.
Smith, Michael. “Normative reasons and full rationality: reply to Swanton”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 160-168.
Miller, Alexander. “An objection to Smith`s argument for internalism”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 169-174.
Smith, Michael. “The argument for internalism: a reply to Miller”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 175-184.
Graham, Keith. “Voting and motivation”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 3, New Series n. 251, 1996, p. 184-190.
Correction 190.

Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996
O`Leary-Hawthorne, John & Pettit, Philip. “Strategies for free will compatibilists”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 191-201.
Williamson, Timothy. “Self-knowledge and embedded operators”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 202-209.
Barker, Stephen. “Parsing if-sentences and the conditions of sentencehood”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 210-218.
Ganeri, Jonardon, Noordhof, Paul & Ramachandran, Murali. “Counterfactuals and preemptive caustion”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 219-225.
Oppy, Grahn. “Gödelian ontological argument”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 226-230.
Baldwin, Thomas. “There might be nothing”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 231-238.
Dodd, Julian. “Countering the counting problem: a reply to Holton”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 239-245.
Rumfitt, Ian. “The vagaries of paraphrase: a reply to Holton on the counting problem”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 246-250.
Frankish, Keith. “How should we revise the paratactic theory?” Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 251-262.
Moser, Paul K. “Physicalism and mental causes: contra Papineau”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 263-267.
Tidman, Paul. “Critical reflection: an alleged epistemic duty”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 268-276.
Steup, Mathias. “Tidman on critical reflection”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 277-281.
Stoljar, Daniel. “What what it`s like isn`t like”. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 281-283.
Index to Volume 56. Analysis, v. 56, n. 4, New Series n. 252, 1996, p. 284

Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997
Levey, Samuel. “Coincidence and principles of composition”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 1-10.
Burke, Michael B. “Coinciding objects: reply to Lowe and Denkel”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 11-18.
Zimmerman, Dean W. “Coincident objects: could a “stuff ontology” help?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 19-27.
McGrew, Timothy J., Shier, David & Silverstein, Harry S. “The two-envelope paradox resolved”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 28-33.
Scott, Alexander D. & Scott, Michael. “What`s in the two envelope paradox?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 34-41.
Arntzenius, Frank & McCarthy, David. “The two envelope paradox and infinite expectations”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 42-50.
Davies, David. “Why one shouldn`t make an example of a brain in a vat”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 51-59.
Laurence, Stephen & Margolis, Eric. “Regress arguments against the language of thought”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 60-66.
Miller, Richard W. “Extenalist self-knowledge and the scope of the a priori”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 67-75.
Milne, Peter. “Quick triviality proofs for probabilities of conditionals”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 75-80.
Achinstein, Peter. “On Evidence: a reply to McGrew”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 81-83.
Whyte, J. T. “Success again: replies to Brandom and Godfrey-Smith”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 84-88.
Lowe, E. J. “Reply to Noonan on vague identity”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 88-91.
Vallicella, William F. “Bundles and indiscenibility: a reply to O`Leary-Hawthorne”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 1, New Series n. 253, 1997, p. 91- 94.

Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997
Markosian, Ned. “The paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 95-97.
Sider, Theodore. “On the paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 97-101.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Substitution and simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 102-108.
Forbes, Graeme. “How much substitutivity?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 109-113.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Reply to Forbes”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 114-118.
Mele, Alfred R. “Underestimating self-control: Kennett and Smith on Frog and Toad”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 119-123.
Kennett, Jeanette & Smith, Michael. “Synchronic self-control is always non-actional”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 123-131.
Greene, Richard & Balmert, N. A. “Two notions of warrant and Plantinga`s solution to the Gettier problem”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 132-139.
Plantinga, Alvin. “Warrant and accidentally true belief”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 140-145.
Girm, Patrick. “Worlds by supervenience: some further pfoblems”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 146-151.
Edwards, Jim. “Is Tennant selling truth short?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 2, New Series n. 254, 1997, p. 152-158.

Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “There might be nothing: the subtraction argument improved”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 159-166.
Braddon-Mitchell, David & Nola, Robert. “Ramsification and Glymour`s counterexample”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 167-169.
Carroll, John W. “Lipton on compatible contrasts”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 170-178.
Bovens, Luc. “The backwards induction argument for the finite iterated prisoner`s dilemma and the surprise exam paradox”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 179-186.
Lillehammer, Hallvard. “Smith on moral fetishism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 187-195.
Garvey, James. “What does McGinn think we cannot know?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 196-201.
Juhl, Cory F. “A context-sensitive liar”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 202-204.
Clark, Michael. “Truth and success: Searle`s attack on minimalism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 205-209.
Tappolet, Christine. “Mixed inferences: a problem for pluralism about truth predicates”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 209-210.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Self-ascription, self-knowledge, and the memory argument”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 211-219.
Yujen Teng, Normas. “Sorensen on begging the question”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 3, New Series n. 255, 1997, p. 220-222.

Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997
Rumfitt, Ian. “The categoricity problem and truth-value gaps”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 223-235.
Priest, Graham. “Yablo`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 236-242.
Hazen, P. “Relations in Lewis`s framework without atoms”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 243-248.
Oppy, Graham. “Countable fusion not yet proven guilty: it may be the Witeheadian account of space whatdunnit”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 249-253.
Ehring, Douglas. “Lew, temporary intrinsics and momentary tropes”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 254-258.
Burgess, J. A. “What is minimalism about truth?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 259-267.
Dodd, Julian. “On a Davidsonian objection to minimalism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 267-272.
Adams, Fred & Aizawa, Ken. “Rock beats scissors: historical fights back”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 273-281.
Warfield, Ted A. “Externalism, privileged self-knowledge, and the irrelevance of slow switching”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 282-284.
Ludlow, Peter. “On the relevance of slow switching”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 285-286.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Is scepticism about self-Knowledge incoherent?” Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 287-290.
Lane Graig, William. “Hartle-Hawking cosmology and atheism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 291-295.
Smith, Quentin. “Quantum cosmology`s implication of atheism”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 295-304.
Deltete, Robert J. & Guy, Reed A. “Hartle-Hawking cosmology and unconditional probabilities”. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 304-315.
Index to Volume 57. Analysis, v. 57, n. 4, New Series n. 256, 1997, p. 316.

Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998
Hurley, S. L. “Vehicles, contents, conceptual structure, and externalism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 1-6.
Clark, Andy & Chalmers, David. “The extended mind”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 7-19.
Hill, Christopher S. “Chalmers on the apriority of modal knowledge”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 20-26.
MavBride, Fraser. “On how we know what there is”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 27-37.
Byrne, Alex & Hall, Ned. “Against the PCA-analysis”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 38-44.
Ganeri, Jonardon, Noordhof, Paul & Ramachandran, Murali. “For a (revised) PCA-analysis”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 45-47.
Paul, L. A. “Problems with late pre-emption”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 48-53.
McFarland, Duncan. “Crane on concepts and experiential content”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 54-58.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reflection on Putnam, Wright and brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 1, New Series n. 257, 1998, p. 59-62.

Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998
Melia, Joseph. “Field`s programme: some interference”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 63-71.
Baldwin, Thomas. “Modal fictionalism and the imagination”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 72-75.
McFarlnad, Duncan & Miller, Alexander. “Jackson on colour as a primary quality”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 76-85.
Jackson, Frank. “Colour, disjunctions, programming”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 86-88.
Reimer, Marga. “Donnellan`s distinction/Kripke`s test”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 89-100.
Hawley, Katherine. “Indeterminism and indeterminacy”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 101-106.
Predelli, Stefano “I am not here now”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 107-115.
McGrath, Matthew. “Van Inwagen`s critique of universalism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 116-121.
Lane Craig, William. “McTaggart`s paradox and the problem of temporary intrinsics”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 122-127.
Copeland, B. Jack. “Turing`s O-machines, Searle, Penrose and brain”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 128-138.
Daniel, Steven G. “A defence of Papineau and mental causes”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 139-145.
Silverstein, Harry S. “More pain or less? Comments on Broome”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 146-151.
Norcross, Alstai.r “Great harms form small benefits grow: how death can be outweighed by headaches”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 152-158.
Hanser, Matthew. “A puzzle about beneficence”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 159-165.
Holtug, Nils. “Egalitarianism and the levelling down objection”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 2, New Series n. 258, 1998, p. 166-174.

Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Mellor`s facts and chances of causations”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 175-181.
Beebee, Helen. “Do causes raise the chances of effects?” Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 182-190.
Paul, L. A. “Keeping track of the time: emending the counterfactual analysis of causation”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 191-198.
Hájek, Alan “Agnosticism meets Bayesianism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 199-206.
Monton, Bradley. “Bayesian agnosticism and constructive empiricism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 207-212.
Fraassen, Bas van. “The agnostic subtly probabilified”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 212-220.
Tennant, Neil. “The full price of truth”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 221-228.
Crlson, Erick. “Fischer on backtracking and Newcomb`s problem”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 229-231.
Borg, Emma. “Semantic category and surface form”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 3, New Series n. 259, 1998, p. 232-238.

Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998
Jackson, Frank & Pettit, Philip. “A problem for expressivism”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 239-251.
Bartha, Paul & Savitt, Steven F. “Second-guessing second nature”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 252-263.
Knowles, Janthan. The language of thought and natural language understanding” Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 264-272.
Elder, Crawford L. “What sensory signals are about”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 273-276.
Dudman, V. H. “On the grammar of conditionals: reply to Brker”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 277-285.
Fogelin, Robert J. “David Lewis on indicative and counterfactual conditionals”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 286-289.
Barker, Stephen J. “Predetermination and tense probabilism. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 290-296.
Rickless, Samuel C. “The semantic function of chained pronouns”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 297-304.
Mele, Alfred R. “Synchronic self-control revisited: Frog and Toad shape up”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 305-310.
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Internalism and the explanation of belief/motivation changes”. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 311-315.
Index to Volume 58. Analysis, v. 58, n. 4, New Series n. 260, 1998, p. 316.

Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999
Priest, Graham. “On a version of one of Zeno`s paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 1-2.
Williamson, Timothy. “A note on truth, satisfaction and the empty domain”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 3-8.
Richard Holton: “Dispositions all the way round”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 9-14.
Stanley, Jason. “Understanding, context-relativity, and the Description Theory”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 14-18.
Ehring,Douglas. “Tropeless in Seattle: the cure for insomnia”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 19-24.
Spurrett, David & Papineau, David. “A note on the completeness of “physics”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 25-29.
Warfield, Ted A. “Searle`s causal powers”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 29-32.
Shafer-Landau, Russ. “Moral judgement and normative reasons”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 33-40.
Hanser, Matthew. “Interfering with aid”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 41-47.
Nuccetelli, Susana. “What anti-individualists cannot know a priori”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 48-51.
Brown, Jessica. “Boghossian on externalism and privileged access”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 52-59.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Difficulties in generating scepticism about knowledge of content”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 1, New Series n. 261, 1999, p. 59-62.

Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999
Cohen, Jonathan. “Holism: some reasons for buyre`s remorse”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 63-71.
Heal, Jane. “Thoughts and holism”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 71-78.
Cohen, Jonathan. “Holism, thought, and the fate of metaphysics: counter-reply to Heal”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 79-85.
Forbes, Graem. “Enlightened semantics for simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 86-91.
Moore, Joseph G. “Saving substitutivity in simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 91-105.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Substitution, simple sentences, and sex scandals”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 106-112.
Predelli, Stefano. “Saul, Salmon, and Superman”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 113-116.
Clark, Michael. “Recalcitrant variants of the liar paradox”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 2, New Series n. 262, 1999, p. 117-126.

Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999
Noordhof, Paul. “Moral requirements are still not rational requirements”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 127-136.
Sobel, David. “Do the desires of rational agents converge?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 137-147.
Poidevin, Robin Le. “Can beliefs be caused by their truth-makers?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 148-156.
Rice, Hugh. “David Lewis`s awkward cases of redundant causation”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 157-164.
Percival, Philip. “A note on Lewis on counterfactual dependence in a chancy world”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 165-173.
Mormann, Thomas. “Nither merelogy nor Whiteheadian account of space yet convicted”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 174-182.
Stoneham, Tom. “Logical form and thought content”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 183-185.
Cross, Charles B. “Coherence and truth conducive justification”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 186-193.
Hetherington, Stephen. “Epistemic disaster averted”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 194-200.
Rea, Michael C. “McGrath on Universalism”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 201-204.
Garrett, Brian. “A sceptical tension”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 205-206.
Sawyer, Sarh. “My language disquotes”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 206-211.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Word-ambiguity, world-switching, and knowledge of content: reply to Brueckner”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 212-217.
Yaffe, Gideon.““Ought” implies “can” and the principle of alternate possibilities”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 3, New Series n. 263, 1999, p. 218-222.

Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999
Waller, Bruce N. “Deep thinkers, cognitive misers, and moral responsibility”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 223-229.
Bovens, Luc. “The two faces of akratics anonymous”.