Governance and Democracy katarsis survey Paper



Yüklə 0,72 Mb.

səhifə23/35
tarix20.09.2017
ölçüsü0,72 Mb.
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   35

GOVERNANCE AND DEMOCRACY 

 KATARIS PROJECT



 

55

 



 

 

 



 

PPPs (public and private partnerships). The agenda also included the consultation of 

individual citizens that were randomly chosen to participate in various forums, which 

challenged both the mechanisms of joint action with collective actors, and the partnership-

based forms of governance. However, these directions have had to adapt to the instituted 

modes of decision-making and the Quebec Liberal Party has not been able to dismantle the 

“Modèle québécois” as it had foreseen.  

3.5.8. Conclusion 

In light of the limits of hierarchical and public governance as well as the pitfalls of Fordism 

and Providentialism, the future relies on innovations in governance. Research shows fairly 

clearly that partnership-based governance, which mobilises not only the state and the market 

but also civil society, cannot take place without an institutional framework favourable to the 

participation of stakeholders in the broader sense and without a deepening of democracy. It 

involves not only adding civil society to the state-market dyad, but also redefining the role of 

each in a world where their respective spheres of intervention become porous, and governance 

emphasises horizontality more than verticality. Such a governance should be a participative 

one, rather than authoritarian or restrictive.  

Although the predominance of neoliberalism seems to have done well to re-establish the value 

of market- and competition-based forms of governance, one could argue that the hegemony of 

these types of governance is not absolute and that it often goes hand in hand with partnership-

based types of governance, particularly in societies and regions where new and old social 

movements have insisted on experimenting with forms of governance that aim at social 

democracy and economic democratisation. 

The sphere of action in which these social movements evolve to expand and to conquer spaces 

of solidarity is limited but nevertheless offers possibilities. However, the weakening of 

democratic institutions allows representatives of the main neoliberal forces to strengthen and 

expand their power in decision-making processes. Thus, while social movements implement 

innovations that promote the inclusion of excluded groups and that offer solutions to poverty, 

new barriers are concurrently imposed by new standards of competitiveness and economic 

profitability. 

Thus, while societal mechanisms do depend on the modes of governance implemented by to 

promote their development; these mechanisms cannot automatically transform unjust societies 



CAHIERS DU CRISES 

 COLLECTION ÉTUDES THÉORIQUES 



 NO 


ET0908 

56

 



 

 

 



 

                                                     

into just societies. To understand how the quality of community life evolves, we must look 

beyond forms of governance. It is essential to comprehend the global nature of the relations 

between individuals and societies in the context of globalisation, the weakening of institutions

as well as the emergence of new opportunities in order to build a truly solidarity-based society. 

In this way, the efforts to implant democratic and participative forms of governance will allow 

society to free itself from the forces that aim only at productivity and profitability and for 

whom governance is nothing more than a matter of efficiency. 

3.6. Tower 

Colliery: 

Nurturing Alternative Space

12

 



3.6.1. Context 

Tower Colliery is the last deep mine in the UK South Wales coalfield. It is situated in one of 

the most economically disadvantaged areas in Great Britain. In 1994, under the Conservative 

government’s energy re-structuring policy, the mine was closed. However, despite a vote by 

the miners to accept redundancy, a campaign was started by Tower members of the National 

Union of Mineworkers (NUM) which organised an employee buyout to established a workers 

cooperative. A group elected by the workforce, the Tower Employment Buyout Team 

(TEBO), assembled a business plan, a technical plan, bank loans, support from the local 

authority and the Wales Co-operative Centre, donations and, finally, a pledge of almost £2 

million composed of the £8,000 redundancy money from each of 239 miners. The Department 

of Trade and Industry (DTI) accepted the TEBO’s bid of £10m in November, 1994 and Tower 

reopened on 2nd January, 1995 as a worker-owned co-operative business enterprise. The 

stated objective was to create jobs and, at the time of writing, it has prospered as an alternative 

business enterprise for over 10 years. 



3.6.2. 

Spatial Consequences of Ownership 

Legal ownership of these physical assets is vested in the employee-owners who enjoy all the 

conventional rights of company shareholders. In common with the initial personal financial 

investment made by the original members, any new member has to invest £8k in a share when 

starting “employment” at Tower. Low interest bank loans are available for new starters to 

 

12



   This chapter was written by Len Arthur (UWIC, Cardiff), Tom Keenoy (University of Leicester), Molly Scott Cato (UWIC, Cardiff, 

Russell Smith (UWIC, Cardiff). 






Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   ...   35


Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2019
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə