Aa history Lovers 2009 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 11,49 Mb.
səhifə73/74
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü11,49 Mb.
#49237
1   ...   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74

Delegates. These Delegates represent the conscience and desire of AA as

regards functional or service matters. Our Tradition contains an emphatic

injunction that these Trustees may never constitute themselves as a

government -- they are to merely provide certain services that enable AA as

a whole to function. The same principles apply at our group and area level.
Dr. Bob, my co-partner, had his own religious views. For whatever they may

be worth, I have my own. But both of us have gone heavily on record to the

effect that these personal views and preferences can never under any

conditions be injected into the AA program as a working part of it. AA is a

sort of spiritual kindergarten, but that is all. Never could it be called a

religion.


Nor should any clergyman, because he does not happen to be a channel of

grace to alcoholics, feel that he or his Church is lacking in grace. No real

question of grace is involved at all -- it is just a question of who can

best


transmit God's abundance. It so happens that we who have suffered

alcoholism, we who can identify so deeply with other sufferers, are the ones

usually best suited for this particular work. Certainly no clergyman ought

to feel any inferiority just because he himself is not an alcoholic! Then,

as I have already emphasized, AA has actually derived all of its principles,

directly or indirectly, from the Church.


Ours, gentlemen, is a debt of gratitude far beyond any ability of mine to

express. On behalf of members everywhere, I give you our deepest thanks for

the warm understanding and the wonderful co-operation that you have

everywhere afforded us. Please also have my gratitude for the privilege of

being with you this morning. This is an hour that I shall remember always

..."
From the Q&A that followed Bill's address:


(4) "... When these Steps were shown to my friends, their reactions were

quite mixed indeed. Some argued that six steps had worked fine, so why

twelve? From our agnostic contingent there were loud cries of too much

"God." Others objected to an expression, which I had included which

suggested getting on one's knees while in prayer. I heavily resisted these

objections for months. But finally did take out my statement about a

suitable prayerful posture and I finally went along with that now

tremendously important expression, "God as we understand Him" -- this

expression having been coined, I think, by one of our former atheist

members. This was indeed a ten-strike. That one has since enabled thousands

to join AA who would have otherwise gone away. It enabled people of fine

religious training and those of none at all to associate freely and to work

together. It made one's religion the business of the AA member himself and

not that of his society.


That AA's Twelve Steps have since been in such high esteem by the Church,

that members of the Jesuit Order have repeatedly drawn attention to the

similarity between them and the Ignatian Exercises, is a matter for our

great wonder and gratitude indeed ..."


(5) From the Foreword to the Second Edition Big Book:
"... Another reason for the wide acceptance of A.A. was the ministration of

friends -- friends in medicine, religion, and the press, together with

innumerable others who became our able and persistent advocates. Without

such support, A.A. could have made only the slowest progress. Some of the

recommendations of A.A.'s early medical and religious friends will be found

further on in this book.


Alcoholics Anonymous is not a religious organization. Neither does A.A. take

any particular medical point of view, though we cooperate widely with the

men of medicine as well as with the men of religion.
Alcohol being no respecter of persons, we are an accurate cross section of

America, and in distant lands, the same democratic evening-up process is now

going on. By personal religious affiliation, we include Catholics,

Protestants, Jews, Hindus, and a sprinkling of Moslems and Buddhists. More

than 15% of us are women ..."
(6) From Bill's Story
"... The door opened and he stood there, fresh-skinned and glowing. There

was something about his eyes. He was inexplicably different. What had

happened?
I pushed a drink across the table. He refused it. Disappointed but curious,

I wondered what had got into the fellow. He wasn't himself. "Come, what's

this all about?" I queried. He looked straight at me. Simply, but smilingly,

he said, "I've got religion ..."


(7) From We Agnostics
"... We, who have traveled this dubious path, beg you to lay aside

prejudice, even against organized religion. We have learned that whatever

the human frailties of various faiths may be, those faiths have given

purpose and direction to millions. People of faith have a logical idea of

what life is all about. Actually, we used to have no reasonable conception

whatever. We used to amuse ourselves by cynically dissecting spiritual

beliefs and practices when we might have observed that many

spiritually-minded persons of all races, colors, and creeds were demon-

strating a degree of stability, happiness and usefulness which we should

have sought ourselves ..."


(8) From Into Action
"... We must be entirely honest with somebody if we expect to live long or

happily in this world. Rightly and naturally, we think well before we choose

the person or persons with whom to take this intimate and confidential step.

