Analysis Vol
Yüklə 0,81 Mb.
|
| Woodruff, Paul. “What`s wrong with discrimination?” Analysis, v. 36, n.3, New Series n. 171, 1976, p. 158-160.
Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976 Anscombe, G. E. M. “On frustration of the majority by fulfilment of the majority`s will”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 161-168. Crocker, Lawrence. “Egoistic hedonism”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 168-176. Werner, Richard. “Hare on abortion”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 177-181. Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Prior on propositional identity”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 182-184. Tiles, J. E. “Davidson`s criterion of event identity”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 185-187. Noonan, H. W. “Sentences and names in Frege”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 188-190. Robins, Michael H. “Promissory obligations and Rawls`s contractarianism”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 190-198. Holmes, Robert L. “Philippa Foot on hypothetical imperatives”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 199-200. Odegard, Douglas. “On a priori contingency”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 201-203. Stone, John David. “A formalization of Geach`s antinomy”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 203-207. Brown, James M. “Bernays`s non-circular poof of the non-independence of the fourth axiom of Principia Mathematica”. Analysis, v. 36, n. 4, New Series n. 172, 1976, p. 207-208. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976 Godfrey-Smith, William. “Names, indices and individuals”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 1-10. Haksar, Vinit. “The alleged paradox of democracy”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 10-14. Nerlich, Graham. “Quine`s ‘real ground’ ” Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 15-19. Corrigendum. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 19. Holt, P. J. “Causality and our conception of matter”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 20-29 Bertolet, R. J. “On the merits of entrenchment”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 29-31. Noonan, H. W. “The four-dimensional world”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 32-39. Fumerton, R. A. “Chandler on the contingently possible”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 39-40. Braude, Stephen E. “Tenses and meaning change”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 41-44. Cohen, Michael. “Assertion: a reply to Brooks”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 1, New Series n. 173, 1976, p. 44-45.
Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977 Postow, B. C. “Generalized act utilitarianism”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 49-52. Matthews, Gareth B. “Surviving as”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 53-58. Derkesen, A. “A muddle in White`s modal thinking”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 59-67. Hyslop, Alec. “Girice without an audience”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 67-69. Cahn, Stephen M. “Cacadaemony”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 69-73. Woodruff, Paul. T”he bystander paradox”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 74-78. McGinn, Colin. “Anamalous monism and Kripke`s Cartesian intuitions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 78-80. Leahy, M. “Lies, damned lies, and Miss Anscombe”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 80-81. Dancy, Jonathan. “The logical conscience”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 81-84. Kraemer Russert, Eric. “Conjunctive properties and scientific realism”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 85-86. Sainsbury, R. M. “Semantics by proxy”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 2, New Series n. 174, 1977, p. 86-96. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. Analysis competition. “Problem Nº 16”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 97. White, Michael J. “Plantinga and the actual world”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 97-104. Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Prior`s theory of propositions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 104-112. Fulmer, Gilbert. “The concept of the supernatural”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 113-116. Nathan, N. M. L. “What vitiates an infinite regress of justification?” Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 116-126. Strom, James J. “On squaring some circles of logic”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 127-129. New, Christopher. “Implicit bargaining and moral beliefs”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 130-133. Devereux, Daniel. “Artifacts, natural objects, and works of art”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 134-136. Kirk, Robert. “More on Quine`s reasons for indeterminacy of translation”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 136-141. Wheeler, Arthur M. “Prima facie and actual duty”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 3, New Series n. 175, 1977, p. 142-144. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977 William, Bernard. “Report on Analysis problem nº 15”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 145. Osborn, D. A. “On deciphering the tables”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 145-146. Karmo, Toomas. “Disturbances” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 147-148. Bench-Capon, T. “A note on Mr. Karmo`s disturbances”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 148-149. Freeman, James B. “A caution on propositional indentity”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 149-151. Casullo, Albert. “Kripke on the a priori and necessary”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 152-159. Martinich, P. “The attributive use of proper names”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 159-163. Noonan, H. W. “An argument of Aristotle on non-contradiction”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 13-169. Grim, Patrick. “Further notes on functions”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 169-176. Hornsby, Jennifer. “Saying of”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 177-185. Frey, R. G. “Animal rights”. Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 186-189. Tienson, John. “Can things of different natural kids be exactly alike?” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 190-197. McLanchlan, Hugh V. “Must we accept either the conservative or the liberal view on abortion?” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 197-204. Quest, Edward. “Whatever arises from a just distribution by just steps is itself just” Analysis, v. 37, n. 4, New Series n. 176, 1977, p. 204-208. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978 Editorial. