Delegates. These Delegates represent the conscience and desire of AA as
regards functional or service matters. Our Tradition contains an emphatic
injunction that these Trustees may never constitute themselves as a
government -- they are to merely provide certain services that enable AA as
a whole to function. The same principles apply at our group and area level.
Dr. Bob, my co-partner, had his own religious views. For whatever they may
be worth, I have my own. But both of us have gone heavily on record to the
effect that these personal views and preferences can never under any
conditions be injected into the AA program as a working part of it. AA is a
sort of spiritual kindergarten, but that is all. Never could it be called a
religion.
Nor should any clergyman, because he does not happen to be a channel of
grace to alcoholics, feel that he or his Church is lacking in grace. No real
question of grace is involved at all -- it is just a question of who can
best
transmit God's abundance. It so happens that we who have suffered
alcoholism, we who can identify so deeply with other sufferers, are the ones
usually best suited for this particular work. Certainly no clergyman ought
to feel any inferiority just because he himself is not an alcoholic! Then,
as I have already emphasized, AA has actually derived all of its principles,
directly or indirectly, from the Church.
Ours, gentlemen, is a debt of gratitude far beyond any ability of mine to
express. On behalf of members everywhere, I give you our deepest thanks for
the warm understanding and the wonderful co-operation that you have
everywhere afforded us. Please also have my gratitude for the privilege of
being with you this morning. This is an hour that I shall remember always
..."
From the Q&A that followed Bill's address:
(4) "... When these Steps were shown to my friends, their reactions were
quite mixed indeed. Some argued that six steps had worked fine, so why
twelve? From our agnostic contingent there were loud cries of too much
"God." Others objected to an expression, which I had included which
suggested getting on one's knees while in prayer. I heavily resisted these
objections for months. But finally did take out my statement about a
suitable prayerful posture and I finally went along with that now
tremendously important expression, "God as we understand Him" -- this
expression having been coined, I think, by one of our former atheist
members. This was indeed a ten-strike. That one has since enabled thousands
to join AA who would have otherwise gone away. It enabled people of fine
religious training and those of none at all to associate freely and to work
together. It made one's religion the business of the AA member himself and
not that of his society.
That AA's Twelve Steps have since been in such high esteem by the Church,
that members of the Jesuit Order have repeatedly drawn attention to the
similarity between them and the Ignatian Exercises, is a matter for our
great wonder and gratitude indeed ..."
(5) From the Foreword to the Second Edition Big Book:
"... Another reason for the wide acceptance of A.A. was the ministration of
friends -- friends in medicine, religion, and the press, together with
innumerable others who became our able and persistent advocates. Without
such support, A.A. could have made only the slowest progress. Some of the
recommendations of A.A.'s early medical and religious friends will be found
further on in this book.
Alcoholics Anonymous is not a religious organization. Neither does A.A. take
any particular medical point of view, though we cooperate widely with the
men of medicine as well as with the men of religion.
Alcohol being no respecter of persons, we are an accurate cross section of
America, and in distant lands, the same democratic evening-up process is now
going on. By personal religious affiliation, we include Catholics,
Protestants, Jews, Hindus, and a sprinkling of Moslems and Buddhists. More
than 15% of us are women ..."
(6) From Bill's Story
"... The door opened and he stood there, fresh-skinned and glowing. There
was something about his eyes. He was inexplicably different. What had
happened?
I pushed a drink across the table. He refused it. Disappointed but curious,
I wondered what had got into the fellow. He wasn't himself. "Come, what's
this all about?" I queried. He looked straight at me. Simply, but smilingly,
he said, "I've got religion ..."
(7) From We Agnostics
"... We, who have traveled this dubious path, beg you to lay aside
prejudice, even against organized religion. We have learned that whatever
the human frailties of various faiths may be, those faiths have given
purpose and direction to millions. People of faith have a logical idea of
what life is all about. Actually, we used to have no reasonable conception
whatever. We used to amuse ourselves by cynically dissecting spiritual
beliefs and practices when we might have observed that many
spiritually-minded persons of all races, colors, and creeds were demon-
strating a degree of stability, happiness and usefulness which we should
have sought ourselves ..."
(8) From Into Action
"... We must be entirely honest with somebody if we expect to live long or
happily in this world. Rightly and naturally, we think well before we choose
the person or persons with whom to take this intimate and confidential step.