Those of us belonging to a religious denomination which requires confession

must, and of course, will want to go to the properly appointed authority

whose duty it is to receive it. Though we have no religious connection, we

may still do well to talk with someone ordained by an established religion.

We often find such a person quick to see and understand our problem. Of

course, we sometimes encounter people who do not understand alcoholics ..."
"... If circumstances warrant, we ask our wives or friends to join us in

morning meditation. If we belong to a religious denomination which requires

a definite morning devotion, we attend to that also. If not members of

religious bodies, we sometimes select and memorize a few set prayers which

emphasize the principles we have been discussing. There are many helpful

books also. Suggestions about these may be obtained from one's priest,

minister, or rabbi. Be quick to see where religious people are right. Make

use of what they offer ..."


(9) From Working With Others
"... Your prospect may belong to a religious denomination. His religious

education and training may be far superior to yours. In that case he is

going to wonder how you can add anything to what he already knows. But he

will be curious to learn why his own convictions have not worked and why

yours seem to work so well. He may be an example of the truth that faith

alone is insufficient. To be vital, faith must be accompanied by self

sacrifice and unselfish, constructive action. Let him see that you are not

there to instruct him in religion. Admit that he probably knows more about

it than you do, but call to his attention the fact that however deep his

faith and knowledge, he could not have applied it or he would not drink.

Perhaps your story will help him see where he has failed to practice the

very precepts he knows so well. We represent no particular faith or

denomination. We are dealing only with general principles common to most

denominations ..."


(10) From The Family Afterward
"... Alcoholics who have derided religious people will be helped by such

contacts. Being possessed of a spiritual experience, the alcoholic will find

he has much in common with these people, though he may differ with them on

many matters. If he does not argue about religion, he will make new friends

and is sure to find new avenues of usefulness and pleasure. He and his

family can be a bright spot in such congregations. He may bring new hope and

new courage to many a priest, minister, or rabbi, who gives his all to

minister to our troubled world. We intend the foregoing as a helpful

suggestion only. So far as we are concerned, there is nothing obligatory

about it. As non-denominational people, we cannot make up others' minds for

them. Each individual should consult his own conscience ..."
========
In just about every mention of "not religious" it seems that Bill's context

was that AA is not affiliated with any specific religious denomination and

matters of religion are solely up to each individual member to define for

themselves -- Bill very definitely was not attempting to distance himself

from religion. Two more citations that might be interesting concerning the

Oxford Group and its influence on the principles embodied in the Steps.


In a July 14, 1949 letter to the Rev Sam Shoemaker Bill W wrote "So far as I

am concerned, and Dr Smith too, the Oxford Group seeded AA. It was our

spiritual wellspring at the beginning."
In AA Comes of Age (pg 39) Bill also wrote: "Early AA got its ideas of

self-examination, acknowledgment of character defects, restitution for harm

done and working with others straight from the Oxford Groups and directly

from Sam Shoemaker their former leader in America and from nowhere else."


Cheers
Arthur
- - - -
Message 6165 from Baileygc23@aol.com

Subject: Re: Huxley on Bill W. as social architect

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6165
Thomsen was close to Bill W, and may have

heard Huxley making the statement. I am trying

to find my AA today and see if the statement

is in the issue. But it seems that the statement

is not traceable further back than to Thomsen.

I hope there is a more definite source.


Let us remember one important thing that is made

clear by Bill W's association with Huxley. No one

is required to follow any kind of conventional

religiosity in order to work the twelve steps

and get sober and serene in Alcoholics Anonymous.
And this is something that is emphasized as well

in Bill W's statements to the psychiatrists and

to the National Catholic Clergy Council:
** AA is not a Religious organization;
** There is no dogma.
** The one theological proposition is a power

greater than one's self.


** Even this concept is forced on no one.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6170. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Wilson, Lois copyright Ellie van

V., 1998 All rights reserved

From: diazeztone . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 12:07:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The Lois Wilson estate sued Ellie V and won to

stop having the book published (Gratitude Press).

It was withdrawn from publication and most

remaining copies destroyed. Ellie V published

without consent. I had the legal document

on my computer for the longest period but

cannot find it now. I have had the book on my

beginners recommended book page


http://aabibliography.com/beginnersbooks.htm
but really should remove that. I am sure the

Wilson estate does not want electronic copies

floating around since they successfully stopped

the printed versions.