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p.1. Thalberg, Irving. “The irreducibility of events”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 1-9. Measor, Nicholas. “Frege, Dummett and the Philistines”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 10-16. Locke, Con. “How to make a Mewcomb choice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 17-23. Holland, Alan. “Carnap on Frege on indirect reference”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 24-32. Jamieson, Dale and Regan, Tom. “Animal rights: a reply to Frey”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 32-36. Simon, Robert L. “Statistical justifications of discrimination”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 37-42. Griffin, Nicholas. “An invalid epistemological argument against”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 42-45. Gorman, J. L. “A problem in the justification of democracy”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 46-50. Jensen, Henning. “Rudinow and Sikora on art-critical concepts”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 51-56. Brooks, D. “Assertions: a reply to Cohen”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 56-58. King-Farlow, John. “Cacodaemony and devilish isomorphism”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 59-61. Steiner, Hillel. “The distribution game”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 61-62. Woodruff, Paul. “Unfair to groups: a reply to Kleinberg”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 1, New Series n. 176, 1978, p. 62-64. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978 Problem n° 17: Analysis, competition. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 65. Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “The power of Russell´s criticism of Frege”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 65-77. Bauerle, Rainer. “Fugitive proposition again”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 78-80. Schlossberger, Egune. “Similirity and Counterfactuals”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 80-82. McMichael, Alan. “Too much of a good thing: a problem in doontic logic”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 83-83. Lewis, David. “Reply to McMichael”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 85-86. Harrison, Jonathan. “Heir of Frankenstein”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 87-91. D. S. Clarke, Jr. “The addressing function of “T” ”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 91-93. Keating, B. F. “Blackburn on the intersubstitutibility of proper names”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 94-98. Dale, A. J. “Refernce, truth-funcionality and causal sentences”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 99-106. Haven, Steven De. “Descartes, Frankfurt and uncelmen”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 107-109. Boer, Steven E. “The irrelevance of the Free will defence”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 2, New Series n. 178, 1978, p. 110-112. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978 Butler, Ronald J. “Apology”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 113. Ross, David. “Report on Analysis, problem N°16”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 113-114. Russert Kramer, Eric. “He loads the gun, nor the dice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 114-115. Lowe, E. J. “Itentional action, chance and control”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 115-116. Bjuröf, Thomas. “Neither intentional nor unintentional”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 116-118. Peacocke, Christopher. “A note on logical constans”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 119-121. O´Neil, Richard. “A reply to Bjurlöf´s objection”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 122-124. Simons, Peter M. “Killing, letting die, and justice”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 124-125. White, Alan. R. “Alewy on C. I. Lewis and entailment”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 126-129. White, Alan R. “Aquiring and possessing knowledge”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 129-131. Mcharry, John D. “A theodicy”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 132-134. King, John L. “Chandler on contingent identity”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 135-136. Montnarquet, James. “Actions and bidily movements”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 137-140. Woodfiel Andrew. “Identity theories and the arguments from epistemic counterparts”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 140-143. McGim, Colin. “Reply to Woodfield”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 144-146. Clarck, Stephen R. L. “Animal wrongs”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 147-149. Bradley, M. C. “More on kirk and Quine on undeletermintion and indenterminacy”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 150-159. Ackerman, Inge, Akerman, Robert and Hendricks, Betty. “Wittegenstein´s fairy tale”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 3, New Series n. 179, 1978, p. 159-160. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978 Simons, Peter M. “Logic and common nouns”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 161-167. Noonan, H. W. “Count nouns and mass nouns”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 167-172. Baldwin, Thomas. “Kripke, pseudo-Kripke, and Wallece”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 173-181. Hadley, Robert F. “Possibility, neccessity and logical truth”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 182-186. Postow, B.C. “Rule utilitarianism in patial compliance theory”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 187-193. Primorac, Igor. “Utilitarianism and self-sacrifice of the innocent”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 194-199. Lovelace, Dave. “A note on the “bystander paradox” ”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 199-200. Woodfield, Andrew. “Relojainder to mcGinn”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 201-203. Geach, P. T. “Russell on denoting”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 204-205. Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “Reply to Ceach”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 206-207. Evans, Gareth. “Can there be vague objects?”. Analysis, v. 38, n. 4, New Series n. 180, 1978, p. 208. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979 Allen Hazen. “One of the truths about actuality”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 1-3. Brade, Michael. “Pragmatism and internal realism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 4-10. Feldman, Richard H. and Wierenga, Edward. “Thalberg on the irreducibility of events”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 11-16. Spector, Arnold. “Assertions plain and coloured”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 17-20. Gibbins, Peter. “Material implications, the sufficcency contion, and conditional proof”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 21-24. Burch, Robert. “Plantinga and leibniz´s Lapse”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 24-29. Clarck, Michael. “Lewy´s conjectures about tautological entailment”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 30-34. Hazen, Allen and Slote, Michael”. “Even if”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 35-38. Steiner, Mark. “Cartesian seepticism and epistemic logic”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 38-41. Odegard, Douglas. “Alston and self-warrant”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 42-44. Pontow, A. C. Dishonest relativism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 45-48. Gallois, André. “How not to make a Newcomb choise”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 49-53. Robertson, Johan. “Woodruff on reverse discrimination”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 54-57. Coughlan, M. J. “Moral evil without consequences?”