Those of us belonging to a religious denomination which requires confession
must, and of course, will want to go to the properly appointed authority
whose duty it is to receive it. Though we have no religious connection, we
may still do well to talk with someone ordained by an established religion.
We often find such a person quick to see and understand our problem. Of
course, we sometimes encounter people who do not understand alcoholics ..."
"... If circumstances warrant, we ask our wives or friends to join us in
morning meditation. If we belong to a religious denomination which requires
a definite morning devotion, we attend to that also. If not members of
religious bodies, we sometimes select and memorize a few set prayers which
emphasize the principles we have been discussing. There are many helpful
books also. Suggestions about these may be obtained from one's priest,
minister, or rabbi. Be quick to see where religious people are right. Make
use of what they offer ..."
(9) From Working With Others
"... Your prospect may belong to a religious denomination. His religious
education and training may be far superior to yours. In that case he is
going to wonder how you can add anything to what he already knows. But he
will be curious to learn why his own convictions have not worked and why
yours seem to work so well. He may be an example of the truth that faith
alone is insufficient. To be vital, faith must be accompanied by self
sacrifice and unselfish, constructive action. Let him see that you are not
there to instruct him in religion. Admit that he probably knows more about
it than you do, but call to his attention the fact that however deep his
faith and knowledge, he could not have applied it or he would not drink.
Perhaps your story will help him see where he has failed to practice the
very precepts he knows so well. We represent no particular faith or
denomination. We are dealing only with general principles common to most
denominations ..."
(10) From The Family Afterward
"... Alcoholics who have derided religious people will be helped by such
contacts. Being possessed of a spiritual experience, the alcoholic will find
he has much in common with these people, though he may differ with them on
many matters. If he does not argue about religion, he will make new friends
and is sure to find new avenues of usefulness and pleasure. He and his
family can be a bright spot in such congregations. He may bring new hope and
new courage to many a priest, minister, or rabbi, who gives his all to
minister to our troubled world. We intend the foregoing as a helpful
suggestion only. So far as we are concerned, there is nothing obligatory
about it. As non-denominational people, we cannot make up others' minds for
them. Each individual should consult his own conscience ..."
========
In just about every mention of "not religious" it seems that Bill's context
was that AA is not affiliated with any specific religious denomination and
matters of religion are solely up to each individual member to define for
themselves -- Bill very definitely was not attempting to distance himself
from religion. Two more citations that might be interesting concerning the
Oxford Group and its influence on the principles embodied in the Steps.
In a July 14, 1949 letter to the Rev Sam Shoemaker Bill W wrote "So far as I
am concerned, and Dr Smith too, the Oxford Group seeded AA. It was our
spiritual wellspring at the beginning."
In AA Comes of Age (pg 39) Bill also wrote: "Early AA got its ideas of
self-examination, acknowledgment of character defects, restitution for harm
done and working with others straight from the Oxford Groups and directly
from Sam Shoemaker their former leader in America and from nowhere else."
Cheers
Arthur
- - - -
Message 6165 from Baileygc23@aol.com
Subject: Re: Huxley on Bill W. as social architect
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6165
Thomsen was close to Bill W, and may have
heard Huxley making the statement. I am trying
to find my AA today and see if the statement
is in the issue. But it seems that the statement
is not traceable further back than to Thomsen.
I hope there is a more definite source.
Let us remember one important thing that is made
clear by Bill W's association with Huxley. No one
is required to follow any kind of conventional
religiosity in order to work the twelve steps
and get sober and serene in Alcoholics Anonymous.
And this is something that is emphasized as well
in Bill W's statements to the psychiatrists and
to the National Catholic Clergy Council:
** AA is not a Religious organization;
** There is no dogma.
** The one theological proposition is a power
greater than one's self.
** Even this concept is forced on no one.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6170. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Wilson, Lois copyright Ellie van
V., 1998 All rights reserved
From: diazeztone . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 12:07:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The Lois Wilson estate sued Ellie V and won to
stop having the book published (Gratitude Press).
It was withdrawn from publication and most
remaining copies destroyed. Ellie V published
without consent. I had the legal document
on my computer for the longest period but
cannot find it now. I have had the book on my
beginners recommended book page
http://aabibliography.com/beginnersbooks.htm
but really should remove that. I am sure the
Wilson estate does not want electronic copies
floating around since they successfully stopped
the printed versions.
LD Pierce
www.aabibliography.com
eztone at hotmail
- - - -
Some information about this from a Past Delegate:
"I was fortunate enough to have had one of
Lois's originals that my friend XXXX XXXX,
Panel ## Area 20, Northern Illinois, sent to me
before her passing. She ... was my service
sponsor.
I sent my copy to Ellie back in '98 for her
to peruse and then she was taken to court in
Canada by Stepping Stones and lost. Sooo, the
copy I had was confiscated by the foundation
and all I got back was apologies from Ellie.
Ellie and I lost touch with one another in
early 2003 and I have no idea where she is
today."
- - - -
An email sent to this Past Delegate by a
figure well known in AA historical circles
(NOT the moderator of the AAHistoryLovers):
Hi H____,
Well, you SOUND sane; so maybe you can help me
understand these hoarding-like behaviors about
"the only" or "the first" or "so-and-so's copy"
-- not to mention the greed-driven attempts to
disallow copying or re-publication or whatever
might make any object of any real interest
something preciously esoteric and difficult of
access?
Perhaps you understand better than I: What in
what's-His-name's Name do such fixations have
to do with the Twelve Steps or, in fact, with
any compassion or love or generosity-of-spirit
or honesty or "carrying the message" or sobriety
or -- pardon the expression -- "spirituality"
of whatever ilk?
For such machinations we get sober?!
God save Alcoholics Anonymous from its "friends."
- - - -
IN PREVIOUSLY POSTED MESSAGES THE FOLLOWING
APPEARED:
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com,
Ernest Kurtz wrote
(kurtzern at umich.edu)
>
> Any attorneys familiar with copyright law -- especially the most
> recent changes and ongoing discussions -- available out there,
> please? If you are willing, please contact me off-list? As a
> multiply copyrighted author as this electronic age comes into being, I
> find things too confusing for this legal mere layperson.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ernie kurtz
> (kurtzern at umich.edu)
>
> - - - -
>
> From Glenn C., the moderator
>
> The seven known used copies of
> Diary of Two Motorcycle Hobos, by Bill and
> Lois Wilson, in the version edited by
> Ellie van V. (Ottowa: Gratitude Press, 1998)
> which are currently for sale are selling for:
>
> US$ 58.88, 60.00, 81.55, 175.00, 379.95,
> 500.00, and 1,250.00
>
> - - - -
>
> On Dec 13, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Jim M wrote:
>
> > This subject title is also known as "Diary of Two Motorcycle Hobos."
> > The Copyright holder is clearly stated in the subject line and in
> > the file I have on hand, however, I received a disturbing email from
> > the Director, Annah Perch, of the Stepping Stones Foundation, ready
> > to act on behalf of the Copyright holder.
> >
> > Does anyone here on AAHistoryLovers know how to get in touch with
> > the Copyright holder, Ellie van V.? I wish to open a direct line of
> > communication with Ellie van V. to talk with her about her title
> > mentioned above.
> >
> > I believe this title is an important part of pre AA history with a
> > glimpse into the lives of our would be cofounders of Alcoholics
> > Anonymous and Al-anon which can be viewed on this page:
http://www.silkworth.net/freestuff.html
> > . Any information you can provide would be of great assistance. Your
> > comments on the above are also welcomed and will be of great help to
> > me in my making the right decision.
> >
> > If you wish, you can contact me directly by sending an email to:
> >
> > "Jim M"
> > (silkworthdotnet at yahoo.com)
> >
> > I thank you for your continued support for the service silkworth.net
> > provides.
> >
> > Yours in service,
> > Ever greatful,
> > Jim M,
> > http://www.silkworth.net/
>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6171. . . . . . . . . . . . More on Huxley etc
From: jenny andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 7:16:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
A letter from Huxley to Dr Humphry Osmond from 740 North Kings Road, Los
Angeles
46. Dated 2 March 1954:
Dear Humphry ... Three interesting things have turned up recently (following
publication of Doors of Perception - one about a woman who experienced "a
transfiguration of the outer world during her various pregnancies", which
Huxley
surmises might have been caused by "a temporary upset in the sugar supply to
the
brain"; another from someone in Seattle who "produced extraordinary changes
in
consciousness by fasting and going without sleep", and) ... Another stranger
writes from Los Angeles. He is an ex-alcoholic (sic), who had ecstatic
experiences in his early days of alcoholism and insists, in spite of what
the
Freudians may say, that the longing for ecstasy is a very strong motive in
many
alcoholics. He is a friend of Indians, knows some who have taken peyote but
had
a terrifying experience, and hints at knowing or being able to find out a
good
deal about the relationship between peyotism and alcoholism among Indians. I
haven't seen this man, and doubt if we shall have time to do so before our
departure. But (I hope you don't mind!) I have asked him to put down his
information on paper and send it to you. I think it might be of considerable
value. He suggests that it might be very interesting to try the effect of
mescalin on alcoholics, past and present. And I think that, if your research
project gets started (or even if it doesn't), this might be a fruitful thing
to
do..."