LD Pierce

www.aabibliography.com

eztone at hotmail
- - - -
Some information about this from a Past Delegate:
"I was fortunate enough to have had one of

Lois's originals that my friend XXXX XXXX,

Panel ## Area 20, Northern Illinois, sent to me

before her passing. She ... was my service

sponsor.
I sent my copy to Ellie back in '98 for her

to peruse and then she was taken to court in

Canada by Stepping Stones and lost. Sooo, the

copy I had was confiscated by the foundation

and all I got back was apologies from Ellie.

Ellie and I lost touch with one another in

early 2003 and I have no idea where she is

today."
- - - -


An email sent to this Past Delegate by a

figure well known in AA historical circles

(NOT the moderator of the AAHistoryLovers):
Hi H____,
Well, you SOUND sane; so maybe you can help me

understand these hoarding-like behaviors about

"the only" or "the first" or "so-and-so's copy"
-- not to mention the greed-driven attempts to

disallow copying or re-publication or whatever

might make any object of any real interest

something preciously esoteric and difficult of

access?
Perhaps you understand better than I: What in

what's-His-name's Name do such fixations have

to do with the Twelve Steps or, in fact, with

any compassion or love or generosity-of-spirit

or honesty or "carrying the message" or sobriety

or -- pardon the expression -- "spirituality"

of whatever ilk?
For such machinations we get sober?!
God save Alcoholics Anonymous from its "friends."
- - - -
IN PREVIOUSLY POSTED MESSAGES THE FOLLOWING

APPEARED:


--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com,

Ernest Kurtz wrote

(kurtzern at umich.edu)

>

> Any attorneys familiar with copyright law -- especially the most



> recent changes and ongoing discussions -- available out there,

> please? If you are willing, please contact me off-list? As a

> multiply copyrighted author as this electronic age comes into being, I

> find things too confusing for this legal mere layperson.

>

> Thank you.



>

> ernie kurtz

> (kurtzern at umich.edu)

>

> - - - -



>

> From Glenn C., the moderator

>

> The seven known used copies of



> Diary of Two Motorcycle Hobos, by Bill and

> Lois Wilson, in the version edited by

> Ellie van V. (Ottowa: Gratitude Press, 1998)

> which are currently for sale are selling for:

>

> US$ 58.88, 60.00, 81.55, 175.00, 379.95,



> 500.00, and 1,250.00

>

> - - - -



>

> On Dec 13, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Jim M wrote:

>

> > This subject title is also known as "Diary of Two Motorcycle Hobos."



> > The Copyright holder is clearly stated in the subject line and in

> > the file I have on hand, however, I received a disturbing email from

> > the Director, Annah Perch, of the Stepping Stones Foundation, ready

> > to act on behalf of the Copyright holder.

> >

> > Does anyone here on AAHistoryLovers know how to get in touch with



> > the Copyright holder, Ellie van V.? I wish to open a direct line of

> > communication with Ellie van V. to talk with her about her title

> > mentioned above.

> >


> > I believe this title is an important part of pre AA history with a

> > glimpse into the lives of our would be cofounders of Alcoholics

> > Anonymous and Al-anon which can be viewed on this page:

http://www.silkworth.net/freestuff.html

> > . Any information you can provide would be of great assistance. Your

> > comments on the above are also welcomed and will be of great help to

> > me in my making the right decision.

> >


> > If you wish, you can contact me directly by sending an email to:

> >


> > "Jim M"

> > (silkworthdotnet at yahoo.com)

> >

> > I thank you for your continued support for the service silkworth.net



> > provides.

> >


> > Yours in service,

> > Ever greatful,

> > Jim M,

> > http://www.silkworth.net/

>
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6171. . . . . . . . . . . . More on Huxley etc

From: jenny andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 7:16:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
A letter from Huxley to Dr Humphry Osmond from 740 North Kings Road, Los

