281
A
NDRZEJ
W
IERCINSKI
: H
ERMENEUTIC
L
EGACY
ogy. He insists that “phenomenology
and theology make two,” without thereby
amalgamating them into one. The recent movement toward religion must be
viewed within a wider context of postmodernity. We could say that as moder-
nity celebrated the secular, postmodernity is carefully restoring the sacred.
Jacques Derrida, by deconstructing any simple opposition between philosophy
and theology, explicitly turns to religion.
88
Hermeneutic Challenge: The Future of Hermeneutics
The International Institute for Hermeneutics invites colleagues specializing in
hermeneutics and hermeneutically related fields into a dialogue, in a spirit of
openness and inclusiveness, to deepen their own knowledge and to increase
hermeneutic awareness in different schools of thinking. This is a first step, by
the Institute and its Hermeneutic Series, toward the establishment of an ongo-
ing international hermeneutic collaboration that aims to transcend lingual, cul-
tural, and disciplinary boundaries.
Looking for the new prospects in hermeneutics we are aware of the challenges
and directions facing philosophical and theological hermeneutics in the imme-
diate future. Hermeneutic and critical theory need to be brought into a creative
dialogue with the classic conceptions of systematic theology. Special focus
needs to be given to important new impulses for interpreting these traditions
emerging from feminism and gender studies.
Gadamer is called “the exemplary practitioner of the hermeneutic virtues, both
intellectual and moral.”
89
His critical development of Heidegger’s notion of
Verstehen, the self-interpretation and projective nature of
Dasein, “urbanized
the Heideggerian province.”
90
With his teacher’s attentiveness to der Ursprung
88
Jacques Derrida, “Faith and Knowledge: The Two Sources of ,Religion’ at the Limits of Mere
Reason,” in Jacques Derrida and Gianni Vattimo, ed., Religion, trans. David Webb(Stanford, Calif.:
Stanford University Press, 1998); idem, Acts of Religion, ed. Gil Anidjar (New York: Routledge,
2002). See also James K. A. Smith, “Determined Violence: Derrida’s Structural Religion,” Journal
of Religion 78 (1998): 97–212 and John D. Caputo, The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida:
Religion without Religion (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1997).
89
Alasdair MacIntyre, in his essay, “On Not Having the Last Word: Thoughts on Our Debts to
Gadamer,” in Malpas, Arnswald, and Kertscher, ed.,
Gadamer’s Century, 157.
90
See Robert Bernasconi, “Bridging the Abyss: Heidegger and Gadamer,” Research in Pheno-
menology 16 (1986): 1–24. Referring to the now famous phrase by Habermas of Gadamer “urba-
nizing Heideggerian province,” Bernasconi interprets Gadamer as departing of Heidegger’s “history
of Being” in favor of Hegelian continuity of history.
Andrzej Wierciúski.pmd
30.6.2006, 12:59
281
282
P
HAINOMENA
15/55–56
D
OKUMENTI
he advanced his own unique readings of Greek and Latin sources, comple-
menting Heidegger’s hermeneutics of facticity with a very personal sensitivity
to the dialogic and social nature of understanding. In his book, Die Lektion des
Jahrhunderts: Ein philosophischer Dialog mit Riccardo Dottori,
91
Gadamer
emphasizes that dialogue between religions and cultures is humanity’s last
chance to preserve itself from the self-destructive forces unleashed by the
technological age. As we live always anew in a dialogue, hope becomes our
modus existendi. Practicing an ever deepening understanding of ourselves and
the other, we will contribute to a civilization of tolerance and respect for alterity.
Gadamer’s hermeneutic enterprise extends to a conscientious transformation
of the world. The call to interpret is ontological, ethical, and transcendental,
for it points to our roots in other worlds: it demands a personal response, not
only to be-there, but to be-grateful to Being.
Hermeneutics expresses different understandings of crucial philosophical is-
sues. What is decisive is to address the matter that needs to be thought through
in the most comprehensive horizon possible. The way the philosophical prob-
lems are addressed is dictated by the inner dynamic of the relationship be-
tween phenomenology and hermeneutics: a hermeneutician attempts to the-
matize everything that presents itself to him/her as that which needs to be ad-
dressed. As with all our activities, thinking points toward creating a tangible
place for our being in the world, a place where we could unrestrainedly explore
and realize its possibilities. We know that this place is tangible, yet we cannot
adequately describe it. We will always attempt to depict and interpret every-
thing. And we will always remain unsatisfied: not because we lack the means
for a describing and descriptive interpretation, but because we are human. The
reason for any limits we deal with is our human finitude. It is our destiny to
learn always afresh to dwell on this earth within this limitation: between de-
scription and interpretation.
Gadamer’s and Ricoeur’s voice accompanied us over the years. Now it joins
the chorus of tradition, inviting us to transmit and transform what we have
received. We continue to listen for this voice. As Heidegger reminds us, ab-
sence is a mode of presence. An era has passed! We miss Hans-Georg Gadamer
and Paul Ricoeur very much, yet in our fidelity to the Wirkungsgeschichte of
91
Hans-Georg Gadamer, Die Lektion des Jahrhunderts: Ein philosophischer Dialog mit Riccardo
Dottori (Münster: LIT Verlag, 2002).
Andrzej Wierciúski.pmd
30.6.2006, 12:59
282