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 58-60. Pariches, Georg E. “Being a free to and being a fice”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 61-63. Austin, A. K. “The unexpected examination”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 1, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 63-64. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979 Problem N° 18: Analysis, competins. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 65-66. Quine, W. V. “Comunents an Newtin-Smith”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 66-67. Frankoff, Robert. “Cartesian insanity”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 68-70. Foley, Richard. “Compatibilism and control over the past”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 70-74. Rapaport, William J. “An adverbial Meinongain theory”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 75-81. Lewis, Michael E and Leuin, Margarita. “The modal confusion in Rawl´s Original position”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 82-87. White, Michael J. “Aristotle and temporally relative modalties”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 88-93. Guttemplan, S. D “The paratactie account of saying of”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 94-100. Yagisawa, T. “Countefactual Analysis, of causation adn Kim´s examples”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 100-105. Perloff, Micahel. “A better alternative”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 106-108. Peetz, Vera. “Imperative inference”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 2, New Series n. 181, 1979, p. 109-112. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979 Hughes, G. E. “Report on Analysis problem n. 17”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 113-115. Regan, Tom. “Singer`s critique of the market”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 115-117. Singer, Peter. “Regan`s critique of Singer”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 118-119. White, Michael J. “The first person pronoun: a reply to Anscombe and Clarke”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 120-123. Meyer, Robert K., Routley, Richard and Dunn, J. Micahel. “Curriy`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 124-128. Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “More on propositional identity”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 130-132. Merrill, G. H. “On the uniqueness of the identity relation”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 133-136. Hornsby, Jennifer. “Reply to Guttemplan”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 136-137. Bertolet, Rod and Rowe, William J. “The fatalism of “Diodorus Cronus” ”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 137-138. Lowe, E. J. “Indicative and counterfactual conditionals”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 139-141. Williams, J. N. “Moore`s paradox: one or two?” Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 141-142. Zemach, Eddy M. “Time and self”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 143-147. Ketchum, Sara Ann. “Evidence, statistics and rights: a reply to Simon”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 148-153. Ibberson, John. “A doubt about universal prescriptivism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 153-158. Geach, P. T. “Russell and Frege again”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 159. Blackburn, Simon and Code, Alan. “Geach again”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 3, New Series n. 183, 1979, p. 160. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979 Hare, R. M. “Universal and past-tense prescriptions: a reply to Mr. Ibberson”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 161-165. Hugly, Philip and Sayward, Charles. “Paradox and semantical correctness”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 166-169. Martin, Robert L. “Reply to Hugly and Sayward”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 169-174. Noonan, H. W. “Rigid designation”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 174-182. Keating, B. F. “Lockwood and Mill on connotation and predication”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 183-188. Hornsby, Jennifer. “Actions and identities”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 189-194. Nemirow, Laurence. “No argument against Ramsey”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 195-201. Locke, Don. “Causation, compatibilism and Newcomb`s problem”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 201-209. Casullo, Albert. “Reid and Mill on Hume`s maxim of conceivability”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 210-211. Lederkramer, David L. “Quest on the entitlement theory”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 212-219. Gordon, David. “Is relativism dishonest?” Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 219-222. Gordon, David. “Steiner on Cartesian scepticism”. Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, New Series n. 184, 1979, p. 223-224. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980 McKinsey, Michael. “Against a defence of cluster theories”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 1-5. Tennant, N. “On and E”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 5-7. Peacocke, Christopher, “A reply to Tennant”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 8-9. Dale, J. “Entailment and substitution instances”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 10-12. Clark, Michael. “Reply to Dale”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 12. Weale, Albert. “The impossibility of liberal egalitarianism”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 13-19. Robinson, H. M. “Mackie`s interpretation of Hume”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 19-24. Thalberg, Irving. “Can we get rid of events? ” Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 25-31. Owen, David W. D. “Actions and bodily movements: another move”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 32-35. Neumann, Michael. “Killing and average utility”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 35-36. Hinton, J. M. “Phenomenologia specimenism”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 37-41. Wasserman, Wayne. “Chisholm`s definition of the evident”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 42-44. Chernoff, Fred. “Goldman on epistemic conjunction”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 45-47. Welbourne, Michael. “Cartesian madness”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 48-49. Lowe, E. J. “For want of a nail”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 50-52. Mckie, J.L. “The transitivity of counterfactuals and causation”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 53-54. Lowe, Malcom F. “Aristotle on the sea-battle: a clarification”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 55-59. Mellor, D. H. “The self from time to time”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 59-62. Hudson, James and Tye, Michael. “Proper names and definite descriptions with widest possible scope”. Analysis, v. 40, n. 1, New Series n. 185, 1980, p. 63-64. Analysis, v. 40, n. 2, New Series n. 186, 1980 Yüklə 0,81 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|