("Letters of Aldous Huxley", op cit).
1.) Who was Osmond?
2.) Is this correspondence with the LA alcoholic preserved in any archive?
3.) What was the research project alluded to?
4.) Did the mescalin experiment with alcoholics ever happen?
Re Les C.'s reference to Lois's Swedenborgian roots, I recall reading
somewhere
that Lois attended a Quaker school in New York and that after Bill died
there
was a Quaker-style meeting at Stepping Stones to celebrate his life.
Apropos - Correspondence between Bill W. and Robert C., March 1950:
"Dear Bill, I've been a member of AA for the past three years and doing a
fairly
good job. In the meantime I've become interested in the Society of Friends
(Quakers) and I seem to see a great kinship between the two movements. The
Way
of Life (sic) of both movements seems to fit so well into each other that I
have
become greatly interested in knowing just how much Quakerism effected not
only
the foundation of AA, but also what part, if any, it has played to date."
Bill's reply: "Dear Robert C., The really amazing fact about Alcoholics
Anonymous, and something I've never been able to comprehend, is that all
religions see in our program a resemblance to themselves. For example,
Catholic
theologians declare our Twelve Points to be in exact accord with their
Ignatian
Exercises for Retreat, and though our book reeks of sin, sickness and death,
the
Christian Science Monitor has often praised it editorially. And so it goes.
Now
looking through Quaker eyes you, too, see us favorably. What happy
circumstances
these! Though the structure of our AA society was designed only by
experience
and what grace God might have given us, I must confess that in this aspect
we do
bear a strong resemblance to the Quakers. We, too, speak of a group
conscience.
Our leadership is rotating. We have no paid preachers and once the early
members
erected the basic principles, the authority seems to flow up from the mass
instead of down through the top. I can assure you that I did not create this
state of affairs, I merely reflected what had already appeared out of the
groups."
From letters in the AA archives at GSO, New York, part of which was
reproduced
in "As Bill Sees It" (page 116).
Bill was widely read in spiritual and religious matters, but I wonder if he
had
any direct experience of Quaker faith and practice?
Laurie A.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6172. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Silkworth: The Little Doctor who
Loved Drunks
From: Chuck Parkhurst . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/21/2009 11:46:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have attempted to order additional copies of
"The Little Doctor Who Loved Drunks" online.
Several of the sites that are offering it for
sale will allow one to go through the ordering
process only to be informed at the conclusion
that the book is on backorder or unavailable.
That likely means they not be able to supply
the book.
I sent an email to AAHL a few days ago stating
that the best place to find this book at a
reasonable cost would be local "serenity shops"
in larger metro areas, and this still seems to
me the best route. I have found several copies
at stores like this in the metro Phoenix area.
In Service with Gratitude,
Chuck Parkhurst
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6173. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Huxley on Bill W. as social
architect
From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 10:22:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Message #6169 from "Arthur S"
(arthur.s at live.com)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6169
was an extremely lengthy criticism of me for
saying, in Message 6165
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6165
"AA is not a Religious organization; there is
no dogma. The one theological proposition is
a power greater than one's self. Even this
concept is forced on no one."
That was a quote from Bill Wilson.
I am sorry if, in Arthur's opinion, Bill Wilson
got the AA position all wrong.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6174. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: More on Huxley etc
From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 11:34:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The original message #6171 from jenny andrews
(jennylaurie1 at hotmail.com)
was about "a letter from Huxley to Dr Humphry
Osmond," and Laurie asked: "Who was Osmond?"
Osmond was one of the people who were into the
LSD experiments at that time. His partners
Dostları ilə paylaş: |