Angeles


46. Dated 2 March 1954:
Dear Humphry ... Three interesting things have turned up recently (following

publication of Doors of Perception - one about a woman who experienced "a

transfiguration of the outer world during her various pregnancies", which

Huxley


surmises might have been caused by "a temporary upset in the sugar supply to

the


brain"; another from someone in Seattle who "produced extraordinary changes

in

consciousness by fasting and going without sleep", and) ... Another stranger



writes from Los Angeles. He is an ex-alcoholic (sic), who had ecstatic

experiences in his early days of alcoholism and insists, in spite of what

the

Freudians may say, that the longing for ecstasy is a very strong motive in



many

alcoholics. He is a friend of Indians, knows some who have taken peyote but

had

a terrifying experience, and hints at knowing or being able to find out a



good

deal about the relationship between peyotism and alcoholism among Indians. I

haven't seen this man, and doubt if we shall have time to do so before our

departure. But (I hope you don't mind!) I have asked him to put down his

information on paper and send it to you. I think it might be of considerable

value. He suggests that it might be very interesting to try the effect of

mescalin on alcoholics, past and present. And I think that, if your research

project gets started (or even if it doesn't), this might be a fruitful thing

to

do..."


("Letters of Aldous Huxley", op cit).
1.) Who was Osmond?

2.) Is this correspondence with the LA alcoholic preserved in any archive?

3.) What was the research project alluded to?

4.) Did the mescalin experiment with alcoholics ever happen?


Re Les C.'s reference to Lois's Swedenborgian roots, I recall reading

somewhere

that Lois attended a Quaker school in New York and that after Bill died

there


was a Quaker-style meeting at Stepping Stones to celebrate his life.
Apropos - Correspondence between Bill W. and Robert C., March 1950:
"Dear Bill, I've been a member of AA for the past three years and doing a

fairly


good job. In the meantime I've become interested in the Society of Friends

(Quakers) and I seem to see a great kinship between the two movements. The

Way

of Life (sic) of both movements seems to fit so well into each other that I



have

become greatly interested in knowing just how much Quakerism effected not

only

the foundation of AA, but also what part, if any, it has played to date."


Bill's reply: "Dear Robert C., The really amazing fact about Alcoholics

Anonymous, and something I've never been able to comprehend, is that all

religions see in our program a resemblance to themselves. For example,

Catholic


theologians declare our Twelve Points to be in exact accord with their

Ignatian


Exercises for Retreat, and though our book reeks of sin, sickness and death,

the


Christian Science Monitor has often praised it editorially. And so it goes.

Now


looking through Quaker eyes you, too, see us favorably. What happy

circumstances

these! Though the structure of our AA society was designed only by

experience

and what grace God might have given us, I must confess that in this aspect

we do


bear a strong resemblance to the Quakers. We, too, speak of a group

conscience.

Our leadership is rotating. We have no paid preachers and once the early

members


erected the basic principles, the authority seems to flow up from the mass

instead of down through the top. I can assure you that I did not create this

state of affairs, I merely reflected what had already appeared out of the

groups."
From letters in the AA archives at GSO, New York, part of which was

reproduced

in "As Bill Sees It" (page 116).


Bill was widely read in spiritual and religious matters, but I wonder if he

had


any direct experience of Quaker faith and practice?
Laurie A.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6172. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Silkworth: The Little Doctor who

Loved Drunks

From: Chuck Parkhurst . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/21/2009 11:46:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
I have attempted to order additional copies of

"The Little Doctor Who Loved Drunks" online.

Several of the sites that are offering it for

sale will allow one to go through the ordering

process only to be informed at the conclusion

that the book is on backorder or unavailable.

That likely means they not be able to supply

the book.


I sent an email to AAHL a few days ago stating

that the best place to find this book at a

reasonable cost would be local "serenity shops"

in larger metro areas, and this still seems to

me the best route. I have found several copies

at stores like this in the metro Phoenix area.


In Service with Gratitude,
Chuck Parkhurst
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6173. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Re: Huxley on Bill W. as social

architect

From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 10:22:00 AM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Message #6169 from "Arthur S"

(arthur.s at live.com)

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6169


was an extremely lengthy criticism of me for

saying, in Message 6165

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/AAHistoryLovers/message/6165
"AA is not a Religious organization; there is

no dogma. The one theological proposition is

a power greater than one's self. Even this

concept is forced on no one."


That was a quote from Bill Wilson.
I am sorry if, in Arthur's opinion, Bill Wilson

got the AA position all wrong.


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 6174. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: More on Huxley etc

From: Baileygc23@aol.com . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/22/2009 11:34:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The original message #6171 from jenny andrews

(jennylaurie1 at hotmail.com)
was about "a letter from Huxley to Dr Humphry

Osmond," and Laurie asked: "Who was Osmond?"


Osmond was one of the people who were into the

LSD experiments at that time. His partners


Yüklə 11,49 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə