Analysis Vol

Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 230-236.
Broome, John & Rabinowicz, Wlodek. “Backwards induction in the centipede game”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 237-242.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Rationality and the Backwards induction argument”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 243-248.
Carroll, John W. “Decision-theoretic finitely iterated prisoner`s dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 249-256.
McGee, Vann. “An airtight Dutch book”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 257-265.
MIntoff, Joe. “Are decisions motive-perpetuating?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 266-275.
Ruben, David-Hillel. “Act individuation: the Cambridge theory”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 276-283.
Goldstein, Laurence. “Circular queue paradoxes-the missing link”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 284-290.
Doff, Julian. “There is no norm of truth: a minimalist reply to Wright”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 291-299.
Edwards, Jim. “Prizing truth corm warranted assertibility: reply to Tennant”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 300-308.
Gettings, Michael. “Gödel`s ontological argument: a reply to Oppy”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 309-313.
Oaklander, L. Nathan. “Craig on McTaggart`s Paradox and the problem temporary intrinsics”. 314- 318.
Lane Craig, William. “Oaklandes on McTaggart and intrinsic change”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 319-320.
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen. “Where the regress argument still goes wrong: reply to Knowles”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 321-327.
Lowe, E. J. “Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy: further reflections”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 328-330.
Scott, Alexander D. & Scott, Michael. “The paradox of the question”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 331-334.
Pollard, Stephen. “Milne`s measure of confirmation”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 335-337.
Shogenji, Tomoji. “Is coherence truth conducive?” Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 338-345.
Coppock, Paul. “Supervenient causation and program explanation: a note on the difference”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 346-354.
Hubin, Danald C. “Converging on values”. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 355-361.
Index to Volume 59. Analysis, v. 59, n. 4, New Series n. 264, 1999, p. 362.

Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000
Ketland, Jeffrey. “A proof of the (strengthened) Liar formula in a semantical extension of Peano Arithmetic”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 1-4.
Cook, Roy T. & Cogburn, Jon. “What negation is not: intuitionism and “0 = 1”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 5-12.
Needham, Paul. “What is water?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 13-21.
Lewis, Peter J. “What is it like be Schödinger`s cat?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 22-29.
Clark, Andy. “A case where access implies qualia?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 30-37.
Beall, Jc. “A neglected response to the Grim result”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 38-41.
Crisp, Thomas M. “Gettier and Plantinga`s revised account of warrant”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 42-50.
Pust, Joel. “Warrant and analysis”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 51-57.
Worley, Sara. “What is property P, anyway?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 58-62.
Mackie, Penelope. “Mellor on causes, chances and degrees of effectiveness”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 63-71.
Mellor, D. H. “Equally effective causes”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 71-73.
Rysiew, Patrick. “Conventional wisdom”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 74-83.
Sider, Theodore. “The stage view and temporary intrinsics”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 84-88.
Katzoff, Charlotte. “Counter-evidence and the duty to critically reflect”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 89-96.
Almeida, Michael J. “Why we ought to be a little less beneficent”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 97-106.
McGeen, Vann. “To tell the truth about conditionals”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 107-111.
Weiss, Bernhard. “Generalizing brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 112-123.
Edwards, Jim. “Burge on testimony and memory”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 124-131.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Externalism and the a prioricity of self-knowledge”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 132-136.
Flvey, Kevin. “The compatibility of anti-individualism and privileged access”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 1, New Series n. 265, 2000, p. 137-142.

Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000
Elga, Adam. “Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 143-147.
Dudman, V. H. “Classifying “conditionals”: the traditional way is wrong”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 147.
Yablo, Stephen. “A reply to new Zeno”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 148-151.
Pérez Laraudogoitia, Jon. “Priest on the paradox of the gods”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 152-155.
Weir, Alan. “Token relativism and the Lair”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 156-169.
Goldstein, Laurence. “How to boil a live frog”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 170-177.
Brown, Jessica. “Against temporal externalism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 178-188.
Stephanou, Yannis. “Necessary beings”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 188-193.
Wolf, Jonathan. “The morality of sales tax”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 194-195.
Mautner, Thomas. “Problems for anti-expressivism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 196-201.
Sorensen, Roy. “Faking Munchausen`s syndrome”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 202-208.
McFarland, Duncan & Miller, Alexander. “Disjunctions, programming and Australian view of colour”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 209-212.
Richard, Mark. “On an argument of Williamson`s”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 2, New Series n. 266, 2000, p. 213-217.

Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000
Bradley, Richard. “A preservation condition for conditionals”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 219-222.
Stephanou, Yannis. “How many possible worlds are there?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 223-228.
Black, Robert. “Nothing matters too much, or Wright is wrong”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 229-237.
Brown, Bryson. “An empty refinement in Mellor`s definition of chances”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 238-243.
Mellor, D. H. “The point of refinement”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 243-246.
Noonan, Harold W. “Reply to Sawyer on brains in vats”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 247-249.
Moore, Joseph G. “Did Clinton lie?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 250-254.
Saul, Jennifer M. “Did, Clinton say something false?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 255-257.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Ambiguity and knowledge of content”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 257-260.
Goldberg, Sanford C. “Word-ambiguity, world-switching, and semantic intentions. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 260-264.
Roger Crisp: Utilitarianism and accomplishment”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 264-267.
Braker, Setphen J. “Is value content a component of conventional implicature?” Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 268-279.
Garrard, Eve. “Slote on virtue”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 280-283.
Blum, Alex. “N”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 284-286.
Blum, Alex. “The Kantian versus Frankfurt”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 287-288.
Otsuka, Michael. “Scanlon and claims of the many versus the one”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 288-293.
García Súarez, Alfons. “The Verification Principle: another puncture”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 3, New Series n. 267, 2000, p. 293-295.

Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000
McGee, Vann & Rayo, Aguistín. “A puzzle about de rebus beliefs”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 297-299.
Barber, Alex. “A pragmatic treatment of simple sentences”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 300-308.
Bermúdez, José Luis. “Self-deception, intentions, and contradictory beliefs”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 309-319.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “Conservativeness and translation- dependent T-schemes”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 319-327.
Robertson, Teresa. “On Soames`s solution to the sorites paradox”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 328-334.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Lowe`s argument against nihilism”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 335-340.
Beall, Jc. “Minimalism, gaps, and the Holton conditional”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 340-351.
Hazen, Allen. “Relaions in Lewis`s framework without atoms: a correction”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 351-353.
Noonan, Harold W. “McKinsey – Brown survives”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 353-356.
Akiba, Ken. “Shogenji`s probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 356-359.
Mackie, Penelope. “Causes, chances, and degrees of effectivenss: reply to Mellor”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 359-363.
Oppy,Graham. “Response to Gettings”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 363-367.
Grey, William. “Gasking`s proof”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 368-370.
Oliver, Alex & Schmeinong, Alexius. “Ghost writers”. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 371.
Index to Volume 60. Analysis, v. 60, n. 4, New Series n. 268, 2000, p. 373.

Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001
Dummett, Michael. “Victor`s error”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 1-2.
Lycan, William G. “A simple argument for a higher-order representation theory of consciousness”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 3-4.
Vision, Gerald. “Flash! Fodor splits the atom”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 5-10.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Causation, influence, and effluence”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 11-19.
Melia, Joseph. “Rediucing possibilities to language”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 19-29.
Hanfling, Oswald. “What is wrong with sorites arguments?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 29-35.
Abbruzzese, John. “On using the multiverse to avoid the paradoxes time travel”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 36-38.
Olson, Eric T. “Personal identity and the radiation argument”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 38-44.
Sobel, David & Copp, David. “Against direction of fit accounts of belief and desire”. 44-53.
Predelli, Stefano. “Copmlex demonstratives and anaphora”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 53-59.
Fabre, Cécile. “The choice-based right to bequeath”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 60-65.
Odrowaz-Spyniewska, Joanna. “Quantum indiscernibility without vague identity”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 65-69.
McGrath, Matthew. “Rea on Universalism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 69-76.
Miller, Alexander “The missing-explanation argument revisited”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 76-85.
Slter, B. H. “Prior`s analytic revised”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 86-90.
Correction to Alex Blum`s “N”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 90.
Nelkin, Dana K. & Rickless, Samuel C. “How to solve Blum`s paradox”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, New Series n. 269, 2001, p. 91-94.

Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001
Noordhof, Paul. “In pain”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 95-97.
Bird, Alexander. “Scepticism and contrast classes”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 97-106.
Nelkin, Dana K. “The Consequence argument and the mind argument”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 107-115.
Goldstei, Laurence. “Truth-bearers and the Liar- a reply to Alan Weir”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 115-125.
Beall, Jc. “A neglected deflactionist approach to the liar”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 126-129.
Gauker, Christopher. “T-schema deflactionism versus Gödel`s first incompleteness theorem”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 129-136.
Dauer, Francis W. “McGinn`s materialism and epiphenomenalism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 136-138.
Clemenson, David. “A paradox of actuality”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 139-141.
Cave, Peter. “Too self-fulfilling”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 141-146.
Shogenji, Tomoji. “Reply to Akiba on the probabilistic measure of coherence”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 147-150.
Hurley, S. L. “Reason and motivation: the wrong distinction?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 151-155.
McNaughton, David & Rawling, Piers. “Achievement, welfare and consequentialism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 156-162.
Crisp, Roger. “Utilitarianism and accomplishment revisited”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 162-164.
Kumar, Rahul. “Contractualism on saving the many”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 2, New Series n. 270, 2001, p. 165-170.

Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p.
Lewis, David. “Sleeping Beauty: reply to Elga”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 171-176.
Beall, Jc. “Is Yablo`s paradox non-circular?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 176-187.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Chalmers`s conceivability argument for dualism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 187-193.
Dokic, Jérôme & Pacherie, Ëlisabeth. “Shades and concepts”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 193-201.
Jonathan Schaffer: “Knowledge, relevant alternatives and missed clues”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 202-208.
Alan Hájek & Daniel Stoljar: “Crimmins, Gonzales and Moore”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 208-213.
Jessica Brown: “Anti-individualism and agnosticism”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 213-224.
Gregory, Dominic.“B is innocent”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 225-229.
Fischer, John Martin. “Newcomb`s problem: a reply to Carlson”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 229-236.
Olsen, Erik J. “Why coherence is not truth-conducive”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 236-241.
Lowe, E. J. “Ontic indeterminacy of identity unscathed”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 241-245.
Mason, Andrew. “Egalitarianism and the Levelling Down Objection”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 246-254.
Smith, Michael. “The incoherence argument: reply to Schafer-Landau”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 3, New Series n. 271, 2001, p. 254-266.

Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001
Bird, Alexander. “Necessarily, salt dissolves in water”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 267-274.
Lewis, David. “Forget about the “correspondence theory of truth”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 275-280.
Armour-Garb, Bradley. “Deflationism and the Meaningless Strategy”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 280-289.
Copeland, Jack, Dyke, Heather & Proudfoot, Diane. “Temporal parts and their individuation”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 289-292.
Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stpehen. “Boghossian on analyticity. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 293-302.
Gillett, Carl & Witmer, D. Gene. “A “physical” need: physicalism and the via negative”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 302-308.
Bostrom, Nick. “The meta-Newcomb problem”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 309-310.
Predelli, Setfano. “Art, Bart and Superman”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 310-313.
Lurz, Robert W. “Begging the question: a reply to Lyca”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 313-318.
Campbell Manson, Neil. “The limitations and costs of Lycan`s “simple” argument”. 319-323.
Noordhof, Paul. “In defence of influence?” Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 323-327.
Hinto, Timothy. “Sandel on tolerance”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 327-333.
Hooker, Brad. “Cudworth and Quinn”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 333-335.
Schnall, Ira M. “The principle of alternate possibilities and “ought” implies “can”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 335-340.
Hirose, Iwao. “Saving the greater number without combining claims”. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 341-342.
Index to Volume 61. Analysis, v. 61, n. 4, New Series n. 272, 2001, p. 343.

Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002
Matthews, Gareth B. “On the idea of there being soothing of everything in everything”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 1-4.
Wetphal, Jonathan. “The retrenchability of “the present”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 4-10.
Priest, Graham. “Rational dilemmas”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 11-16.
Cook, Roy T. “Counterintuitive consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 16-22.
Beall, Jc. & Beuno, Octávio. “The simple liar without bivalence?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 22-26.
Weir, Alan. “Rejoinder to Laurence Goldstein on the Liar”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 26-34.
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. “Now the French are invading England!” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 34-41.
Choi, Sungho. “The “actual events” clause in Noordhof`s account of causation”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 41-45.
Noordhof, Paul. “Sungho Choi and the “actual events” clause”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 46-47.
Monton, Bradley. “Sleeping Beauty and the forgetful Bayesian”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 47-53.
Arntzenius, Frank. “Reflections on Sleeping Beauty”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 53-61.
Lowe, E. J. “Metaphysical nihilism and the subtraction argument”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 62-73.
Paseau, Alexander. “The subtraction argument does not add up”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 73-75.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. “What`s in a contrast class?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 75-84.
Raatikainen, Panu. “Deflationism and Gödel`s theorem – a comment on Gauker”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 85-87.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Anti-individualism and analyticity”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 87-91.
Ketland, Jeffrey. “Hume = Small Hume”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 1, New Series n. 273, 2002, p. 92-93.

Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002
Lewis, David. “Tharp`s third theorem”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 95-97.
Miller, Alexander. “Wright`s argument against error-theories”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 98-103.
Nelkin, Dana K. & Rickless, Samuel C. “Warfield`s new argument for incompatibilism”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 104-107.
Slater, B. H. “Syntactic liars”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 107-109.
Morton, Adam. “If you`re so smart why are you ignorant? Epistemic causal paradoxes”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 110-116.
Frances, Bryan. “A test for theories of belief ascription”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 116-125.
MacBride, Frase. “Could nothing matter?” Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 125-135.
Tennant, Neil. “Victor vanquished”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 135-142.
Brogaard, Berit & Salerno, Joe. “Clues to the paradox of knowability: reply to Dummett and Tennant”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 143-150.
Tye, Michael. “On the location of a pain”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 150-153.
Noordhof, Paul. “More in pain”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 153-154.
Chalmers, David J. “The St. Petersburg two-envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 155-157.
Chase, James. “The non-probabilistic two envelope paradox”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 157-160.
Everett, Anthony. “Predelli on procrastination”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 160-166.
Rosenthal, David M. “Moore`s paradox and Crimmins`s case”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 167-171.
Rodríguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “Metaphysical nihilism defended: reply to Lowe and Paseau”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 172-180.
Dworkin, Gerald. “Patients and prisoners: the ethics of lethal injection” Analysis, v. 62, n. 2, New Series n. 274, 2002, p. 181-189.

Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002
Tooley, Michael. “Backward causation and the Stalnaker-Lewis approach to counterfactuals”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 191-197.
Brueckner, Anthony. “Williamson on the primeness of knowing”. Analysis, v. 62, n. 3, New Series n. 275, 2002, p. 197-202.
Hudson, Hud. “Moving faster than light”.